Surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases is safe and feasible in elderly patients

Treatment approaches and survival outcomes in elderly colorectal cancer patients: a single-center comparative study

BACKGROUND

Geriatric patients account for nearly half of new colorectal cancer (CRC) cases. This study compares clinicopathological features, treatments, outcomes, and frailty in elderly (≥ 70) and younger (< 70) CRC patients at our center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with non-metastatic or de novo metastatic CRC between January 2015 and April 2024 were included. Demographic, pathological, and survival data were retrospectively collected. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 25, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 414 non-metastatic CRC patients, 26.6% were aged ≥ 70. Elderly patients received less perioperative chemotherapy (60% vs. 81.6%, P < 0.001) and had more dose reductions (41.6% vs. 19.2%, P < 0.001). Frailty reduced perioperative chemotherapy in elderly non-metastatic patients (54.5% vs. 92.1%, P < 0.001) but did not affect dose reduction (37.9% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.764) or treatment duration (median 24 weeks for both groups, P = 0.909). In metastatic patients, frailty shortened chemotherapy duration (9.5 vs. 15.5 weeks, P = 0.129). Elderly patients had lower 5- and 8-year overall survival (OS) rates (64.7%, 60.1% vs. 83.0%, 78.8%, P = 0.004). In the de novo metastatic cohort (135 patients), age did not affect OS (19.4 vs. 17.3 months, P = 0.590) or PFS (9.8 vs. 7.5 months, P = 0.209). Rectal cancer (HR: 2.751, P = 0.005) and early chemotherapy termination (HR: 4.138, P < 0.001) worsened OS in non-metastatic CRC, while absence of RAS (HR: 2.043, P = 0.047), BRAF mutations (HR: 8.263, P = 0.010), and metastasectomy (HR: 3.650, P = 0.036) improved OS in metastatic CRC.

CONCLUSION

Age does not independently worsen CRC survival, though early chemotherapy discontinuation impacts outcomes. Reduced-dose chemotherapy or monotherapy can help minimize adverse effects in elderly patients.

Oncologic aspects of the decision-making process for surgical approach for colorectal liver metastases progressing during chemotherapy

Colorectal cancer represents the third most diagnosed malignancy in the world. The liver is the main site of metastatic disease, affected in 30% of patients with newly diagnosed disease. Complete resection is considered the only potentially curative treatment for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), with a 5-year survival rate ranging from 35% to 58%. However, up to 80% of patients have initially unresectable disease, due to extrahepatic disease or bilobar multiple liver nodules. The availability of increasingly effective systemic chemotherapy has contributed to converting patients with initially unresectable liver metastases to resectable disease, improving long-term outcomes, and accessing tumor biology. In recent years, response to preoperative systemic chemotherapy before liver resection has been established as a major prognostic factor. Some studies have demonstrated that patients with regression of hepatic metastases while on chemotherapy have improved outcomes when compared to patients with stabilization or progression of the disease. Even if disease progression during chemotherapy represents an independent negative prognostic factor, some patients may still benefit from surgery, given the role of this modality as the main treatment with curative intent for patients with CRLM. In selected cases, based on size, the number of lesions, and tumor markers, surgery may be offered despite the less favorable prognosis and as an option for non-chemo responders.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been increasingly used in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases. However, the efficacy and safety of NAC in the treatment of resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are still controversial.

AIM

To assess the efficacy and application value of NAC in patients with resectable CRLM.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 2020 to collect clinical studies comparing NAC with non-NAC. Data processing and statistical analyses were performed using Stata V.15.0 and Review Manager 5.0 software.

RESULTS

In total, 32 studies involving 11236 patients were included in this analysis. We divided the patients into two groups, the NAC group (that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy) and the non-NAC group (that received no neoadjuvant chemotherapy). The meta-analysis outcome showed a statistically significant difference in the 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival between the two groups. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were HR = 0.49, 95%CI: 0.39-0.61, P = 0.000 and HR = 0.48 95%CI: 0.36-0.63, P = 0.000. The duration of surgery in the NAC group was longer than that of the non-NAC group [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.41, 95%CI: 0.01-0.82, P = 0.044)]. The meta-analysis showed that the number of liver metastases in the NAC group was significantly higher than that in the non-NAC group (SMD = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.02-1.43, P = 0.043). The lymph node metastasis in the NAC group was significantly higher than that in the non-NAC group (SMD = 1.24, 95%CI: 1.07-1.43, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

We found that NAC could improve the long-term prognosis of patients with resectable CRLM. At the same time, the NAC group did not increase the risk of any adverse event compared to the non-NAC group.

