Sporadic colorectal carcinomas with low-level microsatellite instability in Korea: do they form a distinct subgroup with distinguished clinicopathological features?

Oncological characteristics, treatments and prognostic outcomes in MMR-deficient colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks as the third most prevalent cancer globally. It's recognized that the molecular subtype of CRC, characterized by mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), plays a critical role in determining appropriate treatment strategies. This review examines the current molecular classifications, focusing on dMMR/MSI-H CRC and its subtypes: Lynch syndrome (LS), Lynch-like syndrome (LLS), and sporadic cases. Despite advances in understanding of these genetic backgrounds, clinical trials have not conclusively differentiated the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors among these subgroups. Therefore, while this review details the molecular characteristics and their general implications for treatment and prognosis, it also highlights the limitations and the need for more refined clinical studies to ascertain tailored therapeutic strategies for each subtype. Furthermore, this review summarizes completed and ongoing clinical studies, emphasizing the importance of developing treatments aligned more closely with molecular profiles. By discussing these aspects, the review seeks to provide a comprehensive analysis of oncological characteristics, presenting a detailed understanding of their implications for treatment and prognosis in dMMR/MSI-H CRC.

Case report: Microsatellite instability determination is not always black and white in Lynch syndrome diagnosis

Introduction

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a genetic marker that is useful in the detection and treatment of Lynch syndrome (Sd). Although conventional techniques such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are the standards for MSI detection, the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has offered new possibilities, especially with circulating DNA.

Case report

We present the case of a 26-year-old patient with Lynch Sd and a BRAF-mutated metastatic colon cancer. The discordant MSI results between the conventional methods and NGS posed challenges in making treatment decisions. Subsequent NGS analysis revealed a high MSI status, leading to participation in an immunotherapy trial, with remarkable clinical response.

Conclusion

This case emphasizes the importance of comprehensive molecular profiling and strong interdisciplinary collaborations, especially in cases with ambiguous MSI results.

Low level of microsatellite instability correlates with short disease-free survival of gastric cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Limited studies have been reported about the function of low level of microsatellite instability (MSI-L) in cancer. The aim of our study is to unveil the prognostic role of MSI-L in gastric cancer (GC). One hundred nine patients with locally advanced GC (T3-4a, N+, M0) who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus gastrectomy with extended (D2) lymph node dissection were collected. Clinicopathological characteristics, tumour regression score, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analysed and correlated with the MSI status. The MSI status of 96 patients was identified (7 (7.3%) with MSI-H, 12 (12.5%) with MSI-L, and 77 (80.2%) with MSS). MSI-L was significantly correlated with perineural invasion (P = 0.009) and decreased MUC5AC expression (P = 0.042). Poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in MSI-L patients (83.3% assessed as poor response) was observed (P = 0.501). Compared with patients with MSS tumours, patients with MSI-L tumours showed poor DFS (P = 0.018) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.839 (95% CI 1.131-7.124, P = 0.026) from multivariable cox regression analysis. However, this was not associated with OS (P = 0.063). MSI-L is an independent poor prognostic biomarker for the locally advanced gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed for validation.

MSI-L/EMAST is a predictive biomarker for metastasis in colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a prognostic marker in colorectal cancer (CRC). The biological significance of MSI-low (MSI-L) phenotype and its differences with microsatellite stable (MSS) phenotype remains unclear. The aim of this study is indicating the role of mononucleotide repeat in identifying MSI-L and revealing the association of MSI-L with elevated microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotide repeats (EMAST) and oncologic outcome in CRC patients.

METHODS

MSI and EMAST status were analyzed using three quasimonomorphic panel (BAT-25, BAT-26, and NR-27) and five tetranucleotide repeats (D20S82, D20S85, D9S242, D8S321, and MYCL1), respectively, by capillary electrophoresis method without the need to fluorescent primers. The associations of MSI status with clinicopathological features, EMAST status, metastasis, and overall survival (OS) were investigated.

RESULTS

Among 159 CRC patient 22.0% were MSI-H, 40.3% were MSS, 37.7% were MSI-L, and 41.5% showed EMAST + phenotype. MSI-L were associated with advanced stages, EMAST⁺ tumors and worse OS ( p ≤ 0.001). Metastasis was relatively common in MSI-L/EMAST ⁺ CRCs and BAT-25 were the most unstable marker in these tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

MSI-L tumors have different clinicopathological features from MSS and MSI-H tumors. The MSI-L phenotype is a worse prognostic biomarker in CRC and when accompanied by EMAST could be a predictor for metastasis.

