What Is the Prognostic Value of the Pathologic Response after Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy in Soft Tissue Sarcoma? An Institutional Study Using the EORTC-STBSG Response Score

Background/Objectives: The relationship between pathologic findings in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after neoadjuvant treatment and oncological outcomes remains uncertain due to varying evaluation methods and cut-off values. This study aims to assess pathologic findings after neoadjuvant radiotherapy in STS using the EORTC-STBSG response score and evaluate its prognostic value. Methods: Clinical and outcome data from 44 patients were reviewed. Resected specimens were re-evaluated to measure viable cells, necrosis, fibrosis, and hyalinization. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used for univariate and multivariate analyses to correlate outcomes with pathologic response. Results: The median percentages of viable cells, necrosis, and fibrosis/hyalinization were 20%, 11%, and 40%, respectively. A pathologic complete response (pCR), defined as ≤5% viable cells, was achieved in 25% of cases. Local recurrence occurred in 33% of cases, with a significantly higher rate of 64% after R1 resection compared to 22% after R0 resection. Distant metastases were observed in 42% of patients, primarily in the lungs. The 3-year rates for LRFS, DMFS, and OS were 65%, 54%, and 67%, respectively. A correlation between outcomes and tumor size, grade and histological subtype was observed. Classifying pathologic response by the EORTC-STBSG score failed to show an association with outcomes. Patients achieving pCR showed lower risk of LR and improved OS. Conclusions: While the EORTC-STBSG score did not show a prognostic value, resection specimens with ≤5% viable cells were linked to improved LRFS and OS.

What is the optimal (neo)adjuvant strategy of extremity high-risk soft tissue sarcomas (ESTS)?

Currently, the standard treatment for extremity high-risk soft tissue sarcomas (ESTS) combines surgery and pre- or post-op radiation therapy (RT). In some selected cases, chemotherapy (CT) is incorporated into the therapeutic algorithm as a neoadjuvant approach to enable conservative management. Given the risk of local or metastatic relapse, this paper discusses the potential benefits of CT and RT in high-grade ESTs. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in addition to neoadjuvant CT, the prognostic value of the pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment, and the role for an adjuvant "boost" following resection after pre-operative radiotherapy will be discussed.

Non-invasive monitoring of neoadjuvant radiation therapy response in soft tissue sarcomas by multiparametric MRI and quantification of circulating tumor DNA-A study protocol

BACKGROUND

Wide resection remains the cornerstone of localized soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) treatment. Neoadjuvant radiation therapy (NRT) may decrease the risk of local recurrences; however, its effectiveness for different histological STS subtypes has not been systematically investigated. The proposed prospective study evaluates the NRT response in STS using liquid biopsies and the correlation of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) with histopathology and immunohistochemistry.

METHODS

Patients with localized high-grade STS, who qualify for NRT, are included in this study.

LIQUID BIOPSIES

Quantification of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patient blood samples is performed by targeted next-generation sequencing. Soft-tissue sarcoma subtype-specific panel sequencing in combination with patient-specific exome sequencing allows the detection of individual structural variants and point mutations. Circulating free DNA is isolated from peritherapeutically collected patient plasma samples and ctDNA quantified therein. Identification of breakpoints is carried out using FACTERA. Bioinformatic analysis is performed using samtools, picard, fgbio, and the MIRACUM Pipeline.

MPMRI

Combination of conventional MRI sequences with diffusion-weighted imaging, intravoxel-incoherent motion, and dynamic contrast enhancement. Multiparametric MRI is performed before, during, and after NRT. We aim to correlate mpMRI data with the resected specimen's macroscopical, histological, and immunohistochemical findings.

RESULTS

Preliminary data support the notion that quantification of ctDNA in combination with tumor mass characterization through co-registration of mpMRI and histopathology can predict NRT response of STS.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The methods presented in this prospective study are necessary to assess therapy response in heterogeneous tumors and lay the foundation of future patient- and tumor-specific therapy concepts. These methods can be applied to various tumor entities. Thus, the participation and support of a wider group of oncologic surgeons are needed to validate these findings on a larger patient cohort.

