Surgical management of non-colorectal hepatic metastasis

Assessment of Liver Metastases Using CT and MRI Scans in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Effects of Observer Experience on Diagnostic Accuracy

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of radiologic experience on the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) vs. magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reporting on the liver metastases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (LM of PDAC). Intra-individual CT and MRI examinations of 112 patients with clinically proven LM of PDAC were included. Four radiologists with varying years of experience (A > 20, B > 5, C > 1 and D < 1) assessed liver segments affected by LM of PDAC, as well as associated metastases occurring in each patient. Their sensitivity and specificity in evaluating the segments were compared. Cohen’s Kappa (κ) for diagnosed liver segments and Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICC) for the number of metastatic lesions in each patient were calculated. The radiologists’ sensitivity and specificity for the CT vs. MRI were, respectively: Reader A—94.4%, 90.3% vs. 96.6%, 94.8%; B—86.7%, 79.7% vs. 83.9%, 82.0%; C—78.0%, 76.7% vs. 83.3%, 78.9% and D—71.8%, 79.2% vs. 64.0%, 69.5%. Reviewers A and B achieved greater agreement in assessing results from the MRI (κ = 0.72, p < 0.001; ICC = 0.73, p < 0.001) vs. the CT (κ = 0.58, p < 0.001; ICC = 0.61, p < 0.001), in contrast to readers C and D (MRI: κ = 0.34, p < 0.001; ICC = 0.42, p < 0.001, and CT: κ = 0.48, p < 0.001; ICC = 0.59, p < 0.001). Our results indicate that the accurate diagnosis of LM of PDAC depends more on radiologic experience in MRI over CT scans.

The lack of selection criteria for surgery in patients with non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The benefit of surgery in patients with non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases (NCRNNELM) remains controversial. At the population level, several statistical prognostic factors and scores have been proposed but inconsistently verified. At the patient level, no selection criteria have been demonstrated to guide individual therapeutic decision making. We aimed to evaluate potential individual selection criteria to predict the benefit of surgery in patients undergoing treatment for NCRNNELM.

METHODS

Data for 114 patients undergoing surgery for NCRNNELM were reviewed. In this population, we identified an early relapse group (ER), defined as patients with unresectable recurrence < 1 year postoperatively who did not benefit from surgery (N = 28), and a long-term survival group (LTS), defined as patients who were recurrence-free ≥ 5 years postoperatively and benefited from surgery (N = 20). Clinicopathologic parameters, the Association Française de Chirurgie (AFC) score, and a modified 4-point Clinical Risk Score (mCRS) (excluding CEA level) were analyzed and compared between LTS and ER groups.

RESULTS

The majority of patients were female and a majority had an ASA score ≤ 2 at the time of liver surgery. The median age was 55 years. Almost half of the patients (46%) presented with a single-liver metastasis. Intermediate- and low-risk AFC scores represented 40% and 60% of the population, respectively. Five- and 10-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 56% and 27%, and 30% and 12%, respectively. Negative prognostic factors were the size of liver metastases > 50 mm and delay between primary and NCRNNELM <24 months for OS and DFS, respectively. AFC score was not prognostic while high-risk mCRS (scores 3-4) was predictive for the poorer OS. The clinicopathologic parameters were similar in the ER and LTS groups, except the presence of N+ primary tumor, and the size of liver metastases was significantly higher in the ER group.

CONCLUSION

In patients with resectable NCRNNELM, no predictive factors or scores were found to accurately preoperatively differentiate individual cases in whom surgery would be futile from those in whom surgery could be associated with a significant oncological benefit.

CAN MICROWAVE ABLATION BE AN ALTERNATIVE TO RESECTION FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEUROENDOCRINE LIVER METASTASES?

Objective: Surgical resection of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases has been proven to improve survival, but the benefit of microwave ablation as an alternative or adjunct to surgery has yet to be assessed. Our hypothesis is that ablation is equal to surgery in terms of local recurrence and survival. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis including all patients treated with microwave ablation and/or surgical resection for neuroendocrine liver metastases in our institution between 2008 and 2017. Results: A total of 47 patients and 68 treatments were analyzed, including 34 liver resections, 20 ablations, and 14 combined procedures. A total of 130 individual metastases were treated with ablation, representing a median of 4 per session (range 1-30). While no major complications occurred after ablation, we observed 11 minor and 3 major complications after open surgical resection (P = .0135). Length of stay was significantly shorter after ablation (P = .0008). The majority of patients (33/47, 70.2%) underwent curative procedures, 14 patients underwent (29.8%) debulking procedures. There was no difference in local recurrence rate between tumors treated with ablation or resection. Liver-only disease progression was detected in 29% of the patients and overall progression was detected in 66% of the patients. The mean survival was not significantly different between patients treated with ablation only versus resection with or without ablation (P = .1570). Overall survival was mean 75.3 months (6 to 374 months). Conclusion: Depending on the extent of the liver metastases, microwave ablation might be a safe alternative or addition to resection for neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases with low morbidity and high local efficiency. Abbreviations: CT = computed tomography; MWA = microwave ablation; NET = neuroendocrine tumor; PET = positron emission tomography; RFA = radiofrequency ablation; RFS = recurrence-free survival; SMWA = stereotactic microwave ablation.

