1
|
Han SC, Seong J, Cho SW, Kim HJ, Kim JW, Kim DY, Rhee CS, Won TB. The Search for an Ideal Definitive Treatment of Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Orbit Invasion. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 17:253-262. [PMID: 39075787 PMCID: PMC11375176 DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2024.00157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) often invades the orbit. The treatment approach for sinonasal cancer that has spread to the orbit varies across medical centers and depends on the extent of the invasion. The decision to preserve the orbit in the treatment strategy is made on a case-by-case basis and. RESULTS in varying outcomes. Currently, a multimodal treatment regimen, which may include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy (RT), or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), is commonly adopted for managing sinonasal cancers. This study aims to assess the prognosis of sinonasal SqCC with orbital invasion from various perspectives. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of patients with primary sinonasal SqCC invading the orbit who were treated at Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between 2009 and 2018. The extent of the tumor, orbital invasion, treatment strategies, recurrence rates, and survival rates were analyzed. RESULTS Overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) rates showed no significant differences based on the grade of orbital invasion. When tumor resection with orbit preservation was employed as the definitive treatment, DFS was significantly extended compared to cases where surgery was not the definitive treatment (RT or CCRT). Additionally, there was no significant difference in DFS between patients who underwent orbit exenteration and those who underwent tumor resection with orbit preservation as the definitive treatment. CONCLUSION Tumor resection with orbit preservation as the definitive treatment appears to be the preferred approach, prolonging DFS and increasing the likelihood of longer-term survival in cases of SqCC with orbital invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Cheol Han
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeon Seong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Woo Cho
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Hyun-Jik Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong-Whun Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Dong-Young Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chae-Seo Rhee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Tae-Bin Won
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kuan EC, Wang EW, Adappa ND, Beswick DM, London NR, Su SY, Wang MB, Abuzeid WM, Alexiev B, Alt JA, Antognoni P, Alonso-Basanta M, Batra PS, Bhayani M, Bell D, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Betz CS, Blay JY, Bleier BS, Bonilla-Velez J, Callejas C, Carrau RL, Casiano RR, Castelnuovo P, Chandra RK, Chatzinakis V, Chen SB, Chiu AG, Choby G, Chowdhury NI, Citardi MJ, Cohen MA, Dagan R, Dalfino G, Dallan I, Dassi CS, de Almeida J, Dei Tos AP, DelGaudio JM, Ebert CS, El-Sayed IH, Eloy JA, Evans JJ, Fang CH, Farrell NF, Ferrari M, Fischbein N, Folbe A, Fokkens WJ, Fox MG, Lund VJ, Gallia GL, Gardner PA, Geltzeiler M, Georgalas C, Getz AE, Govindaraj S, Gray ST, Grayson JW, Gross BA, Grube JG, Guo R, Ha PK, Halderman AA, Hanna EY, Harvey RJ, Hernandez SC, Holtzman AL, Hopkins C, Huang Z, Huang Z, Humphreys IM, Hwang PH, Iloreta AM, Ishii M, Ivan ME, Jafari A, Kennedy DW, Khan M, Kimple AJ, Kingdom TT, Knisely A, Kuo YJ, Lal D, Lamarre ED, Lan MY, Le H, Lechner M, Lee NY, Lee JK, Lee VH, Levine CG, Lin JC, Lin DT, Lobo BC, Locke T, Luong AU, Magliocca KR, Markovic SN, Matnjani G, McKean EL, Meço C, Mendenhall WM, Michel L, Na'ara S, Nicolai P, Nuss DW, Nyquist GG, Oakley GM, Omura K, Orlandi RR, Otori N, Papagiannopoulos P, Patel ZM, Pfister DG, Phan J, Psaltis AJ, Rabinowitz MR, Ramanathan M, Rimmer R, Rosen MR, Sanusi O, Sargi ZB, Schafhausen P, Schlosser RJ, Sedaghat AR, Senior BA, Shrivastava R, Sindwani R, Smith TL, Smith KA, Snyderman CH, Solares CA, Sreenath SB, Stamm A, Stölzel K, Sumer B, Surda P, Tajudeen BA, Thompson LDR, Thorp BD, Tong CCL, Tsang RK, Turner JH, Turri-Zanoni M, Udager AM, van Zele T, VanKoevering K, Welch KC, Wise SK, Witterick IJ, Won TB, Wong SN, Woodworth BA, Wormald PJ, Yao WC, Yeh CF, Zhou B, Palmer JN. International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:149-608. [PMID: 37658764 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field. METHODS In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication. RESULTS The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention. CONCLUSION As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Kuan
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Eric W Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel M Beswick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nyall R London
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Sinonasal and Skull Base Tumor Program, Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Shirley Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marilene B Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Waleed M Abuzeid
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Borislav Alexiev
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeremiah A Alt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Paolo Antognoni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Michelle Alonso-Basanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pete S Batra
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mihir Bhayani
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Diana Bell
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christian S Betz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, UNICANCER, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Benjamin S Bleier
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Juliana Bonilla-Velez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Claudio Callejas
- Department of Otolaryngology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ricardo L Carrau
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Roy R Casiano
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Rakesh K Chandra
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Simon B Chen
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alexander G Chiu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Garret Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Naweed I Chowdhury
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Martin J Citardi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marc A Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Gianluca Dalfino
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Iacopo Dallan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - John de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angelo P Dei Tos
- Section of Pathology, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - John M DelGaudio
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Charles S Ebert
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ivan H El-Sayed
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jean Anderson Eloy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - James J Evans
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christina H Fang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, The University Hospital for Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Nyssa F Farrell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Marco Ferrari
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nancy Fischbein
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Adam Folbe
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Wytske J Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meha G Fox
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Gary L Gallia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Christos Georgalas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Anne E Getz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Satish Govindaraj
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stacey T Gray
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessica W Grayson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Bradley A Gross
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jordon G Grube
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Ruifeng Guo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Patrick K Ha
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ashleigh A Halderman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ehab Y Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard J Harvey
- Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, Applied Medical Research Centre, University of South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen C Hernandez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Claire Hopkins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Zhigang Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenxiao Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Ian M Humphreys
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Peter H Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alfred M Iloreta
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Masaru Ishii
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Aria Jafari
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David W Kennedy
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohemmed Khan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adam J Kimple
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd T Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Anna Knisely