Exploiting docetaxel-induced tumor cell necrosis with tumor targeted delivery of IL-12

There is strong evidence that chemotherapy can induce tumor necrosis which can be exploited for the targeted delivery of immuno-oncology agents into the tumor microenvironment (TME). We hypothesized that docetaxel, a chemotherapeutic agent that induces necrosis, in combination with the bifunctional molecule NHS-IL-12 (M9241), which delivers recombinant IL-12 through specific targeting of necrotic regions in the tumor, would provide a significant antitumor benefit in the poorly inflamed murine tumor model, EMT6 (breast), and in the moderately immune-infiltrated tumor model, MC38 (colorectal). Docetaxel, as monotherapy or in combination with NHS-IL-12, promoted tumor necrosis, leading to the improved accumulation and retention of NHS-IL-12 in the TME. Significant antitumor activity and prolonged survival were observed in cohorts receiving docetaxel and NHS-IL-12 combination therapy in both the MC38 and EMT6 murine models. The therapeutic effects were associated with increased tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and were dependent on CD8+ T cells. Transcriptomics of the TME of mice receiving the combination therapy revealed the upregulation of genes involving crosstalk between innate and adaptive immunity factors, as well as the downregulation of signatures of myeloid cells. In addition, docetaxel and NHS-IL-12 combination therapy effectively controlled tumor growth of PD-L1 wild-type and PD-L1 knockout MC38 in vivo, implying this combination could be applied in immune checkpoint refractory tumors, and/or tumors regardless of PD-L1 status. The data presented herein provide the rationale for the design of clinical studies employing this combination or similar combinations of agents.

Detection of circulating tumor-derived material in peripheral blood of pediatric sarcoma patients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Detection of circulating tumor-derived material (cTM) in the peripheral blood (PB) of cancer patients has been shown to be useful in early diagnosis, prediction of prognosis, and disease monitoring. However, it has not yet been thoroughly evaluated for pediatric sarcoma patients.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases for studies reporting the detection of circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor DNA, and circulating RNA in PB of pediatric sarcoma patients. Data on performance in identifying cTM and its applicability in diagnosis, and evaluation of tumor characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment response was extracted from publications.

RESULTS

A total of 79 studies were assigned for the present systematic review, including detection of circulating tumor cells (116 patients), circulating tumor DNA (716 patients), and circulating RNA (2887 patients). Circulating tumor cells were detected in 76% of patients. Circulating DNA was detected in 63% by targeted NGS, 66% by shallow WGS, and 79% by digital droplet PCR. Circulating RNA was detected in 37% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Of the cTM from Ewing's sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma ctDNA proved to be the best target for clinical application including diagnosis, tumor characterization, prognosis, and monitoring of disease progression and treatment response. For osteosarcoma the most promising targets are copy number alterations or patient specific micro RNAs, however, further investigations are needed to obtain consensus on clinical utility.

Trimodality Treatment of Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Where Do We Go Now?

OPINION STATEMENT

Extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) constitutes the majority of patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Patients with localized high-grade ESTS > 5 cm in size carry a substantial risk of developing distant metastasis on follow-up. A neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy approach can enhance local control by facilitating resection of the large and deep locally advanced tumors while trying to address distant spread by treating the micrometastasis for these high-risk ESTS. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy are often used for children with intermediate- or high-risk non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue tumors in North America and Europe. In adults, the cumulative evidence supporting preoperative chemoradiotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial. However, some studies support a possible benefit of 10% in overall survival (OS) for high-risk localized ESTS, especially for those with a probability of 10-year OS < 60% using validated nomograms. Opponents of neoadjuvant chemotherapy argue that it delays curative surgery, compromises local control, and increases the rate of wound complications and treatment-related mortality; however, the published trials do not support these arguments. Most treatment-related side effects can be managed with adequate supportive care. A coordinated multidisciplinary approach involving sarcoma expertise in surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy is required to achieve better outcomes for ESTS. The next generation of clinical trials will shed light on how comprehensive molecular characterization, targeted agents and/or immunotherapy can be integrated into the upfront trimodality treatment to improve outcomes. To that end, every effort should be made to enroll these patients on clinical trials, when available.