Systematic Review of Treatments for Colorectal Metastases in Elderly Patients to Guide Surveillance Cessation Following Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

Although included in surveillance programmes for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases, elderly patients are susceptible to declines in health and quality of life that may render them unsuitable for further surveillance. Deciding when to cease surveillance is challenging.

METHODS

There are no publications focused on surveillance of elderly patients for CRC metastases. A systematic review of studies reporting treatment outcomes for CRC metastases in elderly patients was performed to assess the risk-benefit balance of the key objectives of surveillance; detecting and treating CRC metastases.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight eligible studies reported outcomes for surgery and chemotherapy in the elderly. Liver resections and use of chemotherapy, including biologics, are more conservative and have poorer outcomes in the elderly compared with younger patients. Selected studies demonstrated poorer quality-of-life (QoL) following surgery and chemotherapy. Studies of ablation in elderly patients are limited.

DISCUSSION

The survival benefit of treating CRC metastases with surgery or chemotherapy decreases with advancing age and QoL may decline in the elderly. The relatively lower efficacy and detrimental QoL impact of multimodal therapy options for detected CRC metastases in the elderly questions the benefit of surveillance in some elderly patients. Care of elderly patients should thus be customized based on their preference, formal geriatric assessment, natural life-expectancy, and the perceived risk-benefit balance of treating recurrent CRC metastases. Clinicians may consider surveillance cessation in patients aged 75 years and above if geriatric assessment is unsatisfactory, patients decline surveillance, or patient fitness deteriorates catastrophically.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Selective Internal Radiotherapy With Yttrium-90 as Consolidation Treatment After Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) with yttrium-90 (Y-90)-labeled resin microspheres may have a role in consolidating the response to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer unamenable to resection after assessment of the best response to first-line chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of outcomes in patients who had received SIRT as consolidation therapy after one or more lines of chemotherapy. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had confirmed colorectal liver metastases, and had disease unsuitable for surgical resection or local ablation with curative intent. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients with colorectal liver metastases were treated with at least one SIRT procedure after receiving one or more lines of chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients who received SIRT after prior first-line chemotherapy compared to those who received SIRT after two or more lines of chemotherapy (9 vs. 3 months, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.02854‒0.2039; P < .001), and in patients with liver-only disease compared to those who had extrahepatic metastases (6.4 vs. 4.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.95; P = .0318). There were no grade 3 or higher adverse events.

CONCLUSION

SIRT represents a valid option for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Earlier use of SIRT may provide a greater survival benefit compared to that afforded by the procedure when used in salvage settings.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases in Elderly Patients

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in elderly patients.

METHODS

A PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library search was performed from January 1995 to April 2017, for studies comparing both short- and long-term outcomes in younger and elderly patients undergoing liver resection for CRLM.

RESULTS

Eleven studies comparing patients aged <70 years with patients aged >70 years and 4 studies comparing patients aged <75 years with patients aged >75 years were included. Postoperative morbidity was similar in patients aged >70 years (27 vs. 30%; p = 0.35) but higher in patients aged >75 years (21 vs. 32%; p = 0.001). Postoperative mortality was higher in both patients aged >70 years (2 vs. 4%; p = 0.01) and in patients aged >75 years (1 vs. 6%; p = 0.02). Mean 5-year overall survival was lower in patients aged >70 years (40 vs. 32%; p < 0.001) but equal in patients aged >75 years (42 vs. 32%; p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Although postoperative morbidity and mortality were increased with higher age, liver resection for CRLM seems justified in selected elderly patients.

Liver Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer in the Elderly: Is Surgery Justified?

BACKGROUND

The elderly population with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer has been increasing. As the potentially curative treatment, the role of liver resection in the elderly remains undetermined.

