Limitations of the definition of sarcopenia in cancer surgery

Predictive value of preoperative handgrip strength on postoperative outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the predictive value of preoperative handgrip strength on postoperative outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal tumors.

METHODS

Databases including Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL Complete were searched for articles published from the establishment of database until August 7, 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included, involving five prospective and three retrospective cohort studies with 2291 participants. The prevalence of preoperative low handgrip strength ranged from 11.8 to 62.7%. Preoperative low handgrip strength was associated with an increased risk of total complications (OR = 2.23, 95%CI = 1.43-3.50), pneumonia (OR = 5.16, 95%CI = 3.17-8.38), ileus (OR = 2.48, 95%CI = 1.09-5.65), and short-term mortality (OR = 7.28, 95%CI = 1.90-27.92).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that preoperative HGS had important value to predict certain adverse postoperative outcomes among patients with GI tumors. Low handgrip strength criteria, definition of total complications, and country are the potential sources of heterogeneity, and more research are required to test and update these results.

AWGS2019 vs EWGSOP2 for diagnosing sarcopenia to predict long-term prognosis in Chinese patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia is a nutrition-related disease and has a profound effect on the long-term overall survival (OS) of patients with gastric cancer. Its diagnostic criterion is critical to clinical diagnosis and treatment. However, previous research reported widely differing sarcopenia prevalence due to different criteria. AWGS2019 and EWGSOP2 are the two latest and widely adopted criteria.

AIM

To compare the effects of AWGS2019 and EWGSOP2 on the long-term OS of Chinese gastric cancer patient after radical gastrectomy.

METHODS

An observational study was conducted from July 2014 to January 2017, which included 648 consecutive gastric cancer patients who underwent radical gastrectomy. The sarcopenia elements (skeletal muscle index, handgrip strength, and gait speed) were measured within 1 mo or 7 d before surgery. The patients were followed at fixed intervals to gain the outcomes. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the association between sarcopenia and the long-term OS of these patients according to the two criteria separately. The predictive performance of the models with AWGS2019 and EWGSOP2 were evaluated by the concordance index (C-index) and area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The Akaike information criterion (AIC) was applied to compare model fits.

RESULTS

The prevalence of sarcopenia was 20.5% and 11.3% according to AWGS2019 and EWGSOP2, respectively. Sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for the long-term OS no matter based on AWGS2019 or EWGSOP2, but AWGS2019-sarcopenia in multivariate model had a higher hazard ratio (HR) [2.150 (1.547-2.988)] than EWGSOP2-sarcopenia [HR 1.599 (1.092-2.339)]. Meanwhile, the model with AWGS2019-sarcopenia [C-index 0.773 (0.742-0.804); AIC 2193.7; time-dependent AUC 0.812 (0.756-0.867) for 1-year OS, 0.815 (0.778-0.852) for 3-year OS, and 0.809 (0.759-0.859) for 5-year OS] had better predictive power and model fits than the model with EWGSOP2-sarcopenia [C-index 0.762 (0.729-0.795); AIC 2215.2; time-dependent AUC 0.797 (0.741-0.854) for 1-year OS, 0.804 (0.767-0.842) for 3-year OS, and 0.799 (0.748-0.850) for 5-year OS].

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia is an independent risk factor for the long-term OS in Chinese gastric cancer patients undergoing radical gastrectomy. The prediction model with AWGS2019-sarcopenia has better predictive power and model fits than the prediction model with EWGSOP2-sarcopenia. AWGS2019 may be more appropriate for diagnosing sarcopenia in these Chinese patients than EWGSOP2.

Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery reduces the adverse impacts of sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia is a negative predictor for postoperative recovery. This study was performed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer patients with sarcopenia.

METHODS

We conducted a study of patients who underwent curative surgeries for colorectal cancer in two centers from July 2014 to July 2018. In order to reduce selection bias, we conducted a propensity score matching analysis. Preoperative characteristics including age, gender, anemia, body mass index, hypoalbuminemia, America society of anesthesiology scores, epidural anesthesia, operative procedure, stoma, tumor location, and combined resection were incorporated in the model, and produced 58 matched pairs. The third lumbar skeletal muscle mass, handgrip strength, and 6 m usual gait speed were measured to define sarcopenia. Short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In a total of 1136 patients, 272 had sarcopenia diagnosed, and 227 were further analyzed in this study. Among them, 108 patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery and 119 underwent open colorectal surgery. In the matched cohort, the clinical characteristics of the two groups were well matched. The laparoscopic group had significantly reduced overall complications (15.5% vs. 36.2%, P = 0.016) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (10.5 vs. 14, P = 0.027). Subgroup analysis of postoperative complications showed that the incidence of surgical complications (P = 0.032) was lower in the laparoscopic group. Hospitalization costs (P = 0.071) and 30-day readmissions (P = 0.215) were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is a safe and feasible option with better short-term outcomes in patients with sarcopenia.