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ying-Ju Kuo
- Department of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Devyani Lal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric D Lamarre
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ming-Ying Lan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matt Lechner
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jivianne K Lee
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Victor H Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Corinna G Levine
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jin-Ching Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Derrick T Lin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian C Lobo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Tran Locke
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amber U Luong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly R Magliocca
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Svetomir N Markovic
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gesa Matnjani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Erin L McKean
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Cem Meço
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Salzburg Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Loren Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shorook Na'ara
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniel W Nuss
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Gurston G Nyquist
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gretchen M Oakley
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kazuhiro Omura
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Richard R Orlandi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Nobuyoshi Otori
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Peter Papagiannopoulos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Zara M Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David G Pfister
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alkis J Psaltis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mindy R Rabinowitz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Murugappan Ramanathan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ryan Rimmer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Marc R Rosen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Olabisi Sanusi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Zoukaa B Sargi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Philippe Schafhausen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ahmad R Sedaghat
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Brent A Senior
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Raj Shrivastava
- Department of Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Raj Sindwani
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristine A Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - C Arturo Solares
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Satyan B Sreenath
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Aldo Stamm
- São Paulo ENT Center (COF), Edmundo Vasconcelos Complex, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Katharina Stölzel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Baran Sumer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Pavol Surda
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bobby A Tajudeen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Brian D Thorp
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charles C L Tong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Raymond K Tsang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Justin H Turner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mario Turri-Zanoni
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Aaron M Udager
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Thibaut van Zele
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kyle VanKoevering
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kevin C Welch
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sarah K Wise
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ian J Witterick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tae-Bin Won
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Stephanie N Wong
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Bradford A Woodworth
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Peter-John Wormald
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - William C Yao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chien-Fu Yeh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing Zhou
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vedula S, Kheir L, Hu P, Patel AM, Roden DF, Park RC. Adjuvant Radiation and Survival Following Surgical Resection of Sinonasal Adenocarcinoma. Laryngoscope 2023; 133:2603-2612. [PMID: 36744881 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to investigate the utility of adjuvant radiation in patients who undergo surgical resection for the management of node-negative sinonasal adenocarcinoma (SNAC). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective database review. METHODS The 2004-2016 National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was used to extract patients with surgically resected node-negative SNAC. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox-Proportional Hazards Modelling were used to analyze the impact of adjuvant radiation on overall survival (OS) following surgery. RESULTS 349 patients with SNAC underwent surgical resection. Of these patients, 154 (44.1%) received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Although there was no significant difference in race, age, or sex of those receiving RT, those receiving RT have more advanced diseases and are more likely to have positive margins. Kaplan Meier analysis showed no significant difference in 5-year OS in patient who received adjuvant RT in comparison to those who underwent surgical resection alone (65.7% vs. 72.6%, respectively; p = 0.378). In addition, when looking at only patients with positive margins, 5-year OS still did not have a significant difference (73.8% vs. 61.6%, respectively; p = 0.101). Only patients with clinical AJCC T4 showed a statistically significant survival benefit with adjuvant RT (56.9% vs. 29.9%, respectively; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant RT does not appear to provide a significant survival benefit in patients with resected SNAC, with the exception of those with clinically AJCC T4 disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 133:2603-2612, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudeepti Vedula
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Lena Kheir
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Patrick Hu
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Aman M Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Dylan F Roden
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Richard C Park
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Akay S, Pollard JH, Saad Eddin A, Alatoum A, Kandemirli S, Gholamrezanezhad A, Menda Y, Graham MM, Shariftabrizi A. PET/CT Imaging in Treatment Planning and Surveillance of Sinonasal Neoplasms. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3759. [PMID: 37568575 PMCID: PMC10417627 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Sinonasal cancers are uncommon malignancies with a generally unfavorable prognosis, often presenting at an advanced stage. Their high rate of recurrence supports close imaging surveillance and the utilization of functional imaging techniques. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT has very high sensitivity for the diagnosis of sinonasal malignancies and can also be used as a "metabolic biopsy" in the characterization of some of the more common subgroups of these tumors, though due to overlap in uptake, histological confirmation is still needed. For certain tumor types, radiotracers, such as 11C-choline, and radiolabeled somatostatin analogs, including 68Ga-DOTATATE/DOTATOC, have proven useful in treatment planning and surveillance. Although serial scans for posttreatment surveillance allow the detection of subclinical lesions, the optimal schedule and efficacy in terms of survival are yet to be determined. Pitfalls of 18F-FDG, such as post-surgical and post-radiotherapy crusting and inflammation, may cause false-positive hypermetabolism in the absence of relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinan Akay
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Janet H. Pollard
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Assim Saad Eddin
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Aiah Alatoum
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Sedat Kandemirli
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Ali Gholamrezanezhad
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA 90030, USA
| | - Yusuf Menda
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Michael M. Graham
