Utility of sentinel lymph node biopsy for solitary dermal melanomas

Evaluation of Preoperative and Intraoperative Mobile Gamma Camera Imaging in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma Independent of Preoperative Lymphoscintigraphy

INTRODUCTION

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a standard practice for staging cutaneous melanoma. High false-negative rates have an increased interest in adjunctive techniques for localizing SLNs. Mobile gamma cameras (MGCs) represent potential tools to enhance SLNB performance.

METHODS

An institutional review board approval was obtained for this study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01531608). After obtaining informed consent, 20 eligible melanoma patients underwent 99mTc sulfur colloid injection and standard lymphoscintigraphy with a fixed gamma camera (FGC). A survey using a 20 cm square MGC, performed immediately preoperatively by the study surgeon, was used to establish an operative plan while blinded to the FGC results. Subsequently, SLNB was performed using a gamma probe and a novel 6 cm diameter handheld MGC.

RESULTS

A total of 24 SLN basins were detected by FGC. Prior to unblinding, all 24 basins were identified with the preoperative MGC and the operative plan established by preoperative MGC imaging was confirmed accurate by review of the FGC images. All individual sentinel lymph nodes were identified during intraoperative MGC imaging, and in 5/24 (21%) cases, surgeon-reported additional clinically useful information was obtained from the MGC.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative MGC images provide information consistent with FGC images for planning SLNB and in some cases provide additional information that aided in surgical decision-making.

Assessment of Frailty Can Guide Decision Making for Utilization of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Thick Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is often omitted in selected patients with advanced primary melanoma, although the justification/criteria for omission have been debated.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether assessment of frailty could serve as an objective marker to guide selection for SLNB in patients with advanced primary melanoma.

METHODS

Patients presenting with clinical stage IIC (ulcerated, > 4 mm Breslow thickness) cutaneous melanoma from January 1999 through June 2019 were included. Frailty was assessed using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Frailty Index (MSK FI), a composite score of functional status and medical comorbidities. Five-year melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Cox regression, and predictors of OS were identified using competing risk models.

RESULTS

MSS did not differ between patients who did (n = 451) or did not undergo SLNB (n = 179) [63.2% vs. 65.0%, p = 0.14]; however, omission of SLNB was associated with decreased 5-year OS (29% vs. 44%, p < 0.001). In a multivariable competing risk model, selection for SLNB omission was an independent predictor of death from non-melanoma causes (hazard ratio [HR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-2.3, p < 0.001). After incorporation of the MSK FI score into the multivariable model in this subset, MSK FI (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.5-4.1, p < 0.001), but not SLNB omission, was an independent predictor of poorer OS.

CONCLUSION

We observed worse OS in patients with thick melanoma selected not to undergo SLNB, which was attributed to death due to non-melanoma causes. Formal assessment of frailty may provide an objective prognostic measure to guide selective use of SLNB in these patients.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for T1b Melanoma: Balancing Prognostic Value and Cost

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to report the additional prognostic information and cost associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients with T1b melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An institutional database was queried for patients with T1b melanoma (0.8-1.0 mm or < 0.8 mm with ulceration) with at least 5 years of follow-up. Results of SLNB, completion lymphadenectomy (CLND), recurrence, and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were assessed. Institutional costs of melanoma care were converted to Medicare proportional dollars. A Markov model was created to estimate long-term costs.

RESULTS

Among the total 392 patients, 238 underwent SLNB. Median follow-up was 10.5 years. SLNB was positive in 19 patients (8.0%). Patients who underwent SLNB had higher 10-year nodal recurrence-free survival (98.6% vs. 91.2%, p < 0.001) but not MSS (94.4% vs. 93.2%, p = 0.55). Ulceration (HR 4.7, p = 0.022) and positive sentinel node (HR 11.5, p < 0.001) were associated with worse MSS. Estimates for 5-year costs reflect a fourfold increase in total costs of care associated with SLNB. However, a treatment plan that forgoes adjuvant therapy for resected stage IIIA melanoma but offers systemic therapy for a node-basin recurrence would nullify the additional cost of SLNB.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB is prognostic for T1b melanoma. Its impact on the overall cost of melanoma care is intimately tied to systemic therapy in the adjuvant and recurrent settings.

Clinical significance of tumor mitotic rate and lack of epidermal attachment in melanoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

The primary purpose of this study was to identify the prognostic role of primary dermal melanoma and tumor mitotic rate in melanomas of the head and neck.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the histopathologic, clinical, and demographic data of 256 patients was performed to investigate the impact of primary dermal melanoma and tumor mitotic rate on sentinel lymph node positivity, recurrence, and 5-year overall and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Increased tumor mitotic rate, but not primary dermal melanoma, is a significant predictor of sentinel lymph node positivity and higher likelihood of recurrence. Survival analysis demonstrated that both increased tumor mitotic rate and primary dermal melanoma decreased the 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates of patients with head and neck melanoma lesions.

CONCLUSION

Tumor mitotic rate and primary dermal melanoma may have prognostic significance for both overall and disease-free survival in patients with head and neck melanoma. A larger prospective study is warranted to further elucidate prognostic factors for melanoma in the head and neck region.

The changing landscape of dermatology practice: melanoma and pump-probe laser microscopy

To present current melanoma diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and treatment algorithms and how recent advances in laser pump-probe microscopy will fill in the gaps in our clinical understanding. Expert opinion and significantly cited articles identified in SCOPUS were used in conjunction with a pubmed database search on Melanoma practice guidelines from the last 10 years. Significant advances in melanoma treatment have been made over the last decade. However, proper treatment algorithm and prognostic information per melanoma stage remain controversial. The next step for providers will involve the identification of patient population(s) that can benefit from recent advances. One method of identifying potential patients is through new laser imaging techniques. Pump-probe laser microscopy has been shown to correctly identify nevi from melanoma and furthermore stratify melanoma by aggressiveness. The recent development of effective adjuvant therapies for melanoma is promising and should be utilized on appropriate patient populations that can potentially be identified using pump-probe laser microscopy.

Dermal melanoma: A report on prognosis, outcomes, and the utility of sentinel lymph node biopsy

INTRODUCTION

Historically dermal melanoma (DM) has been labeled as either stage IIIB (in-transit) or stage IV (M1a) disease. We sought to investigate the natural history of DM and the utility and prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).

METHODS

Patients with DM undergoing SLNB at a single center from 1998 to 2009 were identified.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients met criteria, 10 (12%) patients had a positive SLNB. Of those, 5 (50%) recurred (all with distant disease). Twenty-one (29%) of the 73 SLNB negative patients recurred and of those, 15 (71%) developed distant metastases, whereas 6 (29%) developed local or regional recurrence, including two false-negative regional nodal recurrences. No in-transit recurrences were recorded. Five-year recurrence-free and disease-specific survival was significantly better for patients with a negative SLNB versus positive SLNB (56.8% vs. 22.2% P = 0.02, 81.1% vs. 61.0%, P = 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSION

SLNB has prognostic significance for RFS and DSS, and should be utilized in the management of DM based on a >10% yield and low false-negative rate. Our data demonstrate patients with DM do not recur in an in-transit fashion, which along with the survival outcomes suggest the behavior of DM is consistent with primary cutaneous melanoma of similar thickness rather than an isolated in-transit or distant dermal metastasis from a regressed cutaneous primary.