Tanning beds: A call to action for further educational and legislative efforts

Perceptions of Risk and Responses to Tanning Bed Warning Labels: A Pilot Study

Tanning bed use has been linked to increases in skin cancer among young women. Although a causal relationship between ultraviolet radiation emitted by tanning beds and melanoma is well established, it is unclear if tanning bed users are aware of the risk and how they would respond to a warning message. Two hundred and ten women aged 16–29 who had used a tanning bed at least once in the last year were asked about their perceptions of risk and their responses to a warning label. Participants were already aware that tanning beds could cause cancer, but after viewing a warning label, most people said they would stop or reduce their tanning bed use. Reactions to a prototype warning label were encouraging and future research should pursue the possibility that current guidelines for tanning bed warning labels may need to be revised.

Skin Cancer Risk Perception and Tanning Bed Use: A Population-Based Survey to Identify Persons at Risk for Melanoma in Olmsted County, Minnesota

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous melanoma is strongly associated with tanning bed use.

OBJECTIVE

To describe local residents' knowledge, attitudes, and behavior regarding skin cancer and tanning bed use and to estimate prevalence of high risk for melanoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey was mailed to 886 local residents (549, aged 18-39 years; 337, aged ≥40 years). Logistic and linear regression and univariate and multivariable analysis were used to assess perceived risk and skin cancer knowledge.

RESULTS

The response rate was 21%; 55% of the younger group and 37% of the older group had used indoor tanning, and prevalence of high risk for melanoma according to a skin cancer risk calculator was 18% in the younger group and 33% in the older group. Individuals with high risk scores were more likely to correctly perceive that they were at high risk for skin cancer. Most participants with high risk scores and those who previously used tanning beds reported low likelihood of future indoor tanning.

CONCLUSION

Female sex, high risk score, and previous indoor tanning were associated with participants' views of higher skin cancer risk. No specific knowledge gaps were identified. Understanding community residents' attitudes about skin cancer and indoor tanning can help guide interventions.

Indoor Tanning and the Risk of Overall and Early-Onset Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Motivated by the increasing incidences of skin cancer, in 2015, Australian states banned indoor tanning to prevent exposure to artificial ultraviolet light. However, there has been no study investigating the association between indoor tanning and early-onset melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer. In this study, we reviewed a total of 54 studies to examine the association between indoor tanning device use and overall and early-onset skin cancer. We found that indoor tanning is associated with increased risk for early-onset melanoma and NMSC, and has a dose–response relationship with first exposure at an early age and the frequency of exposure. Therefore, this study emphasizes the importance of avoiding indoor tanning risk in younger adults. Our findings provide evidence that supports policies regulating the excessive use of tanning devices, especially in the vulnerable younger population, to reduce the additional risk of skin cancer.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the association between indoor tanning use and the risk of overall and early-onset (age < 50) melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). To evaluate the association between indoor tanning and skin cancer, a systematic review of the literature published until July 2021 was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Summary relative risk (RR) from 18 studies with 10,406 NMSC cases and 36 studies with 14,583 melanoma cases showed significant association between skin cancer and indoor tanning (melanoma, RR= 1.27, 95% CI 1.16–1.39; NMSC, RR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.18–1.65; squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), RR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.38–1.81; basal cell carcinoma (BCC), RR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.00–1.55). The risk was more pronounced in early-onset skin cancer (melanoma, RR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.14–2.69; NMSC, RR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.48–2.68; SCC, RR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.38–2.37; BCC, RR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.15–2.77). Moreover, first exposure at an early age (age ≤ 20 years) and higher exposure (annual frequency ≥ 10 times) to indoor tanning showed increasing risk for melanoma (RR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.16–1.85; RR = 1.52, 1.22–1.89) and NMSC (RR = 2.02, 95% CI 1.44–2.83; RR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.31–1.86). These findings provide evidence supporting primary prevention policies regulating modifiable behaviors to reduce the additional risk of skin cancer among younger adults.

Solarium Use and Risk for Malignant Melanoma: Many Open Questions, Not the Time to Close the Debate

To shed further light on the ongoing debate whether sunbed use may increase melanoma risk, we have critically assessed the scientific literature that is at present available, focussing on a meta-analysis that we published recently. Our literature search identified several meta-analyses that report a weak association for ever-exposure to UV radiation from a solarium with melanoma risk. However, the quality of studies included in these meta-analyses and the resulting evidence levels and grades of recommendation were very low due to the lack of interventional trials and because of severe limitations of many of the observational studies. The results of cohort and case-control studies published until today do not prove causality, not even by the Hill criteria. The overall quality of these observational studies and the resulting evidence levels are low due to severe limitations (including unobserved or unrecorded confounding), which leads to bias. It must be recognized that in the majority of studies, published to date, many of the confounding factors, including sun exposure, sunburns and skin type, have not been adequately and systematically recorded and adjusted for. We conclude that the many limitations of the individual studies and the resulting low levels of evidence and grades of recommendation do at present not allow postulation of a causal relationship between solarium use and melanoma risk. At present, there is no convincing evidence that moderate/responsible solarium use increases melanoma risk.