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Ahmad Shariftabrizi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ferrari M, Alessandrini L, Savietto E, Cazzador D, Schiavo G, Taboni S, Carobbio ALC, Calvanese L, Contro G, Gaudioso P, Emanuelli E, Sbaraglia M, Zanoletti E, Marioni G, Dei Tos AP, Nicolai P. The Prognostic Role of the Immune Microenvironment in Sinonasal Intestinal-Type Adenocarcinoma: A Computer-Assisted Image Analysis of CD3 + and CD8 + Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13050726. [PMID: 37240896 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13050726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The prognostic value of conventional histopathological parameters in the sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) has been debated and novel variables should be investigated. Increasing evidence demonstrated that the evolution of cancer is strongly dependent upon the complex interactions within tumor microenvironment. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the features of immune microenvironment in terms of CD3+ and CD8+ cells in a series of ITAC and explore their prognostic role, as well as their relations with clinicopathological variables. A computer-assisted image analysis of CD3+ and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) density was conducted on surgical specimens of 51 patients with ITAC that underwent a curative treatment including surgery. ITAC displays variable TIL density, which is associated with OS. In a univariate model, the density of CD3+ TIL was significantly related to OS (p = 0.012), whereas the association with CD8+ TIL density resulted in being non-significant (p = 0.056). Patients with intermediate CD3+ TIL density were associated with the best outcome, whereas 5-year OS was the lowest for intermediate CD8+ TIL density. CD3+ TIL density maintained a significant association with OS in the multivariable analysis. TIL density was not significantly related to demographic and clinicopathological variables. CD3+ TIL density was independently associated with OS in a non-linear fashion and patients with intermediate CD3+ TIL density had the best outcome. Though based on a preliminary analysis on a relatively small series of patients, this finding makes TIL density a potential independent prognostic factor of ITAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Ferrari
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, "Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova", University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
- Guided Therapeutics (GTx) Program International Scholarship, University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, ON M5G1L7, Canada
- Technology for Health (PhD Program), Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Lara Alessandrini
- Section of Pathology, Department of Medicine, "Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova", University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Enrico Savietto
- Unit of Otolaryngology, Hospital of Treviso AULSS 2-Marca Trevigiana, 31100 Treviso, Italy
| | - Diego Cazzador
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, "Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova", University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Gloria Schiavo
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, "Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova", University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Stefano Taboni
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, "Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova", University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
- Guided Therapeutics (GTx) Program International Scholarship, University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, ON M5G1L7, Canada
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Innovation in Clinical Research and Methodology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25100 Brescia, Italy
| | - Andrea L C Carobbio
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, "Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova", University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Leonardo Calvanese
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, "Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova", University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Giacomo Contro
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, "Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova", University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
- Technology for Health (PhD Program), Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Piergiorgio Gaudioso
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, "Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova", University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Enzo Emanuelli
- Unit of Otolaryngology, Hospital of Treviso AULSS 2-Marca Trevigiana, 31100 Treviso, Italy
| | - Marta Sbaraglia
- Section of Pathology, Department of Medicine, "Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova", University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Zanoletti
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, "Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova", University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Gino Marioni
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, "Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova", University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Angelo P Dei Tos
- Section of Pathology, Department of Medicine, "Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova", University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, "Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova", University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Multicenter study to assess surgical treatments of 452 sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinomas: A REFCOR study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:39-46. [PMID: 35995650 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective was to assess the local oncological outcomes of endoscopic versus external surgical treatment of sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinomas (ITAC) and the factors of recurrence. METHODS a retrospective non-randomized case-control multicenter study was carried out, including 452 untreated sinonasal ITACs recruited from 10 tertiary referral centers. The tumors were re-classified according to the UICC 2017 (pT). Survival curves were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis was done with the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed with a Cox model adjusted for age, T stage, and radiotherapy. A binary logistic regression compared surgical complications and performed two supplementary analyses on positive margins. RESULTS We compared 195 and 257 patients operated by the external and endoscopic approach, respectively. The mean follow-up was 59.2 ± 48.7 months. Post-operative margins were invaded in 30.6 versus 18.9% of patients, respectively (p = 0.007). The overall recurrence rate was 33.8 versus 24.6%, respectively (p = 0.034). There was a significant difference in favor of the endoscopic approach regarding local recurrence-free survival thanks to better surgical margins in univariate and multivariate analysis (Odd Ratio = 2.01 (1.2-3.36) p = 0.0087). The complication rate (Odds Ratio = 3.4 (1.79-6.32) p < 0.001) was significantly lower in the endoscopic group. The histological positivity of signet-ring cells shows a statistically significant difference in recurrence-free survival (p = 0.0028). CONCLUSION the oncological control of ITAC is better through the endoscopic approach, with negative margins and the absence of signet-ring-cells, two independent factors of recurrence.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lombo C, Castro Silva J, Monteiro E. Sinonasal adenocarcinomas: Retrospective analysis from an oncology center. ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA 2023; 74:15-22. [PMID: 36858783 DOI: 10.1016/j.otoeng.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Sinonasal adenocarcinomas are rare and heterogeneous tumors and for this reason remain understudied. Our purpose is to analyze clinical presentation, outcomes and factors affecting survival of patients with sinonasal adenocarcinomas, treated at our institution. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective review of clinical records of patients with sinonasal adenocarcinoma, treated at a tertiary oncology institution (January 2010 to December 2019). RESULTS Sixty patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma were included, with male preponderance (54.90%) and a mean age of 57.5±14.9 years. Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent type of sinonasal cancer, contrary to previous reports from our institution. In most patients, it was detected at an advanced disease stage, significantly decreasing their survival rate when compared to patients diagnosed at initial stages (p<0.029). Intestinal type adenocarcinoma was established in 47 patients, the most frequent being the colonic subtype (24%). Tumors with good/moderate histologic differentiation presented a survival advantage over those that were poorly differentiated (p=0.043). The most common treatment modality was surgery followed by radiotherapy. Endoscopic resection was performed in 53% of the patients and an external approach was used in 40% of the patients. Estimated overall survival rates at 3 and 5-years were 64% and 53%, respectively, and cancer specific survival 72% and 65%, for the same period. Recurrence rate was 32% and occurred mainly locally. Disease Free Survival rate was 71% at 3 years and 65% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS Despite being the most common sinonasal malignancy in our sample, in contrast to other series, sinonasal adenocarcinomas are still rare tumors with a substantial local failure rate of around 30%. Advanced stage at diagnosis and histologic differentiation grade negatively affected prognosis of these tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catarina Lombo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology of Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal; Department of Otorhinolaryngology of Hospital Senhora da Oliveira de Guimarães, Braga, Portugal.
