Segmental versus extended resection for sporadic colorectal cancer in young patients

Excision of malignant and pre-malignant rectal lesions by transanal endoscopic microsurgery in patients under 50 years of age

BACKGROUND

The most common technique for treating benign and early malignant rectal lesions is transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Local excision is an acceptable technique for high-risk and elderly patients, but there are hardly any data regarding young patients.

AIM

To describe TEM outcomes in patients under 50 years of age.

METHODS

We collected demographic, clinical, and pathological data from all patients under the age of 50 years who underwent the TEM procedure at Hasharon Rabin Medical Center from January 2005 to December 2018.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 26 patients under the age of 50 years underwent TEM procedures. Their mean age was 43.3 years. Eleven (42.0%) were male. The mean operative time was 67 min, and the mean tumor size was 2.39 cm, with a mean anal verge distance of 8.50 cm. No major intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded. The median length of stay was 2 d. Seven (26.9%) lesions were adenomas with low-grade dysplasia, four (15.4%) were high-grade dysplasia adenomas, two were T1 carcinomas (7.8%), and three were T2 carcinomas (11.5%). No residual disease was found following endoscopic polypectomy in two patients (7.8%), but four (15.4%) had other pathologies. Surgical margins were negative in all cases. Local recurrence was detected in one patient 33 mo following surgery.

CONCLUSION

Among young adult patients, TEM for benign rectal lesions has excellent outcomes. It may also offer a balance between the efficacy of complete oncologic resection and postoperative quality of life in the treatment of rectal cancer. In some cases, it may be considered an alternative to radical surgery.

Delphi Initiative for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer (DIRECt) International Management Guidelines

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with early-onset colorectal cancer (eoCRC) are managed according to guidelines that are not age-specific. A multidisciplinary international group (DIRECt), composed of 69 experts, was convened to develop the first evidence-based consensus recommendations for eoCRC.

METHODS

After reviewing the published literature, a Delphi methodology was used to draft and respond to clinically relevant questions. Each statement underwent 3 rounds of voting and reached a consensus level of agreement of ≥80%.

RESULTS

The DIRECt group produced 31 statements in 7 areas of interest: diagnosis, risk factors, genetics, pathology-oncology, endoscopy, therapy, and supportive care. There was strong consensus that all individuals younger than 50 should undergo CRC risk stratification and prompt symptom assessment. All newly diagnosed eoCRC patients should receive germline genetic testing, ideally before surgery. On the basis of current evidence, endoscopic, surgical, and oncologic treatment of eoCRC should not differ from later-onset CRC, except for individuals with pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants. The evidence on chemotherapy is not sufficient to recommend changes to established therapeutic protocols. Fertility preservation and sexual health are important to address in eoCRC survivors. The DIRECt group highlighted areas with knowledge gaps that should be prioritized in future research efforts, including age at first screening for the general population, use of fecal immunochemical tests, chemotherapy, endoscopic therapy, and post-treatment surveillance for eoCRC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The DIRECt group produced the first consensus recommendations on eoCRC. All statements should be considered together with the accompanying comments and literature reviews. We highlighted areas where research should be prioritized. These guidelines represent a useful tool for clinicians caring for patients with eoCRC.

Epidemiology, incidence and treatment of rectal cancer in young women case serie about 11 cases (case series)

Introduction

Rectal cancer constitutes, by its frequency and its gravity, a real concern of the public health in the world, it represents the eighth most frequent cancer. Its incidence is increasing in young people and in particular in women, in whom it remains a rare disease known for its poor prognosis.

The objective of our work is to highlight the epidemiological characteristics of rectal cancer in patients under 40 years of age, determine its incidence and outline the different therapeutic means.

Materials and methods

Our work is a retrospective study with a descriptive aim on a series of 11 female patients aged less than 40 years, operated for rectal cancer in the department of digestive cancer surgery and liver transplantation Casablanca Morocco, over a period of 7 years from January 2013 to December 2019.

Results

The average age of our patients was 34.8 years. The average diagnostic delay was 10 months. The most frequent clinical sign was rectorrhagia (90.9% of cases). On rectal examination, the tumor was inaccessible in 18.8% of cases and externalized in 9.09% of cases. It was located in the lower rectum in 36.36% of cases, the same for the middle rectum. Rectoscopy showed that the majority of tumors were circumferential (36.36%). The budding ulcerative aspect was the most frequently found with 7 cases or 63.63%. The histological study showed the predominance of lieberkühnian adenocarcinoma (63.63%). Thoracic-abdominal-pelvic CT scan showed liver metastases in only one patient (9.09%). Pelvic MRI showed invasion of the mesorectum in 5 cases (45.45%) and of the internal sphincter in 3 cases (27.27%). All our patients underwent laparotomy. Curative surgery was performed in 8 patients and 3 patients had palliative surgery. Preoperative radiotherapy was performed in 81.81% of cases. The evolution was marked by 27.27% of locoregional recurrences. The operative mortality was nil in our series.