Retrospective evaluation of the role of gemcitabine-docetaxel in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma

OBJECTIVE

Well-differentiated (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) account for the majority of liposarcomas. Although gemcitabine-docetaxel is used as second-line treatment in soft tissue sarcomas, its efficacy in WDLPS/DDLPS is not established. This study retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of gemcitabine regimens in WDLPS/DDLPS.

METHODS

All patients with WDLPS or DDLPS who received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy at our institution between September 2002 and January 2021 were included. Response was evaluated by an independent radiologist using RECIST 1.1. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate distributions of survival outcomes and log-rank tests were used to compare survival outcomes between subgroups.

RESULTS

Sixty-five WDLPS/DDLPS patients were included. Seven patients (10.8%) received a gemcitabine-based regimen more than once, totaling 72 treatments. The median age at the start of treatment was 66 years (range 32-80 years). Sixty-five (90.3%) regimens were gemcitabine-docetaxel, and 7 (9.7%) were gemcitabine alone. Majorities of treatments were for disease that was recurrent/metastatic (86.1%), was abdominal/retroperitoneal (83.3%), and had DDLPS components (88.9%), while 25.0% of treatments were for multifocal disease. The overall response rate was 9.7% (7/72). All responses were in patients with documented DDLPS. The median time to progression was 9.2 months (95% CI 5.3-12.3 months). The median overall survival from the start of therapy was 18.8 months (95% CI 13.1-32.4 months).

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine-docetaxel is an efficacious second-line treatment for DDLPS. Though cross study comparisons are not advisable, response to gemcitabine-docetaxel compares favorably to current standard options trabectedin and eribulin. This combination is a valid comparator arm for future second-line trials in DDLPS.

Effect of Favorable Pathologic Response After Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy Alone in Soft-tissue Sarcoma

Purpose

Whether the therapeutic response of soft-tissue sarcoma to neoadjuvant treatment is predictive for clinical outcomes is unclear. Given the rarity of this disease and the confounding effects of chemotherapy, this study analyzes whether a favorable pathologic response (fPR) after neoadjuvant radiation therapy (RT) alone is associated with clinical benefits.

Methods and Materials

An institutional review board-approved retrospective review was conducted on a database of patients with primary soft-tissue sarcoma treated at our institution between 1987 and 2015 with neoadjuvant RT alone followed by surgical resection. Time-to-event outcomes estimated with a Kaplan-Meier analysis included overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control, and distant control (DC). Cox regression analyses were performed to determine prognostic variables associated with clinical outcomes.

Results

Of the overall cohort of 315 patients, 181 patients (57%) were included in the primary analysis with documented pathologic necrosis (PN) rates (mean: 59%) and a median follow up from diagnosis of 48 months (range, 4-170 months). The median neoadjuvant RT dose was 50 Gy (range, 40-60 Gy), and the majority of patients had negative surgical margins (79%). Only 35 patients (19%) achieved a fPR (PN ≥95%), which was associated with a higher R0 resection rate (94% vs. 75%; P = .013), a significant 5-year PFS benefit (74% vs. 43%; P = .014), and a nonsignificant 5-year DC benefit (76% vs. 62%; P = .12) compared with PN <95%. On multivariable analysis, fPR was an independent predictor for PFS (hazard ratio: 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.90; P = .022).

Conclusions

Achieving fPR with neoadjuvant RT alone is associated with a higher R0 resection rate and possible DC benefit, translating into a significant improvement in PFS. Further studies to improve pathologic response rates and prospectively validate this endpoint are warranted.