| | - Joaquim Castro Silva
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology of Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Eurico Monteiro
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology of Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ferrari M, Mattavelli D, Tomasoni M, Raffetti E, Bossi P, Schreiber A, Orlandi E, Taboni S, Rampinelli V, Gualtieri T, Turri-Zanoni M, Battaglia P, Arosio AD, Bignami M, Tartaro T, Molteni M, Bertazzoni G, Fiaux-Camous D, Jourdaine C, Verillaud B, Eu D, Nair D, Moiyadi A, Shetty P, Ghosh-Laskar S, Budrukkar A, Magrini SM, Guillerm S, Faivre S, Piazza C, Gilbert RW, Irish JC, de Almeida JR, Pai P, Herman P, Castelnuovo P, Nicolai P. The MUSES∗: a prognostic study on 1360 patients with sinonasal cancer undergoing endoscopic surgery-based treatment: ∗MUlti-institutional collaborative Study on Endoscopically treated Sinonasal cancers. Eur J Cancer 2022; 171:161-182. [PMID: 35724468 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the last 2 decades, transnasal endoscopic surgery (TES) has become the most frequently employed surgical technique to treat sinonasal malignancies. The rarity and heterogeneity of sinonasal cancers have hampered large non-population-based analyses. METHODOLOGY All patients receiving TES-including treatment between 1995 and 2021 in 5 referral hospitals were included. A prognostic study was performed, and multivariable models were transformed into nomograms. Training and validation sets were based on results from 3 European and 2 non-European centres, respectively. RESULTS The training and validation set included 940 and 420 patients, respectively. The mean age at surgery, primary-versus-recurrent presentation, histology distribution, type of surgery, T category and type of adjuvant treatment were differently distributed in the training and validation set. In the training set, 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival with a 95%-confidence interval were 72.7% (69.5-76.0%) and 66.4% (63.1-69.8%), respectively, significantly varying with histology. At multivariable analyses, age, gender, previous treatment, the extent of resection on the cranial, lateral and posterolateral axes, grade/subtype, T category, nodal status, margin status and adjuvant treatment were all associated with different prognostic outcomes, displaying a heterogeneous significance and effect size according to histology. The internal and external validation of nomograms was satisfactory (optimism-corrected C-index >0.7 and cumulative area under curve >0.7) for all histologies but mucosal melanoma. CONCLUSIONS Outcomes of TES-based treatment of sinonasal cancers vary substantially with histology. This large, non-population-based study provides benchmark data on the prognosis of sinonasal cancers that are deemed suitable for treatment including TES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Ferrari
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, "Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova", University of Padua, Padua, Italy; Guided Therapeutics (GTx) Program International Scholarship, University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, ON, Canada; Technology for Health (PhD Program), Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
| | - Davide Mattavelli
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiologic Sciences, and Public Health, "ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia", University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michele Tomasoni
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiologic Sciences, and Public Health, "ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia", University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Elena Raffetti
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiologic Sciences, and Public Health, "ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia", University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alberto Schreiber
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiologic Sciences, and Public Health, "ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia", University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefano Taboni
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, "Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova", University of Padua, Padua, Italy; Guided Therapeutics (GTx) Program International Scholarship, University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, ON, Canada; Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Innovation in Clinical Research and Methodology (PhD Program), Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Vittorio Rampinelli
- Technology for Health (PhD Program), Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiologic Sciences, and Public Health, "ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia", University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Tommaso Gualtieri
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiologic Sciences, and Public Health, "ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia", University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Mario Turri-Zanoni
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Specialties, "ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi", Varese, Italy; Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy; Head and Neck Surgery & Forensic Dissection Research Center (HNS&FDRc), Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Paolo Battaglia
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Specialties, "ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi", Varese, Italy; Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy; Head and Neck Surgery & Forensic Dissection Research Center (HNS&FDRc), Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Alberto D Arosio
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Specialties, "ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi", Varese, Italy
| | - Maurizio Bignami
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, "ASST Lariana", University of Insubria, Como, Italy
| | - Tiziana Tartaro
- Department of Medical Oncology, "ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi", Varese, Italy
| | - Marinella Molteni
- Department of Radiotherapy, "ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi", Varese, Italy
| | | | | | - Clement Jourdaine
- Hopital Lariboisiere, APHP Nord - Université De Paris, INSERM U 1141, Paris, France
| | - Benjamin Verillaud
- Hopital Lariboisiere, APHP Nord - Université De Paris, INSERM U 1141, Paris, France
| | - Donovan Eu
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Guided Therapeutics (GTx) Program, Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deepa Nair
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Aliasgar Moiyadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Prakash Shetty
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Ashwini Budrukkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Stefano M Magrini
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiologic Sciences, and Public Health, "ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia", University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sophie Guillerm
- Department of Radiotherapy Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Sandrine Faivre
- Department of Medical Oncology Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint Louis, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Cesare Piazza
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiologic Sciences, and Public Health, "ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia", University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Ralph W Gilbert
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan C Irish
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Guided Therapeutics (GTx) Program, Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John R de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Prathamesh Pai
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Philippe Herman
