Is gastrectomy mandatory for all residual or recurrent gastric cancer following endoscopic resection? A large-scale Korean multi-center study

Value of enhanced computed tomography in differentiating small mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal from smooth muscle tumours

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) technology has been gradually used in the differentiation of small mesenchymal tumors of the stomach and intestines from smooth muscle tumours.

AIM

To explore the value of enhanced CT in the differentiation of small mesenchymal tumors of the stomach and intestines from smooth muscle tumours.

METHODS

Clinical data of patients with gastric mesenchymal or gastric smooth muscle tumours who were treated in our hospital from May 2018 to April 2023 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into the gastric mesenchymal tumor group and the gastric smooth muscle tumor group respectively (n = 50 cases per group). Clinical data of 50 healthy volunteers who received physical examinations in our hospital during the same period were selected and included in the control group. Serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), CA-125 and cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 were compared among the three groups. The value of CEA and CA19-9 in the identification of gastric mesenchymal tumours was analysed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The Kappa statistic was used to analyse the consistency of the combined CEA and CA19-9 test in identifying gastric mesenchymal tumours.

RESULTS

CEA levels varied among the three groups in the following order: The gastric mesenchymal tumour group > the control group > the gastric smooth muscle tumour group. CA19-9 levels varied among the three groups in the following order: The gastric mesenchymal group > the gastric smooth muscle group > the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve of CEA and CA19-9 was 0. 879 and 0. 782, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Enhanced CT has shown value in differentiating small mesenchymal tumors of the stomach and intestines from smooth muscle tumors.

The optimal timing of additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic resection to treat early gastric cancer: long-term follow-up study

Patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) who undergo non-curative endoscopic resection (ER) require additional surgery. The aim of the study was to validate surgical and oncological outcomes according to the timing of additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic resection. We retrospectively analyzed long-term follow-up data on the 302 patients enrolled between January 2007 and December 2014. We validated our earlier suggestion that the optimal time interval from non-curative ER to additional surgery was 29 days. All patients were divided into two groups by reference to time intervals from ER to additional surgery of ≤29days (n = 133; group A) and >29 days (n = 169; group B). The median follow-up duration was 41.98 ± 21.23 months. As in our previous study, group B exhibited better surgical outcomes. A total of 10 patients developed locoregional or distant recurrences during the follow-up period, but no significant difference was evident between the two groups. Interestingly, the survival rate was better in group B. Group B (>29 days) exhibited better surgical and oncological outcomes. Thus, additional gastrectomy after non-curative ER should be delayed for 1 month to ensure optimal surgical and oncological outcomes.

A prediction model for lymph node metastasis in early-stage gastric cancer: Toward tailored lymphadenectomy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model for the presence and location of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in early gastric cancer.

METHOD

We reviewed medical records of 4 929 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Variables of age, sex, lymphatic invasion, depth of invasion, location, gross type, differentiation, and tumor size were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of LNM at each LN station.

RESULT

Overall incidence of LNM was 9.1% (448/4 929 patients). For the presence of LNM, risk factors of age, sex, lymphatic invasion, depth of invasion, anatomical part, gross ulceration, size, and tumor differentiation were significantly associated with LNM. The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting LNM after validation was 0.834 for the test set. For the location of LNM, age, sex, lymphatic invasion, depth of invasion, anatomical part, circumferential portion, gross type, differentiation, and tumor size were significantly associated with LNM. The AUC of each LN station was favorable with the test set.

CONCLUSION

Predicting the location of metastatic LNs appeared to be possible in patients with early gastric cancer.

Mixed Histology Is a Risk Factor for Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

The risk factors of lymph node (LN) metastasis are important factors to consider in endoscopic submucosal dissection in early gastric cancer (EGC). The aim of the study was to identify the correlation between mixed histology and LN metastasis in EGC.

METHODS

A total of 1645 patients who underwent curative radical gastrectomy for EGC were divided into three groups (pure differentiated [pure D], mixed, and pure undifferentiated [pure UD]) according to histologic type. They were subsequently analyzed retrospectively for LN metastasis. The patients who had mixed histology between differentiated and undifferentiated tubular adenocarcinoma were defined as mixed group.

RESULTS

The pure UD group was significantly younger than the other groups. Tumor size was larger in the mixed group. LN metastasis occurred more frequently in the mixed group and the pure UD group than in the pure D group (pure D, mixed, and pure UD, 7.7%, 23.2%, and 10.8%, respectively; P < 0.001). A logistic regression analysis revealed that the independent risk factors for LN metastasis were large tumor size (odd ratio [OR], 1.308), submucosal invasion (OR, 3.565), lymphovascular invasion (OR, 9.755), and histologic types of mixed (OR, 2.360) and pure UD (OR, 1.657).

CONCLUSIONS

Mixed histology is an important risk factor for LN metastasis in EGC. Thus, radical gastrectomy should be considered in the cases of mixed-type histology after endoscopic resection.

[Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy as a Surgical Treatment for Upper Third Early Gastric Cancer]

Recently, the incidence of upper third gastric cancer has increased, and with it the number of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedures performed has been increasing. However, if ESD is not indicated or non-curable, surgical treatment may be necessary. In the case of lower third gastric cancer, it is possible to preserve the upper part of the stomach; however, in the case of upper third gastric cancer, total gastrectomy is still the standard treatment option, regardless of the stage. This is due to the complications associated with upper third gastric cancer, such as gastroesophageal reflux after proximal gastrectomy rather than oncologic problems. Recently, the introduction of the double tract reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy has become one of the surgical treatment methods for upper third early gastric cancer. However, since there has not been a prospective comparative study evaluating its efficacy, the ongoing multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (KLASS-05) comparing laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction and laparoscopic total gastrectomy is expected to be important for determining the future of treatment of upper third early gastric cancer.

