Proximal tibial resections and reconstructions: clinical outcome of 225 patients

A Rare Entity of the Anterior Chest Cage Rib Chondrosarcoma: A Case Report and Review of Literature

INTRODUCTION

Primary bone cancers, also called bone sarcomas, can arise anywhere in the body. Less than 1% of cancers are identified as primary bone cancers annually, and they are correlated with high rates of morbidity and death. Twenty to twenty-seven percent of primary malignant osseous neoplasms are chondrosarcomas, the rarest subtype of bone sarcomas. The incidence of chondrosarcomas in Saudi Arabia was less common than globally discovered chondrosarcomas, and only a few cases have been recorded. The most common presentation of the primary CS is to encompass the bony skeleton of the long bones of the lower extremities and the axial skeleton. Detecting primary CS in the anterior chest wall and the rib cage is rare. To our knowledge, chondrosarcomas of the ribs encroaching on the anterior chest are rare and have never been documented in Saudi Arabian or Middle East medical or surgical literature.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe a case of a 32-year-old female with chondrosarcoma of the left anterior 7th rib, with no other medical or surgical histories. Further work-up at the tertiary care center, including CT-scan, MRI, and detailed triple bone scan (nuclear scan) imaging and histological biopsy, revealed features of chondrosarcoma arising from the ribs and involving the surrounding soft tissue. The patient underwent en masse surgical resection with a 4cm margin, including the 6th rib and partial resection of the left hemidiaphragm and a small piece of the diaphragm. The patient was discharged without any inauspicious consequences.

CONCLUSION

In the current work, we comprehensively discussed a scarce case of the anterior chest wall chondrosarcoma affecting the rib. This case highlights the importance of early detection of a rare tumour using a toolkit diagnostic approach to provide successful management and caring of the patient. Consequently, this will guarantee encouraging outcomes and thus stress the fruitful role of the surgery as the best curative modality in chondrosarcoma patients.

Survival and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty in children with proximal tibial osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for correcting limb-length discrepancy after limb-salvage reconstruction for proximal tibial osteosarcoma in children have several limitations. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility, complications, prognosis, and clinical outcomes of reconstruction using hemiarthroplasty after tumor resection in pediatric patients with proximal tibial osteosarcoma.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive retrospective analysis of the data of pediatric patients with osteosarcoma of the proximal tibia who underwent surgery between December 2008 and November 2018 at our center. We enrolled 49 consecutive patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty. The cruciate ligaments of all patients were reconstructed using special spacers, and the medial and lateral collateral ligaments of the knee and joint capsule were reconstructed using a mesh. Postoperatively, if the unequal length of both lower limbs exceeded 4 cm or knee instability occurred, a second-stage surgery was performed for limb lengthening and replacing the distal femoral prosthesis. We analyzed the oncological prognosis, complications of hemiarthroplasty, postoperative stability, and postoperative function.

RESULTS

The follow-up period ranged between 11 and 159 months, with a median of 84 (62, 129) months. The overall 5-year survival rate was 83.2%. Thirty-nine patients survived at the end of the follow-up period with 34 prostheses (87.2%). The overall prosthesis survival rate was 87.4% after 5 years, indicating the long-term benefits of the procedure. Limb length was measured in 28 adult patients. The average limb-length discrepancy was 33 ± 15 mm with a median of 33 mm (21, 47); the femur and tibia caused a discrepancy of 8.5 ± 9.9 mm and 24.8 ± 15.5 mm, respectively. The patients had 30-135° of knee motion, with a mean of 82 ± 24°. The femoral tibial angle was greater on the affected side than on the healthy side, with a mean difference of 4.5°±3.6°. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 25 ± 3. Five patients underwent second-stage distal femoral prosthesis replacement, with mean MSTS scores of 24 ± 2 and 28 ± 1 before and after second-stage surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemiarthroplasty in children reduces limb-length discrepancy in adulthood by rebuilding cruciate ligaments, lateral collateral ligaments, and the joint capsule, thereby improving knee stability.

Proximal tibial replacement with megaprosthesis in the setting of proximal tibial nonunion: A case report

Background

Fracture nonunion is a major concern among an orthopaedic patient population, especially in those who have sustained traumatic fractures involving the tibia. Strong risk factors for nonunion include age, smoking history, and a poor diet. The incidence of nonunion also increases with each additional failed surgical intervention.

Methods

Our retrospective case study involved 56-year-old woman with a history of chronic low back pain, osteopenia, malnutrition, smoking, marijuana use, and alcohol use, who presented with a proximal tibia fracture after a fall, initial treatment included temporization with multiplanar external fixation and subsequent internal fixation. Five weeks later, she presented with atrophic nonunion. She subsequently underwent multiple unsuccessful surgeries to address her nonunion, including open repair with bone grafting and multiplanar external fixation for bone transport. Ultimately, the nonunion was addressed by proximal tibia replacement with megaprosthesis with excellent clinical results.

Results and conclusion

Replacement of a proximal tibia with megaprosthesis is a viable option for limb salvage, especially when all alternative treatments have been unsuccessful.

The survival and complication profiles of the Compress® Endoprosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background/purpose

This study aimed to summarize the survival and complication profiles of the compress® endoprosthesis (CPS) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Online databases (PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science) were searched from inception to November 2023. Trials were included that involved the use of CPS for endoprosthetic replacement in patients with massive segmental bone defects. Patients' clinical characteristics and demographic data were extracted using a standardized form. The methodological quality of included 13 non-comparative studies was assessed on basis of the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). All the available Kaplan-Meier curves in the included studies were digitized and combined using Engauge-Digitizer software and the R Project for Statistical Computing.

Results

The meta-analysis of thirteen included studies indicated: the all-cause failure rates of CPS were 26.3 % after surgery, in which the occurrence rates of aseptic loosening were 5.8 %. And the incidences of other complications were as follows: soft tissue failure (1.8 %), structure failure (8.2 %), infection (9.5 %), tumor progression (1.1 %). The 1-, 4-, and 8-year overall survival rates for all-cause failure with 95 % CI were 89 % (86 %-92 %), 75 % (71 %-79 %) and 65 % (60 %-70 %), respectively. The estimated mean survival time of all-cause failure was 145 months (95 % CI, 127-148 months), and the estimated median survival time of all-cause failure was 187 months (95 % CI, 135-198 months). The 1-, 4-, and 8-year overall survival rates of aseptic loosening with 95 % CI were 96 % (94 %-98 %), 91 % (87 %-95 %) and 88 % (83 %-93 %), respectively. The estimated mean survival time of aseptic loosening was 148 months (95 % CI, 137-153 months).

Conclusion

CPS's innovative spring system promotes bone ingrowth by providing immediate and high-compression fixation, thereby reducing the risk of aseptic loosening caused by stress shielding and particle-induced osteolysis. CPS requires less residual bone mass for reconstructing massive segmental bone defects and facilitates easier revision due to its non-cemented fixation. In addition, the survival rate, estimated mean survival time, and complication rates of CPS are not inferior to those of common endoprosthesis.

Characteristics and Epidemiology of Megaprostheses Infections: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Megaprostheses were first employed in oncological orthopedic surgery, but more recently, additional applications have arisen. These implants are not without any risks and device failure is quite frequent. The most feared complication is undoubtedly the implants' infection; however, the exact incidence is still unknown. This systematic review aims to estimate in the current literature the overall incidence of megaprosthesis infections and to investigate possible risk/protective factors.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search for studies published from July 1971 to December 2023 using specific keywords. To be included, studies needed to report either the megaprosthesis anatomical site, and/or whether the megaprosthesis was coated, and/or the surgical indication as oncological or non-oncological reasons.

RESULTS

The initial literature search resulted in 1281 studies. We evaluated 10,456 patients and the overall infection rate was 12%. In cancer patients, the infection rate was 22%, while in non-oncological patients, this was 16% (trauma 12%, mechanical failure 17%, prosthetic joint infections 26%). The overall infection rates comparing coated and uncoated implants were 10% and 12.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of megaprosthesis implants is increasing considerably. In traumatological patients, the infection rate is lower compared to all the other subgroups, while the infection rate remains higher in the cancer patient group. As these devices become more common, focused studies exploring epidemiological data, clinical outcomes, and long-term complications are needed to address the uncertainties in prevention and management.

Risk factors for peri-megaprosthetic joint infections in tumor surgery: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Peri-megaprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in tumor surgery are complex and challenging complications that significantly impact the outcomes of the patients. The occurrence of PJI poses a substantial threat to the success of these operations. This review aims to identify and summarize the risk factors associated with PJI in tumor surgery with megaprosthetic reconstruction as well as to determine the overall risk of PJI in limb salvage surgery.