Molecular Subtypes of Colorectal Cancer and Their Clinicopathologic Features, With an Emphasis on the Serrated Neoplasia Pathway

CONTEXT

-Colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease entity with 3 molecular carcinogenesis pathways and 2 morphologic multistep pathways. Right-sided colon cancers and left-sided colon and rectal cancers exhibit differences in their incidence rates according to geographic region, age, and sex. A linear tendency toward increasing frequencies of microsatellite instability-high or CpG island methylator phenotype-high cancers in subsites along the bowel from the rectum to the cecum or the ascending colon accounts for the differences in tumor phenotypes associated with these subsites. The molecular subtypes of colorectal cancers exhibit different responses to adjuvant therapy, which might be responsible for differences in subtype-specific survival.

OBJECTIVES

-To review the clinicopathologic and molecular features of the molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer generated by combined CpG island methylator phenotype and microsatellite statuses, to integrate these features with the most recent findings in the context of the prognostic implications of molecular subtypes, and to emphasize the necessity of developing molecular markers that enable the identification of adenocarcinomas involving the serrated neoplasia pathway.

DATA SOURCES

-Based on the authors' own experimental data and a review of the pertinent literature.

CONCLUSIONS

-Because colorectal cancers arise from 2 different morphologic multistep carcinogenesis pathways with varying contributions from 3 different molecular carcinogenesis pathways, colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous and complex disease. Thus, molecular subtyping of colorectal cancers is an important approach to characterizing their heterogeneity with respect to not only prognosis and therapeutic response but also biology and natural history.

Molecular markers in colorectal cancer: clinical relevance in stage II colon cancer

SUMMARY Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in developed countries. Adjuvant chemotherapy is standard for stage III colorectal cancer but its use in stage II is controversial. Several clinicopathological factors have been described to define a high-risk group among stage II colon cancers, which can aid the selection of patients who may benefit from chemotherapy. Local tumor invasion (T4), high histological grade, obstruction and perforation at diagnosis, and number of lymph nodes removed are the most widely accepted factors. Several molecular factors have been also investigated as prognostic candidate biomarkers. DNA ploidy, KRAS and TP53 mutations, thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, thymidine phosphorylase, loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 18q and microsatellite instability have been widely investigated. The aim of this review is to analyze the current evidence and clinical applications of the classical molecular biomarkers as well as new ones such as BRAF, circulating tumor cells, genome expression signatures and DNA methylation.

An alternative pathway in colorectal carcinogenesis based on the mismatch repair system and p53 expression in Korean patients with sporadic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Microsatellite instability (MSI) and chromosomal instability are main mechanisms underlying colorectal carcinogenesis. We determined the features and prognosis of colorectal cancer based on MSI including mismatch repair genes and expression of p53.

METHODS

Between 1999 and 2008, a total of 2,649 colorectal cancer patients were analyzed using a prospective database. A mismatch repair defect (MMR-D) was defined as a loss of expression of more than one MMR protein and/or MSI-high. MMR-proficiency (MMR-P) was defined as expression of all MMR proteins and microsatellite stable (MSS)/MSI-low. Groups 1 (G1), 2 (G2), 3 (G3), and 4 (G4) were defined as MMR-D and p53-positive expression, MMR-D and p53-negative expression, MMR-P and p53-positive expression, MMR-P and p53-negative expression, respectively.

RESULTS

Eighty-two (3.0%), 181 (6.8%), 1,368 (51.7%), and 1,018 (38.5%) patients were classified into groups 1-4, respectively. Comparison between G1 and G2 showed differences in location (p < 0.001), size (p = 0.030), node metastasis (p = 0.027), distant metastasis (p = 0.009), and stage (p = 0.040). Comparison between G3 and G4 showed differences in location (p < 0.001) and histology (p < 0.001). Comparison between G1 and G3 showed differences in location (p < 0.001) and histology (p < 0.001). Comparison between G2 and G4 showed differences in age (p < 0.001), location (p < 0.001), size (p = 0.006), histology (p < 0.001), node metastasis (p < 0.001), distant metastasis (p < 0.001), and stage (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, stage (p = 0.007) and histology (p < 0.001) were associated with improved overall survival, and stage (p < 0.001) was associated with disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the MSI and p53 subsets, colorectal cancers showed different clinicopathologic features, but these subsets had no prognostic impact on overall and disease-free survival rate.

Sporadic colorectal carcinomas with low-level microsatellite instability: a distinct subgroup with specific clinicopathological and molecular features

PURPOSE

The biologic significance of low-level microsatellite instability (MSI) in sporadic colorectal cancers (CRCs) is not clearly defined. In particular, the relationship of MSI-low to MSI-high and microsatellite stable (MSS) tumours is currently under debate and the prognostic impact of these genetic changes remains unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate whether sporadic MSI-low CRCs have different clinicopathological and molecular features from MSS and MSI-high tumours.

METHODS

A series of 184 primary sporadic CRCs were divided, according to the level of MSI, into three groups (94 MSS, 22 MSI-low and 68 MSI-high) and were analyzed for baseline clinicopathological features and outcome, allelic losses at 18q, 8p and 4p chromosomes and immunohistochemical expression of MGMT, hMlh1, hMsh2, Fhit, Cox-2, p21 and p27 proteins.

