Secondary cytoreductive surgery and peri-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal recurrence of colorectal and appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis following prior primary cytoreduction

Evaluation of repeat cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal and colorectal cancers: a multicentre Canadian study

Background

Peritoneal recurrences after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for appendiceal and colorectal cancers are frequent. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, technical feasibility and perioperative and long-term outcomes of repeat CRS/HIPEC in patients with recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal and appendiceal origin.

Methods

Data were collected from patients treated from 2000 to 2016 for recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal or colorectal cancer with CRS/HIPEC at 2 specialist centres. Data on demographics, procedure details, morbidity and survival were recorded. Analyses compared the iterations of CRS/HIPEC to assess the safety and effectiveness of repeat surgery.

Results

Of all patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC in the 2 centres, 37 patients underwent a repeat procedure. Operative time was similar for the first and second surgeries (412.1 v. 412.5 min, p = 0.74) but patients had a significantly lower peritoneal carcinoma index score with the second surgery (21.8 in the first iteration v. 9.53 in the second iteration, p < 0.001) and significantly less blood loss (1762 mL in the first iteration v. 790 mL in the second iteration, p = 0.001). There was a nonsignificant decrease in grade III–IV complications and there was no 30-day mortality associated with repeat procedures. For patients with colorectal cancer, median disease-free survival was 9.6 months and median overall survival was 40 months. For patients with appendiceal cancer, median disease-free survival was 15 months and overall survival was 64.4 months.

Conclusion

Repeat CRS/HIPEC procedures for recurrent appendiceal and colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis are safe in well-selected patients, without increased morbidity or mortality, and they are associated with significant long-term survival, particularly for patients with appendiceal cancers. These results support the use of repeat CRS/HIPEC in these patients.

Immune Effects of M51R Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Treatment of Carcinomatosis From Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze the oncolytic and immunomodulatory functions of an M protein mutant of vesicular stomatitis virus (M51R VSV) in a murine model of peritoneal surface dissemination from colon cancer (PSD from CRC).

METHODS

Luciferase-expressing CT26 peritoneal tumors were established in Balb/c mice to evaluate the impact of M51R VSV treatment on intraperitoneal tumor growth and overall survival. The mice were treated with either intraperitoneal phosphate buffered saline (n = 10) or 5 × 10⁶ PFU M51R VSV (n = 10) at 5 d after tumor implantation. Tumor bioluminescence was measured every 3 d during the 60-day study period. The immunomodulatory effect of M51R VSV treatment was evaluated in mice treated with either intraperitoneal phosphate buffered saline (n = 21) or M51R VSV (n = 21). Peritoneal lavages were collected at days 1, 3, and 7 after M51R VSV treatment for flow cytometry and multiplex cytokine bead analysis.

RESULTS

A single, intraperitoneal treatment with M51R VSV inhibited the growth of PSD from CRC as evidenced by decreased bioluminescence and improved survival. This treatment approach also resulted in significantly higher frequencies of peritoneal CD4+ T (10.95 ± 1.17 versus 6.19 ± 0.44, P = 0.004) and B1b cells (5.01 ± 0.97 versus 2.20 ± 0.2, P = 0.024). On the other hand, treatment with M51R VSV resulted in fewer myeloid-derived suppressor cells relative to controls (10.66 ± 1.48 versus 14.47 ± 1.06, P = 0.035). M51R-treated peritoneal cavities also contained lower concentrations of immunosuppressive monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and interleukin 6 cytokines relative to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that M51R VSV alters the innate and adaptive immune responses in PSD from CRC. Future studies will delineate specific components of antitumor immunity that result in its therapeutic effect.

Optimal Surveillance Frequency After CRS/HIPEC for Appendiceal and Colorectal Neoplasms: A Multi-institutional Analysis of the US HIPEC Collaborative

BACKGROUND

No guidelines exist for surveillance following cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for appendiceal and colorectal cancer. The primary objective was to define the optimal surveillance frequency after CRS/HIPEC.

