Progression and prognosis of gastric stump cancer

Identification of prognostic signatures in remnant gastric cancer through an interpretable risk model based on machine learning: a multicenter cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to develop an individual survival prediction model based on multiple machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict survival probability for remnant gastric cancer (RGC).

METHODS

Clinicopathologic data of 286 patients with RGC undergoing operation (radical resection and palliative resection) from a multi-institution database were enrolled and analyzed retrospectively. These individuals were split into training (80%) and test cohort (20%) by using random allocation. Nine commonly used ML methods were employed to construct survival prediction models. Algorithm performance was estimated by analyzing accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), confusion matrices, five-fold cross-validation, decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curve. The best model was selected through appropriate verification and validation and was suitably explained by the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach.

RESULTS

Compared with the traditional methods, the RGC survival prediction models employing ML exhibited good performance. Except for the decision tree model, all other models performed well, with a mean ROC AUC above 0.7. The DCA findings suggest that the developed models have the potential to enhance clinical decision-making processes, thereby improving patient outcomes. The calibration curve reveals that all models except the decision tree model displayed commendable predictive performance. Through CatBoost-based modeling and SHAP analysis, the five-year survival probability is significantly influenced by several factors: the lymph node ratio (LNR), T stage, tumor size, resection margins, perineural invasion, and distant metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study established predictive models for survival probability at five years in RGC patients based on ML algorithms which showed high accuracy and applicative value.

Analysis of endoscopic and pathological features of 6961 cases of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) stage and tissue differentiation affect treatment efficacy and prognosis, highlighting the importance of understanding the risk factors that affect these parameters. Therefore, this study analyzed risk factors affecting the GC stage and differentiation and the relationships between the cancer site and the sex and age of the patient. We collected clinical data from 6961 patients with GC, including sex, age, endoscopic lesion location, and pathological differentiation. Patients were grouped based on GC stage (early or advanced), differentiation (well or poorly differentiated), and lesion site (upper stomach [cardia and fundus], middle stomach [gastric body], and lower stomach [gastric antrum]). Differences in sex, age, location, stage, and degree of differentiation were assessed based on these groupings. Univariate analysis revealed that the disease location and differentiation significantly differed based on the GC stage (P < 0.05), whereas sex, age, site, and stage significantly differed based on GC differentiation (P < 0.05). A multivariate analysis confirmed these factors as independent risk factors affecting GC. Moreover, lesion sites significantly differed between sexes (P < 0.05) and among age groups (P < 0.05). Although the effects of family history, lifestyle, and Helicobacter pylori infection status of the patients were not considered, this single-center retrospective study established independent risk factors for GC.Trial registration ChiCTR2200061989.

Clinicopathological Predisposing Factors for Gastric Stump Cancer and Its Management: A Single-Center Analytical Study

Background The incidence of gastric stump carcinoma (GSC) is not declining because of the long latency period. The survival rate of treated gastric cancer patients has increased due to early detection and improvements in surgical techniques and chemotherapy. Increased survival rates and improved surveillance following gastric surgery have increased the incidence of GSC. Aim The study aims to investigate the clinicopathological factors affecting the interval between index gastric surgery and the occurrence of GSC, and our experience in the management of GSC is presented. Methods A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with GSC in our institution was completed. Patient characteristics and clinicopathological outcomes were analyzed. Results A total of 28 patients were included in this cohort with 17 (60.71%) males and 11 (39.28%) females. The mean interval from index surgery to the incidence of GSC was 24.42 years for benign etiology and six years for malignant etiology. Index surgeries were truncal vagotomy with 14 gastrojejunostomies (50%) and 14 subtotal gastrectomies (50%). The interval between index surgery and the incidence of GSC is not statistically significant concerning the type of surgery (p: 0.661), pathological TNM (tumor, nodes, metastases) stage (p: 0.520), pathological differentiation (p: 0.828), lymphovascular invasion (p: 0.252), perineural invasion (p: 0.672), and adjuvant therapy (p: -0.655). Survival was significantly higher in those patients who received curative resection in comparison to a palliative procedure (p: 0.041). Conclusion Strict surveillance for at least 10 years after initial gastric surgery is of utmost importance as half of the patients fated to develop GSC will do so within this time. In those patients with early diagnosis, no evidence of metastasis, and good performance status, curative surgery is feasible with acceptable morbidity.

The value of lymph nodes ratios in the prognosis of resectable remnant gastric cancer through the retrospective propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE

Currently, the characteristics and prognosis of remnant gastric cancer (RGC) are not fully understood yet. The present study aimed to describe the details of clinicopathological features of resectable RGC and investigated the factors affecting survival after the curative operation.