METHODS

A thorough examination of published literature, scrutinizing the incidence of PJI in tumor prostheses after limb salvage surgery was done. Research studies that documented the incidence of PJI in tumor patients who underwent limb salvage surgery, and explored the risk factors associated with the occurrence of PJI were deemed eligible.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies were included in the analysis and underwent comprehensive examination. After the exploration of key parameters, several significant risk factors for PJI concerning the type of implant coating, surgical site characteristics, patient demographics, and procedural factors were recorded.

DISCUSSION

The findings underscore the need for a nuanced approach in managing tumor patients undergoing limb salvage surgery and megaprosthetic reconstruction, with emphasis on individualized risk assessments and individualized preventive strategies.

Rare case of chondrosarcoma of the manubrium sterni: Management challenges and insights (a surgical case report)

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Chondrosarcoma of the manubrium sterni is an exceedingly rare localization of chondrosarcoma. Its treatment poses a significant therapeutic challenge due to the tumor's proximity to the mediastinal organs and the clavicles. This challenge is magnified when the inner ends need to be resected due to tumor contact with the sternoclavicular joints and, more critically, during the reconstruction of the thoracic wall.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 71-year-old female with a 45x42x51 mm chondrosarcoma of the manubrium sterni, extending to both sternoclavicular joints. The diagnosis was confirmed cytologically and histologically after an ultrasound-guided biopsy. A surgical strategy involving en bloc resection of the manubrium sterni, the internal ends of both clavicles, and the first two ribs, followed by sternal reconstruction using a synthetic manubrial plate and titanium costal staples without clavicular bridging, was indicated and executed.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

This case outlines the surgical considerations and techniques adopted for this complex procedure, emphasizing the operative planning and interdisciplinary collaboration required for a successful outcome.

CONCLUSION

At 18 months post-surgery, the patient demonstrated favorable clinical and radiological progress, indicating a positive response to the treatment strategy employed.

Functional audit of the use of megaprosthesis for limb reconstruction in musculoskeletal tumors - A retrospective single-center study

Introduction

Medical advancements in musculoskeletal oncology has significantly reduced the mortality rate associated with limb-sparing surgery, making it comparable to amputation. The use of modular megaprosthesis for sarcoma treatment has now become a standard practice. However, these non-biological implants are not without their complications.

Materials and methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all patients who underwent wide resection of locally aggressive and malignant bone tumors, followed by reconstruction with megaprosthesis between January 2018 and January 2023 at tertiary care hospital. Patients were evaluated based on oncological outcomes, functional outcomes, and complications with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months.

Results

The study included a total of 30 patients, comprising 16 males and 14 females, with a mean age of 33.6 ± 15.6 years. They all underwent wide resection and reconstruction with megaprosthesis. Diagnosis among the patients included 19 cases of giant cell tumors, 5 cases of osteosarcomas, 2 cases of metastatic bone tumors, and 1 case each of chondrosarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, multiple myeloma, and chondromyxoid fibroma. These tumors were predominantly located in the distal femur (15 patients) and proximal tibia (12 patients). The average follow-up period was 33 ± 21 months, resulting in an average final Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score of 81 % ± 9 %. Complications were observed in 21 patients, with infection being the most common, specifically Type 4 (10 patients, 37 %), followed by Type 1 (4 patients, 13 %) and Type 3 (4 patients, 13 %). Two patients (7 %) experienced Type 5 complications, while three succumbed to their illnesses. Additionally, two patients required amputation, one due to local recurrence and the other due to a deep-seated infection.

Conclusion

Megaprosthesis is a viable reconstruction option following wide resection of bone tumors. Infection remains the most common issue, and cost poses a significant challenge.

What to improve: Results of fixed-hinge knee endoprosthesis reconstructions over 40 years in a single tumor center

INTRODUCTION

Over the past decades, numerous structural changes in implants, medical treatments, and surgical techniques have been made for Malignant Bone Tumors (MBT) around the knee. However, the overall care improvement is still unclear. The method is crucial when analyzing outcomes in surveys involving tumors, and a thorough assessment of the mortality is mandatory because death acts as competing event. The aims of this study were: 1) a comprehensive and longitudinal assessment of the revisions with an extensive follow-up and adequate methods; 2) a complete mortality review to consider competing risks.

HYPOTHESIS

The hypothesis was that some prosthesis's structural improvements were made while the surgical toll increased as well as an improvement of mortality was also expected.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Analyses were performed on 248 patients with MBT (mean follow-up was 8.7 years, surgeries between 1972 and 2017). Three prosthesis models were successively used over time: 120 Guepar (older model), 42 Tornier, and 86 Stanmore (more recent model). The primary outcome was the assessment of revisions sorted out according to Henderson: type-1 soft-tissue failures or instability, type-2 aseptic loosening, type-3 structural failures, type-4 periprosthetic infections, type-5 tumoral progression. Death and amputations were considered as competing events. An extensive assessment of mortality was performed by merging the dataset with the French register of Deaths (INSEE). Cumulative probabilities were computed at 2, 5, 10, and 15 years and compared with Gray's tests.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival was, 80% (95% CI: 73-87) for Guepar, 69% (95% CI: 56-84) for Tornier, and 71% (95% CI: 62-82) for Stanmore (p=0.4). The 5-year cumulative risks for type-1 were 5% (95% CI: 1-9), 9% (95% CI: 0-18), and 17% (95% CI: 9-25) for Guepar, Tornier, and Stanmore, respectively (p=0.01). The 15-year cumulative risks for type-2 were 22% (95% CI: 15-39), 8% (95% CI: 0-17) and 8% (95% CI: 2-14) for Guepar, Tornier, and Stanmore, respectively (p=0.10). Ten patients had an implant failure, nine Guepar, and one Tornier. The 5-year cumulative risks for type-4 were 7% (95% CI: 2-12), 19% (95% CI: 7-31), and 12% (95% CI: 5-18) for Guepar, Tornier, and Stanmore, respectively (p=0.08). There were 29 tumoral progressions; the 15-year risks were 16% (95% CI: 2-22), 2% (95% CI: 0-7%), and 12% (95% CI: 4-19%) for Guepar, Tornier, and Stanmore, respectively (p=0.08). No difference whatsoever was found between the proximal tibial and distal femur.

CONCLUSION

There were some improvements in prosthesis design (forged steel instead of cast steel) and probably also in cemented stem fixation, but not in prosthetic joint infection and local recurrence over forty years. The overall mortality did not change significantly over the last 40 years amongst this specific cohort of patients who benefited from a hinge reconstruction prosthesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; comparative case series with sensibility analysis.

Functional Outcome Following Proximal Tibial Osteosarcoma Resection and Reconstruction by Modular Endoprosthesis

PURPOSE

The proximal tibia is a common location for osteosarcoma. Modular endoprosthesis is a popular reconstructive option, yet it has been associated with many complications. Our study aimed to evaluate the functional outcome and complications of proximal tibial osteosarcoma patients treated by limb salvage using modular endoprosthesis.

METHODS

A retrospective study of a prospective database was performed during the period between January 2000 and July 2017. Fifty-five patients with proximal tibial osteosarcoma underwent resection and modular endoprosthetic reconstruction. The functional outcome was evaluated using the Musculoskeletal tumor society scoring system and knee range of motion. Postoperative complications were classified according to Henderson classification; Type 1 (soft tissue failure), Type 2 (aseptic loosening), Type 3 (structural failure), Type 4 (infection) and Type 5 (local tumor progression).

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 71.69 ± 49.76 months. The mean musculoskeletal tumor society score was 26.5 ± 2.22; the mean range of motion was 72.63 ± 25.07, and the mean extension lag was 15.09 ± 15.38. Type 1, type 2, type 3, type 4, and type 5 complications occurred in 7.3%, 14.5%, 21.8%, 23.6%, and 5.5%, respectively. Chest metastasis developed in 10 patients (18.2%). The estimated 5-year and 10-year survival rates for the treated patients were 83.6% and 79.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal tibial osteosarcoma reconstruction with a modular endoprosthesis is a reliable treatment option for retaining limb function. Most complications are manageable.

The history of resection prosthesis

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this historical review is to highlight the progression and development of prosthetic reconstruction with a focus on the modular distal femur with hinged total knee arthroplasty.

METHOD

Scientific literature was searched for descriptions of endoprosthetic reconstruction of the extremities to provide a thorough overview of the subject, focusing the research on the evolution of limb salvage of the distal femur.

RESULTS

After the first works of Gluck and Giordano, with ivory and metal and the pioneer shoulder prosthesis by Pean in the late 1890s, a great advancement was brought by reconstructions performed for injured soldiers of the Great War. By the 1940s, replacement of all the main joints had been attempted, and documented.