Radiological progression of extremity soft tissue sarcoma following pre-operative radiotherapy predicts for poor survival

OBJECTIVES

To determine if radiological response to pre-operative radiotherapy is related to oncologic outcome in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STSs).

METHODS

309 patients with extremity STS who underwent pre-operative radiation and wide resection were identified from a prospective database. Pre- and post-radiation MRI scans were retrospectively reviewed. Radiological response was defined by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. Local recurrence-free, metastasis-free (MFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared across response groups.

RESULTS

Tumour volume decreased in 106 patients (34.3%; PR - partial responders), remained stable in 97 (31.4%; SD - stable disease), increased in 106 (34.3%; PD - progressive disease). The PD group were older (p = 0.007), had more upper extremity (p = 0.03) and high-grade tumours (p < 0.001). 81% of myxoid liposarcomas showed substantial decrease in size. There was no difference in initial tumour diameter (p = 0.5), type of surgery (p = 0.5), margin status (p = 0.4), or complications (p = 0.8) between the three groups. There were 10 (3.2%) local recurrences with no differences between the three response groups (p = 0.06). 5-year MFS was 52.1% for the PD group vs 73.8 and 78.5% for the PR and SD groups, respectively (p < 0.001). OS was similar (p < 0.001). Following multivariable analysis, worse MFS and OS were associated with higher grade, larger tumour size at diagnosis and tumour growth following pre-operative radiation. Older age was also associated with worse OS.

CONCLUSION

STS that enlarge according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumour criteria following pre-operative radiotherapy identify a high risk group of patients with worse systemic outcomes but equivalent local control.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Post-radiation therapy, STS enlargement may identify patients with potential for worse systemic outcomes but equivalent local control. Therefore, adjunct therapeutic approaches could be considered in these patients.

A moderate dose of preoperative radiotherapy may improve resectability in myxoid liposarcoma

BACKGROUND

Histotype specific neoadjuvant therapy response data is scarce in soft tissue sarcomas. This study aimed to assess the impact of a moderate radiotherapy (RT) dose on resectability and to correlate MRI parameters to pathological treatment response in Myxoid Liposarcoma (MLS).

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial assessed the radiological effects of 36 Gy of preoperative radiotherapy in primary non-metastatic MLS (n=34). Distance of the tumor to the neurovascular bundle, tumor dimensions, fat fraction, enhancing fraction were determined on MRI scans at baseline, after 8 and 16 fractions, and preoperatively. Pathological response was established by central pathology review.

RESULTS

Preoperative radiotherapy resulted in a median increase of 2 mm (IQR 0 to 6) of the distance of the tumor to the neurovascular bundle. As compared to baseline, the median change of the tumor volume, craniocaudal diameter and axial diameter at preoperative MRI were -60% (IQR -74 to -41), -19% (IQR -23 to -7) and -20% (IQR -29 to -12), respectively. The median fat fraction of 0.1 (IQR 0.0-0.1) and enhancing fraction of 0.8 (IQR 0.6 to 0.9) at baseline, changed to 0.2 (IQR 0.1 to 0.5) and to 0.5(IQR 0.4 to 0.9) preoperatively, respectively. Radiological signs of response in terms of volume, enhancing fraction and fat fraction were correlated with specific pathological signs of response like hyalinization, necrosis and fatty maturation.

CONCLUSIONS

A moderate dose of preoperative radiotherapy may improve resectability in MLS and could facilitate achievement of clear margins and function preservation. MRI features which were predictive for expressions of pathological response, can play a role in further personalization of neoadjuvant treatment strategies in order to improve outcome in MLS.

Imaging response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment in soft tissue sarcomas: Where do we stand?