METHODS

From Jan. 2006 to Dec. 2015, a total of 118 resectable RGC patients (the RGC group) and 236 age-, sex- and TNM stages-matched resectable gastric cancer (GC) patients (the control group) were recruited retrospectively. Clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate was 46.61% for RGC patients compared to 55.08% for control groups (P < 0.01), and the mean overall survival time of RGC patients was 40.23 ± 32.27 months, compared to 55.06 ± 34.29 months in the control group (P = 0.023 after matching). The overall survival (OS) of RGC patients with stage IIb was much worse than IIa (P < 0.001) and similar to IIIa (P = 0.463) and IIIb (P = 0.014). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis revealed that TNM stage (HR: 3.899, P < 0.001) and lymph nodes ratio (LNR) (HR: 2.405, P = 0.028) were independent prognostic significance to OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The OS of RGC was much worse than GC with similar TNM stages, and LNR might consider a highly reliable indicator to evaluate the prognostic in RGC.

Mixed neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gastric stump: A case report

BACKGROUND

Gastric stump cancer, also known as gastric remnant cancer (GRC), is one of the main complications of postgastrectomy syndrome, which usually occurs following Billroth II reconstruction. The predominant histological subtype of GRC is adenocarcinoma, whereas neuroendocrine carcinoma is relatively rare. In particular, there are few recently reported cases of mixed neuroendocrine carcinoma (MNEC) in the English literature. Here, we present an extremely rare case of MNEC of the gastric stump.

CASE SUMMARY

A 59-year-old patient presented to our department owing to chronic constipation. He had undergone subtotal gastric resection 35 years prior to admission because of benign peptic ulcer. After admission, the patient underwent several tests, and gastroendoscopy showed evidence of Billroth II gastrectomy and local thickening of the gastric stump mucosa at the gastrojejunostomy site, with bile reflux; pathological biopsy revealed adenocarcinoma. He was then diagnosed with GRC and underwent total gastrectomy, D2 Lymphadenectomy, and esophagojejunal Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Histopathological examination of the specimen identified MNEC comprising MNEC (60%), adenocarcinoma (30%), and squamous cell carcinoma (10%). Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated on September 17, 2020. Taxol plus cisplatin was administered for only one cycle because of severe liver function damage, and the regimen was changed to etoposide plus cisplatin on October 10, 2020 for five cycles. The patient recovered, with no recurrence after 6 mo of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Gastric MNECs (GMNECs) is a rare type of GRC. This study presented the unusual occurrence of GMNEC in the gastric stump. This case will contribute to improvements in our understanding of the carcinogenesis, biology, pathology, and behavior of GMNEC and GRC.

Management of Acute Gastric Remnant Complications After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Single-Center Case Series

PURPOSE

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a common bariatric procedure. Its configuration creates an excluded gastric remnant, which is subject to potential acute complications such as bleeding, perforation, and necrosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospective database including all patients presenting between 2007 and 2019 to our institution with acute gastric remnant complications after RYGB was performed.

RESULTS

Seven patients were included, including 3 hemorrhages, two of which were treated with double-balloon enteroscopy, as well as 3 perforations and 1 necrosis, all of which required emergent surgery. Overall gastric remnant complication rate was 0.3% in this series.

CONCLUSION

Acute gastric remnant complications after RYGB are infrequent, but their diagnosis and management can be challenging. Double-balloon enteroscopy has diagnostic and therapeutic value for selected patients. Emergent surgery remains the standard of care for unstable patients and should not be delayed.

Prognosis and clinicopathologic features in patients with gastric stump cancer after curative surgery

Background

Gastric stump ("remnant") cancer is the development of a malignancy related to previous gastric surgery. Prognosis in gastric stump cancer, compared with that in primary gastric cancer, is still controversial.

Methods

From January 1988 to December 2012 at a single medical centre in Taiwan, 105 patients with gastric stump cancer, including 85 with previous peptic ulcer disease and 20 with previous gastric cancer, were analyzed for clinicopathologic characteristics and overall survival (os).

Results

The 5-year os rates for patients with gastric stump cancer and with primary gastric cancer were 51.2% and 54.5% respectively (p = 0.035). Analysis of clinicopathologic characteristics indicated that, compared with patients having primary gastric cancer, those with gastric stump cancer had more lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001) and had been diagnosed at a more advanced stage (p = 0.047). Multivariate analysis with os as an endpoint showed that age [p = 0.015; hazard ratio (hr): 2.300; 95% confidence interval (ci): 1.173 to 4.509], tumour size (p = 0.037; hr: 1.700; 95% ci: 1.031 to 2.801), stromal reaction (p = 0.021; hr: 1.802; 95% ci: 1.094 to 2.969), and pathologic N category (p = 0.001; hr: 1.449; 95% ci: 1.161 to 1.807) were independent predictors in gastric stump cancer. The os rates for patients with gastric stump cancer who previously had gastric cancer or peptic ulcer disease were 72.9% and 50.0% respectively (p = 0.019). The Borrmann classification was more superficial (p = 0.005), lymph node metastases were fewer (p = 0.004), and staging was less advanced (p = 0.025) in patients with gastric stump cancer who previously had gastric cancer than in their counterparts who previously had peptic ulcer disease.