DISCUSSION

Walldius in the 1950s developed a fully constrained hinge knee, offering for the first time a consistent and replicable method of substituting the joint. In 1953, Shiers' prosthesis allowed for good flexion and extension. Stanmore and GUEPAR group prosthesis in the 1960s were the first to have a different right and left side model. The rotating hinge was developed in 1978 by Walker, with the innovative concept of six degrees of freedom. Between 1979 and 1982, Kotz developed the modular segmental replacement that, added to a fixed hinge knee, permitted the revolutionary creation of the modern distal femur replacement.

CONCLUSION

The study of the materials and mechanical solutions that was brought to the modern distal femur resection prosthesis is a good example of a virtuous multidisciplinary teamwork between orthopaedic surgeons, anatomists, and biomechanical engineers.

Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia for oncological conditions

Aims

The proximal tibia (PT) is the anatomical site most frequently affected by primary bone tumours after the distal femur. Reconstruction of the PT remains challenging because of the poor soft-tissue cover and the need to reconstruct the extensor mechanism. Reconstructive techniques include implantation of massive endoprosthesis (megaprosthesis), osteoarticular allografts (OAs), or allograft-prosthesis composites (APCs).

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of clinical data relating to patients who underwent proximal tibial arthroplasty in our regional bone tumour centre from 2010 to 2018.

Results

A total of 76 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Mean age at surgery was 43.2 years (12 to 86 (SD 21)). The mean follow-up period was 60.1 months (5.4 to 353). In total 21 failures were identified, giving an overall failure rate of 27.6%. Prosthesis survival at five years was 75.5%, and at ten years was 59%. At last follow-up, mean knee flexion was 89.8° (SD 36°) with a mean extensor lag of 18.1° (SD 24°). In univariate analysis, factors associated with better survival of the prosthesis were a malignant or metastatic cancer diagnosis (versus benign), with a five- and ten-year survival of 78.9% and 65.7% versus 37.5% (p = 0.045), while in-hospital length of stay longer than nine days was also associated with better prognosis with five- and ten-year survival rates at 84% and 84% versus 60% and 16% (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, only in-hospital length of stay was associated with longer survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.66).

Conclusion

We have shown that proximal tibial arthroplasty with endoprosthesis is a safe and reliable method for reconstruction in patients treated for orthopaedic oncological conditions. Either modular or custom implants in this series performed well.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(9):733–740.

Evaluation of tumor-prostheses over time: Complications, functional outcome, and comparative statistical analysis after resection and reconstruction in orthopedic oncologic conditions in the lower extremities

Objectives:

Previous multicenter studies report variable outcomes and failure rates after tumor-prosthetic reconstructions. The purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate implant survival, limb survival, and functional outcome in a cohort of patients who underwent resection of primary malignancies or aggressive benign bone tumors and reconstruction with modern tumor-prostheses in the lower extremities and (2) to provide comparison to a historical cohort on previous generations of tumor-prostheses from the same center.

Methods:

A longitudinal retrospective single-center study of 72 consecutive patients (F/M = 30/42), mean age = 44 (range = 7–84) years with bone, soft tissue sarcoma adjacent to bone (n = 69), and aggressive benign bone tumors (n = 3) having surgery between 2006 and 2016 with bone resection and reconstruction with tumor-prostheses were compared to a historical cohort from1985 to 2005. Revisions were classified as major and minor revisions. Causes of failure were classified according to the Henderson classification. Fine and Gray competing risk analysis was used for assessing cumulative incidence for implant revision and limb amputation. Functional outcome was evaluated with Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score system.

Results:

Forty-seven patients were alive at the end of the study. Mean follow-up was 6 years (range = 2–13 years). Ten-year cumulative risk of major revision was 18% (95% confidence interval = 9%–28%). Deep infection and recurrence of tumor caused most revisions in modern tumor-prostheses. Ten-year cumulative incidence of limb amputation was 11% (95% confidence interval = 3%–18%). According to the Henderson classification, the overall predominant failure mode was non-mechanical (n = 20, 51%). Mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score was 20 (67%) (range = 0–30).

Conclusion:

A minimum of 2 years follow-up with modern modular tumor-prostheses demonstrated a relatively low risk of implant failure and amputation and also an acceptable functional outcome. No statistical difference of, implant survival, limb survival and functional outcome between tumor-prostheses over two time periods was observed, possibly explained by Type 2 error.

Functional outcome of infected endoprosthesis: A 20-year retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

Bone tumours are increasingly treated with limb-salvage surgeries. However, implant infection is a devastating complication, greatly affecting the functional outcome. Yet, data on functional outcome post-implant infection are scarce. This study aims to determine the functional outcome and implant survival of these patients.

METHODS

Patients' data on endoprosthetic replacement surgeries at our institution (January 1996-December 2016) was retrospectively reviewed. Information was available for 161 patients and was analysed using SPSS and SMART Partial Least Squares. Functional outcome was determined using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) scoring system.

RESULTS

Both mean rank MSTS (33.14 vs 87.02) and TESS (48.17 vs 85.13) scores were significantly lower in the infected group. These differences remained statistically significant after excluding amputation and rotationplasty cases within the infected group. Even after the resolution of infection, both MSTS and TESS remained significantly higher in the non-infected group. However, analysis of the infected group showed no significant differences in functional outcome between persistent and resolved infections (implant in-situ). Age significantly impacted the functional outcome for both the non-infected and infected groups, while local recurrence and metastasis significantly impacted the non-infected cases. Local tumour recurrence was lower in infected endoprosthetic patients (8.3% vs 10.5%). 56% of infected implants were removed; the majority were treated with two-stage revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

Endoprosthesis infection worsens the overall functional outcome. Additional factors affecting functional outcome were age, presence of local recurrence and metastatic disease. Local tumour recurrence was lower amongst infected endoprosthesis cases, and >50% of infected implants were removed.

Revision surgeries for tumor endoprostheses around the knee joint: a mid-long-term follow-up of 20 cases

Background

Tumor endoprostheses of the knee joint after limb salvage surgery is associated with high rates of complications, which has introduced great challenges to a delayed revision surgery. The aim of the study was to summarize the failures, functional outcomes and prosthetic survival in revision tumor endoprostheses of the knee joint.

Methods

The clinical data of 20 patients with malignant tumors who received prosthetic revisions after limb salvage surgery from January, 2000 until January, 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The cohort was constituted of 11 male and 9 female patients with a mean age of 34.1 years (range, 16 to 66 years). Infection cases received two-stage revisions after removing prostheses initially, while all other cases received one-stage revisions. Revision reasons and complications were well documented and analyzed.

Results

All patients received complete follow-up with a mean time of 64.7 months (range, 27 to 155 months). A total of 6 (6/20, 30.0%) patients experienced a second complication after revision surgery, of whom, one patient with deep infection experienced repeated infections after prosthetic revision and received amputation surgery; one patient revised of prosthetic fracture experienced an infection and received a second-stage infection revision; one case revised of prosthetic loosening had deep infection receiving anti-infective therapy with prostheses still in position; one case having wound complication healed after receiving two times of debridement surgery; one MBGCT patient experienced a second aseptic loosening 6 years after the initial loosening thus undergoing a second revision; a recurrent osteosarcoma patient died of pulmonary metastasis 3 years after revision surgery. Kaplan-Meier survival curve indicated a 5-year survival rate of initial prostheses was 75%. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS-93) score [20.9 (range, 15 to 27 scores)] at 1 year after revision surgeries was significantly improved (p < 0.001) when compared with the score [17.2 (range, 13 to 21 scores)] before revisions.

Conclusion

Prosthetic mechanical problems, aseptic loosening and infections were primary reasons for revisions after tumor endoprostheses of the knee joint. Although revision surgeries were complicated while still associated with high risk of failure, which remains the remedy strategy for limb salvage and functional recovery in those patients.

The functional outcome after tumor resection and endoprosthesis around the knee: a systematic review

The evidence for the functional outcome of endo- prosthetic replacement (EPR) after tumour resection has been from few cohort studies. A scoping search revealed no systematic review on patient reported outcome measures after EPR around the knee. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome of distal femoral and proximal tibial EPR after tumour resection. A systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines. The search identified 2560 articles from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science. 36 studies satisfying the selection criteria were included for data synthesis. Pooled analysis was performed for homogenous studies. Narrative synthesis was performed for all the studies due to heterogeneity in methodological and statistical analysis. Amongst the overall patient population of 2930, mean ages ranged from 18-66 years and the mean follow up periods in the studies ranged from 12 - 180 months. The weighted mean functional outcome was similar for patients who had DFEPR and PTEPR. The functional outcome scores of Rotating Hinge Knee implants (RHK) were significantly greater than that for Fixed Hinge Knee implants (FHK). The weighted mean functional outcome scores were higher after cemented fixation and after primary EPR procedures. The current evidence suggests that functional out- come after EPR in the knee is good, and RHK implants are better than FHK implants. Functional outcome after primary EPR was significantly better than following revision EPR, and this underscores the importance of minimising complications at the primary surgery.