Laparoscopic Reinforcement Suture (LARS) on Staple Line of Duodenal Stump Using Barbed Suture in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Prospective Single Arm Phase II Study

Purpose

Laparoscopic gastrectomy is accepted as a standard treatment for patients with early gastric cancer in Korea, Japan, and China. However, duodenal stump leakage remains a fatal complication after gastrectomy. We conducted a prospective phase II study to evaluate the safety of the new technique of laparoscopic reinforcement suture (LARS) on the duodenal stump.

Materials and Methods

The estimated number of patients required for this study was 100 for a period of 18 months. Inclusion criteria were histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma treated with laparoscopic distal or total gastrectomy and Billroth II or Roux-en-Y reconstruction. The primary endpoint was the incidence of duodenal stump leakage within the first 30 postoperative days. The secondary endpoints were early postoperative outcomes until discharge.

Results

One hundred patients were enrolled between February 2016 and March 2017. The study groups consisted of 65 male and 35 female patients with a mean age (years) of 62.3. Of these, 63 (63%) patients had comorbidities. The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was 38. The mean operation time was 145 minutes including 7.8 minutes of mean LARS time. There was no occurrence of duodenal stump leakage. Thirteen complications occurred, with one case of reoperation for splenic artery rupture and one case of mortality.

Conclusions

Based on the results of this prospective phase II study, LARS can be safely performed in a short operation period without development of duodenal stump leakage. A future randomized prospective controlled trial is required to confirm the surgical benefit of LARS compared to non-LARS.

Clinicopathological characteristics of patients who underwent additional gastrectomy after incomplete endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer

To evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and factors that lead to residual tumors in patients who underwent additional gastrectomy for incomplete endoscopic resection (ER) for early gastric cancer (EGC).Between 2003 and 2013, the medical records of patients underwent additional gastrectomy after incomplete ER were retrospectively reviewed. Those diagnosed with the presence of histologic residual tumor in specimens obtained by gastrectomy were assigned to the residual tumor (RT) group (n = 47); those diagnosed with the absence of histologic residual tumor were assigned to the nonresidual tumor (NRT) group (n = 33).In the multivariate analysis, endoscopic piecemeal resection, Helicobacter pylori infection, large tumor size (>2 cm), and both (lateral and vertical) marginal involvement were independent factors of the presence of residual tumor in additional gastrectomy after incomplete resection ER for EGC and the rates of independent factors were significantly higher in the RT group than in the NRT group (P < 0.05).Before ER, preexamination to accurately determine the GC invasion depth and the presence of LN metastasis is very important. During ER, surgeons should attempt to perform en bloc resection and to resect the mucous membrane with adequate safety margins to prevent tumor invasion into the lateral and vertical margins.

Treatment Strategy after Incomplete Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer

Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer is defined as incomplete when tumor cells are found at the resection margin upon histopathological examination. However, a tumor-positive resection margin does not always indicate residual tumor; it can also be caused by tissue contraction during fixation, by the cautery effect during endoscopic resection, or by incorrect histopathological mapping. Cases of highly suspicious residual tumor require additional endoscopic or surgical resection. For inoperable patients, argon plasma coagulation can be used as an alternative endoscopic treatment. Immediately after the incomplete resection or residual tumor has been confirmed by the pathologist, clinicians should also decide upon any additional treatment to be carried out during the follow-up period.

Endoscopic resection versus surgery for early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions: a meta-analysis

Aim

To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection (ER) and surgery for the treatment of early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions.

Methods

Databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Science Citation Index, from 2000 to 2016, were searched for eligible articles. In this meta-analysis, the main outcome measurements were local recurrence, complications, metachronous lesions, hospital stay, and 5-year overall survival.

Results

Nine trials were identified and a total of 2748 patients were included. The rate of complication was higher in the surgery group compared with the ER group (OR 0.41; 95 % CI 0.30–0.55). The rates of local recurrence and metachronous lesions were lower in the surgery group (OR 0.03; 95 % CI 0.00–0.06; OR 8.76; 95 % CI 4.17–18.41). The hospital stay was shorter in the ER group (mean difference −6.96; 95 % CI −7.94 to −5.99). The 5-year overall survival rate did not significantly differ between the two groups (OR 1.23; 95 % CI 1.03–1.47).

Conclusions

We provided evidence that, ER was comparable to surgery in terms of the 5-year overall survival. In addition, ER had a lower rate of complications and shorter hospital stay, but a higher rate of local recurrence and metachronous lesions for the treatment of early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions.

Additional surgery for non-curative resection after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of 200 cases

PURPOSE

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is recommended for early gastric cancer with a low risk of lymph node metastasis. When the pathological findings do not meet the curative criteria; then, an additional gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is recommended. However, most cases have neither lymph node metastasis nor a local residual tumor during an additional surgery.

METHODS

This was a single-institutional retrospective cohort study, analyzing 200 patients who underwent an additional gastrectomy after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection from January 2005 to October 2015. We reviewed the patients' clinicopathological data and evaluated the predictors for the presence of a residual tumor.

RESULTS

Histopathology revealed lymph node metastasis in 15 patients (7.5 %) and a local residual tumor in 23 (11.5 %). A multivariable analysis revealed macroscopic findings (flat/elevated type) (p = 0.011, odds ratio = 4.63), lymphatic invasion (p < 0.0001, odds ratio = 14.2), and vascular invasion (p = 0.04, odds ratio = 4.00) to be predictors for lymph node metastasis. A positive vertical margin (p = 0.0027, odds ratio = 3.26) and horizontal margin (p = 0.0008, odds ratio = 5.74) were predictors for a local residual tumor. All cases with lymph node metastasis had lymphovascular invasion with at least one other non-curative factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of a residual tumor can, therefore, be estimated based on the histopathology of endoscopic submucosal dissection samples. Lymphovascular invasion appears to be a pivotal predictor of lymph node metastasis.