Conclusion

Detection of patients with precancerous conditions, screening for cancer in subjects at risk (familial recto-colic cancer, familial recto-colonic polyposis and ulcerative colitis), suspicion of cancer in the presence of any proctological sign, early diagnosis and curative surgical resection preceded by radiotherapy are the means that can improve the prognosis of rectal cancer in young women.

•

Rectal cancer constitutes, by its frequency and its gravity, a real concern of the public health in the world.

•

It represents the eighth most frequent cancer.

•

Its incidence is increasing in young people and in particular in women, in whom it remains a rare disease known for its poor prognosis.

Colorectal Cancer in the Adolescent and Young Adult Population

Colorectal cancer in the young adult population is of increasing incidence and concern. Genetic predisposition and heritable syndromes contribute to this trend, but perhaps more concerning is the majority of new diagnoses that involve no traceable genetic risk factors. Prevention and early recognition, with a high suspicion in the symptomatic young adult, are critical in attenuating recent trends. Clinical management requires coordinated multidisciplinary care from diagnosis to surveillance in order to ensure appropriate management. This review provides a summary of key aspects related to colorectal cancer in adolescents and young adults, including epidemiology, biology, genetics, clinical management, and prevention.

An Incidental Finding of Anemia: Rectal Adenocarcinoma in a Young Adult

Rectal adenocarcinoma is an uncommon finding in patients under the age of 40. However, epidemiological surveys have suggested that colorectal cancers are increasing in incidence among patients aged 20 to 39 years in the United States. Colorectal adenocarcinoma is often not considered in the differential diagnosis in this demographic because of age. Here, we present the case of an incidental finding of anemia during a preliminary evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis leading to the diagnosis of stage IV-B rectal adenocarcinoma in a 34-year-old male patient.

A 34-year-old Caucasian male presented with the incidental finding of anemia during a preliminary evaluation for rheumatoid arthritis. The patient was asymptomatic with the exception of a three-month history of wrist and ankle joint pain. Past medical history was positive for only a three-year history of occasional spotty, painless rectal bleeding attributed to internal hemorrhoids. Physical exam findings were positive for mild extremity pallor and positive fecal occult blood test. Hematologic studies revealed a significant microcytic, hypochromic anemia with severe iron deficiency. Laboratory studies revealed no evidence of vitamin deficiency, hemolytic activity, hematuria, hypothyroidism, or clotting factor disorder. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), rheumatoid factor, and cyclic citrullinated peptide 3 (CCP3) were elevated supporting the diagnosis of underlying rheumatoid arthritis. On further questioning, the patient revealed that he had been utilizing an average of 2000 mg of ibuprofen daily during the previous several months in an attempt to control his joint pain. The patient was evaluated for a potential upper gastrointestinal bleed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), which found no evidence of active bleeding. As the patient continued to have decreasing hemoglobin levels, he was evaluated for a lower gastrointestinal source of bleeding by colonoscopy, which revealed an 8 cm circumferential mass at the anal verge. Pathological evaluation of biopsy samples revealed a moderately differentiated invasive adenocarcinoma. The patient had no family history of colorectal cancer or major associated risk factors, such as obesity, smoking history, heavy alcohol use, diabetes mellitus type 2, or a history of inflammatory bowel disease. Following discharge, positron emission tomography (PET) scan showed extensive metastatic disease to multiple regional lymph nodes as well as multiple suspicious hepatic lesions and bilateral pulmonary nodules. Due to the poor prognosis, recommended treatment consisted of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) along with palliative radiation.

The cause of the increase in the incidence rate of colorectal cancer in young adults remains unknown. Among this demographic, colorectal cancers appear to be more aggressive and present at later stages with more advanced disease. In young adults, the most common clinical sign at presentation is rectal bleeding. In young adults presenting with seemingly common gastrointestinal complaints, a high degree of suspicion for colorectal cancer may be warranted by clinicians.

Incidence of colorectal cancer in young patients

Sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) is traditionally diagnosed after de sixth decade of life, although a small percentage of cases are diagnosed in patients under 40 years of age, and incidence is increasing. There exists a great volume of controversy regarding clinical outcome of young patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) when compared to elder counterparts. Our aims were to evaluate the rate of CRC in young patients, to review the pertaining literature and to discuss outcomes and clinical prognosis. A retrospective review involving patients with CRC was undertaken, focusing on age at diagnosis. The information extracted from this literature review showed a trend towards a decreased incidence in older people with an opposite effect among adolescents and young adults. Moreover, biological aggressiveness in young adults diagnosed with CRC has not been fully recognized, although it is usually diagnosed later and in association with adverse histological features. Besides that, these features don't affect outcome. These apparent increase in CRC incidence among young patients during the last decades raises the need for a greater suspicious when evaluating common symptoms in this group. Thus, educational programs should widespread information for both population and physicians to improve prevention and early diagnosis results.