Conclusions

Survival is poorer in patients with gastric stump cancer who previously had peptic ulcer disease than in those who previously had primary gastric cancer. Patients with gastric stump cancer who previously had gastric cancer and could receive curative gastrectomy tended to have a better prognosis because of a more superficial Borrmann classification. Regular follow-up in patients who have undergone gastric surgery is recommended for the early detection of gastric stump cancer.

Development and External Validation of Web-Based Models to Predict the Prognosis of Remnant Gastric Cancer after Surgery: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is a rare malignant tumor with poor prognosis. There is no universally accepted prognostic model for RGC.

METHODS

We analyzed data for 253 RGC patients who underwent radical gastrectomy from 6 centers. The prognosis prediction performances of the AJCC7th and AJCC8th TNM staging systems and the TRM staging system for RGC patients were evaluated. Web-based prediction models based on independent prognostic factors were developed to predict the survival of the RGC patients. External validation was performed using a cohort of 49 Chinese patients.

RESULTS

The predictive abilities of the AJCC8th and TRM staging systems were no better than those of the AJCC7th staging system (c-index: AJCC7th vs. AJCC8th vs. TRM, 0.743 vs. 0.732 vs. 0.744; P>0.05). Within each staging system, the survival of the two adjacent stages was not well discriminated (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that age, tumor size, T stage, and N stage were independent prognostic factors. Based on the above variables, we developed 3 web-based prediction models, which were superior to the AJCC7th staging system in their discriminatory ability (c-index), predictive homogeneity (likelihood ratio chi-square), predictive accuracy (AIC, BIC), and model stability (time-dependent ROC curves). External validation showed predictable accuracies of 0.780, 0.822, and 0.700, respectively, in predicting overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The AJCC TNM staging system and the TRM staging system did not enable good distinction among the RGC patients. We have developed and validated visual web-based prediction models that are superior to these staging systems.

Outcomes after completion total gastrectomy for gastric remnant cancer: experience from a Canadian tertiary centre

BACKGROUND

There is controversy about the safety and outcomes of completion total gastrectomy (CTG) for gastric adenocarcinoma. We compared a cohort of patients who underwent CTG for gastric remnant cancer (GRC) after partial gastrectomy for benign disease with patients who underwent primary total gastrectomy (PTG) for sporadic gastric cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a single-institution, prospectively maintained clinical database of patients who had undergone gastrectomy from 2005 to 2016 for demographic, surgical, clinical and tumour pathology data, as well as postoperative, pathologic and oncologic outcomes including complications, length of stay, disease-free survival and overall survival. We used the χ² and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to compare groups and performed the Mantel-Cox log-rank test for Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. We compared the CTG group to all patients in the PTG group and to a 5:1 propensity-matched PTG cohort.

RESULTS

We analyzed data for 64 patients (9 CTG, 55 PTG). The groups were equivalent at baseline and had similar operative, perioperative treatment and pathologic characteristics. After propensity matching, the reoperation rate for complications was higher after CTG than PTG (22% v. 0%, p = 0.03), but there was no significant difference in the overall complication rate or length of stay. At 5 years, there was no difference in disease-free survival (28% v. 58%, p = 0.4) or overall survival (33% v. 44%, p = 0.7).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that CTG for gastric adenocarcinoma can be undertaken safely a priori with no additional risk of recurrence or death compared to PTG for sporadic gastric cancer.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of remnant gastric cancer: A single-center retrospective analysis of 90 patients

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is significantly poor. However, the mechanism and some clinical features of RGC have not been fully understood and are still under debate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2000 to January 2014, 90 RGC patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups according to primary disease. Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 34 (37.8%) patients were diagnosed with remnant gastric cancer following benign disease (RGCB) and 56 (62.2%) were diagnosed with remnant gastric cancer following malignant disease (RGCM). The mean time interval from the primary operation to the development of RGC was 12.5 ± 13.3 years in all RGC patients. The mean time interval in RGCB was significantly longer than that in RGCM (P < 0.01). The 1-, 2-, and 3- year overall survival rates of all patients were 56.1%, 38.2% and 33.2%, respectively. Univariate analysis indicated that tumor size, curability, histology type, serosa invasion, nodal involvement and distant metastasis were prognostic factors for RGC. The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that distant metastasis was an independent prognostic factor for RGC.

CONCLUSION

RGC occurred earlier in patients with gastrectomy for primary malignant disease than for primary benign disease, even though the primary disease made no difference to the survival of RGC. Nonetheless, RGC patients experienced dismal overall survival. Therefore, early diagnosis plays a significant role in successfully carrying out curative resection and improving the prognosis for RGC.