EWGSOP2 versus EWGSOP1 for sarcopenia to predict prognosis in patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy: Analysis from a large-scale prospective study

BACKGROUND

In 2010, the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) reached a consensus on sarcopenia (EWGSOP1). In 2018, the EWGSOP met again (EWGSOP2) to update original definition of sarcopenia. This study aimed to investigate the association of sarcopenia and survival and compare the prognostic effects of sarcopenia as defined by EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2 after gastrectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study including patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer from August 2014 to February 2018. The sarcopenia elements, including skeletal muscle index, muscle attenuation, handgrip strength, and gait speed were measured before surgery. Patients were followed up after gastrectomy to gain the actual clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The prevalence of sarcopenia was 17.0% and 18.9% according to the EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2 respectively. Sarcopenia was independent risk factor for postoperative complications. Compared with EWGSOP1-sarcopenia, EWGSOP2-sarcopenia and had a higher odds ratio (OR) (2.453 vs. 1.550) in multivariate model. Area under the ROC curve of model including EWGSOP2-sarcopenia was larger than that of the model including EWGSOP1-sarcopenia (AUC 0.653 vs. 0.634, P = 0.021). For both of EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2, sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), but EWGSOP2-sarcopenia seemed to have a higher hazard ratio (OS, 1.667 vs. 1.449; DFS, 1.603 vs. 1.563). In addition, severe sarcopenia, as defined by either EWGSOP2 or EWGSOP1, had a strong predictive power (OR 4.909 vs. 3.827) for postoperative complications. Both versions of severe sarcopenia were significantly predictive of OS and DFS in Cox analysis.

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia at uniform diagnosis standard was an independent risk factor for survival in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Sarcopenia defined by EWGSOP2 criteria better predicts clinical outcomes than that defined by EWGSOP1 criteria in patients with gastric cancer after gastrectomy.

Sarcopenia: a new predictor of postoperative complications for elderly gastric cancer patients who underwent radical gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

A geriatric assessment is needed to identify high-risk elderly patients with gastric cancer. However, the current geriatric assessment has been considered to be either time-consuming or subjective. The present study aimed to investigate the predictive effect of sarcopenia on the postoperative complications for elderly patients who underwent radical gastrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective study of patients who underwent radical gastrectomy from August 2014 to December 2015. Computed tomography-assessed lumbar skeletal muscle, handgrip strength, and gait speed were measured to define sarcopenia.

RESULTS

Sarcopenia was present in 69 of 240 patients (28.8%) and was associated with lower body mass index, lower serum albumin, lower hemoglobin, and higher nutritional risk screening 2002 scores. Postoperative complications significantly increased in the sarcopenic patients (49.3% versus 24.6%, P < 0.001), compared with nonsarcopenic patients. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that sarcopenia (odds ratio: 2.959, 95% CI: 1.629-5.373, P < 0.001) and the Charlson comorbidity index ≥2 (odds ratio: 3.357, 95% CI: 1.144-9.848, P = 0.027) were independent risk factors for postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia, presented as a new geriatric assessment factor, was a strong and independent risk factor for postoperative complications of elderly patients with gastric cancer.

Sarcopenia predicts 1-year mortality in elderly patients undergoing curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective study

PURPOSE

One-year mortality is vital for elderly oncologic patients undergoing surgery. Recent studies have demonstrated that sarcopenia can predict outcomes after major abdominal surgeries, but the association of sarcopenia and 1-year mortality has never been investigated in a prospective study.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study of elderly patients (≥65 years) who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer from July 2014 to July 2015. Sarcopenia was determined by the measurements of muscle mass, handgrip strength, and gait speed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the risk factors associated with 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 173 patients were included, in which 52 (30.1 %) patients were identified as having sarcopenia. Twenty-four (13.9 %) patients died within 1 year of surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for 1-year mortality. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated an increased predictive power for 1-year mortality with the inclusion of sarcopenia, from 0.835 to 0.868. Solely low muscle mass was not predictive of 1-year mortality in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia is predictive of 1-year mortality in elderly patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery. The measurement of muscle function is important for sarcopenia as a preoperative assessment tool.