METHODS

The U.S. HIPEC Collaborative database (2000-2017) was reviewed for patients who underwent a CCR0/1 CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal or colorectal cancer. Radiologic surveillance frequency was divided into two categories: low-frequency surveillance (LFS) at q6-12mos or high-frequency surveillance (HFS) at q2-4mos. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Among 975 patients, the median age was 55 year, 41% were male: 31% had non-invasive appendiceal (n = 301), 45% invasive appendiceal (n = 435), and 24% colorectal cancer (CRC; n = 239). With a median follow-up time of 25 mos, the median time to recurrence was 12 mos. Despite less surveillance, LFS patients had no decrease in median OS (non-invasive appendiceal: 106 vs. 65 mos, p < 0.01; invasive appendiceal: 120 vs. 73 mos, p = 0.02; colorectal cancer [CRC]: 35 vs. 30 mos, p = 0.8). LFS patients had lower median PCI scores compared with HFS (non-invasive appendiceal: 10 vs. 19; invasive appendiceal: 10 vs. 14; CRC: 8 vs. 11; all p < 0.01). However, on multivariable analysis, accounting for PCI score, LFS was still not associated with decreased OS for any histologic type (non-invasive appendiceal: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.28, p = 0.1; invasive appendiceal: HR: 0.73, p = 0.42; CRC: HR: 1.14, p = 0.59). When estimating annual incident cases of CRS/HIPEC at 375 for non-invasive appendiceal, 375 invasive appendiceal and 4410 colorectal, LFS compared with HFS for the initial two post-operative years would potentially save $13-19 M/year to the U.S. healthcare system.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-frequency surveillance after CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal or colorectal cancer is not associated with decreased survival, and when considering decreased costs, may optimize resource utilization.

Factors influencing long-term survival after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma peritonei originating from appendiceal neoplasms

Background

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare disease, most commonly of appendiceal origin. Treatment consists of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS–HIPEC). The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors for recurrence and survival.

Methods

This was an observational study using a prospectively designed database containing consecutive patients with PMP originating from the appendix, undergoing CRS–HIPEC at a tertiary referral centre between 1996 and 2015. Histopathological slides were reassessed. Cox regression was used for multivariable analyses.

Results

Of 225 patients identified, 36 (16·0 per cent) were diagnosed with acellular mucin, 149 (66·2 per cent) had disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis (DPAM) and 40 (17·8 per cent) had peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis (PMCA). The 5‐year overall survival (OS) rates were 93, 69·8 and 55 per cent respectively. Recurrence was observed in 120 patients (53·3 per cent), 39 of whom (17·3 per cent) were treated with a second CRS–HIPEC procedure. Factors independently associated with poor disease‐free survival were six or seven affected regions (hazard ratio (HR) 6·01, 95 per cent c.i. 2·04 to 17·73), incomplete cytoreduction (R2a resection: HR 1·67, 1·05 to 2·65; R2b resection: HR 2·00, 1·07 to 3·73), and more than threefold raised carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and/or carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19‐9 level (HR 2·31, 1·30 to 4·11). Factors independently associated with poorer OS were male sex (HR 1·74, 1·09 to 2·77), incomplete cytoreduction (R2a resection: HR 1·87, 1·14 to 3·08; R2b resection: HR 2·28, 1·19 to 4·34), and more than threefold raised CEA and/or CA19‐9 level (HR 2·89, 1·36 to 6·16).

Conclusion

CEA and CA19‐9 levels raised more than threefold above the upper limit identify patients with PMP of appendiceal origin and poorer survival.

Outcome and surgical strategy in critical sites in cases of psuedomyxoma peritonei

BACKGROUND

For a long time peritoneal neoplasms were considered beyond surgical intervention and beyond cure, till the concept of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was introduced. However this surgical intervention is technically demanding and associated with considerable postoperative morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the surgical strategy in resection of critical sites loaded by heavy tumor deposits and to evaluate short and long term results of CRS and HIPEC, in a cohort of Egyptian patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) from appendiceal origin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

21 patients with PMP, age ranged from 40 to 63years, 12 males and 9 females. All were recruited from the department of surgery at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cairo University over the period from February 2011 to February 2016. They were subjected to CRS and HIPEC with mitomycin-C.

RESULTS

The median peritoneal carcinoma index (PCI) was 22 (range: 10-39). Optimal cytoreduction (CCR-0/1) was achieved in 19 patients (90.4%) of whom 17 patients (80.9%) had a complete cytoreduction (CCR-0). The median follow up period was 51.5months (range: 0.07-82.3months). The cumulative overall survival was 85.7% while the cumulative disease free survival was 76.9%.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting five years postoperative outcome of CRS and HIPEC in Egyptian patients with PMP from appendiceal origin. Our results support that although technically demanding this treatment modality is safe and associated with favorable outcome.

Palliative Surgery for Pseudomyxoma Peritonei

Introduction:

Pseudomyxoma peritonei is a rare disease causing peritoneal carcinomatosis. In patients with extensive carcinomatosis, curative treatment is unachievable. Palliative debulking therapy is the only treatment in relieving symptoms. We report our results from palliative debulking surgery at a national pseudomyxoma peritonei center in Denmark.

Methods:

From January 2007 to October 2012, we performed 27 palliative operations for pseudomyxoma peritonei with debulking at our institution. All patients were evaluated and found eligible for palliative treatment only. Patients were prospectively registered, while perioperative data were collected retrospectively from patient records.