Inflammation-based indexes and clinicopathologic features are strong predictive values of preoperative circulating tumor cell detection in gastric cancer patients

PURPOSE

Circulating tumor cell (CTC) count and the host inflammatory response are two independent predictors for patients with various malignant disease. Several inflammation-based indicators have been demonstrated to have prognostic value in many malignant solid tumors, including systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and prognostic nutrition index (PNI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the inflammation-based indexes including SII, NLR PLR, and PNI for CTC detection of gastric cancer patients before surgery.

METHODS

CTCs were measured using the isolation method by size of epithelial tumor cells and Wright staining for 60 patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgery. The indicators of SII, NLR, PLR, and PNI were calculated based on clinical laboratory testing.

RESULTS

The detected CTC number was correlated with extension of tumor invasion (p = 0.037), lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001), and TNM stage (p < 0.001). The CTC detection ratio was significantly correlated with T stage (p = 0.041), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.001), nerve fiber invasion of tumor outside the lymph nodes (p = 0.017), and TNM stage (p < 0.001). Statistical analysis showed that SII (p < 0.001), NLR (p < 0.001), PLR (p < 0.001), and PNI (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with positive CTC count and CTC detection rate.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that preoperative indicators consisting of SII, NLR, PLR, and PNI are robust predictors for CTC detection in gastric cancer patients undergoing tumor resection.

Perforated Carcinoma in the Gastric Remnant: A Case of Conservative Treatment Prior to Successful Curative R0 Resection

An 80-year-old man who had undergone distal gastrectomy and Billroth-II gastrojejunostomy 38 years previously, for a benign gastric ulcer, was diagnosed with remnant gastric cancer based on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings. He presented at our emergency department with acute-onset epigastric pain due to perforated remnant gastric cancer. Conservative medical management was selected, including nasogastric tube insertion, antibiotics, and proton pump inhibitors, because his peritonitis was limited to his epigastrium and his general condition was stable. Twenty-one days after the perforation occurred, curative total remnant gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy were performed. Adhesion between the lateral segment of the liver and the dissected lesser curvature of the gastric remnant may have contributed to the peritonitis in this case, which was limited to the epigastrium. This is the first report of perforated remnant gastric cancer in which conservative treatment was effective prior to curative resection. The protocol reported here may be of use to other clinicians who may encounter this clinical entity in their practices.

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: Risk factors associated with conversion and a systematic analysis of literature

BACKGROUND

In traditional opinion, history of abdominal surgery was the relative contraindication for Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) with high rate of conversion to Open gastrectomy (OG).Use of LG for treatment of remnant gastric cancer (RGC) has been documented in some case studies and controlled clinical trials. However, whether LG is superior, equal or inferior to OG in these patients is not clear.

METHODS

English language articles published between January 2005 and January 2016 were searched in MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Main outcome measures were: conversion of LG to OG, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, tumor size, positive proximal resection margin, lymph node dissection, disease stage, post-operative resumption of oral intake, postoperative hospital stay, complications, mortality and follow-up findings. Published clinical data which was in the situation of conversion to OG was collected, and the factors associated with conversion to open surgery were examined.

RESULTS

Five non-randomized controlled trials and seven LG case studies were included in the systematic review. Meta-analysis of the data could not be performed due to high variation and heterogeneity in study design, study population, LG technique, and outcome measures among the included studies. Systematic analysis of the included studies showed that LG was associated with significantly shorter mean operative time, early resumption of oral intake, and shorter hospital stay, as compared to that with OG. No significant difference in complications was observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

LG in the hands of experienced surgeons is relative feasibility and safety for RGC. Previous surgical anastomosis, previous open surgery and surgical experience were associated with conversion to OG. However, these findings should be validated with robust prospective comparative studies.

Does remnant gastric cancer really differ from primary gastric cancer? A systematic review of the literature by the Task Force of Japanese Gastric Cancer Association

Remnant gastric cancer, most frequently defined as cancer detected in the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy for benign disease and those cases after surgery of gastric cancer at least 5 years after the primary surgery, is often reported as a tumor with poor prognosis. The Task Force of Japanese Gastric Cancer Association for Research Promotion evaluated the clinical impact of remnant gastric cancer by systematically reviewing publications focusing on molecular carcinogenesis, lymph node status, patient survival, and surgical complications. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE with the keywords "remnant," "stomach," and "cancer," revealing 1154 relevant reports published up to the end of December 2014. The mean interval between the initial surgery and the diagnosis of remnant gastric cancer ranged from 10 to 30 years. The incidence of lymph node metastases at the splenic hilum for remnant gastric cancer is not significantly higher than that for primary proximal gastric cancer. Lymph node involvement in the jejunal mesentery is a phenomenon peculiar to remnant gastric cancer after Billroth II reconstruction. Prognosis and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates seem to be comparable to those for primary proximal gastric cancer. The crude 5-year mortality for remnant gastric cancer was 1.08 times higher than that for primary proximal gastric cancer, but this difference was not statistically significant. In conclusion, although no prospective cohort study has yet evaluated the clinical significance of remnant gastric cancer, our literature review suggests that remnant gastric cancer does not adversely affect patient prognosis and postoperative course.

Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the gastric stump following Billroth II gastrectomy: case report and review of the literature

CONTEXT

Gastric stump cancer after gastric resection is a well-known disease. It may be a newly developed cancer after resection due to benign disease, or recurrent or residual disease after oncological surgery. The predominant histological type is usually adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to report on a rare occurrence of a mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) on the gastric stump.

CASE REPORT

The case of an 83-year-old female who presented a locally aggressive gastric stump MANEC, 35 years after Billroth II gastrectomy to treat a peptic ulcer, is reported. The patient underwent resection and adjuvant therapy. She has been followed up for one year without signs of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

MANEC is a rare type of gastrointestinal neoplasm. The classification, histopathology, clinical features, treatment issues and prognosis are discussed along with a brief review of the literature.

Gastric remnant cancer: A distinct entity or simply another proximal gastric cancer?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes following resection of gastric remnant (GRC) and conventional gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection for gastric cancer in 8 academic institutions from 2000-2012 were evaluated to compare morbidity, mortality, and survival based on history of prior gastrectomy.

RESULTS

Of the 979 patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative-intent during the 12-year study period, 55 patients (5.8%) presented with GRC and 924 patients (94.4%) presented with conventional gastric cancer. Patients with GRC were slightly older (median 69 vs. 66 years). GRC was associated with higher rates of complication (56% vs. 41%, P = 0.028), longer operative times (301 vs. 237 min, P < 0.001), higher intraoperative blood loss (300 vs. 200 ml, P = 0.012), and greater need for blood transfusion (43% vs. 23%, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in 30-day (3.6% vs. 4%) or 90-day mortality (9% vs. 8%) between the two groups. Overall survival rates were similar between GRC and conventional gastric cancer (5-year 20.3% vs. 38.6%, P = 0.446). Multivariate analysis revealed that history of gastrectomy was not predictive of survival while established predictors (older age, advanced T-stage, nodal involvement, blood transfusion, multivisceral resection, and any complication) were associated with poor survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite higher morbidity, prognosis after resection of gastric remnant cancer is similar to conventional gastric cancer.

Surgical Resection of Remnant Gastric Cancer Following Distal Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Clinicopathological Study

BACKGROUND

Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is one of the less prevalent gastric cancers. The purpose of this study was to explore the clinicopathological characteristics and results of the operation of RGC following distal gastrectomy. In particular, we examined factors related to prognosis.

METHODS

Between January 1970 and December 2012, 122 patients with RGC following distal gastrectomy underwent further surgery and were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Initial gastric diseases included benign (49 patients, 40.2 %) and malignant diseases (73 patients, 59.8 %). Reconstructions by initial surgery included Billroth I (80 patients, 65.6 %) and Billroth II (42 patients, 34.4 %). Tumors were located at anastomotic (44 patients, 36.1 %) and nonanastomotic sites (78 patients, 63.9 %). There were 59 patients (48.4 %) classified with pathological (p) stage I, 19 as p stage II (15.6 %), 22 as p stage III (18.0 %), and 22 (18.0 %) as p stage IV. A total of 100 patients (82.0 %) underwent curative resection, and 22 underwent noncurative resection. The number of cases of postoperative morbidity, 90-day mortality, and adjuvant chemotherapy were 23 (18.9 %), 3 (2.5 %), and 20 (16.4 %), respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors of RGC. Multivariate analysis revealed historical periods, pathological venous invasion, curative resection, and postoperative morbidity to be independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of patients with RGC can be improved by aggressively performing curative resection without causing complications.

Prognostic factors and survival in patients with gastric stump cancer

AIM: To elucidate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of gastric stump cancer (GSC).

METHODS: The clinical data for 92 patients with GSC were collected at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. The prognostic factors were analyzed with Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS: GSC tended to occur within 25 years following the primary surgery, when the initial disease is benign, whereas it primarily occurred within the first 15 years post-operation for gastric cancer. Patients with regular follow-up after primary surgery had a better survival rate. The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that Borrmann type I/II (HR = 3.165, 95%CI: 1.055-9.500, P = 0.040) and radical resection (HR = 1.780, 95%CI: 1.061-2.987, P = 0.029) were independent prognostic factors for GSC. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of the 92 patients were 78.3%, 45.6% and 27.6%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of those undergoing radical resection were 79.3%, 52.2%, and 37.8%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates for stages I, II, III, and IV were 85.7%, 47.4%, 16.0%, and 13.3%, respectively (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION: The appearance of GSC occurs sooner in patients with primary malignant cancer than in patients with a primary benign disease. Therefore, close follow-up is necessary. The overall survival of patients with GSC is poor, and curative resection can improve their prognosis.

Prognostic value of tumor size in patients with remnant gastric cancer: is the seventh UICC stage sufficient for predicting prognosis?