Analysis of Surgical Pathology Data in the HIRA Database: Emphasis on Current Status and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Specimens

Background:

In Korea, medical institutions make claims for insurance reimbursement to the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA). Thus, HIRA databases reflect the general medical services that are provided in Korea. We conducted two pathology-related studies using a HIRA national patient sample (NPS) data (selection probability, 0.03). First, we evaluated the current status of general pathologic examination in Korea. Second, we evaluated pathologic issues associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

Methods:

The sample data used in this study was HIRA-NPS-2013-0094.

Results:

In the NPS dataset, 163,372 pathologic examinations were performed in 103,528 patients during the year 2013. Considering sampling weight (33.3), it is estimated that 5,440,288 (163,372 × 33.3) pathologic examinations were performed. Internal medicine and general surgery were the most common departments requesting pathologic examinations. The region performing pathologic examinations were different according to type of medical institution. In total, 490 patients underwent ESD, and 43.4% (213/490) underwent ESD due to gastric carcinoma. The results of the ESD led to a change in disease code for 10.5% (29/277) of non-gastric carcinoma patients. In addition, 21 patients (4.3%) underwent surgery following the ESD. The average period between ESD and surgery was 44 days.

Conclusions:

HIRA sample data provide the nation-wide landscape of specific procedure. However, in order to reduce the statistical error, further studies using entire HIRA data are needed.

Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in additional gastrectomy after endoscopic resection of cT1aN0 gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Endoscopic therapy for clinical T1aN0 (cT1aN0) gastric cancer is an excellent therapeutic strategy; however, pathological lymph node metastasis (LNM) occasionally occurs. Patients who have a potential for LNM are subject to additional gastrectomy. Our aim was to identify predictors of LNM in additional gastrectomy.

METHODS

One hundred and twelve cT1aN0 gastric cancer patients undergoing additional gastrectomy after endoscopic resection were identified between 1997 and 2013. Predictors for LNM were initially selected by a univariate analysis and applied to a multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

(1) Twelve patients (10.7 %) had LNM following additional gastrectomy. (2) Clinicopathological factors significantly associated with LNM were the depth of invasion (SM2 or deeper, designated as SM2) (p = 0.0018) and rigorous lymphatic invasion (ly2,3) (p < 0.001). (3) The univariate predictors for LNM were applied to the multivariate logistic regression model, and SM2 (p = 0.0027) and ly2,3 (p = 0.0028) remained significant predictors. (4) When classified into 2 × 2 subgroups, the predictability for LNM was as follows: SM2 plus ly2,3 (46.7 %), SM2 plus ly0,1 (10.0 %), M,SM1 plus ly2,3 (0 %), and M,SM1 plus ly0,1 (0 %).

CONCLUSIONS

In cT1aN0 gastric cancer patients, both SM2 and ly2,3 are significant predictors for LNM that may be important as references for additional gastrectomy after endoscopic resection.

Effect of rescue surgery after non-curative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Whether rescue surgery confers a survival benefit in patients undergoing non-curative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer remains controversial.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent non-curative endoscopic resection of at least one lesion of differentiated-type early gastric cancer between 2000 and 2011. Patients with a positive lateral resection margin as the only non-curative factor were excluded. Outcome was investigated by univariable (Kaplan-Meier) and multivariable (Cox proportional hazards) analysis.

RESULTS

Some 341 patients underwent non-curative endoscopic resection for at least one lesion of differentiated-type early gastric cancer. Sixty-seven patients with a positive lateral resection margin as the only non-curative factor were excluded, leaving 274 patients for analysis; 194 had rescue surgery and 80 had no additional treatment. The median duration of follow-up was 60·5 months. Patients who had rescue surgery were younger, had a lower Charlson co-morbidity index score, smaller tumours and a higher lymphovascular invasion rate than patients with no treatment. Among 194 patients who had rescue surgery, intragastric local residual tumours were found in ten (5·2 per cent) and lymph node metastases in 11 (5·7 per cent). Patients with lymph node metastasis were significantly older than those without metastasis; no other significant differences were found. Univariable analysis showed that patients aged less than 65 years, those with a Charlson co-morbidity index score below 4 and patients undergoing rescue surgery had significantly longer overall survival. Five-year overall survival rates in the rescue surgery and no-treatment groups were 94·3 and 85 per cent respectively. In multivariable analysis, rescue surgery was identified as the only independent predictor of overall survival after non-curative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer.

CONCLUSION

Rescue surgery confers a survival benefit after non-curative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer.

Influence of endoscopic submucosal dissection on additional gastric resections

BACKGROUND

Widespread application of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) results in noncurative resection in some patients. The influence of preceding ESD on additional gastric resections has not been completely evaluated.

METHODS

Endoscopic, surgical, and pathological records of 255 patients who underwent additional gastrectomy after noncurative ESD at a single prefectural cancer center from September 2002 to December 2010 were reviewed. The estimated gastric resection based on endoscopic images before ESD was compared with the actual gastric resection performed after ESD.

RESULTS

Altered gastric resection was performed in 4 (1.6%) of the 255 patients. In 3 patients, total gastrectomy was performed instead of distal gastrectomy; in 1 patient, distal gastrectomy was performed instead of pylorus-preserving gastrectomy because of an insufficient distance from the cardia or pylorus caused by contraction of the ESD scar. Standard gastrectomy including total or distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was performed in 33 patients because of deep submucosal invasion with positive/indefinite vertical margins. The final pathology revealed pT2 or deeper in 10 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, 98.4% patients underwent the scheduled gastric resection before ESD, and the preceding gastric ESD had almost no influence on changing the gastric resection of the additional surgery. Although rare, the preceding ESD may necessitate alterations in gastric resection to widen the surgical area because of contraction of ESD scar for lesions near the cardia or pylorus. MINI ABSTRACT: A retrospective study of additional gastrectomy after noncurative ESD showed that the preceding ESD had almost no influence on changing the gastric resection of the additional surgery.

Risk factors for local recurrence in patients with positive lateral resection margins after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

With the widespread use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC), the number of cases with incomplete resection due to positive lateral resection margins (LM+) is increasing. Local recurrence, which occurs frequently in LM+ cases, is an important issue. This study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological factors related to tumor recurrence in LM+ cases after ESD for EGC.