- Hopital Lariboisiere, APHP Nord - Université De Paris, INSERM U 1141, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Specialties, "ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi", Varese, Italy; Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy; Head and Neck Surgery & Forensic Dissection Research Center (HNS&FDRc), Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, "Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova", University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abu-Shama Y, Renard S, Nguyen DT, Henrot P, Toussaint B, Rumeau C, Gallet P, Jankowski R. Descriptive analysis of recurrences of nasal intestinal-type adenocarcinomas after radiotherapy. Head Neck 2022; 44:1356-1367. [PMID: 35355362 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite adjuvant radiotherapy, rates of recurrences of endoscopically operated nasal intestinal-type adenocarcinomas (ITAC) have not been improved in successive series. To better understand how to improve local control, we aimed to investigate the site of local recurrences of ITACs. METHODS Retrospective study in a reference center in sinonasal malignancies. For all patients with a local recurrence, radiotherapy plans were retrieved and compared to the delineation of local recurrences. RESULTS Of 63 patients, 54 underwent adjuvant radiotherapy of which 14 (25.9%) had a local recurrence. Eleven of them had their onset in an optimally irradiated area. Difficulty to dissect the cribriform plate and/or the lateral lamina was reported for 11 patients with local recurrences in the operative reports (p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Most of recurrences arose in an optimally irradiated area. A close cooperation between surgeons and radiotherapists is required to define areas at risk and adapt treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yazan Abu-Shama
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Sophie Renard
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Duc Trung Nguyen
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Philippe Henrot
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Bruno Toussaint
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Cécile Rumeau
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Patrice Gallet
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Roger Jankowski
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Huang H, Chen K, Deng L, Chen Y, Zhao D, Lin W. Development and validation of a nomogram for prognosis of sinonasal adenocarcinoma (a nomogram for sinonasal adenocarcinoma). Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 52:869-879. [PMID: 35642571 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of sinonasal adenocarcinoma is low, and there are few studies on survival and prognosis. Therefore, we aim to develop and validate a prognostic model for predicting the overall survival of sinonasal adenocarcinoma and provide guidance for clinical management. METHODS Patients who were diagnosed as sinonasal adenocarcinoma through Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 1975 and 2015 were randomly divided into a training group and validation group. Univariate, multivariate survival analysis was performed to screen independent survival factors. A nomogram was established to predict the overall survival rate of sinonasal adenocarcinoma. Receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration plot were performed to verify the discrimination and accuracy of the model. A decision curve analysis was performed to verify the clinical applicability of the model. RESULTS A total of 423 patients with sinonasal adenocarcinoma were randomly divided into training group (n = 299) and verification group (n = 124). We established and verified the Nomo map including age, marriage, grade, surgery and tumour size. The c-index of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results stage, T stage and this model are 0.635, 0.626 and 0.803, respectively. The survival rate of the high-risk group scored by this model was lower than that of the low-risk group (P < 0.001). Decision curve analysis shows that the model has advantages in predicting survival rates. CONCLUSION Our model is considered to be a useful tool for predicting the overall survival of sinonasal adenocarcinoma, with good discrimination and clinical applicability. We hope that this model will help rhinologists to make clinical decisions and manage patients diagnosed with sinonasal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hesen Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xia Men, Fu Jian, China
| | - Kaiqin Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xia Men, Fu Jian, China
| | - Lifeng Deng
- Quanzhou Medical College, Quanzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yaling Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xia Men, Fu Jian, China
| | - Dean Zhao
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xia Men, Fu Jian, China
| | - Wei Lin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sinonasal adenocarcinomas: Retrospective analysis from an oncology center. ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.otorri.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
12
|
Meerwein CM, Brada MD, Soyka MB, Holzmann D, Rupp NJ. Reappraisal of Grading in Intestinal-Type Sinonasal Adenocarcinoma: Tumor Budding as an Independent Prognostic Parameter. Head Neck Pathol 2022; 16:670-678. [PMID: 35015192 PMCID: PMC9424375 DOI: 10.1007/s12105-022-01410-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Since sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinomas (ITAC) show resemblance to colorectal adenocarcinomas, we aimed to investigate novel prognostic factors of outcome, with particular focus on the role of tumor budding (TB). Retrospective clinico-pathological single-institution study on consecutive ITAC patients between 1996 and 2020. Histopathological parameters including conventional subtypes and TB features (low, intermediate, high) were evaluated with the aid of pancytokeratin (AE1/AE3) immunohistochemical staining. Parameters were correlated to clinical data and outcome. A total of 31 ITAC patients were included. Overall, 19/31 patients (61.3%) presented with stage III/IV disease. Presence of lymph node or distant metastases was rare (1/31 patient, 3.2%). Treatment protocols consisted of tumor resection in 30/31 patients (96.8%) and primary radiochemotherapy in 1/31 patient (3.2%). Adjuvant radiation therapy was conducted in 20/30 surgically treated patients (66.7%). The 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 83.9% and 78.3% and the 3- and 5-years disease-specific survival (DSS) 83.7% % and 78.5%, respectively. The presence of intermediate/high TB (defined as ≥ 5 buds) was associated with both, worse DSS (log rank p = 0.03) and OS (log rank p = 0.006). No patient with low TB revealed progressive disease or died of the disease. No association between TB and tumor stage or conventional tumor subtype was found. Tumor budding seems to be an independent prognostic factor of worse outcome in ITAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian M. Meerwein
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 24, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Muriel D. Brada
- Department of Molecular Pathology, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael B. Soyka
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 24, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David Holzmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 24, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Niels J. Rupp
- Department of Molecular Pathology, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland ,Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Anderson G, Ebadi M, Vo K, Novak J, Govindarajan A, Amini A. An Updated Review on Head and Neck Cancer Treatment with Radiation Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4912. [PMID: 34638398 PMCID: PMC8508236 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The complexity of head and neck cancers (HNC) mandates a multidisciplinary approach and radiation therapy (RT) plays a critical role in the optimal management of patients with HNC, either as frontline or adjuvant treatment postoperatively. The advent of both definitive and post-operative RT has significantly improved the outcomes of patients with HNC. Herein, we discuss the role of postoperative RT in different subtypes of HNC, its side effects, and the importance of surveillance. The treatment regions discussed in this paper are the oral cavity, nasopharynx, paranasal sinus cavity, oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx. Multiple studies that demonstrate the importance of definitive and/or postoperative RT, which led to an improved outlook of survival for HNC patients will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett Anderson
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA
| | - Maryam Ebadi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Louis A. Weiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL 60640, USA
| | - Kim Vo
- College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA 91766, USA
| | - Jennifer Novak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Ameish Govindarajan
- Department of Internal Medicine, UCLA-Kern Medical Center, Bakersfield, CA 93306, USA
| | - Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Issa K, Smith BD, Kaplan SJ, Madden J, Jang DW, Zomorodi A, Brizel D, Abi Hachem R. A systematic review on sinonasal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2021; 11:1391-1394. [PMID: 34013656 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Khalil Issa
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Blaine D Smith
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Samantha J Kaplan