BACKGROUND

The 7th UICC N stage may be unsuitable for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) because the original disease and previous operation usually cause abnormal lymphatic drainage. However, the prognostic significance of the current TNM staging system in RGC has not been studied.

METHODS

Prospective data from 153 RGC patients who underwent curative gastrectomy from Jan 1995 to Aug 2009 were reviewed. All patients were classified according to tumor size (<3 cm as N0;>3&≤5 cm as N1;>5&≤7 cm as N2; and>7 cm as N3). The overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Tumor sizes ranged from 1.0 to 15.0 cm (median 5.0 cm). Tumor size, depth of invasion and lymph node (LN) metastasis were significant prognostic factors based on both the univariate and multivariate analyses (P<0.05). In the survival analysis, the seventh edition UICC-TNM classification provided a detailed classification; however, some subgroups of the UICC-TNM classification did not have significantly different survival rates. The combination of the seventh edition T classification and the suggested N classification, with ideal relative risk (RR) results and P value, was distinctive for subgrouping the survival rates except for the IA versus IB and II A versus IIB. A modified staging system based on tumor size, predicted survival more accurately than the conventional TNM staging system.

CONCLUSIONS

In RGCs, tumor size is an independent prognostic factor and a modified TNM system based on tumor size accurately predicts survival.

Surgical treatment of non-early gastric remnant carcinoma developing after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The optimal surgical procedure for gastric remnant carcinoma (GRC) remains debatable. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the surgical treatments for T2-4 GRC developing after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

Between 1970 and 2012, a total of 50 patients underwent R0 resection for T2-4 GRC. The clinicopathologic features, therapeutic methods, and follow-up data of these patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

The tumor was located at a non-anastomotic site of the remnant stomach in 43 of the 50 patients. Total gastrectomy was performed in 48 patients and partial gastrectomy was in two patients. Lymph node metastasis was found in 19 patients. Major postoperative complications occurred in 16 patients. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of the 50 patients were 90%, 66%, and 44%, respectively. Presence of small intestinal or esophageal infiltration and postoperative complications was independently associated with poorer survival. Dissection of the perigastric and splenic hilar/artery nodes was found to have potential therapeutic benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection for T2-4 GRC developing after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer can be invasive, but is feasible and effective. Total gastrectomy with splenectomy is one of the recommendable procedures for this disease.

Limited subtotal gastrectomy for early remnant gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Detection of early remnant gastric cancer (ERGC) is increasing as a result of the development of endoscopic technology and a surveillance program. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of limited subtotal gastrectomy (SG) surgery for ERGC compared to total gastrectomy (TG).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a database of 72 consecutive patients with remnant gastric cancer who underwent laparotomy at the National Cancer Center Hospital East between January 1993 and December 2008. Thirty-five patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ERGC underwent curative resection: 13 SG and 22 conventional TG. Patients and tumor characteristics, operative results, and postoperative assessments 1 year after surgery were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Operating time, blood transfusion, and hospital stay were similar in the two groups. In the SG group, blood loss and postoperative recovery of body weight tended to be better than in the TG group. There was no dumping syndrome in the SG group, while this occurred in three patients in the TG group. The levels of hemoglobin and total protein were higher 1 year after remnant gastrectomy in the SG group than in the TG group. No recurrence of gastric cancer was detected in the SG group during median follow-up of 99.2 months.

CONCLUSION

In comparison to TG, limited SG surgery for ERGC improved the postoperative course, with no recurrence of cancer. Therefore, SG is a safe and effective treatment for ERGC.

A retrospective clinicopathologic study of remnant gastric cancer after distal gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is a unique clinical entity with relatively less frequency in gastric cancer series and often reported to be detected at advanced stages and had poor prognosis.

METHODS

A total of 112 patients with RGCs from July 1991 to July 2008 were enrolled in this retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

A total number of 112 cases were composed of 20 (17.8%) differentiated carcinomas and 92 (82.2%) undifferentiated carcinomas. There are 64 (57.1%) patients with tumor at anastomotic site and 48 (42.9%) tumor at nonanastomotic site. The diameter of tumors was ≥4 cm in 83 (74.1%) patients. Borrmann III, IV accounted for 70.5% and 17.8% respectively. Three (2.6%) patients were classified as stage I, 16 as stage II (14.2%), 62 as stage III (55.3%), and 31 (27.6%) as stage IV. Percentage of T4 stage was 57.1%. Distant metastasis rate and lymph node metastasis rate were 27.6% and 58.9%, respectively. There were numerous clinicopathologic differences according to different original disease, initial reconstruction, and tumor location. The median overall survival time was 27.9 months. TNM stage and option of treatments were independent prognostic factors in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The lifelong annual follow-up endoscopic examinations after the initial gastrectomy and radical resection may help to improve the prognosis of RGCs.