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a broad family of rare tumours for which surgery with radiotherapy represents first-line treatment. Recently, neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy has been increasingly used in high-risk patients in an effort to reduce surgical morbidity and improve clinical outcomes. An adequate understanding of the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapies would optimise patient care, allowing a tailored approach. Although response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) is the most common imaging method to assess tumour response, Choi criteria and functional and molecular imaging (DWI, DCE-MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG-PET) seem to outperform it in the discrimination between responders and non-responders. Moreover, the radiologic-pathology correlation of treatment-related changes remains poorly understood. In this review, we provide an overview of the imaging assessment of tumour response in STS undergoing neoadjuvant treatment, including conventional imaging (CT, MRI, PET) and advanced imaging analysis. Future directions will be presented to shed light on potential advances in pre-surgical imaging assessments that have clinical implications for sarcoma patients.

Complete pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment is associated with better survival outcomes in patients with soft tissue sarcoma: Results of a retrospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) management may include neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment by radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by wide surgical excision. While pathological complete response (pCR) to preoperative treatment is prognostic for survival in osteosarcomas, its significance for STS is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of pCR to pre-operative treatment on 3-year disease-free survival (3y-DFS) in STS patients.

METHODS

This is an observational, retrospective, international, study of adult patients with primary non-metastatic STS of the extremities and trunk wall, any grade, diagnosed between 2008 and 2012, treated with at least neoadjuvant treatment and surgical resection and observed for a minimum of 3 years after diagnosis. The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of pCR. (≤5% viable tumor cells or ≥95% necrosis/fibrosis) on 3y-DFS. Effect on local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant recurrence-free survival (MFS) overall survival (OS) at 3 years was also analyzed. Statistical univariate analysis utilized chi-square independence test and odds ratio confidence interval (CI) estimate, multivariate analysis was performed using LASSO.

RESULTS

A total of 330 patients (median age 56 years old, range:19-95) treated by preoperative RT (67%), CT (15%) or CRT (18%) followed by surgery were included. pCR was achieved in 74/330 (22%) of patients, of which 56/74 (76%) had received RT. 3-yr DFS was observed in 76% of patients with pCR vs 61% without pCR (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that pCR is statistically associated with better MFS (95% CI, 1.054-3.417; p = 0.033), LRFS (95% CI, 1.226-5.916; p = 0.014), DFS (95% CI, 1.165-4.040; p = 0.015) and OS at 3 years (95% CI, 1.072-5.210; p = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

In a wide, heterogeneous STS population we showed that pCR to preoperative treatment is prognostic for survival.

Dose Reduction of Preoperative Radiotherapy in Myxoid Liposarcoma: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

IMPORTANCE

Currently, preoperative radiotherapy for all soft-tissue sarcomas is identical at a 50-Gy dose level, which can be associated with morbidity, particularly wound complications. The observed clinical radiosensitivity of the myxoid liposarcoma subtype might offer the possibility to reduce morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether a dose reduction of preoperative radiotherapy for myxoid liposarcoma would result in comparable oncological outcome with less morbidity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The Dose Reduction of Preoperative Radiotherapy in Myxoid Liposarcomas (DOREMY) trial is a prospective, single-group, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial being conducted in 9 tertiary sarcoma centers in Europe and the US. Participants include adults with nonmetastatic, biopsy-proven and translocation-confirmed myxoid liposarcoma of the extremity or trunk who were enrolled between November 24, 2010, and August 1, 2019. Data analyses, using both per-protocol and intention-to-treat approaches, were conducted from November 24, 2010, to January 31, 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

The experimental preoperative radiotherapy regimen consisted of 36 Gy in once-daily 2-Gy fractions, with subsequent definitive surgical resection after an interval of 4 or more weeks.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

As a short-term evaluable surrogate for local control, the primary end point was centrally reviewed pathologic treatment response. The experimental regimen was regarded as a success when 70% or more of the resection specimens showed extensive treatment response, defined as 50% or greater of the tumor volume containing treatment effects. Morbidity outcomes consisted of wound complications and late toxic effects.