Percutaneous stereotactic image-guided microwave ablation for malignant liver lesions

Thermal ablation has proven beneficial for hepatocellular carcinoma and possibly for colorectal liver metastases, but data is lacking for other liver metastases. Computer-assisted navigation can increase ablation efficacy and broaden its indications. We present our experience with percutaneous stereotactic image-guided microwave ablation (SMWA) for non-colorectal liver metastases (NCRLM), in form of a retrospective study including all SMWA for NCRLM from 2015 to 2017. Indication for SMWA was determined at a multidisciplinary tumorboard. End-points include recurrence, overall and liver-specific disease progression and complications. Twenty-three patients underwent 25 interventions for 40 lesions, including 17 neuroendocrine tumor, nine breast cancer, four sarcoma, two non-small cell lung cancer, three duodenal adenocarcinoma, one esophageal adenocarcinoma, one pancreatic adenocarcinoma, one ampullary carcinoma, one prostate carcinoma, and one renal cell carcinoma metastases. Median follow-up was 15 months (2-32). Incomplete ablation rate was 2.5% (1/40), local recurrence rate 10% (4/40). Three patients (12%) had minor complications. Overall disease progression was 73.9% (17/23), median disease-free survival 7 months (0-26) and overall survival 18 months (2-39). SIMWA is feasible, safe and minimally invasive for NCRLM in selected patients. While it might offer an alternative to resection or palliative strategies, the oncological benefit needs to be evaluated in a larger patient cohort.

Outcome after hepatic resection for isolated non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases in 100 patients - the role of the embryologic origin of the primary tumor

Background

The indication for hepatic resection (HR) in patients suffering from liver metastases (LM) other than colorectal and neuroendocrine tumors is one focus of current multidisciplinary, oncologic considerations. This study retrospectively analyzes outcome after HR for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine (NCNNE) LM in the absence of distant or extrahepatic metastases.

Methods

We included 100 consecutive patients undergoing HR for isolated NCNNE LM from a prospective database in our institution, including postoperative follow-up. Primary tumors were of mesodermal origin in 44%, of ectodermal origin in 29% and of entodermal origin in 27%. Survival analysis was performed by univariate and multivariable methods. Mean follow-up after hepatic surgery was 3.6 years (0.25–16).

Results

Median age at the time of HR was 59.5 years. Kaplan-Meier-estimated survival after liver resection was 56.8%, 34.3% and 24.5% after 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Univariate analysis after HR revealed residual disease (hepatic or primary; p = 0.02), female gender (p = 0.013), entodermal origin (p = 0.009) and early onset of metastatic disease (≤24 months, p = 0.002), as negative prognostic factors. Multivariable survival analysis confirmed residual disease, female gender, entodermal embryologic origin and early onset of metastatic disease (≤24 months) as independent negative prognostic factors.

Conclusion

Overall outcome after HR of NCNNE LM results in acceptable long-term outcome. Although individual decision-making today mostly relies on clinical experience for this type of disease, risk factors derived from the embryologic origin of the tumor might help in patient selection.

Hepatic resection of non-colorectal non-endocrine liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Hepatic resection is standard treatment for liver metastases from colorectal and neuroendocrine cancers as well as primary biliary and hepatic carcinomas. The role of hepatic resection in patients with non-colorectal non-endocrine liver metastases (NCNELM) is less defined. Overall survival in this group of patients is poor with few patients surviving beyond two years, even with modern chemotherapy.

METHODS

A prospective database of all liver resections performed by a single surgeon (KSH) from January 2007 to December 2014 was maintained. Patient demographics, surgical and pathological data were collected prospectively; survival data were updated retrospectively. Patients were grouped according to pathology and analysis was performed using SPSS (version 21).

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients underwent hepatic resection for NCNELM, of which 18 were major resections. Pathologies encountered included sarcoma in 8/48, both breast and ovarian in 6/48 each and renal cell carcinoma and melanoma, each representing 5/48. A result of 38/48 patients undertook chemotherapy prior to surgery. R0 margin was achieved in 96%. Seven patients suffered complications from surgery and one peri-operative mortality. Overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 93%, 83% and 61%, respectively. Forty-four percent of patients developed disease recurrence, 29% at distant sites.

CONCLUSION

Hepatic resection can be achieved safely for NCNELM. Patient selection is key, along with a standardized surgical and anaesthetic technique. Patients should be rigorously investigated to exclude disseminated disease and multidisciplinary discussion must take place prior to surgery. Patients with NCNELM should not routinely be excluded from liver resection and selected patients may benefit from resection.