METHODS

From January 2005 to December 2012, a total of 1,083 patients with EGC underwent ESD at our hospital. Of these, cases with a pathological diagnosis of LM+ were included in this study. Patients with positive vertical resection margins, those who underwent surgical resection immediately or were followed up for less than 6 months after ESD, were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 55 LM+ cases after ESD for EGC were enrolled. Incorrect delineation of a lesion that extended pathologically beyond the ESD marking dots was the main cause of LM+. Local recurrence was found in 20 (36.4 %) patients (median follow-up period, 23 months). Local recurrence rates related to LM+ length were as follows: 7/29 (24.1 %) in 2 mm, 6/16 (37.5 %) in 4 mm, 1/3 (33.3 %) in 6 mm, 4/5 (80 %) in 8 mm, and 2/2 (100 %) in ≥ 10 mm. In multivariate analysis, tumor size > 2 cm (OR 4.48, 95 % CI 1.18-16.99, p = 0.027), and LM+ length > 6 mm (OR 7.65, 95 % CI 1.15-50.70, p = 0.035) were independent risk factors for tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSION

To decrease the risk of LM+, it is highly important to accurately delineate the lateral margins during ESD; when the final histopathological result is LM+, cases with LM+ length >6 mm or tumor size > 2 cm should be considered for additional surgical resection or re-ESD because of a high risk of tumor recurrence.

How much progress has been made in minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in Korea?: a viewpoint from Korean prospective clinical trials

Gastric cancer is the most common cancer in Korea. Because the incidence of gastric cancer is still high even with early detection and because of developments in surgical instruments and technological advances, minimally invasive surgery has rapidly become an accepted treatment for gastric cancer in Korea. Many Korean gastric surgeons have contributed to the rapid adaptation of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: not only the Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) group, but also other expert surgeons after the 2000s. Thanks to their vigorous efforts involving active learning, education, workshops, academic communications, and international communications with active laparoscopic gastric surgeons in Korea, numerous results and well-designed large-scale clinical studies have been published or are actively ongoing, thus increasing its wide acceptance as an option for gastric cancer. Now, Korea has become one of the leading countries using minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of gastric cancer. This review article will summarize the current status and issues, as well as the clinical trials that have finished or are ongoing, regarding minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in Korea.

Predictors of lymph node metastasis in patients with non-curative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Although surgery is recommend for non-curative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer (EGC), only a part of patients are found to have lymph node (LN) metastasis. This study aimed to identify the predictors of LN metastasis in patients with non-curative endoscopic resection.

METHODS

Between April 2005 and July 2013, consecutive patients who received non-curative endoscopic resection and then underwent gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy or followed at least 1 year with abdominal computed tomography were retrospectively enrolled at a single tertiary hospital. Non-curative resection was defined as a resection beyond the expanded criteria in pathologic mapping. The predictors for LN metastasis were identified by fitting a multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Among the 1783 consecutive patients who received endoscopic resection of EGC, non-curative resection was performed in 323 (18.1%) patients. Of these patients, a total of 267 patients were enrolled, and the rate of LN metastasis was 6.7% (18/267). In multivariate analysis, venous invasion [odds ratio (OR), 7.83; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.20-27.86; p = 0.001], sm2 invasion (tumor invasion ≥500 µm into submucosa; OR 4.98; 95% CI 1.34-18.47; p = 0.016), or antral tumor location (OR 12.65; 95% CI 1.57-102.00; p = 0.017) were independent predictors for LN metastasis. The rates of LN metastasis were 1.1% (95% CI 0-2.7) for patients with one or no predictor and 17.8% (95% CI 9.7-25.8) for those with two or more predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy after non-curative endoscopic resection of EGC is recommended for the patients with two or more identified predictors. However, close follow-up without immediate surgery might be considered cautiously for those with only one or no predictor.

Collaboration between laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic resection: an evidence-based review

Developments in endoscopy and laparoscopy have made monumental changes to the way gastrointestinal diseases are being managed. Many diseases that were traditionally managed by open surgical resection could now be treated by endoscopy alone. However, there are still instances where endoscopic treatment alone is inadequate for disease control and laparoscopic surgery is required. In addition, the collaboration between laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection or other endoscopic resectional techniques represents a new frontier for further research. The present manuscript aims to discuss the complementary role of laparoscopic surgery to endoscopic resection in the traditional context and also its future development.

Is there an optimal surgery time after endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer?

BACKGROUND

The patients with early gastric cancer who have undergone incomplete endoscopic resection (ER) generally need additional surgery because of the possibility of lymph node metastasis. The aim of study was to evaluate the optimal time interval from ER to additive surgery by evaluating the effect of time interval on the surgical and oncological outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed 154 patients who underwent additive gastrectomy after incomplete ER at Severance and Gangnam Severance Hospitals. The time interval point, at which operative time and estimated intraoperative blood loss (EBL) of the earlier operation group and the later operation group showed the greatest disparities, was evaluated. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the time interval point, as the earlier operation group (group A) and the later operation group (group B). We retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical and oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

The greatest difference between operative time and EBL was in the groups who underwent operation before and after 29 days. Of the 154 patients, 78 were in group A (≤29 days) and 76 in group B (>29 days). There were no differences in the clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes except for tumor size. The operative time and EBL were significantly longer and more in group A compared with group B.

CONCLUSIONS

The time interval between ER and additive surgery is associated with surgical outcomes. Additive surgery at about 1 month after ER may be optimal for better surgical outcomes without affecting the oncological outcomes.

The clinical significance and management of noncurative endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer

Nowadays, endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection has shown effectiveness equivalent to that of gastrectomy and has emerged as a popular technique for curative treatment of gastric cancer. However, noncurative resection or resection beyond the indication may lead to lymphatic and extended organ metastasis resulting in loss of the opportunity for full recovery. Therefore, it is an important issue to decide the range of curative resection in the endoscopic resection field. Furthermore, management of noncurative endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer is also important. The most favorable treatment after noncurative resection would be surgery. However, other noninvasive treatments such as argon plasma coagulation, additional endoscopic resection and close observation for recurrence are thought to be the optional treatments after the noncurative resection. In the future, prospective research studies and observations are expected to verify the effectiveness of noninvasive treatments.