- Duke Medical Center Library, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - John Madden
- Department of Pathology/Division of Pathology Clinical Services, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - David W Jang
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Ali Zomorodi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - David Brizel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Ralph Abi Hachem
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sommer F. Rare Diseases of the Nose, the Paranasal Sinuses, and the Anterior Skull Base. Laryngorhinootologie 2021; 100:S1-S44. [PMID: 34352902 PMCID: PMC8354577 DOI: 10.1055/a-1331-2469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Due to their low incidence and thus resulting limited diagnostic criteria as well as therapeutic options, rare diseases of the nose, the paranasal sinuses, and the anterior skull base are a significant challenge. The value as of which a disease has to be considered as rare amounts to a maximum of 5 patients per 10 000 people. Within these diseases, however, there are extreme differences. Some rare or orphan diseases like for example the inverted papilloma belong to regularly diagnosed and treated diseases of larger departments of oto-rhino-laryngology whereas other rare diseases and malformations have only been described in less than 100 case reports worldwide. This fact emphasizes the necessity of bundling the available experience of diagnostics and therapy. The present article gives an overview about rare diseases of the nose, the paranasal sinuses, and the anterior skull base from the field of diseases/syndromes of the olfactory system, malformations of the nose and paranasal sinuses, ventilation and functional disorders as well as benign and malignant tumors. The classification and data on diagnostic and therapeutic options were established based on the current literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Sommer
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätsklinik Ulm
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ferrari M, Bossi P, Mattavelli D, Ardighieri L, Nicolai P. Management of sinonasal adenocarcinomas with anterior skull base extension. J Neurooncol 2020; 150:405-417. [PMID: 31897925 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03385-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 12/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sinonasal adenocarcinomas (SNAC) are rare and heterogeneous. Management of SNAC follows a rather standardized and internationally accepted paradigm. Several refinements have been introduced during the last decade. METHODS A narrative review of most updated literature on SNACs has been conducted. RESULTS SNACs are classified as intestinal-type and non-intestinal-type, which are further categorized according to grade. Preoperative work-up should include magnetic resonance imaging (or contrast-enhanced computed tomography as a secondary or complementary choice) and biopsy under general anesthesia, or under local anesthesia in case of a history of exposure to wood and/or leather dust. Positron emission tomography, neck ultrasound, and fine-needle aspiration cytology are indicated in selected cases. Surgery represents the most common upfront modality of treatment and is usually accomplished via a transnasal endoscopic approach. Adjuvant radiation therapy is indicated for high-grade, locally advanced tumors and/or in case of margins involvement. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin may offer high response rates and long-term control in a subgroup of patients affected by intestinal-type adenocarcinoma, and in particular in those whose tumors harbor a functional p53 protein. Most of the bio- and immune-therapeutic potentials on SNACs still remain theoretical, and no clinical data are currently available. CONCLUSIONS Management of SNAC consists of histological diagnosis, radiological staging, radical surgery, and adjuvant radiation therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be indicated in selected cases. The role of biotherapy and immune therapy still needs to be elucidated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Ferrari
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy. .,Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Davide Mattavelli
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| | - Laura Ardighieri
- Department of Pathology, ASST Spedali Civili Di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Patel NN, Maina IW, Kuan EC, Triantafillou V, Trope MA, Carey RM, Workman AD, Tong CC, Kohanski MA, Palmer JN, Adappa ND, Newman JG, Brant JA. Adenocarcinoma of the Sinonasal Tract: A Review of the National Cancer Database. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 81:701-708. [PMID: 33381376 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1696707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2019] [Accepted: 07/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Sinonasal adenocarcinoma (SNAC) is a rare malignancy arising from mucus-secreting glandular tissue. Limited large-scale studies are available due to its rarity. We evaluated SNAC in the National Cancer Database (NCDB), a source that affords multi-institutional, population studies of rare cancers and their outcomes. Methods The NCDB was queried for adenocarcinoma in the sinonasal tract. Multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate for factors contributing to overall survival (OS). Results A total of 553 patients were identified. The cohort was composed of 59.3% males. The nasal cavity was the most common primary site, representing 44.1% of cases. About 5.7% of patients presented with nodal disease, while 3.3% had distant metastases. About 40.6% of cases presented with stage IV disease. About 73.5% of patients underwent surgery, 54.2% received radiation therapy, and 27.7% had chemotherapy. Median OS was 71.7 months, while OS at 1, 2, and 5 years was 82, 73.0, and 52%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, advanced age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.05), Charlson-Deyo score of 1 (HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.20-3.30), advanced tumor grade (HR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.39-5.34), and advanced tumor stage (HR: 2.71; 95% CI: 1.33-5.50) were associated with worse OS, whereas surgery (HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.20-0.60) and radiation therapy (HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.33-0.91), but not chemotherapy (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.66-2.05), predicted improved OS. Conclusions SNAC is a rare malignancy with 5-year survival approximating 50%. Surgery and radiation therapy, but not chemotherapy, are associated with improved survival, and likely play a critical role in the interdisciplinary management of SNAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil N Patel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Ivy W Maina
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Edward C Kuan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Vasiliki Triantafillou
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Michal A Trope
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Ryan M Carey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Alan D Workman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Charles C Tong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Michael A Kohanski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Jason G Newman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Jason A Brant
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Invasion of the orbit by tumors of the paranasal sinus represents an advanced state of disease. Prognosis has hardly improved in recent decades, despite multimodal therapeutic approaches. Complete resection of the tumor still remains the most promising therapy. Orbital exenteration implies a dramatic event for the patient's psyche and quality of life. If the eye that would have to be exenterated is the only one remaining with sufficient vision, exenteration should be abandoned in consensus with the patient. Aesthetic improvements following exenteration can be achieved by surgical and prosthetic techniques. The method of prosthesis fixation needs to be determined with respect to the patients' individual expectations and manual abilities. The main aspects of functional rehabilitation are good local cleanability and sufficient nasal breathing without encrusted mucus, which can be achieved by restoring the natural laminar airflow. Tumors of the paranasal sinus with orbital invasion represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The information regarding prognosis, therapeutic approaches, post-therapeutic quality of life, and rehabilitation options should be thoroughly discussed by patients and therapists prior to treatment.