Results:

The majority of patients ( n = 25) received an omentectomy (93%) as the primary procedure. In total, 17 (63%) received additional surgery. Median operative time was 88 min (range: 33–160 min). Median stay at the recovery ward was 6 h (2–288 h). Median hospital stay was 8 days (4–105 days). In all, 23 (85%) patients had no in-hospital complications, whereas 4 patients experienced complications (15%). Two of the complications were mild (Clavien-Dindo grade II), and two experienced severe complications (grade III and IV). Thirty-day mortality was 0%. Median survival was 3.0 years (0.2–6.2 years).

Conclusion:

Palliative debulking is a safe procedure with an acceptable morbidity and mortality offering immediate disease control.

Incidence and treatment of recurrent disease after cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneally metastasized colorectal cancer: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The optimal treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal origin is a combination of cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + IPC). Although 5-year survival rates of up to 40% have been reported, recurrent disease remains common and is estimated to be a strong negative prognostic factor for survival. This systematic review elaborates on the incidence of recurrent disease and the possibilities to prevent and treat recurrence.

METHODS

Two searches were performed. To identify the magnitude of recurrent the disease, a search was performed in Pubmed and EMBASE until September 2014. A second search was performed in Pubmed to identify treatment of recurrent disease with secondary CRS + IPC.

RESULTS

The first search resulted in 139 and 94 articles in Pubmed and EMBASE respectively. Among those, 28 were included. Overall recurrence rates ranged from 22.5 to 82%. Local, systemic and combined local-systemic recurrence ranged from 6 to 42.5%, 10.4-43% and 5.8-21.5%. Median time to recurrence varied from 9 to 23 months, three-year disease free survival ranged from 14 to 41.5%. The second search resulted in 140 articles among which 17 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 190 patients underwent secondary CRS. Median survival after the second procedure ranged from 18 to 55.7 months. One, two and three-year survival ranged between 66 and 94, 44-50 and 0-66%.

CONCLUSION

Recurrence is very common after cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for PC of colorectal origin. Repeat cytoreductive surgery suggests a potential survival benefit for a highly selected group. Therefore, strategies to prevent recurrence are of the utmost importance.

Patterns of recurrence following complete cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

CytoReductive Surgery (CRS) combined with Hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) has an established role in the treatment of peritoneally metastasized colorectal cancer. The aim of the study was to describe the recurrence patterns and to evaluate treatment options and related survival.

METHODS

Patients treated with CRS + HIPEC in two tertiary referral centers between April 2005 and March 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. The prognostic value of several parameters was calculated using Cox Regression.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty two of 287 patients (46%) with peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with complete CRS and HIPEC were diagnosed with recurrent disease, after a median disease-free interval of 11.4 months. Recurrence were locoregional (43%), distant metastases (26%) or both (31%). Thirty-two of the 132 patients with recurrences (24%) were treated surgically with curative intent, which extended the median survival from 12 months to 43 months, compared to palliative treatment (best supportive care or chemotherapy; P < 0.001). Initial nodal status (P = 0.01) and the number of affected regions at initial CRS (P = 0.02) were significantly correlated to survival after disease recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Disease recurrence after CRS and HIPEC is common; in selected patients, an aggressive surgical approach may be beneficial and extend survival.

Repeat cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for recurrent colorectal peritoneal metastases: yes or no?

PURPOSE

To clarify the role of repeat CRS for recurrent colorectal carcinoma (CRC) through: (i) Systematic review of the literature (ii) Analysis of survival outcomes in a prospective cohort.

METHODS

(i) Pubmed and MEDLINE from 1980 to July 2013 searched using terms: colorectal carcinoma, peritonectomy, cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), redo, repeat, and iterative. (ii) Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis of consecutive patients undergoing repeat CRS at St George Hospital between Jan 2000 and July 2013.

RESULTS

(i) The search strategy yielded 309 articles, 5 meeting inclusion criteria, reporting on 91 patients. Median overall survival from first CRS ranged from 39 to 57.6 months with 3-yr survival of 50%, and 5-year survival of 30%. Median survival from second CRS was 20-months with 1-yr survivals of 72% and 66% and 2-year survivals of 50% and 44%. (ii) Repeat CRS performed on 18 patients found median survival from first CRS was 59 months, with 1, 3, and 5-year survival of 100%, 52% and 26% respectively. Median survival from repeat CRS was 22.6 months with 1, 2, and 3-year survival of 94%, 48% and 12% respectively.

CONCLUSION

The current data on repeat CRS in CRC is relatively immature and more data is required before drawing clear conclusions. Patient selection should be on a case by case basis conducted through a MDT process with emphasis on surrogate markers for favourable outcomes.