The clinical significance and management of noncurative endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer

Nowadays, endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection has shown effectiveness equivalent to that of gastrectomy and has emerged as a popular technique for curative treatment of gastric cancer. However, noncurative resection or resection beyond the indication may lead to lymphatic and extended organ metastasis resulting in loss of the opportunity for full recovery. Therefore, it is an important issue to decide the range of curative resection in the endoscopic resection field. Furthermore, management of noncurative endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer is also important. The most favorable treatment after noncurative resection would be surgery. However, other noninvasive treatments such as argon plasma coagulation, additional endoscopic resection and close observation for recurrence are thought to be the optional treatments after the noncurative resection. In the future, prospective research studies and observations are expected to verify the effectiveness of noninvasive treatments.

Outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy after endoscopic treatment for gastric cancer: a comparison with open gastrectomy

PURPOSE

Additional gastrectomy is needed after endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer when pathology confirms any possibility of lymph node metastasis or margin involvement. No studies depicted the optimal type of surgery to apply in these patients. We compared the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy with those of open gastrectomy after endoscopic resection to identify the optimal type of surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2003 to 2010, 110 consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy either by laparoscopic (n=74) or by open (n=36) for gastric cancer after endoscopic resection were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative and oncological outcomes were compared according to types of surgical approach.

RESULTS

Clinicopathological characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Laparoscopic group showed significantly shorter time to gas passing and soft diet and hospital day than open group while operation time and rate of postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups. All specimens had negative margins regardless of types of approach. Mean number of retrieved lymph nodes did not differ significantly between the two groups. During the median follow-up of 47 months, there were no statistical differences in recurrence rate (1.4% for laparoscopic and 5.6% for open, P=0.25) and in overall (P=0.22) and disease-free survival (P=0.19) between the two groups. Type of approach was not an independent risk factor for recurrence and survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic gastrectomy after endoscopic resection showed comparable oncologic outcomes to open approach while maintaining benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Thus, laparoscopic gastrectomy can be a treatment of choice for patients previously treated by endoscopic resection.

The risk factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer patients who underwent endoscopic resection: is the minimal lymph node dissection applicable? A retrospective study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors associated with lymph node (LN) metastasis in early gastric cancer patients who underwent endoscopic resection (ER) and to evaluate the feasibility of minimal LN dissection in these patients.

METHODS

From January 2001 to March 2011, patients who underwent gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy due to the potential risk of LN metastasis after ER were enrolled at National Cancer Center, Korea. The incidence, risk factors, and distribution of LN metastasis were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 147 enrolled patients, the LN metastasis was identified in 12 patients (8.2%). The incidence of LN metastasis was not significantly increased in patients with submucosal invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and mixed undifferentiated histology [odds ratio (OR), 5.55, 1.349, and 0.387; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.688-43.943, 0.405-4.494, and 0.081-1.84, respectively]. Tumor size more than 2 cm was significantly associated with LN metastasis (OR, 14.056; 95% CI, 1.76-112.267). The incidence of LN metastasis gradually increased from 3.2 to 20%, as number of risk factors increased (P = 0.019). LN metastasis was present primarily along the perigastric area in all except two patients (1.4%) with skip metastasis to extragastric area.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard surgery with at least D1 + LN dissection must be recommended for patients who proved to have risk factors for LN metastasis after ER, because the potential of skip metastasis is not negligible. Nevertheless, the minimal LN dissection, such as sentinel basin dissection, might be applied cautiously in patients with small-sized tumors after ER.

Risk factors of residual or recurrent tumor in patients with a tumor-positive resection margin after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

In cases with a tumor-positive resection margin after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer (EGC), not all patients are found to have residual or recurrent tumor. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with residual/recurrent tumor in patients with incomplete endoscopic resection of EGC.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic resection of EGC at a single institution in South Korea. Patients with a tumor-positive resection margin in the specimen were divided into two groups, with and without residual/recurrent tumor, and the clinicopathologic characteristics were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients with a tumor-positive lateral or vertical resection margin after endoscopic mucosal resection (n = 10) or submucosal dissection (n = 92) were enrolled. Overall, the rate of residual/recurrent tumor was 33.3 % (34/102): 17 residual tumors in 46 patients who immediately underwent additional endoscopic or surgical resection, and 17 recurrent tumors in 56 patients who were initially followed up with regular endoscopy during a median period of 17 (range = 2-70) months. Univariate analysis showed that the presence of ulcer, the direction of the tumor-positive resection margin, and length of lateral resection margin involvement by the tumor were associated with the incidence of residual/recurrent tumor. In multivariate analysis, total length (cm) of lateral resection margin involvement was the only independent risk factor for residual/recurrent tumor (OR 2.05; 95 % CI 1.22-3.44, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with extensive tumor involvement of a lateral resection margin after endoscopic resection of EGC should consider additional endoscopic or surgical resection due to a high risk of residual/recurrent tumor.