Collapse
|
19
|
Shay A, Ganti A, Raman A, Kuhar HN, Auger SR, Eggerstedt M, Patel T, Kuan EC, Batra PS, Tajudeen BA. Survival in low-grade and high-grade sinonasal adenocarcinoma: A national cancer database analysis. Laryngoscope 2019; 130:E1-E10. [PMID: 31081940 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS The purpose of this study was to investigate survival differences between low-grade and high-grade sinonasal adenocarcinoma (SNAC) by examining demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment modalities. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective database analysis. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with SNAC between 2004 and 2015. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for all cases of SNAC. Subsequent analysis focused on low-grade (grade 1 and grade 2) and high-grade (grade 3 and grade 4) SNAC. RESULTS A total of 1,288 patients with SNAC were included in the main cohort and divided into low grade (n = 601) and high grade (n = 370). The 5-year overall survival for all patients, low-grade, and high-grade was 54%, 64%, and 38%, respectively. Prognostic factors associated with decreased survival for the main cohort include advanced age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.06), Charlson-Deyo score (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.05-1.78), grade 2 (HR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.26-3.86], grade 3 (HR: 3.67; 95% CI: 2.09-6.45), and grade 4 (HR: 3.31; 95% CI: 1.38-7.91). Radiotherapy was associated with improved overall survival for high-grade SNAC (HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.24-0.70) but not for low-grade SNAC (HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.59-1.85). CONCLUSIONS This investigation is the largest to date analyzing the association of treatment modalities with overall survival in SNAC. Surgery remains paramount to treatment, with radiotherapy offering additional survival benefit for high-grade SNAC. Administration of chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 130:E1-E10, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aryan Shay
- Rush Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ashwin Ganti
- Rush Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Anish Raman
- Rush Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Hannah N Kuhar
- Rush Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Samuel R Auger
- Rush Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Michael Eggerstedt
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Tirth Patel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Edward C Kuan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California, U.S.A
| | - Pete S Batra
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Bobby A Tajudeen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Unilateral endoscopic resection with transnasal craniectomy for sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinoma: A bi-institutional case-control study on 54 patients. Oral Oncol 2018; 87:89-96. [PMID: 30527250 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2018] [Revised: 08/25/2018] [Accepted: 10/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) of the ethmoid mostly affects patients exposed to wood dust and has been traditionally treated with bilateral resection. The aim of the present study was to validate unilateral endoscopic resection with transnasal craniectomy (uERTC) in selected ITACs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients affected by ITAC receiving uERTC from 2004 to 2017 at two tertiary referral centers were retrospectively analyzed. A control group of patients treated with bilateral endoscopic resection with transnasal craniectomy (bERTC) was selected. Olfaction, taste, and quality of life were evaluated. Survival and functional outcomes in the two groups were compared. RESULTS Fifty-four patients who underwent uERTC (case group: 27/54) or bERTC (control group: 27/54) were enrolled. The two groups were statistically comparable. Five-year overall (OS), disease-specific (DSS), recurrence-free (RFS) survivals, and local recurrence rates were not significantly different between groups. Hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the uERTC group (p = 0.0004) and no significant difference in terms of complications was demonstrated. The rate of subjective olfaction preservation was significantly higher in the uERTC group (45.5%) than in the bERTC group (0.0%) (p = 0.0007). Median 22-Items Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) values were not significantly different between groups. No significant association of olfaction and taste preservation/worsening with reconstructive technique, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy was observed. CONCLUSIONS uERTC is an adequate surgical procedure for selected unilateral ITAC with similar survival rates and lower morbidity compared to bERTC. A rigorous follow-up of patients with ITAC is crucial and strongly recommended independently of the extent of resection.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) is one of the most frequent sinonasal tumors, especially in European countries. The purpose of this article is to review the most recent literature, with special emphasis on biological and genetic profile and treatment guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS Results on large series support transnasal endoscopic surgery as the technique of choice in the large majority of patients with ITAC. Adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended in advanced-stage and high-grade lesions. More robust data are required to confirm that early-stage, low-grade lesions can be treated with exclusive surgery. The efficacy of new chemotherapy and biotherapy regimens and the added value of heavy particle radiotherapy are currently under evaluation. With a 5-year overall survival ranging between 53 and 83%, which is mainly impacted by local recurrences, ITAC requires a more detailed understanding of its biology. Genetic and biological studies have identified alterations in the molecular pathways of EGFR, MET, and H-RAS which might be considered as potential targets for biotherapy. SUMMARY Surgery still plays a key role in the treatment of ITAC, but multidisciplinary management is mandatory. Although further validation is needed, the role of nonsurgical treatment strategies is rising, in agreement with the progresses made in the biological profiling of the disease.
Collapse
|
22
|
Bignami M, Lepera D, Volpi L, Lambertoni A, Arosio A, Pistochini A, Nicolai P, Castelnuovo P. Sinonasal Non-Intestinal-Type Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Review of 22 Patients. World Neurosurg 2018; 120:e962-e969. [PMID: 30196179 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Revised: 08/25/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze outcomes and prognostic factors of sinonasal nonsalivary non-intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (n-ITAC.) METHODS: A retrospective review of 22 consecutive patients with n-ITAC was performed. RESULTS Average follow-up time was 77 months. The 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival were 95.2%. The 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival were 100% for pT1, pT2, and pT3 tumors and 83.3% for pT4a and pT4b tumors; 100% for G1 tumors and 87.5% for G3 tumors; and 100% for tumors with negative surgical margin and 50% for tumors with positive surgical margin. Stage, grade, and surgical margins were independent prognostic factors. Adjuvant radiotherapy was performed for high-grade and high-stage tumors. CONCLUSIONS Surgery followed by radiotherapy has remained a mainstay for management of n-ITAC, and the endoscopic transnasal approach, when correctly planned and indicated, is the surgery of choice. Adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended in cases of high-stage (T3 and T4) and high-grade tumors. n-ITAC is associated with a favorable outcome. High grade, pT4 stage, and positive surgical margins are independent negative prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Bignami
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Davide Lepera
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
| | - Luca Volpi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Alessia Lambertoni
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Alberto Arosio
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Andrea Pistochini