AIMS

This study provides a meta-analysis on the outcome of liver resection of colorectal liver metastasis in patients aged over 70.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from the years 2000 to 2015 were searched for eligible studies. Data on perioperative mortality, postoperative complications, and survival were collected.

RESULTS

Twelve retrospective studies with a total of 11,285 patients (2498 elderly patients and 8787 younger patients) were identified. The elderly (>70 years old) were associated with a similar overall complication rate (30.5 vs. 28.0%; OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.91-1.28; p = 0.39) and a higher 30-day mortality (OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.12-3.31; p = 0.02) after liver resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The overall survival showed a significant difference in favor of the younger patients (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.65-0.89; p = 0.0007). However, with regard to disease-free survival, there was no significant difference between elderly and younger patients (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.82-1.06; p = 0.30).

CONCLUSION

Liver resection of CRLM is relatively safe in carefully selected elderly patients. Liver resection should be offered to selected elderly patients with CRLM.

Treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly

Colorectal cancer has a high incidence, and approximately 60% of colorectal cancer patients are older than 70, with this incidence likely increasing in the near future. Elderly patients (> 70-75 years of age) are a very heterogeneous group, ranging from the very fit to the very frail. Traditionally, these patients have often been under-treated and recruited less frequently to clinical trials than younger patients, and thus are under-represented in publications about cancer treatment. Recent studies suggest that fit elderly patients can be treated in the same way as their younger counterparts, but the treatment of frail patients with comorbidities is still a matter of controversy. Many factors should be taken into account, including fitness for treatment, the wishes of the patient and family, and quality of life. This review will focus on the existing evidence for surgical, oncologic, and palliative treatment in patients over 70 years old with colorectal cancer. Careful patient assessment is necessary in order to individualize treatment approach, and this should rely on a multidisciplinary process. More well-designed controlled trials are needed in this patient population.

Hepatectomy in elderly patients: does age matter?

BACKGROUND

With the increase in average life expectancy in recent decades, the proportion of elderly patients requiring liver surgery is rising. The aim of the meta-analysis reported here was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hepatectomy in elderly patients.

METHODS

An extensive electronic search was performed for relevant articles that compare the outcomes of hepatectomy in patients ≥70 years of age with those in younger patients prior to October 2012. Analysis of pooled data was performed with RevMan 5.0.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight observational studies involving 15,480 patients were included in the analysis. Compared with the younger patients, elderly patients experienced more complications (31.8 vs 28.7 %; P = 0.002), mainly as a result of increased cardiac complications (7.5 vs 1.9 %; P < 0.001) and delirium (11.7 vs 4.5 %; P < 0.001). Postoperative major surgical complications (12.6 vs 11.3 %; P = 0.55) and mortality (3.6 vs 3.3 %; P = 0.68) were comparable between elderly and younger patients. For patients with malignancies, both the 5-year disease-free survival (26.5 vs 26.3 %; P = 0.60) and overall survival (39.5 vs 40.7 %; P = 0.29) did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative major surgical complications, mortality, and long-term results in elderly patients seem to be comparable with those in younger patients, suggesting that age alone should not be considered a contraindication for hepatectomy.

Treatment of older patients with colorectal cancer: a perspective review

In a continuously aging population, the burden of colorectal cancer (CRC) is rising among older patients. Despite the fact that almost half of the cases occur in patients over 75 years, this age group is subjected to disparities regarding diagnostic and therapeutic options. So far, exclusion of older patients from randomized clinical trials has resulted in a lack of evidence-based guidelines. Nevertheless, newer data from studies specifically targeting older patients and subgroup analyses indicate that proper treatment planning and specific medical and geriatric assessment can achieve a safe and beneficial treatment result in older patients, often with similar outcomes to their younger counterparts. Resection of the primary tumour, if feasible, should be the primary goal of surgery aiming for cure, although it should be avoided under emergency conditions. Chronological age per se should not be an exclusion criterion for adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy, or targeted therapies. Careful patient selection, dose adjustments, close monitoring and early intervention in the event of side effects are essential. The benefits of treatment must be balanced with potential effects of treatment and patients' wishes.