Metachronous liver and bone metastasis from small early gastric carcinoma without lymph node involvement: A case report

A 65-year-old man was referred to our Hospital for examination of gastric cancer initially diagnosed by medical check-up. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy demonstrated a superficial depressed-type gastric cancer in the antrum, and abdominal computed tomography showed no evidence of distant metastases. A tumor measuring 11 mm in diameter was removed by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Since histological examinations of ESD specimens showed a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma invading the submucosal layer with lymphatic invasion, the patient subsequently underwent laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection, resulting in no residual carcinoma and no lymph node metastasis. The patient developed solitary liver metastasis one year later and was treated with trastuzumab plus capecitabine/cisplatin since results of the immunohistochemical analysis of the resected specimens demonstrated overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). The patient was alive 12 months after surgical resection of the liver metastasis and subsequently developed bone metastasis. Controversy remains over the role of HER2 status as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer. However, it has been generally reported that HER2 overexpression correlates with aggressive biological behavior and poor prognosis. HER2 overexpression is a potentially useful predictive factor for tumor recurrence and poor prognosis even in early gastric cancer cases.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgical treatment for gastrointestinal cancer

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used in Japan as a minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer. The application of ESD has expanded to the esophagus and colorectum. The indication criteria for endoscopic resection (ER) are established for each organ in Japan. Additional treatment, including surgery with lymph node dissection, is recommended when pathological examinations of resected specimens do not meet the criteria. Repeat ER for locally recurrent gastrointestinal tumors may be difficult because of submucosal fibrosis, and surgical resection is required in these cases. However, ESD enables complete resection in 82%-100% of locally recurrent tumors. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a well-developed surgical procedure for the local excision of rectal tumors. ESD may be superior to TEM alone for superficial rectal tumors. Perforation is a major complication of ESD, and it is traditionally treated using salvage laparotomy. However, immediate endoscopic closure followed by adequate intensive treatment may avoid the need for surgical treatment for perforations that occur during ESD. A second primary tumor in the remnant stomach after gastrectomy or a tumor in the reconstructed organ after esophageal resection has traditionally required surgical treatment because of the technical difficulty of ER. However, ESD enables complete resection in 74%-92% of these lesions. Trials of a combination of ESD and laparoscopic surgery for the resection of gastric submucosal tumors or the performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy after ESD have been reported, but the latter procedure requires a careful evaluation of its clinical feasibility.

Minimally invasive approaches for gastric cancer-Korean experience

Laparoscopic surgery in Korea increased rapidly because of the early detection of gastric cancer by the development of diagnostic tools and nationwide screening. The Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study Group (KLASS group) played a leading role in various projects related with minimally invasive surgery. The justification of minimally invasive procedures including robotic surgery, sentinel-node biopsy, or single-port surgery/Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) must be predetermined by the clinical trial before a wide application, and the medical industry as well as surgeons should have great responsibility.

Predictive value of the pathological extent of tumor invasion in endoscopic resection margins positive for residual tumor cells in surgically resected specimens of early gastric cancer

Although endoscopic resection (ER) is considered to be the optimal treatment for early gastric cancer, indications for radical gastrectomy in patients undergoing incomplete ER for early gastric cancer remain unclear. We evaluated the pathological extent of tumor invasion in the ER margins positive for residual tumor cells in the surgically resected specimens. We measured the vertical and/or horizontal length of the exposed tumor in the ER specimens of 23 patients with margins positive for tumor cells. We compared the clinicopathological data to distinguish between the presence and absence of residual tumor cells in the surgically resected specimens. Of 17 lesions with exposed tumor cells in the vertical margins of the ER specimens, only 3 (17.6%) had residual tumor cells in the corresponding site of the surgically resected specimens. By contrast, of 10 lesions with exposed tumor cells in the horizontal margins of the ER specimens, 8 (80.0%) had residual tumor cells in the corresponding site of the surgically resected specimens. The length of the exposed tumor in the vertical margins of the ER specimens was significantly associated with the incidence of residual tumor cells in the vertical margins of the surgically resected specimens. When the cut-off value for the length of the exposed tumor in the vertical ER margins was set to >3 mm, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.67 and 0.95, respectively. In conclusion, measurement of the length of the exposed tumor in the ER margins for early gastric cancer is a simple procedure that is able to determine whether additional surgical intervention is necessary.

Clinical Outcome of Positive Margin of Postgastrectomy with Adenocarcinoma of Stomach

<sec><title>Objectives</title> Many investigators have recommended adequate resection margin and lymphadenectomy for radical curative resection. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical characteristics of positive resection margin (proximal or distal) of postgastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer. </sec><sec><title>Methods</title> We studied 17 patients with gastric cancer who were diagnosed positive resection margin by intraoperative frozen biopsy or permanent biopsy report from January 2005 to December 2007, retrospectively. Surgical margin monitored by endoscopy. </sec><sec><title>Results</title> Distal gastrectomy was performed in 13 patients and total gastrectomy in 4. Gastrectomy with combined resection including splenectomy was performed in 3, distal pancreatectomy in 2, transverse colon segmental resection in 1, and cholecystectomy in 2. Positive Proximal margin was found in 12, positive distal margin in 3, and both in 2. Palliative chemotherapy was performed in 8 patients. Postoperative follow up endoscopy was established in only 8 patients. Malignant results from endoscopic biopsy in gastroenteric or esophagoenteric anastomotic line were proven in 2 patients during follow up. 9 patients were not performed follow-up endoscopy. Among total 17 patients, 2 patients are alive. Fifteen patients died of aggravation of disease in 13 and postoperative complication in 2. </sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title> Although positive surgical margin in far advanced gastric cancer were found, it can consider that does not further resection to obtain microscopic clear anastomotic margin. </sec>

A decade in gastric cancer curative surgery: Evidence of progress (1999-2009)

To investigate the progress in evidence-based surgical treatment of non-metastatic gastric cancer, we reviewed the last ten years’ literature. The data used in this review were identified by searches made on MEDLINE, Current Contents, PubMed, and other references taken from relevant original articles (on prospective and retrospective studies) concerning gastric cancer surgery. Only papers published in English between January 1999 and December 2009 were selected. Data from ongoing studies were obtained in December 2009, from the trials registry of the United States National Institutes of Health (http://www.clinicaltrial.gov). The citations list was presented according to evidence based relevance (i.e., randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, retrospective series). In the last ten years, many challenges have been faced relating to the extension of gastric resection and nodal dissection as well as surgical timing, but we found only limited evidence, regardless of latitude of study. The ongoing phase-III trials may provide answers that will be valid for the coming decades, and which may bring definitive answers for the currently unresolved questions.