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kılıç S, Samarrai R, Kılıç SS, Mikhael M, Baredes S, Eloy JA. Incidence and survival of sinonasal adenocarcinoma by site and histologic subtype . Acta Otolaryngol 2018; 138:415-421. [PMID: 29205085 DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2017.1401229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the incidence and survival of sinonasal adenocarcinoma (SNAC) by subsite and histologic subtype. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective database review. METHODS Using the SEER database, we performed a retrospective analysis, identified cases of SNAC diagnosed between 1973 and 2013 and analyzed demographic, histopathology, clinicopathology, and determinants of disease specific survival (DSS). RESULTS A total of 746 patients with SNAC were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 64 years. Overall incidence was 0.44 per million, and was higher among blacks (O.R.:1.10-2.07:1) and males (O.R.:1.38-2.06:1). Nasal cavity (41.5%) was the most common site, followed by maxillary (26.5%), and ethmoid (17.4%) sinuses. Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma was less likely than Adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (ANOS) to be found in the maxillary sinus (8.8% vs. 30.6%, p < .05). Surgery alone (48.56%) was the most common treatment modality, followed by surgery and radiotherapy (RT) (32.5%), and RT alone (11.6%). DSS at 5, 10, and 20 years were 63.8%, 57.6%, and 47.0%, respectively. DSS was higher for nasal cavity SNAC, lower grade, lower stage, and those receiving surgery only. CONCLUSIONS SNAC is more common among men and blacks. Incidence has not changed significantly in the past 40 years. Survival varies with grade, stage, histology, subsite, and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suat Kılıç
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Ruwaa Samarrai
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Sarah S. Kılıç
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Mina Mikhael
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Soly Baredes
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
- Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Neurological Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Jean Anderson Eloy
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
- Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Neurological Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
López F, Lund VJ, Suárez C, Snyderman CH, Saba NF, Robbins KT, Vander Poorten V, Strojan P, Mendenhall WM, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. The Impact of Histologic Phenotype in the Treatment of Sinonasal Cancer. Adv Ther 2017; 34:2181-2198. [PMID: 28871554 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-017-0605-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The management of sinonasal cancer is a challenge due to its low occurrence and anatomical and significant diversity of histological types. The therapeutic modality used should be tailored individually according to the histology, tumour stage, molecular profile and previous treatments. The clinical management of sinonasal cancer has improved greatly owing to developments in endoscopic surgery and precision radiotherapy. Complete surgical resection is the mainstay of sinonasal malignancies' management but multimodality therapy is associated with improved outcomes in certain histologies. The recognition of various histological types with biological behaviours more suitable for non-surgical modalities has allowed treatment protocols to become more tailored to the disease. In this review we aim to describe and to summarise the current data guiding the management of sinonasal cancer with emphasis on phenotypic variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando López
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
- Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, University of Oviedo, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias and CIBERONC, ISCIII, Oviedo, Spain.
| | - Valerie J Lund
- Professorial Unit, Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Carlos Suárez
- Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, University of Oviedo, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias and CIBERONC, ISCIII, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nabil F Saba
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, The Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - K Thomas Robbins
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, ILL, USA
| | - Vincent Vander Poorten
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Department of Oncology, Section Head and Neck Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Primož Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Alfio Ferlito
- Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Therapy of sinonasal malignancies invading the orbit-orbital exenteration versus preservation of the orbit plus radiotherapy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 45:258-261. [PMID: 28011179 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2016] [Revised: 09/28/2016] [Accepted: 11/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Orbital invasion is a strong independent prognostic factor for sinonasal malignancies. While there is consent about preservation of the orbit for tumors limited to the orbital periosteum there is controversy about the optimal management of sinonasal malignancies transgressing this barrier. Therefore the aim of our study was to compare exenteration versus preservation of the orbit. MATERIAL AND METHODS 52 patients with sinonasal malignancies invading the orbit beyond the orbital periosteum with involvement of the orbital soft tissues were included in the retrospective study. Prognostic factors were identified through univariate analysis. RESULTS Univariate analysis revealed a significant impact of N-classification (p = 0.017), and treatment strategy (p = 0.016). Exenteration of the orbit was associated with a significantly better 5-year overall survival rate (65.5%) than preservation of the orbit (14%). CONCLUSIONS For patients with invasion of the structures beyond the orbital periosteum, exenteration yields better survival results than preservation of the orbital structures in combination with radiotherapy. In cases where both eyes are affected from the tumor or if only one dysfunctional eye would be left over after therapy, we do not recommend orbital exenteration because life quality would be critically deteriorated.
Collapse
|
26
|
Hachem RA, Beer-Furlan A, Elkhatib A, Rangarajan S, Prevedello D, Blakaj D, Bhatt A, Carrau R. Modern Treatment Outcomes in Sinonasal Malignancies. CURRENT OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY REPORTS 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s40136-016-0133-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
27
|
Mortuaire G, Leroy X, Vandenhende-Szymanski C, Chevalier D, Thisse AS. Comparison of endoscopic and external resections for sinonasal instestinal-type adenocarcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273:4343-4350. [PMID: 27363404 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4181-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2015] [Accepted: 06/25/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is considered as a valid option in the management of nasal adenocarcinoma (ADC). Comparative studies with open approaches are still required. A monocentric retrospective study was carried out from May 2002 to December 2013, including 43 patients with intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the ethmoid sinus. Non-resectable tumours or recurrences were excluded. Before 2008, open approach with lateral rhinotomy (LR) was performed as the gold standard of treatment. From 2008, ESS was systematically used as a first-line option as long as a complete resection was achievable. Adjuvant radiation therapy was delivered (RT) for all the patients. LR and ESS were performed in, respectively, 23 and 20 patients. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, occupational dust exposure, histopathological subtypes, and T stage based on the pathological assessment of the specimen (10 pT2, 26 pT3, 2 pT4a, and 5 pT4b). The tumour origin was mainly located in the olfactory cleft with the involvement of the cribriform plate in 60 % of patients. No major complication was observed in ESS group with a reduced hospital stay (5.6 vs 7.6 days). The disease-free survival was not different between LR and ESS groups over a mean follow-up period of 6.6 years. Even for local advanced stages with skull base involvement, we confirm the reliability and the advantages of ESS in terms of oncological outcomes and morbidity. We advocate complete excision of the olfactory cleft to ensure an appropriate control of the tumoral origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey Mortuaire
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital, Lille, France. .,Université de Lille 2, Lille, France. .,Service d'ORL de chirurgie cervico-faciale, Hôpital Huriez CHRU Lille, Lille, 59000, France.
| | - Xavier Leroy
- Université de Lille 2, Lille, France.,Pathology Department, University Hospital, Lille, France
| | | | - Dominique Chevalier
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital, Lille, France.,Université de Lille 2, Lille, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Thisse
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|