Evaluating the role of level 3 axillary lymph node dissection in metastatic melanoma: Can we predict involvement?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

MSLT-2 and DECOG-SLT established that immediate complete axillary lymph node dissection (CLND) did not correlate with an increase in melanoma-specific survival when compared with active ultrasound observation in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive disease. After those trials, there was a shift toward performing CLND only for clinically node-positive disease. With these changes, we sought to determine the role of level III axillary lymph nodes in bulky disease and how the use of neoadjuvant therapy may impact the rate of positivity in level III axillary nodes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review on all patients who underwent axillary CLND for cutaneous melanoma by one surgeon at an academic center from 2014 to 2022. These patients underwent CLND based on either having SLN+ disease or having clinically palpable or radiographically bulky disease.

RESULTS

Of 95 patients included, there were 7 (7.3%) patients with level III positivity. One was SLN+ (1.0%), while 3 (3.1%) had bulky disease and neoadjuvant therapy, and 3 (3.1%) had bulky disease without neoadjuvant therapy. No preoperative factors were identified that predicted level III involvement. After performing CLND, the patients who had clinically palpable or radiographically bulky disease and neoadjuvant therapy had higher percent necrosis of nodes in levels I and II but not III. At 5 years, overall survival and recurrence-free survival were improved in those without level III involvement (58% and 64%, respectively) when compared to those with level III involvement (41% and 50%), though this was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Further study may identify better prognostic factors for level III positivity, allowing for the possibility of dissecting only levels I and II or even replacing CLND with targeted node dissections.

Current surgical management for melanoma

Melanoma is a major malignant cutaneous neoplasm with a high mortality rate. In recent years, the treatment of melanoma has developed dramatically with the invention of new therapeutic agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecular-targeted agents. These agents are available as adjuvant therapies for postoperative patients with stage IIB, IIC, and III melanomas. Furthermore, neoadjuvant therapy has been studied in several global clinical trials and has demonstrated promising and favorable clinical efficacy, mainly in patients with palpable regional lymph nodes. A recent large phase III clinical trial investigating early lymph node dissection for sentinel lymph node metastases demonstrated no survival benefits. Based on these data, surgery should be reconsidered as an appropriate treatment modality for melanoma. The need for invasive surgical procedures will be reduced with the invention of effective adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies and novel clinical trial data on regional lymph node dissection. However, surgery still plays an important role in treating early-stage melanoma, accurately determining the disease stage, and effective palliative treatment for advanced melanoma. In this article, we focus on surgery for primary tumors, regional lymph nodes, and metastatic sites in an era of remarkably revolutionary drug treatments for melanoma.

Suction Drain Volume following Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma-When to Remove Drains? A Retrospective Cohort Study

Postoperative complications such as seroma formation and wound-site infection occur following completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for melanoma. We analyzed the impact of time-to-drain removal and drainage volume on seroma formation after ALND. We retrospectively analyzed data from 118 patients after completion ALND for melanoma. Primary endpoints were daily amount of drainage volume, seroma formation and time-to-drain removal. Secondary endpoints included patient-related, disease-specific and perioperative parameters as well as the number of histologically analyzed lymph nodes and surgical complications graded by the Clavien−Dindo classification (CDCL). Statistical analyses were performed using logistic regression models. Drain removal around the 8th postoperative day was statistically associated with a lower risk for the occurrence of seroma formation (p < 0.001). Patients with an increased drainage volume during the early postoperative days were more prone to develop seroma after drain removal. With 49% (CDCL I and II), most complications were managed conservatively, while only 5.9% (CDCL III) required revision surgery (CDCL overall: 55.9%). ALND is a safe procedure with a low rate of severe CDCL III type of complications. To decrease seroma evacuation, our results imply that drains should be removed around the 8th postoperative day to reduce the risk of infection, readmission or prolonged hospitalization.

Recent Evolution in the Management of Lymph Node Metastases in Melanoma

Introduction

Based upon two large randomized international clinical trials (German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG-SLT) and Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT-II)) published in 2016 and 2017, respectively, active surveillance has been demonstrated to have equivalent survival outcomes to completion lymphadenectomy (CLND) for a subset of patients who have microscopic lymph node disease. In this study, the changes in national practice patterns were examined regarding the utilization of CLND after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).

Methods

Using the National Cancer Database, CLND utilization was examined in SLN-positive patients diagnosed with melanoma between 2012 and 2016. A hierarchal logistical regression model with hospital-level random intercepts was constructed to examine the factors associated with SLNB followed by observation vs. SLNB with CLND.

Results

Of the 148,982 patients identified, 43% (n = 63,358) underwent SLNB and 10.3% (n = 6,551) had a SLNB with microscopic disease. CLND was performed for 57% (n = 2,817) of these patients. Patients were more likely to undergo CLND if they were ≤ 55 years of age (OR, 1.454; p ≤ 0.0001), ages 56 - 65 (OR, 1.127; p = 0.026), Charlson Deyo Score = 0 (OR, 2.088; p = 0.043), or were diagnosed with melanoma in 2012 (OR, 2.259, p ≤ 0.0001).