Implant Survival, Clinical Outcome and Complications of Megaprosthetic Reconstructions Following Sarcoma Resection

Simple Summary

Malignant bone and soft tissue tumors are usually surgically removed with an envelope of healthy tissue as a barrier. If located in the long bones of the upper and lower extremity, this approach leads to a large bone defect commonly affecting a joint. One way to rebuild the bone defect and the neighboring joint is the use of a megaprosthesis that is anchored in the remaining bone comparable to a conventional joint replacement. In general this approach is popular as it provides early stability and allows the affected patient to begin rehabilitation early on. However, complications leading to long-term unplanned reoperation are common. This article provides an overview of current implant survival, types of complication and long-term outcomes of megaprostheses used following tumor resection.

Abstract

Megaprosthetic reconstruction of segmental bone defects following sarcoma resection is a frequently chosen surgical approach in orthopedic oncology. While the use of megaprostheses has gained popularity over the last decades and such implants are increasingly used for metastatic reconstructions and in non-tumor cases, there still is a high risk of long-term complications leading to revision surgery. This article investigates current implant survivorship, frequency and types of complications as well as functional outcomes of upper and lower limb megaprosthetic reconstructions.

Reconstruction of the extensor mechanism augmented with reverse transferred iliotibial band after proximal tibia tumor resection and mega-prosthetic replacement

BACKGROUND

The optimal procedure for functional reconstruction of the extensor mechanism after proximal tibia mega-prosthetic replacement remains unclear.

METHODS

Since 2006, 14 consecutive patients with aggressive bone tumors in the proximal tibia who underwent mega-prosthetic replacement were prospectively treated with reconstruction of the extensor mechanism using an ipsilateral iliotibial band. The surgical procedure consisted of wrapping the reversed iliotibial band around the tibia component, firmly suturing it to the remaining patellar tendon and tibialis anterior fascia, and covering it with a muscle flap. At the last follow up, the function was assessed based on extensor lag, active flexion of the knee, and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score. Patellar height was measured with the Insall-Salvati ratio (ISR) preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the last follow up.

RESULTS

At the last follow up, the extensor lag and active flexion in 14 patients averaged 2.5° and 86°, respectively. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score could be obtained in nine surviving patients at the last follow up and was a mean of 20.7 points. The mean ISR preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the last follow up was 1.04, 0.75, and 0.89, respectively. The extensor lag was not associated with the ISR value at any points, while reduced active flexion significantly correlated with a low ISR at the last follow up (P = 0.015). Four patients underwent additional surgeries due to postoperative infection, but none required eventual revision or amputation.

CONCLUSION

The extensor mechanism reconstruction with the reverse transferred iliotibial band for mega-prosthetic replacement after proximal tibia resection yielded reliable outcomes with functional benefit to stabilize active knee extension.

Pedicled fibular transfer for biologic knee extensor tendon reinsertion following proximal tibial resection in pediatric osteosarcoma: Long-term outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Proximal tibial sarcoma resections result in a reconstructive challenge, necessitating joint and extensor mechanism reconstruction. The gait and functional outcomes for children reconstructed with a combination of megaprosthesis and pedicled fibular flap for extensor mechanism reconstruction, are presented.

METHODS

Four patients, aged 11-18 years old, were available for comprehensive analysis. The proximal tibial osteosarcoma was resected, and the reconstructive technique involved a megaprosthesis for the knee joint, used in combination with a pedicled fibula flap as a biologic structure for reinsertion of the knee extensor mechanism. Outcomes were measured with three-dimensional gait analysis and patient questionnaires.

RESULTS

Minor postoperative wound issues occurred in some patients, requiring debridement with skin grafting. One patient fractured their transferred fibula, requiring fixation. The follow up period ranged from 1.7 to 24 years postoperatively. The longevity and quality of reconstructions were strong, measured by both objective and patient-reported outcomes. All patients reported independent walking >500 m in the Functional Mobility Scale and rated their walking as a nine or 10 (out of 10) on the Functional Assessment Questionnaire. Knee society scoring revealed overall satisfaction rate of 75-80%. No patients required gait aids. The gait profile analysis revealed effective gait patterns, with patterns deviating 5.4-7° from "typical gait." Deviations >6.5° are considered abnormal.

CONCLUSION

The long-term results of combining a megaprosthesis with a pedicled fibula flap for extensor reinsertion, revealed a high level of independent function. The patients performed well, without the need for aids, and gait study evidence of minimal gait deviations.

Surgical treatment of skeletal metastases in proximal tibia: a multicenter case series of 74 patients

Background and purpose - The proximal tibia is a rare site for metastatic bone disease and is a challenging anatomical site to manage due to the proximity to the knee joint and poor soft tissue envelope. We investigated implant survival and complications of different surgical strategies in the treatment of proximal tibia pathological fractures.Patients and methods - The study comprised a 4 medical center, retrospective analysis of 74 patients surgically treated for metastases of the proximal tibia. Patient records were reviewed to identify outcome, incidence, and type of complications as well as contributing factors.Results - Reconstruction techniques comprised cement-augmented osteosynthesis (n = 33), tumor prosthesis (n = 31), and total knee arthroplasty with long cemented stems (n = 10). Overall implant survival was 88% at 6 months and 1 year, and 67% at 3 years. After stratification by technique, the implant survival was 82% and 71% at 1 and 3 years with tumor prosthesis, 100% at 1 and 3 years with total knee arthroplasty, and 91% at 1 year and 47% at 3 years with osteosynthesis. Preoperative radiotherapy decreased implant survival. Complications were observed in 19/74 patients. Treatment complications led to amputation in 5 patients.Interpretation - In this study, the best results were seen with both types of prothesis reconstructions, with good implant survival, when compared with treatment with osteosynthesis. However, patients treated with tumor prosthesis showed an increased incidence of postoperative infection, which resulted in poor implant survival. Osteosynthesis with cement is a good alternative for patients with short expected survival whereas endoprosthetic replacement achieved good medium-term results.

Functional and radiologic results of extensor mechanism reconstruction methods following proximal tibial modular endoprosthetic reconstructions: Direct versus medical textile augmented reattachment

BACKGROUND

Following proximal tibial resection and modular endoprosthetic reconstruction, extensor mechanism can be reconstructed with different techniques. This study compares direct reattachment (DR) with medical textile augmented reattachment (MTAR) methods in terms of functional results and radiological results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-five patients (34 male, 21 female) operated between 1990 and 2015 with a minimum follow up of 24 months in a single center were evaluated retrospectively. The median age was 18 years (range: 9-64). The reconstruction was performed via MTAR (polypropylene mesh, Trevira) in 23 patients and DR in 32 patients. Incidence and degree of extension lag, degree of flexion and development of postoperative patella alta were evaluated at 3, 6 and 24 months.

RESULTS

The mean follow up was 78.5 months. Extension lag incidence at 24 months was 71.9% in the DR group compared with 43.5% in the MTAR group (P < 0.05).Theextensionlagratiosat 24 months in DR was 0-5° in 8.7% (n = 2), 6-10° in 21.7% (n = 5), 11-15° in 17.4% (n = 4) and > 15° in 52.2% (n = 12), respectively. Extension lag ratios at 24 months in MTAR were 0-5° in 12.5% (n = 4), 6-10° in 6.3% (n = 2), 11-15° in 6.3% (n = 2) and > 15° in 6.3% (n = 2). The mean MSTS score in DR group was 20.7 compared with 23.2 in the MTAR group (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

MTAR is associated with a lower incidence as well as a lower degree of extension lag. The flexion range and the incidence of patella alta are not statistically different between the groups. MSTS scores of MTAR group are significantly higher than DR group at 2-year follow up.

Successful mid- to long-term outcome after reconstruction of the extensor apparatus using proximal tibia-patellar tendon composite allograft

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to assess the outcomes of extensor mechanism reconstruction with proximal tibia-patellar tendon composite allograft.

METHODS

24 consecutive patients treated with allograft-prosthetic composite for proximal tibia tumour resection and a conventional total knee arthroplasty were included. Extensor mechanism reconstruction was performed with a proximal tibia-patellar tendon composite allograft and the suture of the donor tendon to the remnant native patellar tendon. Function was evaluated by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score (MSTS) and range of motion. Western Ontario and MacMaster University (WOMAC) and visual analogue scale for pain also were used.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 11.7 (range 3-15) years, mean MSTS score was 22.4 (range 20-30), mean flexion was 94.0° (range 84°-110°), and mean extension lag was 7.2° (range 0°-18°). The mean VAS-pain was 4.3 (range 2-6), and WOMAC score was 72.4 (range 58-100). There was no failure of the reconstructed extensor mechanism.