Liver Resection for Metastatic Disease; A Population-Based Analysis of Trends

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to evaluate all patients who underwent liver resection for metastatic disease for demographics, characteristics of the primary tumor and metastasis, volume of liver resection specimens per pathology laboratory and to describe trends in surgical treatment.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected using the Dutch nationwide pathology network. All pathology reports containing details on liver resections for metastatic disease between January 2001 and December 2010 were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 3,916 liver resections were performed in 3,699 patients with a median age of 63 years (range 1-91). The primary tumor was mainly colorectal (n = 3,256; 88.0%). The number of 'high volume liver centers' increased from 2 to 12 in the study period, whereas the number of 'low volume centers' decreased. The number of liver resections increased from 224 to 596 per year (p ≤ 0.0001). A significant increase was demonstrated in elderly patients, patients with multiple metastases, liver resections for smaller metastases and minor liver resections.

CONCLUSION

Although the majority of patients were young and had solitary metastasis, indications for liver resection are expanding as indicated by increasing numbers of elderly and patients with multiple liver metastases. Patients with non-colorectal liver metastases were seldom candidates for resection.

Is Hepatic Resection for Non-colorectal, Non-neuroendocrine Liver Metastases Justified?

BACKGROUND

Discussions about the benefit of liver resection (LRx) for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine metastases are controversial. This study aimed to analyze the outcome of LRx for these patients and validate a previously published prognostic risk model.

METHODS

The study analyzed 150 patients who underwent LRx for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine (NCNN) metastases. Patients' demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment options, and postoperative outcome were investigated. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models were used to assess survival and prognostic variables.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up period of 61 months, 39 % of the patients were alive. The 30-day mortality rate was 0.7 %. The overall, disease-free, and intrahepatic recurrence-free survival rates were respectively 42, 29, and 51 % at 5 years and 28, 23, and 47 % at 10 years. The negative prognostic factors identified in the multivariate analysis were melanoma (p = 0.04), squamous tumors (p = 0.01), and a primary tumor liver metastasis, with an interval shorter than 2 years (p = 0.02), whereas the predictive prognostic factors identified were breast cancer (p = 0.04), stromal tumors (p = 0.03), and major LRx (p = 0.04). The prognostic risk score stratified patients into low risk (0-3 points: n = 50; 5-year overall survival [OS] 58 %), medium risk (4-6 points: n = 91; 5-year OS 35 %), and high risk (≥7 points: n = 9; 5-year OS, 33 %) groups (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Liver resection for patients with NCNN metastases is a safe treatment option. More than 25 % of patients can achieve a long-term survival of 10 years when the histology of the primary tumor and the surrogates for the individual biologic tumor behavior are taken into account. Exclusion of patients with NCNN liver metastases from surgical therapy is no longer justified.

Liver resection for non-colorectal, non-carcinoid, non-sarcoma metastases: a multicenter study

Background

The role of liver resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine, non-sarcoma (NCNNNS) metastases is ill-defined. This study aimed to examine the oncologic outcomes of liver resection in such patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of liver resection for NCNNNS metastases was performed at two large centers. Liver resection was offered selectively in patients with stable disease. Oncologic outcomes were examined using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Fifty-two patients underwent liver resection for NCNNNS metastases. Overall 5-year survival was 58%. Five-year survival was 85% for breast metastases, 66% for ocular melanoma, 83% for other melanomas, 50% for gastro-esophageal metastases, and 0% for renal cell carcinoma metastases. A contemporary colorectal liver metastasis cohort had a survival of 63% (p=0.89).

Conclusions

Liver resection is an effective option in the management of selected patients with NCNNNS metastases which have been deemed stable. Five-year survival rates were comparable to that of a contemporary cohort of patients with colorectal liver metastases in carefully selected patients. Further, larger studies are required to help identify potential prognostic variables and aid in decision-making in this heterogeneous population.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: current opinions on a rare, but potentially curable neoplasm

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) share a unique genetic identity, functional behavior, and clinical course. Compared with tumors of the exocrine pancreas, they are rare and show a different biologic behavior and prognosis. On the basis of data from recent studies, all PNETs, outside of small insulinomas, should be considered potentially malignant and treated accordingly. Untreated tumors have a high possibility to grow locally into adjacent structures or spread to distant organs. Although surgical excision irrespective of tumor functioning or nonfunctioning state remains the cornerstone of therapy, providing the best disease-free and survival rates to date, the understanding of the genetic nature of the disease yields new 'targets' to consider in drug development. The aim of this review is to summarize all recent advances of genetic research and new drug development in terms of PNETs, especially their genetic identity and subsequent alterations leading to the development of near or total malignant activity, and the new medical treatment strategies of this potentially curable disease on the basis of therapeutical agents acting, where possible, at the genetic level.