Clinicopathological characteristics and survival difference between gastric stump carcinoma and primary upper third gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The increased incidence of early gastric cancer in several Asian countries has been associated with an increase in gastric stump carcinoma (GSC) following gastric cancer surgery. The clinicopathological characteristics of GSC remain unclear because of the limited number of patients with GSC.

METHODS

The clinicopathological characteristics, including the 5-year survival rate of patients with GSC following distal gastrectomy (167 patients), were compared with those of patients with primary upper third gastric cancer (PGC; 755 patients). The clinicopathological characteristics of patients with GSC were also compared between those who had initial surgery for gastric cancer (GSC-M group, 78 patients) and for benign lesions (GSC-B group, 89 patients).

RESULTS

The GSC-B group has a greater male/female ratio (13.8 vs. 3.1) and a longer interval between initial gastrectomy and surgery for GSC (31.0 vs. 9.4 years) than the GSC-M group. The 5-year survival rate was not significantly different between the GSC-B group (49.0 %) and the GSC-M group (59.3 %, P = 0.359). A comparison between the GSC group and the PGC group revealed a poorer 5-year survival rate for the GSC group (53.6 %) than the PGC group (78.3 %, P < 0.001), and the same trend was observed even after stratification by the pathological stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Stump carcinoma arises earlier following gastrectomy for malignant disease than for benign disease. The prognosis was poor in patients with GSC compared to those with PGC. Early detection of GSC is necessary and an appropriate follow-up program should be established.

The pattern of lymph node metastasis and the suitability of 7th UICC N stage in predicting prognosis of remnant gastric cancer

BACKGROUNDS

The original disease and previous operation usually cause abnormal lymphatic drainage of remnant gastric cancer (RGC). We analyzed metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) of RGCs to explore the pattern of lymphatic metastasis and rational surgical treatment for RGC.

METHODS

Eighty-three RGC patients who underwent radical gastrectomy from July 1991 to July 2008 enrolled in this retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

Original disease, tumor size, Borrmann type, depth of invasion, and histological type were related to an increased risk of lymph node (LN) metastasis (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that tumor size and depth of invasion were independent predictive factors of LN metastasis (P < 0.05). In comparison with upper one-third gastric cancer, patients with RGC tended to have a lower incidence of perigastric LN metastasis and higher incidence of metastasis to the mesojejunum and lower mediastinal LNs. A high incidence of MLNs in the No. 14 and mesojejunum was found from the patients who had previously undergone Billroth II reconstruction, while patients after Billroth I reconstruction had higher No. 12 and No. 13 LN metastasis rates. Cut-point survival analysis demonstrated that the most appropriate cutoffs of MLNs were set at 0, 2, 6, and 9. Patients of 0, 1-2, 3-6, 7-9, or ≥10 MLNs presented with median survival time of 37, 35, 24, 13, and 9 month, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative diagnosis of depth of invasion and tumor size can help surgeons to evaluate LN metastasis. The 7th UICC N stage may be unsuitable and should be evaluated and improved in order to help surgeons rationally to estimate N stage of RGC.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of remnant gastric cancer

Purpose

The long-term survival rate of gastric cancer patients after surgery has recently increased as a result of making an early diagnosis of gastric cancer. Therefore, the incidence of remnant gastric cancer is increasing. This study was performed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with remnant gastric cancer.

Materials and Methods

From January 2005 to December 2009, twenty-nine patients with remnant gastric cancer and who underwent surgery at Pusan National University Hospital were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed their medical records. We also divided them into two groups: the remnant gastric cancer (RGC)-B group (first operation for benign disease) and the RGC-M group (first operation for malignant disease).

Results

The RGC-B group included ten patients and the RGC-M group included nineteen patients. The mean interval between the first and second operations was 17 years. The curative resection rate was 93.1% (27/29). The postoperative complication rate was 20.7% (6/29) and there was no perioperative mortality. Ten (37%) of twenty-seven patients experienced recurrence after curative resection and eight patients (27.6%) expired due to aggravation of remnant stomach cancer. An advanced TNM stage and non-curative resection were the negative prognostic factors for survival for patients with remnant stomach cancer (P=0.0453 and P<0.001). The RGC-M group showed a shorter interval (P<0.001) and the RGC-B group had more advanced TNM stage (P=0.003).

Conclusions

Long-term follow-up should be considered not only for patients who undergo an operation for malignant disease, but also for the patients who underwent an operation for benign disease. When remnant gastric cancer is diagnosed, curative resection is essential to improve the survival.

Tumors arising at previous anastomotic site may have poor prognosis in patients with gastric stump cancer following gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

We analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of patients with gastric stump cancer (GSC) to identify important prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical reports of 34 patients with GSC treated at Kochi Medical School from 1982 to 2008 to analyze the clinical and pathological factors that influenced patient survival.