CONCLUSION

Patellar tendon reconstruction with allogeneic tissue from the proximal tibia allograft sutured to the recipient's remnant patellar tendon provides the mechanical support needed for healing of the reconstructed extensor mechanism with a substantial functional benefit to stabilize active knee extension and successful reconstruction survival at long-term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

One-Stage Soft Tissue Reconstruction Following Sarcoma Excision: A Personalized Multidisciplinary Approach Called "Orthoplasty"

Background and Objectives. Wide surgical resection is a relevant factor for local control in sarcomas. Plastic surgery is mandatory in demanding reconstructions. We analyzed patients treated by a multidisciplinary team to evaluate indications and surgical approaches, complications and therapeutic/functional outcomes. Methods. We analyzed 161 patients (86 males (53%), mean age 56 years) from 2006 to 2017. Patients were treated for their primary tumor (120, 75.5%) or after unplanned excision/recurrence (41, 25.5%). Sites included lower limbs (36.6%), upper limbs (19.2%), head/neck (21.1%), trunk (14.9%) and pelvis (8.1%). Orthoplasty has been considered for flaps (54), skin grafts (42), wide excisions (40) and other procedures (25). Results. At a mean follow-up of 5.3 years (range 2–10.5), patients continuously showed no evidence of disease (NED) in 130 cases (80.7%), were alive with disease (AWD) in 10 cases (6.2%) and were dead with disease (DWD) in 21 cases (13.0%). Overall, 62 patients (38.5%) developed a complication (56 minor (90.3%) and 6 major (9.7%)). Flap loss occurred in 5/48 patients (10.4%). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) was 74.8 ± 14 and 79.1 ± 13, respectively. Conclusions. Orthoplasty is a combined approach effective in management of sarcoma patients, maximizing adequate surgical resection, limb salvaging and functional recovery. One-stage reconstructions are technically feasible and are not associated with increased risk of complications.

The Effectiveness and Safety of General and Spinal Anesthesia on Systemic Inflammatory Response in Patients with Tumor-Type Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The anesthesia procedure in tumor-type total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may contribute to systemic inflammatory response. Therefore, we aim to investigate the effectiveness and safety of general and spinal anesthesia in patients with tumor-type TKA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with tumors around the knee undergoing primary unilateral TKA were randomly divided into the general anesthesia group (n = 13) and spinal anesthesia group (n = 12). Knee joint HSS scores and Western Ontario and McMaster University osteoarthritis index (WOMAC osteoarthritis) were recorded before surgery and 12 months after surgery. Visual analogue scale, C-reactive protein (CPR), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) concentration were measured preoperatively (T0), on the day of the operation (T1), and on the first day (T2) after the operation. Complications in the two groups were recorded.

RESULTS

The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, tourniquet time, and complication rate were not significantly different between the general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia groups (all p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in CPR (7.6 ± 3.1, 8.1 ± 4.1, 91.3 ± 24.2 vs. 7.1 ± 2.9, 7.6 ± 3.8, 85.1 ± 19.3 pg/mL, respectively), IL-8 (12.2 ± 6.6, 13.4 ± 7.3, 19.2 ± 10.5 vs. 11.9 ± 5.7, 12.9 ± 8.6, 22.2 ± 12.4 pg/mL, respectively), and TNF-α (2.5 ± 1.7, 2.2 ± 1.9, 2.8 ± 2.1 vs. 2.4 ± 1.3, 2.7 ± 2.1, 2.9 ± 1.6 pg/mL, respectively) between the two groups at T0, T1, and T2 (all p > 0.05). There were no statistical differences in pre- and postoperative HSS knee scores (39.78 ± 11.3, 90.24 ± 15.3 vs. 42.68 ± 12.5, 91.21 ± 16.3) and WOMAC indexes (49.89 ± 7.9, 25.12 ± 6.2 vs. 51.3 ± 8.3, 23.15 ± 5.3) between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

General anesthesia and spinal anesthesia in patients with tumor-type TKA had the same effectiveness and safety.

Survival and complications in hinged knee reconstruction prostheses after distal femoral or proximal tibial tumor resection: A retrospective study of 161 cases

INTRODUCTION

Hinged knee megaprostheses are mainly used for reconstruction after tumor resection. They may incur complications, but this has not been assessed in the French literature, except in small series at short follow-up. We therefore conducted a large-scale nationwide multicenter retrospective study with a minimum 5 years' follow-up. The objectives were (1) to compare survival between distal femoral and proximal tibial reconstruction prostheses, and (2) to analyze complications and failure.

HYPOTHESIS

Distal femoral hinged reconstruction prostheses show longer survival with fewer complications than proximal tibial prostheses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred sixty-one patients were included: 118 in the distal femoral group, and 43 in the proximal tibial group. Tumors were mostly osteosarcomas (90 cases) or chondrosarcomas (31 cases). Mean age was 37 years (range, 12-86 years). Complications were assessed on the Henderson classification. Failure was defined by prosthesis anchor exchange or amputation.

RESULTS

At a mean 9 years' follow-up (range, 5-23 years), implant survival was longer in the distal femoral group: 5- and 10-year survival, 84% [95% CI, 75-89] and 70% [95% CI, 59-79] versus 74% [95% CI, 69-85] and 43% [95% CI, 23-61] (p=0.02). Revision surgery for complications mainly concerned aseptic loosening (19%, 30 cases) or deep infection (16%, 25 cases) and more often involved the proximal tibia (65% vs. 43%, 28 vs. 51 cases; OR 2.4 [95% CI, 1.2-5.1]; p=0.02).

DISCUSSION

Hinged knee reconstruction prosthesis is a solution in tumoral pathology, but with a high risk of complications (loosening and infection) and a higher failure rate in the proximal tibial reconstruction prosthesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, case series.

Rotating-hinge knee prosthesis as a viable option in primary surgery: Literature review & meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rotating-hinge knee replacements are usually reserved for revision surgeries, when the extent of soft tissue loss makes a constrained implant more suitable. They remain an uncommon choice in primary surgery when the soft tissue loss is not as extensive.

METHODS

We completed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess patients who underwent a Total Knee Replacement (TKR) with the rotating-hinge prosthesis in the primary setting. We searched PubMed and Embase for articles published in the ten years prior June 2017: Prosthesis survival rates, causes of failure, and clinical/functional scores were the primary outcomes. Twenty-one articles met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Articles were grouped into (1) non-tumour (n=11) and (2) tumour indications (n=10). Survival data was summarized in forest plots, generated using Stata.

RESULTS

We found that for certain indications the prosthesis has impressive survival rates and functional outcomes. Short-term (1-5 year) prosthesis survival in non-tumour cases was 92% (95% CI, 87-98%) and 77% (95% CI, 68-87%) in tumour cases. Mid-term (6-10 year) survival was 82% (95% CI, 74-89%) and 69% (95% CI, 57-81%) in non-tumour and tumour studies respectively. In analysis of clinical scores, patients showed a significant improvement in their pain score. Infection was the most commonly cited cause of prosthesis failure in both non-tumour and tumour studies, attributing to 31.5% and 37.6% of failures respectively. Aseptic loosening, dislocation and fracture were also commonly cited complications.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that the rotating-hinge knee prosthesis is a viable option in primary surgery when there is extensive soft tissue destruction surrounding the joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Proximal Tibial Reconstruction After Tumor Resection: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

The proximal part of the tibia is a common location for primary bone tumors, and many options for reconstruction exist following resection. This anatomic location has a notoriously high complication rate, and each available reconstruction method is associated with unique risks and benefits. The most commonly utilized implants are metallic endoprostheses, osteoarticular allografts, and allograft-prosthesis composites. There is a current lack of data comparing the outcomes of these reconstructive techniques in the literature.

METHODS

A systematic review of peer-reviewed observational studies evaluating outcomes after proximal tibial reconstruction was conducted, including both aggregate and pooled data sets and utilizing a Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) review for quality assessment. Henderson complications, amputation rates, implant survival, and functional outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 1,643 patients were identified from 29 studies, including 1,402 patients who underwent reconstruction with metallic endoprostheses, 183 patients who underwent reconstruction with osteoarticular allografts, and 58 patients who underwent with reconstruction with allograft-prosthesis composites. The mean follow-up times were 83.5 months (range, 37.3 to 176 months) for the metallic endoprosthesis group, 109.4 months (range, 49 to 234 months) for the osteoarticular allograft group, and 88.8 months (range, 49 to 128 months) for the allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction group. The mean patient age per study ranged from 13.5 to 50 years. Patients with metallic endoprostheses had the lowest rates of Henderson Type-1 complications (5.1%; p < 0.001), Type-3 complications (10.3%; p < 0.001), and Type-5 complications (5.8%; p < 0.001), whereas, on aggregate data analysis, patients with an osteoarticular allograft had the lowest rates of Type-2 complications (2.1%; p < 0.001) and patients with an allograft-prosthesis composite had the lowest rates of Type-4 complications (10.2%; p < 0.001). The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores were highest in patients with an osteoarticular allograft (26.8 points; p < 0.001). Pooled data analysis showed that patients with a metallic endoprosthesis had the lowest rates of sustaining any Henderson complication (23.1%; p = 0.009) and the highest implant survival rates (92.3%), and patients with an osteoarticular allograft had the lowest implant survival rates at 10 years (60.5%; p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoarticular allograft appears to lead to higher rates of Henderson complications and amputation rates when compared with metallic endoprostheses. However, functional outcomes may be higher in patients with osteoarticular allograft. Further work is needed using higher-powered randomized controlled trials to definitively determine the superiority of one reconstructive option over another. In the absence of such high-powered evidence, we encourage individual surgeons to choose reconstructive options based on personal experience and expertise.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Mid- to long-term results of allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction after removal of a distal femoral malignant tumor are comparable to those of the proximal tibia

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of allograft-prosthesis composite for reconstruction after malignant tumors at the distal femur and proximal tibia.