Nanoscale iodized oil emulsion: a useful tracer for pretreatment sentinel node detection using CT lymphography in a normal canine gastric model

BACKGROUND

Pretreatment identification of the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in gastric cancer patients may have great advantages for minimally invasive treatment. No reliable method for the detection of SLNs during the pretreatment period in gastric cancer has been established. The aim of this study was to determine whether computed tomographic (CT) lymphography using nanoscale iodized oil emulsion via endoscopic submucosal injection can visualize LNs.

METHODS

Five dogs underwent CT lymphography after endoscopic submucosal injection of 2 ml of a nanoscale iodized oil emulsion. CT images were taken before and 30, 90, and 210 min after contrast injection. Intraoperative SLN detection was performed using endoscopically injected indocyanine green lymphography for comparison.

RESULTS

Computed tomographic lymphography with nanoscale iodized oil emulsion enabled the visualization of 19 enhanced LNs (mean = 3.8/dog, range = 3-6) with a 100% SLN detection rate. The locations of the SLNs were the lesser curvature (n = 7), greater curvature (n = 1), infrapyloric (n = 3), and left gastric (n = 8) areas. Contrast enhancement of SLNs continuously increased and peaked after 210 min at 142.4 ± 42.3 HU. No green LNs were visualized in the three locations that were detected by CT lymphography. However, no additional LNs were visualized using the dye method. The concordance rate based on the LNs between the SLNs on CT lymphography and the green LNs using the ICG method was 84% (16/19), whereas the concordance rate of the stations identified by CT lymphography and the dye method was 78.6% (11/14).

CONCLUSIONS

Computed tomographic lymphography using nanoscale iodized oil emulsion is a promising tool for preoperative SLN detection for early gastric cancer if the biological safety of the nanoscale iodized oil emulsion can be established.

Clinical Outcomes of Gastrectomy after Incomplete EMR/ESD

Purpose

Endoscopic resection is widely accepted as standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) without lymph node metastasis. The procedure is minimally invasive, safe, and convenient. However, surgery is sometimes needed after endoscopic mucosal resection/endoscopic submucosal dissection endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)/endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) due to perforation, bleeding, or incomplete resection. We evaluated the role of surgery after incomplete resection.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively studied 29 patients with gastric cancer who underwent a gastrectomy after incomplete EMR/ESD from 2006 to 2010 at Korea University Hospital.

Results

There were 13 incomplete resection cases, seven bleeding cases, three metachronous lesion cases, three recurrence cases, two perforation cases, and one lymphatic invasion case. Among the incomplete resection cases, a positive vertical margin was found in 10, a positive lateral margin in two, and a positive vertical and lateral margin in one case. Most cases (9/13) were diagnosed as mucosal tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography, but only three cases were confirmed as mucosal tumors on final pathology. The positive residual tumor rate was two of 13. The lymph node metastasis rate was three of 13. All lymph node metastasis cases were submucosal tumors with positive lymphatic invasion and no residual tumor in the gastrectomy specimen. No cases of recurrence were observed after curative resection.

Conclusions

A gastrectomy is required for patients with incomplete resection following EMR/ESD due to the risk of residual tumor and lymph node metastasis.

Is Surgical Treatment Necessary after Non-curative Endoscopic Resection for Early Gastric Cancer?

Purpose

Additional surgery is commonly recommended in gastric cancer patients who have a high risk of lymph node metastasis or a positive resection margin after endoscopic resection. We conducted this study to determine factors related to residual cancer and to determine the appropriate treatment strategy.

Materials and Methods

A total of 28 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy due to non-curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer between January 2006 and June 2009 were enrolled in this study. Their clinicopathological findings were reviewed retrospectively and analyzed for residual cancer.

Results

Of the 28 patients, surgical specimens showed residual cancers in eight cases (28.6%) and lymph node metastasis in one case (3.8%). Based on results of the endoscopic resection method, the rate of residual cancer was significantly different between the en-bloc resection group (17.4%) and the piecemeal resection group (80.0%). The rate of residual cancer was significantly different between the diffuse type group (100%) and the intestinal type group (20%). The rate of residual cancer in the positive lateral margin group (25.0%) was significantly lower than that in the positive vertical margin group (33.3%) or in the positive lateral and vertical margin group (66.7%).

Conclusions

We recommended that patients who were lateral and vertical margin positive, had a diffuse type, or underwent piecemeal endoscopic resection, should be treated by surgery. Minimal invasive procedures can be considered for patients who were lateral margin positive and intestinal type through histopathological examination after en-bloc endoscopic resection.

Surgical outcome after incomplete endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer is a relatively new and attractive treatment, but occasionally fails to remove all cancer lesions completely. This study aimed to elucidate clinicopathological factors that could be helpful in predicting residual tumour in the surgical specimen after incomplete endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

METHODS

Patients who underwent gastrectomy because of incomplete ESD between August 2004 and August 2008 were analysed. Clinicopathological characteristics were reviewed retrospectively from prospectively collected medical records. Patients were classified into groups with and without residual tumour. Pathology results following gastrectomy were compared with those of incomplete ESD.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients were included. The incidence of residual tumour in the surgical specimen was 24·6 per cent after incomplete ESD. Elevated/flat-type cancers, large tumours (at least 2 cm) and those limited to the mucosa had significantly higher incomplete ESD rates. Cancer limited to the mucosa and the presence of tumour in the lateral margin were associated with residual tumour in the surgical specimen (both P = 0·001).

CONCLUSION

Radical gastrectomy should be performed if pathological examination reveals a positive lateral resection margin after ESD.

Case series of intra-abdominal adhesions induced by artificial ulceration after endoscopic submucosal dissection before additional laparoscopic gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

As endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) increases, increasing numbers of patients require additional gastrectomy with lymph node dissection after noncurative ESD. ESD may cause intra-abdominal adhesions, making additional laparoscopic gastrectomy technically difficult.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relation of the presence of intra-abdominal adhesions and ESD treatment to allow safe laparoscopic gastrectomy.