Conclusions

The utilization of CLND among patients with microscopic nodal melanoma was significantly lower in 2016 compared to 2012. Younger age, lack of comorbidities, and primary tumor location on the trunk or head/neck were associated with higher utilization of CLND.

Patients with sentinel lymph node positive melanoma: Who needs completion lymph node dissection?

INTRODUCTION

Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for melanoma after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was recently shown to improve regional but not overall survival, likely due to the majority of patients harboring no further nodal disease. We sought to determine predictors of non-sentinel node (NSN) positivity.

METHODS

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data on melanoma patients undergoing SLNB.

RESULTS

116 patients underwent 119 CLNDs. The incidence of NSN positivity was 17.6%; the average number of positive NSNs in those cases was 1.5. Cervical and inguinofemoral location were most likely to yield positive NSN(s) (40% each). Conversely, the axilla was least likely at 18% (p < 0.001). The average number of nodes harvested was 13 for NSN negative cases and 20 for NSN positive cases (p = 0.005). Tumor thickness increased the probability of positive NSN(s) (OR 1.2, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor thickness and nodal basin were predictors of NSN metastasis, factors that could help determine which patients may benefit from CLND. Further, CLNDs with fewer nodes may inadequately clear residual nodal disease.

Impact of extended lymphadenectomy on morbidity and regional recurrence-free survival in melanoma patients

Introdurction: Current guidelines for malignant melanoma do not set a concrete cutoff limit for the number of lymph nodes to be resected during regional lymph node dissection (LND). Here, we investigate if extended LND (ext-LND) has an impact on surgical morbidity and oncological outcome in melanoma patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 245 melanoma patients receiving axillary or inguinal LND in curative intention were investigated retrospectively. Ext-LND was defined as axillary LND with 20 or more and inguinal LND with 10 or more resected lymph nodes. Surgical morbidity and regional recurrence-free survival were investigated.

RESULTS

Ext-LND did not lead to increased surgical morbidity in the overall study collective. After ext-LND, 55.4% of the patients experienced one of the investigated complications compared to 46.2% in the limited LND group (p = .2113). There was no difference in the occurrence of lymphatic fistula, wound infection, severe bleeding or neurological complications. In addition, patients with positive lymph node status showed improved regional recurrence-free survival following ext-LND (p = .0425).

CONCLUSION

Ext-LND can be considered a quality marker of LND in melanoma patients.

Complications following completion lymphadenectomy versus therapeutic lymphadenectomy for melanoma - A systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) following a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been reported to be less morbid than lymphadenectomy for palpable disease (therapeutic lymph node dissection; TLND). The reporting of morbidity data can be heterogeneous, and hence no 'average' surgical complication rates of these procedures has been reported. This review aims to determine complications rates to inform patients undergoing surgery for metastatic melanoma.

METHODS

A systematic review of English-language literature from 2000 to 2017, reporting morbidity information about CLND and TLND for melanoma, was performed. The methodological quality of the included studies was performed using the methodological index for non-randomised studies (MINORS) instrument and Detsky score. Pooled proportions of post-operative complications were constructed using a random effects statistical model.

RESULTS

After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 18 articles progressed to the final analysis. In relation to TLND (1627 patients), the overall incidence of surgical complications was 39.3% (95% CI 32.6-46.2); including wound infection/breakdown 25.4% (95% CI: 20.9-30.3); lymphoedema 20.9% (95% CI: 13.8-29.1); and seroma 20.4% (95% CI: 15.9-25.2). For CLND (1929 patients), the overall incidence of surgical complications was 37.2% (95% CI 27.6-47.4); including wound infection/breakdown 21.6% (95% CI: 13.8-30.6); lymphoedema 18% (95% CI: 12.5-24.2); and seroma 17.9% (95% CI: 10.3-27). The complication rate was marginally lower for CLND but not to statistical significance.

DISCUSSION

This study provides information about the incidence of complications after CLND and TLND. It can be used to counsel patients about the procedures and it sets a benchmark against which surgeons can audit their practice.

Measuring the quality of melanoma surgery - Highlighting issues with standardization and quality assurance of care in surgical oncology

In an attempt to ensure high standards of cancer care, there is increasing interest in determining and monitoring the quality of interventions in surgical oncology. In recent years, this has been particularly the case for melanoma surgery. The vast majority of patients with melanoma undergo surgery. Usually, this is with combinations of wide excision, sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymphadenectomy. The indications for these procedures evolved during a time when no effective systemic adjuvant therapy was available, and whilst the rationale has been sound, the justification for differences in extent and thoroughness has generally been supported by inadequate or low-level evidence. This has led to a substantial variation among melanoma centres or even among surgeons within a centre in how these procedures are done. With recent rapid progress in the efficacy of systemic treatments that are impacting on overall survival, the prospect of long-term survival in these previously high risk patients means that more than ever long-term locoregional control of melanoma is imperative. Furthermore, the understanding of effects of systemic therapy on locoregional disease will only be interpretable if surgeons use standardized, high quality techniques. This article focuses on standardization and evolution of quality indicators for melanoma surgery and how these might have a positive impact on patient care.