Management of locally advanced and metastatic colon cancer in elderly patients

Colon cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States with a median age at diagnosis of 69 years. Sixty percent are diagnosed over the age of 65 years and 36% are 75 years or older. At diagnosis, approximately 58% of patients will have locally advanced and metastatic disease, for which systemic chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival. Treatment of cancer in elderly patients is more challenging due to multiple factors, including disabling co-morbidities as well as a decline in organ function. Cancer treatment of elderly patients is often associated with more toxicities that may lead to frequent hospitalizations. In locally advanced disease, fewer older patients receive adjuvant chemotherapy despite survival benefit and similar toxicity when compared to their younger counterparts. A survival benefit is also observed in the palliative chemotherapy setting for elderly patients with metastatic disease. When treating elderly patients with colon cancer, one has to consider drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Since chronological age is a poor marker of a patient’s functional status, several methods of functional assessment including performance status and activities of daily living (ADL) or instrumental ADL, or even a comprehensive geriatric assessment, may be used. There is no ideal chemotherapy regimen that fits all elderly patients and so a regimen needs to be tailored for each individual. Important considerations when treating elderly patients include convenience and tolerability. This review will discuss approaches to the management of elderly patients with locally advanced and metastatic colon cancer.

Survival after liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors

Background

Hepatic metastases develop in approximately 50% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases. We performed a review and meta-analysis to evaluate survival after resection of CRC liver metastases (CLMs) and estimated the summary effect for seven prognostic factors.

Methods

Studies published between 1999 and 2010, indexed on Medline, that reported survival after resection of CLMs, were reviewed. Meta-relative risks for survival by prognostic factor were calculated, stratified by study size and annual clinic volume. Cumulative meta-analysis results by annual clinic volume were plotted.

Results

Five- and 10-year survival ranged from 16% to 74% (median 38%) and 9% to 69% (median 26%), respectively, based on 60 studies. The overall summary median survival time was 3.6 (range: 1.7–7.3) years. Meta-relative risks (95% confidence intervals) by prognostic factor were: node positive primary, 1.6 (1.5–1.7); carcinoembryonic antigen level, 1.9 (1.1–3.2); extrahepatic disease, 1.9 (1.5–2.4); poor tumor grade, 1.9 (1.3–2.7); positive margin, 2.0 (1.7–2.5); >1 liver metastases, 1.6 (1.4–1.8); and >3 cm tumor diameter, 1.5 (1.3–1.8). Cumulative meta-analyses by annual clinic volume suggested improved survival with increasing volume.

Conclusion

The overall median survival following CLM liver resection was 3.6 years. All seven investigated prognostic factors showed a modest but significant predictive relationship with survival, and certain prognostic factors may prove useful in determining optimal therapeutic options. Due to the increasing complexity of surgical interventions for CLM and the inclusion of patients with higher disease burdens, future studies should consider the potential for selection and referral bias on survival.

Resection of colorectal liver metastases in the elderly: does age matter?

AIM

Despite the incidence of colorectal cancer increasing with age the proportion of patients undergoing surgery for colorectal liver metastases decreases dramatically in the elderly. Is this referral or selection bias justified?

METHOD

A prospective database of resection for colorectal liver metastases at a single centre was retrospectively analysed to compare the outcome in patients aged ≥75 years (group E) with those aged <75 years (group Y). Data were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method with Cox regression modelling.

RESULTS

Of 1443 resections, 151 (10.5%) in group E were compared with 1292 (89.5%) in group Y. The two groups were matched apart from higher American Society of Anesthesiology scores (P=0.001) and less use of chemotherapy (P=0.01) in the elderly. Perioperative morbidity and 90-day mortality were higher in the elderly compared with the younger group (32.5%vs 21.2%, P=0.02, and 7.3%vs 1.3%, P=0.001). In the last 5 years, mortality in the elderly improved and was no longer significantly different from that of the younger patients [n=2/76 (2.6%) vs n=9/559 (1.6%); P=0.063]. The 5-year survival was similar in groups E and Y for cancer-specific (41.4%vs 41.6%, P=0.917), overall (37.0%vs 38.2%) and median (44.1 months vs 43.6 months, P=0.697) survival respectively.