METHODS

Case-control study of 24 patients with distal femur tumor and 21 with proximal tibia tumor. Union of the allograft-host interface was assessed by the International Society of Limb Salvage criteria, and complications according Henderson. Functional outcome was evaluated by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) score, and pain by a visual analog scale.

RESULTS

The median follow-up in the femoral group was 11.4 (range 2.3-25.0) years, and 10.1 (range 2.2-25.0) in tibial group. Incorporation of the allograft was successful in more than 90% in both groups. Tumor location was not significant predictor for allograft failure in multivariate analysis. Aseptic prosthesis loosening occurred in two patients in either group, and another patient in the tibial group had a breakage of the tibial insert. Excluding local recurrences and amputations, the prosthesis survival at 10 years was 94.1% in the femoral group, and 83.3% in the tibial group (n.s.). For the patients with preserved limb, the median MSTS score was 23.6 in the femoral group and 22.8 in tibial group (n.s.). Likewise, there were no significant differences in median WOMAC score (n.s.) or VAS pain (n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

Allograft-prosthesis composite is an effective procedure for distal femur tumors related to the graft, prosthesis survival, and functional outcomes. The results are comparable to those for proximal tibial tumors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level III.

Fitness, Function, and Exercise Training Responses after Limb Salvage With a Lower Limb Megaprosthesis: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To describe the fitness, function, and exercise training responses of patients following reconstruction of the lower limb with a total femoral (TF), proximal femoral (PF), distal femoral (DF), or proximal tibial (PT) megaprosthesis. TYPE: Systematic review.

LITERATURE SURVEY

Five research databases were searched systematically for original studies published in English from 2006 to 2017 that reported fitness, functioning, or exercise training responses for one or more of the four types of lower limb megaprosthesis listed above.

METHODOLOGY

Methodologic quality was assessed using a 22-item modified STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) checklist.

SYNTHESIS

Of the 5342 articles retrieved, 28 met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies reported fitness outcomes, primarily in PT, with none in TF. Impaired knee extensor strength of the affected limb was reported following limb salvage with PF, DF, and PT megaprosthetics. Impaired flexibility was reported following limb salvage with DF and PT megaprosthetics. Functional outcomes were described in all studies and were most commonly reported using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) system score. Results indicated no clear difference in functional outcomes between megaprosthesis locations. No studies evaluated exercise training responses.

CONCLUSIONS

This review identified impairments of lower limb strength and flexibility following limb salvage with a lower limb megaprosthesis. Similarity in functional outcomes for all four reported megaprosthetic locations may indicate a lack of sensitivity in outcome measures, including the absence of items assessing higher-level functioning. Exercise interventions that aim to improve fitness and function in this population have not been evaluated but are required given increasing 5-year survival rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

[Application of proximal tibial hemiprosthesis replacement and second-stage revision for proximal tibial osteosarcoma in three children]

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of proximal tibial hemiprosthesis replacement in the first stage and prosthesis revision in the second stage in reducing the risk of length discrepancy of limbs in children with proximal tibial osteosarcoma.

Methods

Between 2009 and 2013, 3 children with conventional osteosarcoma at the proximal tibia (stage ⅡB) were treated. There were 2 boys and 1 girl. They were 12, 13, and 13 years old, respectively. After 4 courses of preoperative chemotherapy, the proximal tumor segmental resection and proximal tibial hemiprosthesis replacement were performed. Then the patients underwent prosthetic revision in the second stage when they were 20, 17, and 17 years old, respectively.

Results

All patients successfully completed two stages of operations. The length discrepancy of lower limb after the second stage operation were 19, 7, and 21 mm, respectively. Three patients were followed up 13, 3, and 27 months after the second stage operation, and the lower extremities functions were satisfactory. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 26, 27, and 25, respectively.

Conclusion

The proximal tibial hemiprosthesis replacement in the first stage combined with prosthesis revision in the second stage for treating the proximal tibia osteosarcoma in children can keep the distal femur growth ability, reduce the length discreapancy of lower limb, and obtain satisfactory stability and good function.

Lower Extremity Megaprostheses in Orthopaedic Oncology

The megaprosthesis is designed to reproduce the form and function of a removed or lost large segment of bone and accompanying soft tissues. Slow but substantial improvements in the design and surgical implementation of these devices have advanced the capacity to restore patients' functional abilities. The essential challenges include identifying the ideal materials, bonding these materials to bone and soft tissues, reproducing functional anatomy, and adapting to the growing skeleton. Failure of these devices can result from soft-tissue insufficiency, aseptic loosening, structural failures, infection, and tumor recurrence. The history of the use of megaprostheses in the pelvis, proximal femur, distal femur, total femur, and proximal tibia has shown that each anatomic area presents unique challenges. Improvements that have been made over the years will guide the development of the next generation of devices. Despite early high complication rates, these devices are a reasonable choice in the right patient.

Implant Survival and Complication Profiles of Endoprostheses for Treating Tumor Around the Knee in Adults: A Systematic Review of the Literature Over the Past 30 Years

BACKGROUND

Endoprosthetic replacement has become the mainstream method of reconstruction after tumor resection around the knee for decades, but there is a lack of comprehensive review evaluating the implant outcomes. We performed a systematic review to analyze the implant survival and complication profiles of distal femoral replacement (DFR) and proximal tibial replacement (PTR) in adults, and to evaluate the effects of different fixation methods and hinge mechanisms.

METHODS

A systematic review of 40 studies with 4748 DFR cases and 1713 PTR cases was performed after searching the PubMed and EMBASE databases. Results of the implant longevity, complications, and other relevant data were extracted, recategorized, and analyzed. An additional review of 227 cases of Compress DFR from 6 studies was also performed.

RESULTS

The mean 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year implant survival rates of DFR were 78.3%, 70.1%, 61.6%, and 38.3%, slightly higher than those of PTR (75%, 60%, 55.3%, and 25.1%). Aseptic loosening (8.8%) and infection (8.5%) were the most devastating complications in DFR, while in PTR it was infection (16.8%). Cemented or cementless fixation did not significantly affect implant survival or aseptic loosening rate. Rotating-hinge mechanism might improve long-term implant survival and reduce bushing wear, but not necessarily prevented aseptic loosening. The series Kotz modular femur and tibia replacement system/Howmedica modular replacement system/global modular replacement system was one of the most durable implants. The Compress DFR showed no superiority in implant survival and complication profiles over other brands of endoprostheses.

CONCLUSION

Short-term to mid-term implant survival of adult tumor endoprostheses around the knee is acceptable but long-term outcome remains unsatisfactory. Efforts should be made in reducing loosening and infection.

Tumour endoprosthesis replacement in the proximal tibia after intra-articular knee resection in patients with sarcoma and recurrent giant cell tumour

PURPOSE

Proximal tibia replacements are commonly associated with post-operative complications and poor functional results due to an insufficiency of the extensor mechanism.

METHODS

This study evaluated the clinical results with a special emphasis of the extensor mechanism reconstruction with a reattachment tube and complications after intra-articular resection of the proximal tibia and reconstruction with a tumour endoprosthesis (MUTARS®) in 98 patients (median age 18 years) with malignant bone tumours or giant cell tumours.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the limb survival rates were 94.9, 90.5 and 74.5% at one, two and ten years, respectively. Periprosthetic infection was the most common reason for secondary amputation (eight patients). The cumulative incidence rates of prosthetic failure (Henderson II-IV) were 18% at two years and 29% at five years post-operatively. An active extension deficit of more than 10° was noted in six patients only.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that limb salvage with tumour prostheses after intra-articular resection can achieve good functional results with an active extension of the knee in the majority of patients. While mechanical complications can be treated successfully with revision surgery, periprosthetic infection continues to be the main reason for secondary amputation.