RESULTS

The median interval between initial and second operation was 15.8 years; this interval was significantly longer in patients diagnosed originally with benign disease than in those with previous malignant disease. Histologically, the incidence of diffuse-type cancer was significantly prominent in patients with previous benign gastric disease than in those with previous malignant gastric disease. The overall 5-year survival rate was 53.3%, with presence of lymph node metastasis and pathological serosal invasion of the tumor associated with poor survival. The final analysis revealed tumor located at anastomosis, tumor size greater than 5 cm, serosal invasion, the presence of lymph node metastasis, and stage III or higher to be significantly associated with poor survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Follow-up programs after gastrectomy should account for long latency periods of disease. Early detection, attentive observation of anastomotic site, and sufficient surgical resection were important influences on outcome for patients with GSC after Billroth I or Billroth II reconstruction.

Treatment and outcome of patients with gastric remnant cancer after resection for peptic ulcer disease

BACKGROUND

To study the pathology, treatment, and outcome of patients with gastric remnant cancer (GRC) after resection for peptic ulcer disease (PUD).

METHODS

Review of a prospective gastric cancer database identified patients with GRC after gastrectomy for PUD. Clinicopathologic and treatment-related variables were obtained. Multivariate analysis was performed for factors associated with disease-specific survival (DSS).

RESULTS

From January 1985 to April 2010, 4402 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were treated at our institution and 105 patients (2.4%) had prior gastrectomy for PUD. Prior resections were most often Billroth II (N = 97, 92%). The median time from initial resection to development of GRC was 32 years (3-60 years), and the majority of tumors were located at the gastrointestinal anastomosis (N = 72, 69%). Median DSS was 1.3 years (0.6-2.1 years). Patients who had resection had a significantly better outcome than patients who did not have resection (median DSS 5 vs 0.35 years, P < .0001). Factors associated with DSS on multivariate analysis included advanced T-stage (HR 16.5 (CI 2.2-123.4), P = .0006) and lymph node metastasis (HR 1.1 (CI 1.0-1.2), P < .0001). Stage-specific survival following R0 resection was similar to patients with conventional gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients have a lifetime risk for the development of GRC following resection for PUD. As with conventional gastric cancer, determinants of survival of patients with GRC include advanced T stage and nodal metastasis. Patients with GRC amenable to curative resection exhibit the best DSS and have stage-specific outcomes similar to patients with conventional gastric cancer.

Survival status of patients with gastric cancer after radical resection: a five-year follow-up study

AIM: To survey the survival status of gastric cancer patients after radical resection and to evaluate prognostic factors in these patients.

METHODS: The clinical data for 298 patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical resection from August 2003 to August 2006 at Jilin Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine were followed up for 5 years were retrospectively reviewed. The life table, Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to evaluate the survival status of these patients.

RESULTS: (1) A total of 154 patients died within 5 years. The median survival time was 48. 225 mo, and the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 78%, 57% and 47%, respectively. Death hazard was highest between 9-11 mo after surgery. (2) Univariate analysis indicated that TNM stage, tumor size, differentiation, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis, combined multiple organ resection, therapy with Chinese medicine, and extent of tumor resection were significant predictors of the prognosis in these patients. (3) Multivariate analysis showed that TNM stage (RR = 1.497), lymph node metastasis (RR = 1.613), distant metastasis (RR = 1.458), and therapy with Chinese medicine (RR = 0.592) were independent prognostic factors in these patients.

CONCLUSION: The prognosis of patients with gastric cancer after radical resection is poor. TNM stage, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis are independent factors affecting the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer after radical resection. Therapy with Chinese medicine can improve the survival of patients with gastric cancer after radical resection.

Laparoscopy-assisted resection for gastric stump cancer and gastric stump recurrent cancer: a report of 15 cases

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to investigate the technical methods and clinical therapeutic effects of laparoscopy-assisted resection of gastric stump cancer (GSC).

METHODS

Laparoscopy-assisted resection was performed on 15 patients with GSC. The approach, method, difficult points, and techniques of the operation were analyzed, and its clinical therapeutic effect was evaluated.

RESULTS

With the help of laparoscopy, D2 radical resection of gastric stump was performed on 12 patients, and palliative gastric stump resection was performed on two patients. There was one case of conversion from laparoscopic surgery to open surgery. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was performed in all cases to reconstruct the alimentary tract. The mean operative time for laparoscopy-assisted resection was 205 ± 25 min. The mean intraoperative blood loss volume was 110 ± 40 ml. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 18 ± 5. A gastric tube was not placed in the patients after surgery. The mean time for the recovery of intestinal function was 2.5 ± 1 days, the mean duration of postoperative liquid diet was 2.5 ± 1 days, and the mean time for the recovery of ambulatory activity was 3 ± 0.5 days. There was one case of postoperative infection of the incision site. The follow-up time was 6-40 months, with 1 case of death due to liver metastasis, 1 case of death due to peritoneal metastasis, 1 case of death due to complications from lupus erythematosus, and survival for the remaining 12 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy-assisted resection of GSC is technically feasible; determination of the short- and long-term efficacies will require a larger and comparative sample study.