Colorectal surveillance after segmental resection for young-onset colorectal cancer: is there evidence for extended resection?

AIM

Although sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) usually occurs in patients aged over 50, recent evidence suggests that the incidence is increasing in younger patients. Such patients are theoretically at high risk of metachronous neoplasia and may be candidates for extended prophylactic colectomy. This study aimed to define the risk of metachronous cancer/adenomas during follow-up of younger patients who underwent segmental colectomy for CRC.

METHOD

A CRC database was used to identify patients aged under 50 who underwent surgery for CRC between 1994 and 2010. Patients diagnosed with hereditary cancer or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded. The primary end-points were frequency of extended resection and the rates of metachronous cancer and high-risk adenomas during follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 284 young patients with a resectable primary tumour, of whom 280 (98.6%) underwent segmental resection, 3 (1%) extended resection and 1 (0.4%) local resection. Endoscopic follow-up was available for 150 of the patients who had segmental colectomy, with a mean age of 42.6 (±5.8) years at diagnosis and median follow-up time of 68 months (interquartile range 45-105). Out of these 150 patients, 4 (2.7%) developed metachronous colonic adenocarcinoma at 24, 71, 151 and 228 months after index surgery. Thirty additional patients had at least one adenoma identified during surveillance, and three had sessile serrated polyps. Out of the three patients undergoing extended resection, none had metachronous cancer or advanced adenomas at an average follow-up of 17 years.

CONCLUSION

A segmental colectomy or proctectomy is adequate treatment for patients presenting with CRC under the age of 50.

Colorectal cancer in young adults: A difficult challenge

Sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) is traditionally diagnosed after the sixth decade of life, and current recommendations for surveillance include only patients older than 50 years of age. However, an increasing incidence of CRC in patients less than 40 years of age has been reported. This occurrence has been attributed to different molecular features and low suspicion of CRC in young symptomatic individuals. When confronting young-onset CRC with older patients, issues such as biological aggressiveness, stage at diagnosis and clinical outcomes seem to differ in many aspects. In the future, the identification of the molecular profile underlying the early development of sporadic CRC will help to plan tailored screening recommendations and improve management. Besides that, differential diagnosis with CRC linked with hereditary syndromes is necessary to provide adequate patient treatment and family screening. Until we find the answers to some of these doubts, doctors should raise suspicion when evaluating an young adult and be aware of this risk and consequences of a late diagnosis.

Factors Associated With the Performance of Extended Colonic Resection vs. Segmental Resection in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Study

OBJECTIVES:

Early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates are rising. This group is susceptible to heritable conditions (i.e., Lynch syndrome (LS)) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with high metachronous CRC rates after segmental resection. Hence, extended colonic resection (ECR) is often performed and considered generally in young patients. As there are no population-based studies analyzing resection extent in early-onset CRC, we used CDC Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) data to assess state-wide operative practices.

METHODS:

Using CER and Louisiana Tumor Registry data, all CRC patients aged ≤50 years, diagnosed in Louisiana in 2011, who underwent surgery in 2011–2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Prevalence of, and the factors associated with operation type (ECR including subtotal/total/proctocolectomy vs. segmental resection) were evaluated.

RESULTS:

Of 2,427 CRC patients, 274 were aged ≤50 years. In all, 234 underwent surgery at 53 unique facilities and 6.8% underwent ECR. Statistically significant ECR-associated factors included age ≤45 years, polyposis, synchronous/metachronous LS-associated cancers, and IBD. Abnormal microsatellite instability (MSI) was not ECR-associated. ECR was not performed in sporadic CRC.

CONCLUSIONS:

ECR is performed in the setting of clinically obvious associated high-risk features (polyposis, IBD, synchronous/metachronous cancers) but not in isolated/sporadic CRC. However, attention must be paid to patients with seemingly lower risk characteristics (isolated CRC, no polyposis), as LS can still be present. In addition, the presumed sporadic group requires further study as metachronous CRC risk in early-onset sporadic CRC has not been well-defined, and some may harbor undefined/undiagnosed hereditary conditions. Abnormal MSI (LS risk) is not associated with ECR; abnormal MSI results often return postoperatively after segmental resection has already occurred, which is a contributing factor.