Lymph node dissection for stage III melanoma

Locoregional spread of melanoma to its draining lymph node basin is the strongest negative prognostic factor for patients. Exclusive of clinical trials, patients with sentinel lymph node-positive (microscopic) or clinically palpable (macroscopic) nodal disease should undergo lymphadenectomy. This article reviews the management and technical aspects of surgical care for regional metastases. Adjunct therapies (immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and radiation) may supplement lymphadenectomy in certain patient populations. Surgical morbidity after lymphadenectomy can be substantial, creating opportunities for improvement via minimally invasive techniques or refined patient selection.

Contemporary controversies and perspectives in the staging and treatment of patients with lymph node metastasis from melanoma, especially with regards positive sentinel lymph node biopsy

The management of melanoma lymph node metastasis particularly when detected by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is still controversial. Results of the only randomized trial conducted to assess the therapeutic value of SLNB, the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-1), have not conclusively proven the effectiveness of this procedure but are interpreted by the authors and guidelines as indicating SLNB is standard of care. After surgery, interferon alpha had a small survival benefit and radiotherapy has limited effectiveness for patient at high-risk of regional recurrence. New drugs, including immune modulating agents and targeted therapies, already shown to be effective in patients with distant metastasis, are being evaluated in the adjuvant setting. In this regard, ensuring high quality of surgery through the identification of reliable quality assurance indicators and improving the homogeneity of prognostic stratification of patients entered onto clinical trials is paramount. Here, we review the controversial issues regarding the staging and treatment of melanoma patients with lymph node metastasis, present a summary of important and potentially practice changing ongoing research and provide a commentary on what it all means at this point in time.

Dominant lymph drainage in the upper extremity and upper trunk region: evaluation of lymph drainage in patients with skin melanomas

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to evaluate the lymph drainage from the primary focus to the regional lymph nodes in patients with melanomas of the upper extremity and upper trunk region.

METHOD

The study is a retrospective study of 20 patients with upper extremity melanomas and 14 patients with upper trunk melanomas treated with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or sentinel lymph node biopsy at the hospital. ALND was performed in 14 cases. In these cases, 12 were curative dissections and 2 were elective dissections. The dominant lymph drainage patterns from the primary regions were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the upper extremity and upper trunk region melanomas, lymph drainage to Level I was determined in all cases. In these two regions there were no cases of lymph drainage to Level II not passing through Level I. Furthermore, there were no cases where sentinel lymph node or metastasis of the lymph nodes was clearly determined in Level III. Among the upper extremity melanomas, lymph drainages to the cubital (10 %) and mid-arm nodes (5 %) were established. Among the scapular region melanomas, lymph drainages to the supraclavicular nodes (25 %) were determined.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a dominant lymph drainage pattern of melanomas of the upper extremity and upper trunk region to Level I. No lymph node dissection of Level III in patients with melanomas of the upper extremity and upper trunk region is necessary unless preoperative examination determines a high possibility of metastasis-positive lymph nodes in level III.

Surgeons' opinions on lymphadenectomy in melanoma patients with positive sentinel nodes: a worldwide web-based survey

PURPOSE

A worldwide web-based survey was conducted among melanoma surgeons to investigate opinions about completion lymph node dissection (CLND) in patients with positive sentinel nodes (SN).

METHODS

A questionnaire was designed following input from a group of melanoma surgeons. Cognitive interviews and pilot testing were performed. Surgeons identified through a systematic-review of the SN and CLND literature were invited by email.

RESULTS

Of 337 surgeons, 193 (57.2 %) from 25 countries responded (January-July 2011). Most respondents work in melanoma (30.1 %) and surgical oncology (44.6 %) units. In patients with a positive SN, 169 (91.8 %) recommend CLND; the strength of the recommendation is mostly influenced by patient comorbidities (64.7 %) and SN tumor burden (59.2 %). Seventy-one responders enroll patients in the second Multicenter Selective-Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-2), and 64 of them (76 %) suggest entering the trial to majority of patients. In cases requiring neck CLND, level 1-5 dissection is recommended by 35 % of responders, whereas 62 % base the extent of dissection on primary site and lymphatic mapping patterns. Only inguinal dissection or ilioinguinal dissection is performed by 36 and 30 % of surgeons, respectively. The remaining 34 % select either procedure according to number of positive SNs, node of Cloquet status, and lymphatic drainage patterns. Most surgeons (81 %) perform full axillary dissections in positive SN cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of melanoma surgeons recommend CLND in SN-positive patients. Surgeons participating in the MSLT-2 suggest entering the trial to the majority of patients. More evidence is needed to standardize the extent of neck and groin CLND surgeries.