RESULTS

Among the 79 eligible patients, 44 (56%) were men and the median (interquartile range) age was 45 (39-56) years. Two patients did not undergo surgical resection because of intercurrent metastatic disease. Extensive pathological treatment response was observed in 70 of 77 patients (91%; posterior mean, 90.4%; 95% highest probability density interval, 83.8%-96.4%). The local control rate was 100%. The rate of wound complication requiring intervention was 17%, and the rate of grade 2 or higher toxic effects was 14%.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of the DOREMY nonrandomized clinical trial suggest that deintensification of preoperative radiotherapy dose is effective and oncologically safe and is associated with less morbidity than historical controls, although differences in radiotherapy techniques and follow-up should be considered. A 36-Gy dose delivered in once-daily 2-Gy fractions is proposed as a dose-fractionation approach for myxoid liposarcoma, given that phase 3 trials are logistically impossible to execute in rare cancers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02106312.

Neoadjuvant Treatment Options in Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Due to the heterogeneity of soft tissue sarcomas (STS), the choice of the proper perioperative treatment regimen is challenging. Neoadjuvant therapy has attracted increasing attention due to several advantages, particularly in patients with locally advanced disease. The number of available neoadjuvant modalities is growing continuously. We may consider radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiosensitizers, hyperthermia, and their combinations. This review discusses possible neoadjuvant treatment options in STS with an emphasis on available evidence, indications for each treatment type, and related risks. Finally, we summarize current recommendations of the STS neoadjuvant therapy response assessment.

Isolated limb perfusion for soft tissue sarcoma: Current practices and future directions. A survey of experts and a review of literature

Soft tissue sarcomas constitute 1% of adult malignant tumors. They are a heterogeneous group of more than 50 different histologic types. Isolated limb perfusion is an established treatment strategy for locally advanced sarcomas. Since its adoption for sarcomas in 1992, after the addition of TNFα, few modifications have been done and although indications for the procedure are essentially the same across centers, technical details vary widely. The procedures mainly involves a 60 min perfusion with melphalan and TNFα under mild hyperthermia, achieving a limb preservation rate of 72-96%; with an overall response rates from 72 to 82.5% and an acceptable toxicity according to the Wieberdink scale. The local failure rate is 27% after a median follow up of 14-31 months compared to 40% of distant recurrences after a follow up of 12-22 months. Currently there is no consensus regarding the benefit of ILP per histotype, and the value of addition of radiotherapy or systemic treatment. Further developments towards individualized treatments will provide a better understanding of the population that can derive maximum benefit of ILP with the least morbidity.

Tumor necrosis and clinical outcomes following neoadjuvant therapy in soft tissue sarcoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The prognostic role of tumor necrosis following neoadjuvant therapy is established in bone sarcomas but remains unclear in soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, MEDLINE in progress, EMBASE and Cochrane to identify studies that investigated neoadjuvant therapy in STS. Studies were required to report survival data based on extent of necrosis, or provided individual patient data allowing estimation thereof. Hazard ratios (HR) for relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) and odds ratios (OR) for recurrence at 3 years and for death at 5 years were pooled in a random effect meta-analysis. Associations between patient characteristics and attainment of ≥90% necrosis were explored.

RESULTS

21 studies comprising 1663 patients were included. Extremity tumors were most common (n = 1554; 93%). Induction regimens included chemotherapy with radiotherapy (n = 924; 56%), chemotherapy alone (n = 412; 25%), radiotherapy alone (n = 78; 5%), isolated limb perfusion (ILP) (n = 231; 14%), and targeted therapy/radiotherapy (n = 18; 1%). Patients with <90% necrosis had higher hazard of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.47; 95% CI: 1.06-2.04; p = 0.02) and death (HR 1.86; 95% CI: 1.41-2.46; p < 0.001). Risk of recurrence at 3 years (OR = 3.35; 95% CI: 2.27-4.92; p < 0.001) and of death at 5 years (OR 2.60; 95% CI: 1.59-4.26; p < 0.001) were similarly increased. Compared to other modalities, ILP was associated with higher odds of achieving ≥90% necrosis (OR 12.1; 95% CI: 3.69-39.88; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Tumour necrosis <90% following neoadjuvant therapy is associated with increased recurrence risk and inferior OS in patients with STS.