Comparison between uncemented and cemented fixation for the tibial component in distal femoral replacement: a clinical and radiological study

PURPOSES

We performed a retrospective, cohort study to compare uncemented tibial fixation with cemented tibial fixation in distal femoral replacement (DFR).

METHODS

Sixty-two cases with uncemented tibial fixation and 58 cases with cemented tibial fixation were included. Inter-group comparisons were performed for baseline data, oncological and prosthetic outcomes, and changes of cortical thickness of tibial diaphysis. Radiological signs of bone adaptations around the uncemented tibial stem were identified through evaluation of plain films during follow-up.

RESULTS

Uncemented tibial fixation shortened operative duration by 26 minutes, achieved equivalent oncological and prosthetic outcomes, and helped preserve anterior cortical thickness of tibia compared with the cemented counterpart after a mean follow-up of over 40 months. Radiological signs of osseointegration and reactive line were observed in 64.3 and 17.9% cases with uncemented tibial fixation. The two signs had different patterns of distribution and no significant predisposing factors could be identified.

CONCLUSIONS

For DFR, the uncemented tibial fixation was safe and effective in functional reconstruction and in preservation of anterior cortex of tibial diaphysis. It could achieve osseointegration and might permit adaptive micromotion of the tibial stem post-operatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

level III Therapeutic.

Survival, complications and functional outcomes of cemented megaprostheses for high-grade osteosarcoma around the knee

PURPOSE

We initiated a retrospective study on the long-term survival of cemented endoprostheses for bone tumours around the knee to answer the following questions: (1) What was the survival of these patients? (2) What was the overall survival of cemented prostheses around the knee? (3) What types of failures were observed in these reconstructions? (4) Did the survival and complications vary according to the site of the implant? (5) What was the functional result after cemented prosthesis replacement around the knee?

METHODS

From January 2006 to December 2013, 108 consecutive patients with an average age of 25 years, who had mature bone development as evidenced by imaging examinations, underwent 108 cemented endoprosthetic knee replacements for osteosarcoma resection. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy using a multi-drug protocol consisting of high dose methotrexate (HDMTX), doxorubicin (ADM), cisplatin (DDP) and high dose ifosfamide (HDIFO). When extensor mechanism reconstruction was required, we ran nonabsorbable sutures through designated holes in the tibial component to fix detached hamstrings and the remaining ligaments in an imbricated fashion as well as reinforced the reconstruction with a medial gastrocnemius flap. Seventy-two (72/108, 66.7%) lesions were located in the distal femur and 36 (36/108, 33.3%) lesions at the proximal tibias. Nineteen patients were staged as IIA and 89 as IIB according to the Enneking staging system. The average follow-up was 53.3 months (range 12-125 months), with a minimum oncological follow-up of one year. Survival, prosthetic failure, complications and functional outcomes were recorded and reassessed at every visit after the primary operation.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, the oncologic results showed that 33 patients died from metastases, and local recurrence occurred in ten patients. The estimated overall five-year and eight-year survival rates were 71% (95% CI: 62.4-79.65%) and 67.2% (95% CI: 58-76.4%), respectively. In this study, a total of 51 complications occurred in 45 patients, and at the end of follow-up, 59 patients had prostheses in situ. The estimated overall five-year and eight-year implant survival rates were 77.7% (95% CI: 67.9-87.5%) and 54.5% (95% CI: 31.4-77.6%), respectively, when patients who died with their original prostheses were censored. In total, 21 (21/108, 19.4%) implants failed, five due to infections (5/21), eight due to aseptic loosening (8/21), four due to local recurrence (4/21), three due to structural failure (3/21) and one due to soft tissue failure (1/21). The average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS) at the most recent follow-up was 22.9 (9-30) points on a 30-point scale, which indicated an excellent or good functional outcome. Analysis of the results based on implant site revealed a slight difference of the estimated five-year prosthesis survival between implants located in the distal femur and those located in the proximal tibia [86.1% (95% CI: 75.5-97%) versus 66.9% (95% CI: 49.8-83.9%); P = 0.09]. However, the functional outcomes and complication rates of prostheses located in the distal femur were both better than those located in the proximal tibia.

CONCLUSIONS

With effective management strategies for complications, cemented endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal tibia and distal femur using an extensor mechanism reconstruction technique provides a reliable method of reconstruction following tumour resection around the knee. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study.

Clinical outcome and complications of thoracic and pelvic limb stump and socket prostheses

Objectives: To describe the use, quality of life, compliance, complications, and outcome of animals fitted with stump socket prostheses.

Methods: Medical records of dogs fitted with a stump socket prosthesis were reviewed. Functional outcome, quality of life and complications were retrospectively assessed from an owner questionnaire.

Results: Thirteen stump socket prostheses (12 dogs) were fitted for a variety of reasons including trauma, congenital abnormalities, and neoplasia. Eight dogs had a good outcome overall and four a poor outcome. Quality of life (QOL) remained good or excellent in 10/12 dogs. Nine complications were seen in 7/12 dogs, most were manageable; surgical wound complications (n = 2) and pressures sores (n = 4) were the most frequently encountered. One dog suffered multiple complications. Thoracic and pelvic limb stump socket prostheses had a similar complication rate, however all animals with a poor outcome had a thoracic limb stump socket prosthesis; two were small breed dogs (under 10 kg) and two had bilateral thoracic limb abnormalities.

Clinical significance: Stump socket prostheses are feasible and versatile in animals. In correctly selected cases, good to excellent outcomes are possible. However, complications are frequent but often manageable. Further investigations are required into the risk factors for poor outcomes and prospective studies are required to assess changes in biomechanics, function, and QOL before and after fitting of a stump socket prosthesis. Until further evidence is available, careful consideration should be given before fitting bilateral thoracic limb stump socket prostheses or thoracic limb stump socket prostheses to small breed dogs.

Supplementary Material to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-16-09-0127

Megaprosthesis of the knee in tumor and revision surgery

The introduction of multidisciplinary approach with chemo and radiotherapy, the advances in surgical and the improvements of diagnostic techniques allowed limb salvage surgery in most cases of bone sarcomas instead of amputation. Modular megaprostheses are the most common method of reconstruction after segmental resection of the long bones in the extremities for their availability, immediate fixation, early weight bearing, good function. Despite the advances in materials and implant designs, these systems have an high incidence of complications. Aim of this study was to report the experience on mega-prostheses implanted around the knee in tumor and revision surgery to analyze: the most frequent used current systems, the problems of stems fixation, extensor mechanism reconstructions in proximal tibia resections and the preservation of growth of the lower extremity in children.

Megaprosthesis of the knee in tumor and revision surgery

The introduction of multidisciplinary approach with chemo and radiotherapy, the advances in surgical and the improvements of diagnostic techniques allowed limb salvage surgery in most cases of bone sarcomas instead of amputation. Modular megaprostheses are the most common method of reconstruction after segmental resection of the long bones in the extremities for their availability, immediate fixation, early weight bearing, good function. Despite the advances in materials and implant designs, these systems have an high incidence of complications. Aim of this study was to report the experience on mega-prostheses implanted around the knee in tumor and revision surgery to analyze: the most frequent used current systems, the problems of stems fixation, extensor mechanism reconstructions in proximal tibia resections and the preservation of growth of the lower extremity in children. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Extensor reconstruction of the knee using the fibular transposition technique after proximal tibial resection

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of the extensor mechanism after resection of the proximal tibia is challenging, and several surgical procedures are available. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of the fibular transposition technique for reconstruction of the extensor mechanism of the knee after proximal tibial resection.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed five consecutive patients who underwent resection of the proximal tibia with prosthetic reconstruction and reconstruction of the extensor using fibular transposition between 1997 and 2011. There were two female and three male patients with a mean age of 50years (range, 27 to 76years). A follow-up evaluation included both passive and active range of motion, extensor lag, the MSTS score and complications.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up for 93months (range, 44 to 160months). The mean extensor lag and active flexion were four degrees (range, 0 to 10°) and 103° (range, 85 to 110°), respectively. The mean MSTS score was 80% (range, 73 to 90%). All patients were able to ambulate without crutches at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of the fibular transposition technique is a simple, reliable, and successful procedure for extensor reconstruction after proximal tibial resection.

A new technique using mesh for extensor reconstruction after proximal tibial resection

BACKGROUND

Proximal tibial reconstruction following wide resection in both malignant and benign tumors presents difficulties mainly due to both patellar tendon reconstruction and high risk of infection. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of a new technique using a mesh for extensor reconstruction.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed nine consecutive patients who underwent resection of the proximal tibia with prosthetic reconstruction and reconstruction of the extensor using a mesh between 2009 and 2012. The surgical technique included the attachment of the mesh to the tibial component with a band of meshes looped over the patella and a gastrocnemius flap for coverage.