DESIGN

Case series from a retrospective review of additional gastrectomy after noncurative ESD.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Eight of 333 patients receiving ESD at Oita University Faculty of Medicine from 1999 to 2008 underwent additional laparoscopic gastrectomy because of noncurative ESD.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Intra-abdominal adhesions were evaluated by using an adhesion scoring system (0-3 points) and clinicopathologic findings, including artificial ulcerations after ESD.

RESULTS

All patients successfully underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy within 1 to 2 months after ESD. Three patients with large artificial ulceration (>25 mm) after ESD treatment had severe intra-abdominal adhesions (adhesion score > or =2). These patients tended to have a large blood loss and long operation times during laparoscopic gastrectomy. Despite the 2-month interval from ESD to laparoscopic gastrectomy, ulcerations in these patients were at healing stage with inflammatory cells infiltrating the muscular deep layer.

LIMITATION

A retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

After ESD with large artificial ulceration (>25 mm), the presence of intra-abdominal adhesions complicating additional laparoscopic gastrectomy was often observed.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric neoplastic lesions at a single institution in South Korea

OBJECTIVE. Although endoscopic treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) is an accepted therapy in South Korea and Japan, long-term outcomes remain unknown. We evaluated the clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric dysplasia and EGC. MATERIAL AND METHODS. A total of 402 patients with gastric dysplasia and EGC were treated with ESD at a single hospital from January 2004 to December 2007. The patients underwent ESD and then received periodic endoscopic follow-up and metastatic surveys for 9-49 months (median 30 months). Resectability (en bloc or piecemeal resection), curability (complete or incomplete), local recurrence, and disease-free survival rates were estimated. RESULTS. There were 107 patients with low-grade dysplasia (LGD), 97 with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and 198 with EGC. In EGC patients, en bloc resection was achieved in 89.7% (177/198), the complete resection rate was 87.9% (174/198), and the local recurrence rate was 5.1% (10/198). Tumor size >20 mm was significantly associated with local recurrence (odds ratio 6.45; 95% CI 1.20-20.11; p=0.001). There were significant correlations between the incidences of a piecemeal or incomplete resection and that of local recurrence (odds ratio 5.23; 95% CI 1.02-18.34; p=0.001; and odds ratio 6.99; 95% CI 1.22-21.65; p=0.002, respectively). The 3-year cancer-free survival rate was 94.9%. CONCLUSIONS. Curative treatment with successful en bloc resection can reduce the local recurrence of gastric neoplastic lesions after ESD. Clinical outcome may be excellent, although longer follow-up studies are warranted.

Safety of extended endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection following the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association treatment guidelines

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are widely performed. Indications for these procedures have been extended in Korea and Japan. The aim was to evaluate whether these extended indications are safe.

METHODS

All patients who had surgery for early gastric cancer at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between May 2003 and December 2007 were identified from a prospective database. Lymph node status was examined in patients who met extended indications for EMR and had undergone surgical resection.

RESULTS

Of patients with mucosal cancers, 129 met extended indications for EMR or ESD and three (2.3 per cent) had lymph node metastasis. Of the 52 submucosal cancers meeting extended indications for EMR or ESD, two (4 per cent) had lymph node metastasis. Differentiated mucosal cancers without ulcer formation did not have lymph node metastasis, irrespective of size.

CONCLUSION

Extending the indications for EMR and ESD according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association guidelines carries an increased risk of lymph node metastasis. For cancers meeting these criteria, treatment by gastric resection with lymph node dissection should still be considered. A well differentiated mucosal cancer of any size without ulceration may be considered as an extended indication for EMR or ESD.

Risk factors for food residue after distal gastrectomy and a new effective preparation for endoscopy: the water-intake method

Background/Aims

Food residue is frequently observed in the gastric remnant after distal gastrectomy, despite adequate preparation. We devised a water-intake method to reduce food residue in the gastric remnant by drinking large quantities of water in a short time. The aims of this study were to identify the risk factors for food residue and to study the effectiveness of this new method for endoscopy preparation.

Methods

A cohort of 708 patients who underwent distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer was reviewed prospectively. Sixty patients with large amounts of food residue were randomly divided into two groups: a water-intake group (n=40) and a prolonged fasting group (n=20).

Results

The incidences of a large amount of food residue were 15.7%, 5.8%, 7.5%, and 2.8% at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively, after distal gastrectomy. Independent risk factors for food residue were endoscopy at 3 months, diabetes mellitus, a body mass index of <19.5, and laparoscopic surgery. The proportion of successful preparations at follow-up endoscopy was higher for the water-intake group (70%) than for the prolonged fasting group (40%, p=0.025).

Conclusions

The water-intake method can be recommended as a preparation for endoscopy in patients who have had repetitive food residue or risk factors after distal gastrectomy.

[Surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma]

The gastric cancer is the most common cancer in Korea. The only treatment modality showing improved survival for gastric cancer is curative surgical resection, which comprises the resection of stomach, proper lymphadenectomy, and reconstruction. However, specific surgical procedures should be decided according to the location of the cancer, advancement of the tumor, and patients condition. Surgical treatment for gastric cancer has been developed toward two directions that are minimal invasive surgery for early gastric cancer and multi-disciplinary approach for advanced gastric cancer. Laparoscopic surgery for early gastric cancer has been accepted for minimally invasive surgery. Moreover, the advancement of diagnostic tools to assess biological aggressiveness of the tumor enables physicians to perform endoscopic resection or minimized resection for early gastric cancer. Recently, surgeons try to extend the application of laparoscopic gastric resection and D2 lymphadenectomy to advanced gastric cancer. However, technical and oncological evidences based on clinical trials should be filed up before adopting it as a standard therapy. In case of advanced gastric cancer, in addition to radical surgery, various treatment modalities including chemotherapy, radiation, and molecular target therapy also have been applied in many clinical trials. However, it should be stressed that a prerequisite for precise evaluation of the efficacy of these combined treatment modalities would be the standardization of surgical procedure.