Histopathological tumor response following neoadjuvant hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion in extremity soft tissue sarcomas: Evaluation of the EORTC-STBSG response score

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to evaluate the applicability and prognostic value of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (EORTC-STBSG) histopathological response score in extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) patients treated with neoadjuvant hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) and delayed surgical resection.

METHODS

Patients treated between 1991 and 2016 were included. The histopathological tumor response was established in accordance with the EORTC-STBSG response score. The distribution of patients was assorted according to the 5-tier histopathological response score for tumor grade, histological subtype and HILP regimen. Predictors for local recurrence free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) were identified through Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were included and their resection specimens were reanalyzed. Which resulted in 11 Grade A (12.1%), ten Grade B (11.0%), 15 Grade C (16.5%), 22 Grade D (24.2%) and 33 Grade E (36.3%) responses found among the series. The histopathological response was significantly influenced by the HILP regimen used, p = 0.033. Median follow-up was 65.0 (18.0-157.0) months. The histopathological response was not associated with LRFS nor OS. Resection margins, HILP regimen and adjuvant radiotherapy were associated with LRFS. Patients' age, tumor grade, tumor size and histological subtype were predictors for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The EORTC-STBSG response score is applicable for determining the histopathological response to neoadjuvant ESTS treatment. However, this response does not seem to predict LRFS nor OS in locally advanced ESTS.

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion, preoperative radiotherapy, and surgery (PRS) a new limb saving treatment strategy for locally advanced sarcomas

BACKGROUND

This feasibility study presents the results of a new intensive treatment regimen for locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcomas (ESTS), consisting of hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP), preoperative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and surgical resection.

METHODS

From 2011 to 2016, 11 high grade locally advanced ESTS patients underwent this treatment regimen. Preoperative EBRT (12 × 3 Gy) started <4 weeks following the HILP (TNF-α and melphalan) and the surgical resection was planned to take place <2 weeks following the end of the EBRT.

RESULTS

All patients completed the treatment. After a median follow-up of 32 (23-50) months, the limb was saved in 10 patients (91%), 1 patient (9%) developed a local recurrence, 5 patients (45%) developed distant metastases, and 3 patients (27%) died of their disease. During follow-up two patients (18%) developed a pathologic fracture of the treated limb and three patients (27%) developed a major wound complication requiring surgical intervention. The median overall treatment time (OTT) was 56 (49-69) days.

CONCLUSIONS

This intensive treatment regimen is feasible and safe in locally advanced ESTS, and it achieves oncological results that are comparable with conventional HILP treatment. In addition, the major wound complication risk is comparable and the OTT is reduced.

Molecular Predictors of Radiotherapy Response in Sarcoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Soft-tissue sarcoma is one of the few clinical cancer models in which pre-operative radiotherapy is commonly utilized and in which tumor response to radiotherapy could be assessed. However, clinical and histopathological features of soft-tissue sarcomas are not useful in predicting tumor radiotherapy response. Exploration of predictive markers of sarcoma response to radiotherapy is further confounded by discordance between radiological tumor size reduction, pathological changes, and clinical local recurrence rates. The diversity of disease histology and anatomical origin further influences which type of radiotherapy response (volumetric vs. cytotoxic) would best relate to patient outcome. Advances in molecular biology and understanding of sarcoma biology have recently resulted in the identification of several molecular and imaging predictive markers of radiotherapy response. As the underlying mechanism of radiation-induced cell killing involves the production of DNA damage through the production of oxygen radicals, the most promising biomarkers and imaging markers are related to DNA damage repair genes, hypoxia, and tumor vasculature. As bone and cartilaginous sarcomas are less often treated with radiotherapy, biomarkers of response in these diseases are less examined.