RESULTS

One patient had an above-the-knee amputation due to infection. Eight patients were followed up for 33 months (range, 20-50). In the eight patients, extensor lag had a mean of 5° (range, 0 to 20). Active flexion had a mean of 96.25° (range, 80 to 120) and ISOLS scores had a mean of 21/30 (range, 18 to 26). All patients were able to ambulate without crutches at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Extensor lag was significantly less compared to previous reports. No complications were observed in eight patients. Utilization of the mesh for extensor reconstruction after the proximal tibial resection is a simple, reliable and successful method.

Outcome after Reconstruction of the Proximal Tibia--Complications and Competing Risk Analysis

Background and Objectives

The proximal tibia (pT) is a common site for bone tumors. Improvements in imaging, chemotherapy and surgical technique made limb salvage surgery the treatment of choice. Yet, reconstructions of the pT have been associated with less favorable outcome compared to other parts of the extremities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with a modular endoprosthetic reconstruction of the pT.

Methods

Eighty-one consecutive patients with an average age of 29 years underwent endoprosthetic reconstruction of the pT. Postoperative complications were categorized according to the ISOLS classification, and revision-free survival until first complication (any Type 1–5), soft tissue failure (Type 1), aseptic loosening (Type 2), structural failure (Type 3), infection (Type 4), and local tumor progression (Type 5) was estimated by using a Fine-Gray model for competing risk analyses for univariate and multivariable regression with Firth’s bias correction.

Results

A total of 45 patients (56%) had at least one complication. Cumulative incidence for complication Types 1 to 5 at 5 years with death and amputation as competing events revealed a risk of 41% for the first complication, 14% for Type 1, 16% for Type 2, 11% for Type 3, 17% for Type 4, and 1% for Type 5.

Conclusion

Despite inclusion of amputation and death as strong competing events, pT replacements are still associated with a high risk of postoperative failures. The results suggest that infection and soft tissue failures (Type 1 and 5) seem to depend from each other. Sufficient soft tissue reconstruction and closure allow better function and reduce the risk of infection as the most prominent complication. The use of a rotating hinge design has significantly reduced structural failures over time.

Function of the extensor mechanism of the knee after using the ‘patellar-loop technique’ to reconstruct the patellar tendon when replacing the proximal tibia for tumour

The aim of this study was to analyse the gait pattern, muscle force and functional outcome of patients who had undergone replacement of the proximal tibia for tumour and alloplastic reconstruction of the extensor mechanism using the patellar-loop technique.

Between February 1998 and December 2009, we carried out wide local excision of a primary sarcoma of the proximal tibia, proximal tibial replacement and reconstruction of the extensor mechanism using the patellar-loop technique in 18 patients. Of these, nine were available for evaluation after a mean of 11.6 years (0.5 to 21.6). The strength of the knee extensors was measured using an Isobex machine and gait analysis was undertaken in our gait assessment laboratory. Functional outcome was assessed using the American Knee Society (AKS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores.

The gait pattern of the patients differed in ground contact time, flexion heel strike, maximal flexion loading response and total sagittal plane excursion. The mean maximum active flexion was 91° (30° to 110°). The overall mean extensor lag was 1° (0° to 5°). The mean extensor muscle strength was 25.8% (8.3% to 90.3%) of that in the non-operated leg (p < 0.001). The mean functional scores were 68.7% (43.4% to 83.3%) (MSTS) and 71.1 (30 to 90) (AKS functional score).

In summary, the results show that reconstruction of the extensor mechanism using this technique gives good biomechanical and functional results. The patients’ gait pattern is close to normal, except for a somewhat stiff knee gait pattern. The strength of the extensor mechanism is reduced, but sufficient for walking.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1063–9.

Survival of modern knee tumor megaprostheses: failures, functional results, and a comparative statistical analysis

BACKGROUND

Modular megaprostheses are now the most common method of reconstruction after segmental resection of the long bones in the lower extremities. Previous studies reported variable outcome and failure rates after knee megaprosthetic reconstructions.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The objectives of this study were to analyze the results of a modular tumor prosthesis after resection of bone tumor around the knee with respect to (1) survivorship; (2) failure rate; (3) comparative survivorship against different sites of reconstructions and of primary and revision implants; and (4) functional results on the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system.

METHODS

Between 2003 and 2010, 247 rotating-hinge Global Modular Reconstruction System (GMRS) knee prostheses were implanted in our institute for malignant and aggressive benign tumors. During this time, that group represented 23% of the patients who had oncologic megaprosthesis reconstruction about the knee after resection of primary or metastatic bone tumors (247 of 1086 patients). In the other 77% of cases we used other types of oncologic prostheses. Before 2003 we used the older Howmedica Modular Resection System and Kotz Modular Femur/Tibia Replacement from 2003 we used mostly the GMRS but we continued to use the HMRS in some cases such as patients with poor prognoses, elderly patients, or metastatic patients. Sites included 187 distal femurs and 60 proximal tibias. Causes of megaprosthesis failure were classified according to Henderson et al. in five types: Type 1 (soft tissue failure), Type 2 (aseptic loosening), Type 3 (structural failure), Type 4 (infection), and Type 5 (tumor progression). Followup was at a minimum oncologic followup of 2 years (mean, 4 years; range, 2-8 years). Kaplan-Meier actuarial curves of implant survival to major failures were done. Functional results were analyzed according to the MSTS II system; 223 of the 247 were available for functional scoring (81%).

RESULTS

At latest followup, among 175 treated patients for primary reconstruction, 117 are continuously disease-free, 26 have no evidence of disease after treatment of relapse, eight are alive with disease, and 24 died from disease. The overall failure rate of the megaprostheses in our series was 29.1% (72 of 247). Type 1 failure occurred in 8.5% (21 of 247) cases, Type 2 in 5.6% (14 of 247), Type 3 in 0%, Type 4 in 9.3% (23 of 247), and Type 5 in 5.6% (14 of 247). Kaplan-Meier curve showed an overall implant survival rate for all types of failures of 70% at 4 years and 58% at 8 years. Prosthetic survivorship for revisions was 80% at 5 years and for primary reconstructions was 60% at 5 years (p = 0.013). Survivorship to infection was 95% at 5 years for revision patients and 84% at 5 years for primary patients (p = 0.475). The mean MSTS score was 84 (25.2; range, 8-30) with no difference between sites of localization (24.7 in proximal tibia versus 25.4 in distal femur reconstruction; p = 0.306).

CONCLUSIONS

Results at a minimum of 2 years with this modular prosthesis are satisfactory in terms of survivorship (both oncologic and reconstructive) and causes and rates of failure. Although these results seem comparable with other like implants, we will continue to follow this cohort, and we believe that comparative trials among the available megaprosthesis designs are called for.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Tips and tricks of limb salvage: Proximal tibia

Due to its anatomical location, the upper end of the tibia poses unique problems while attempting limb salvage and appropriate reconstruction. This article attempts to highlight a few of the key steps, pearls and pitfalls while attempting this challenging procedure.

Is there a role for knee arthrodesis with modular endoprostheses for tumor and revision of failed endoprostheses?

BACKGROUND

Knee arthrodeses are performed to treat infection after arthroplasty and tumors requiring extensive soft tissue resection. Many techniques have been described, but most have important disadvantages. Currently, endoprosthetic arthrodesis implants are available, but little is known about them.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Our objective was to analyze a series of knee arthrodeses with a modular prosthetic system to evaluate (1) survivorship of the implant, (2) complications, (3) whether survivorship differed between arthrodeses done for primary tumor resection and revision reconstructions, and (4) whether survivorship differed based on the presence of previous infection or the use of a gastrocnemius flap.

METHODS

We present 32 patients with modular knee arthrodeses; arthrodeses were performed in 25 patients with tumors and in seven patients without tumors. There were 14 implants done at the time of tumor resection and 18 for revision of failed implants. Survivorship and complications were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Log-rank test was used for comparison between primary and revision implants, not infected and previously infected implants, and use or nonuse of a gastrocnemius flap.

RESULTS

Survivorship of arthrodeses with modular endoprostheses was 50% and 25% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. There were nine infections (29%) and one implant fracture (3%). Amputation as final surgery was required in 8 patients (six owing to infection and two to oncologic failures). There was no significant difference in survivorship between arthrodeses done for primary tumor resection and as a salvage procedure for failed implants. No differences were found between patients with and without prior infection or with and without a gastrocnemius flap.

CONCLUSIONS

Survivorship of a modular arthrodesis implant was 50% at 5 years owing to a high complication rate. Infection is the most common cause of failure of oncologic and revision implants. Implant fracture is a rare occurrence. Modular segmental arthrodesis provides a stable construct for patients in whom limb preservation is possible but a hinged device is contraindicated as a result of major muscle resection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.