Optimal surgical treatment of breast cancer: Implications for local control and survival

Fat/water ratios measured with diffuse reflectance spectroscopy to detect breast tumor boundaries

Recognition of the tumor during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) can be very difficult and currently a robust method of margin assessment for the surgical setting is not available. As a result, tumor-positive margins, which require additional treatment, are not found until histopathologic evaluation. With diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), tissue can be characterized during surgery based on optical parameters that are related to the tissue morphology and composition. Here we investigate which optical parameters are able to detect tumor in an area with a mixture of benign and tumor tissue and hence which parameters are most suitable for intra-operative margin assessment. DRS spectra (400-1600 nm) were obtained from 16 ex vivo lumpectomy specimens from benign, tumor border, and tumor tissue. One mastectomy specimen was used with a custom-made grid for validation purposes. The optical parameter related to the absorption of fat and water (F/W-ratio) in the extended near-infrared wavelength region (~1000-1600 nm) provided the best discrimination between benign and tumor sites resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 100 % (excluding the border sites). Per patient, the scaled F/W-ratio gradually decreased from grossly benign tissue towards the tumor in 87.5 % of the specimens. In one test case, based on a predefined F/W-ratio for boundary tissue of 0.58, DRS produced a surgical resection plane that nearly overlapped with a 2-mm rim of benign tissue, 2 mm being the most widely accepted definition of a negative margin. The F/W-ratio provided excellent discrimination between sites clearly inside or outside the tumor and was able to detect the border of the tumor in one test case. This work shows the potential for DRS to guide the surgeon during BCS.

Primary systemic therapy for breast cancer: Does the patient's involvement in decision-making create a new future?

OBJECTIVE

Primary systemic therapy (PST) followed by surgery is the standard initial treatment for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). However, some patients are averse to mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery and do not consent to these procedures. The reasons for this controversial decision, the factors influencing the decision-making and optimal solutions for decision aiding need to be investigated.

METHODS

We addressed these questions by a review of literature on the possibilities associated with different patient choices and subsequent treatment options in relation to LABC.

RESULTS

A total of 5 reviews and 22 clinical studies were summarized in relation to decision making and the most successful decision aids. A discussion is given of the issues of those few patients who cannot be convinced to undergo surgery.

CONCLUSION

Currently there is no guideline for the treatment of patients who reject the surgical procedures after PST. Medical oncologists should be able to apply decision aid modalities in a personalized manner to give all needed information to their patients thereby ensuring a deliberate decision-making process, facilitating acceptance of a need for surgery, and thus improving the chances of prolonged survival.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Currently multidisciplinary tumor boards are the most suitable decision aids in oncological practice.

How to identify patients with increased risk of breast cancer relapse?

A cohort of 362 breast cancer patients had subtype classification accomplished using 4 immunohistochemical markers: luminal A (ER or PR positive, HER2 negative, Ki-67<14%), luminal B (ER or PR positive, HER2 negative, Ki-67≥14%), luminal HER2 (ER or PR positive, HER2 positive), HER2 enriched (ER or PR negative, HER2 positive) or triple negative (ER, PR, and HER2 negative). Multivariable Cox analysis was used to determine the risk of local (LR) or distant (DR) relapse associated with the intrinsic subtypes, adjusting for standard clinicopathologic factors. There have been a total of 124 recurrences. Triple-negative patients were associated with increased risk of LR. Luminal B subtype showed statistical tendency (P=0.053) to LR. For patients undergoing breast conservation surgery, luminal B and HER2-enriched subtypes demonstrated an increased risk to LR, and this was statistically significant on multivariable analysis. After mastectomy, there was no statistical difference between subtypes of LR or DR on multivariable analysis. Luminal A tumors are associated with a low risk of LR or DR. Despite the existence of gene expression profiling, in the current study we demonstrate that analysis of 4 immunohistochemical markers is equally effective and less expensive alternative to identify higher recurrence risk patients.

Light-guided lumpectomy: first clinical experience

Despite numerous advances, lumpectomy remains a challenging procedure. We report on the early use of light-guided lumpectomy. Eight patients with non-palpable breast cancer undergoing lumpectomy for biopsy-proven and radiographically identifiable cancer were enrolled in the study. An optical wire was designed that incorporated a standard hook-wire with an optical fiber. The optical wire was placed in the same manner as a standard hook-wire. During light-guided lumpectomy, an eye-safe laser illuminated the optical wire and created a sphere of light surrounding the cancer. The light was visible at the beginning of each surgery and facilitated approaching the cancer without using the wire. Dissection around the sphere of light kept the wire tip within the surgical specimen. Three of eight initial surgical specimens had focally positive margins. Additional cavity shaves were performed during five lumpectomies and resulted in negative margins in seven of eight patients. Light-guided lumpectomy is a minor change to breast conserving surgery that can be easily incorporated into clinical practice. Further investigation into the clinical benefit of light-guided lumpectomy is warranted.

The numbers of FoxP3+ lymphocytes in sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer patients correlate with primary tumor size but not nodal status

Regulatory T cells, lymphocytes marked by expression of the transcription factor Forkhead Box Protein P3 (FoxP3), inhibit the activation of tumor-specific T cells in tumor-draining lymph nodes. Immunohistochemical analyses of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from 104 breast cancer patients showed a significant association (p = .0028, Pearson correlation) between the number of FoxP3+ cells and the size of primary breast invasive ductal carcinoma. In contrast, there was no correlation between the number of FoxP3+ cells and the presence of SLN metastases, or other clinicopathological parameters. These results suggest the presence of an immune suppressive environment in SLNs of larger tumors.