CONCLUSION

In the elderly liver resection for metastatic disease can be performed with acceptable mortality and morbidity with as good a prospect of survival as for younger patients.

Management of colorectal cancer patients after resection of liver metastases: can we offer a tailored treatment?

Surgical resection remains the only option of cure for patients with colorectal liver metastases, and no patient should be precluded from surgery. There is much controversy not only regarding the most appropriate therapeutic approach in the neoadjuvant setting but also after surgery is performed. Many patients will experience early relapses but others will be long survivors. We need to establish reliable prognostic and predictive factors to offer a tailored treatment. Several prognostic factors after metastasectomy have been identified: high C-reactive protein levels, a high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, elevated neutrophil count and low serum albumin are related to a worst outcome. Elevated CEA and Ki 67 levels, intrahepatic and perihepatic lymph node invasion are also some of the markers related to a worst outcome. In contrast, the administration of preoperative chemotherapy has been associated with a better prognosis after hepatectomy. The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy should be done taking in consideration these factors. Regarding predictive factors, determination of ERCC1, TS, TP and DPD and UGT1 polymorphisms assessment could be considered prior to chemotherapy administration. This would avoid treatment related toxicities and increase this population quality of life.

Glycine and taurine equally prevent fatty livers from Kupffer cell-dependent injury: an in vivo microscopy study

BACKGROUND

IRI still is a major problem in liver surgery due to warm ischemia and organ manipulation. Steatosis is not only induced by diabetes, hyperalimentation, alcohol and toxins, but also chemotherapy given before resection. Since steatotic livers are prone to Kupffer cell-dependent IRI, protection of steatotic livers is of special interest. This study was designed to compare the effect of taurine and glycine on IRI in steatotic livers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Steatosis was induced with ethanol (7 g/kg b.w.; p.o.) in female SD rats. Ten minutes after inactivation of Kupffer cells with taurine or glycine (300 mM; i.v.), left liver lobes underwent 60 minutes of warm ischemia. Controls received the same volume of valine (300 mM; i.v.) or normal saline. After reperfusion, white blood cell-endothelial interactions and latex-bead phagocytosis by Kupffer cells were investigated. Liver enzymes were measured to estimate injury. For statistical analysis, ANOVA and Student's t-test were used.

RESULTS

Glycine and taurine significantly decreased leukocyte- and platelet-endothelium interactions and latex-bead phagocytosis (p < 0.05). Liver enzymes were significantly lower after glycine and taurine (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that preconditioning with taurine or glycine is equally effective in preventing injury to fatty livers most likely via Kupffer cell-dependent mechanisms.

Colon cancer and the elderly: from screening to treatment in management of GI disease in the elderly

Colorectal cancer is one of the commonest tumours in the Westernized world affecting mainly the elderly. This neoplasm in older individuals occurs more often in the right colon and grows more rapidly than in the young, often shows a mucinous histology and mismatch repair gene changes. Effective screening permits discovery of colorectal cancer at an early highly treatable stage and allows for detection and removal of premalignant colorectal adenomas. Screening methods that focus on cancer detection use fecal assays for the presence of blood or altered DNA, those for detection of adenomas (and early cancer) use endoscopic or computerised radiologic techniques. Broad use of screening methods has lowered colorectal cancer development by about 50%. In addition, prevention of the earliest stage of colon carcinogenesis has been shown to be effective in small prospective studies and epidemiologic surveys but have not been employed in the general population. Since 1996 the chemotherapeutic armamentarium for metastatic colorectal cancer has grown beyond 5-fluorouracil to include an oral 5-fluorouracil prodrug, capecitabine as well as irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Three targeted monoclonal antibodies (Moabs), bevacizumab (an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor Moab) and cetuximab/panitumumab, both anti-epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, have also earned regulatory approval. Most stage IV patients are treated with all of these drugs over 2 or 3 sequential lines of palliative chemotherapy and attain median survivals approaching 24 months. Lastly, adjuvant oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil for high risk resected stage II and stage III colon cancer patient has led to substantial improvement in cure rates. With appropriate care of age associated comorbidities these treatment modalities are feasible and effective in the geriatric population.