RESULTS

MSI-low tumours were more frequently distal (59.1%) whereas MSS tumours had a strong predilection for distal (72.3%) and MSI-high tumours for proximal location (54.4%; p = 0.003). When compared with MSI-high tumors, MSI-low CRCs were adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified (p = 0.0138) and well to/moderately differentiated (p = 0.027). MSI-low CRCs also showed specific molecular features including intermediate 18q allelic losses, altered MGMT and Cox-2 expression. Finally, the 5-year overall survival rates were 79% for MSI-low, 40.3% for MSS and 71% for MSI-high CRCs (p = 0.0160 MSS vs. MSI-low groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Sporadic MSI-low CRCs display characteristic clinicopathological and genetic features that distinguish them from MSS CRCs.

Location-related differences in sporadic microsatellite unstable colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite unstable CRC is associated with female gender, large tumours, and poor differentiation. However, there are few reports about the characteristics and differences of sporadic microsatellite unstable CRC based on tumour location.

AIMS

Site-specific heterogeneity of sporadic microsatellite unstable colorectal cancer (CRC) based on location was elucidated.

METHODS

We enrolled 164 CRC patients with high-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-H) from the prospective database of 2686 consecutive CRC patients who underwent surgical resection. We analysed microsatellite instability (MSI) and expression of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins (MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6).

RESULTS

Among the 164 MSI-H CRC, 105 (64.0%) were located in the proximal colon and 59 (36.0%) were located in the distal colon. The proximal MSI-H CRC was predominantly in female (p=0.014), had a more aggressive differentiation (p=0.001), was of advanced stage (p=0.035), and had a frequent loss of MLH1 expression (p=0.005) compared to the distal MSI-H CRC.

CONCLUSION

There were different clinicopathologic characteristics and MMR protein expression between proximal and distal MSI-H CRC. These findings suggest that the underlying carcinogenic pathway or molecular background differs according to location, despite being microsatellite unstable CRC.

Microsatellite instability in endometrial polyps

OBJECTIVE(S)

To investigate the prevalence of microsatellite instability (MSI) in endometrial polyps and to evaluate whether there are clinical and histopathological parameters associated with this kind of instability.

STUDY DESIGN

Between September 2008 and April 2009, endometrial polyps were collected from 109 patients. MSI was evaluated using the NCI recommended markers BAT25, BAT26, D2S123, D5S346 and D17S250. Histopathological analysis was performed, and clinical information was obtained from patients' records.

RESULT(S)

MSI low was detected in 6.4% of the validated samples (7/109). Of the seven MSI that were detected, six were positive for instability at D17S250 and one at D5S346. There were no significant differences between polyps with or without MSI with regard to age, BMI, menarche, parity, miscarriage or menopause; however, MSI was more frequent in polyps with simple hyperplasia without atypia (3/20; 15%). Furthermore, patients with multiple polyps had a marginally but statistically insignificant increase in the frequency of MSI (p<0.07).

CONCLUSION(S)

This is the first prospective study of MSI in endometrial polyps using hysteroscopically obtained samples. In a population of 109 patients, MSI was infrequent in endometrial polyps. Although MSI appears to be more frequent in multiple polyps and polyps with simple hyperplasia without atypia, this was not statistically significant.

Clinical relevance of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a clonal change in the number of repeated DNA nucleotide units in microsatellites. It arises in tumors with deficient mismatch repair due to the inactivation of one of the four mismatch repair genes: MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, and PMS2. In order to determine the MSI status of a tumor, microdissection and polymerase chain reaction-based detection strategies are required. For practical purposes, MSI is equivalent to the loss of staining by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of one of the mismatch repair genes since both signify an abnormality in mismatch repair. Of all colorectal cancers (CRCs), 15% to 20% display MSI or abnormal IHC (often referred to as microsatellite instability [MIN] pathway). The remaining 80% to 85% of CRCs are microsatellite stable but most are characterized by chromosomal instability (CIN pathway). Almost all Lynch syndrome tumors have MSI or abnormal IHC and they account for up to one third of all MIN CRCs (3% to 5% of all CRCs). The remaining MIN tumors are sporadic as a result of somatic inactivation of the MLH1 gene caused by methylation of its promoter. Thus, the presence of a MSI/IHC abnormality prompts further investigations to diagnose Lynch syndrome, whereas its absence excludes Lynch syndrome. We recommend screening all CRC tumors for IHC or MSI. MIN tumors have a more favorable outcome than CIN tumors, and fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy does not improve the outcome of stage II or stage III MIN tumors. More data are needed to determine how best to treat patients with stage II and stage III MIN CRCs.