1
|
Walach MT, Körner M, Weiß C, Terboven T, Mühlbauer J, Wessels F, Worst TS, Kowalewski KF, Kriegmair MC. Impact of a kidney-adjusted ERAS ® protocol on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:319. [PMID: 39441354 PMCID: PMC11499443 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03513-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2024] [Accepted: 10/15/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evaluation of a kidney-adjusted enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) protocol (kERAS) in patients undergoing nephron-sparing surgery (PN). METHODS The kERAS protocol is a multidimensional protocol focusing on optimized perioperative fluid and nutrition management as well as strict intraoperative and postoperative blood pressure limits. It was applied in a prospective cohort (n = 147) of patients undergoing open or robotic PN. Patients were analyzed for the development of acute postoperative renal failure (AKI), achievement of TRIFECTA criteria, upstaging or new onset of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and length of hospital stay (LOS) and compared to a retrospective cohort (n = 162) without application of the protocol. RESULTS Cox regression analyses could not confirm a protective effect of kERAS on the development of AKI post-surgery. A positive effect was observed on TRIFECTA achievement (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.5, p = 0.0374). Patients treated with the kERAS protocol showed less long-term CKD upstaging compared to those treated with the standard protocol (p = 0.0033). There was no significant effect on LOS and new onset of CKD. CONCLUSION The implementation of a kERAS protocol can have a positive influence on long-term renal function in patients undergoing PN. It can be used safely without promoting AKI. Furthermore, it can be realized with a manageable amount of additional effort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margarete Teresa Walach
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Mona Körner
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christel Weiß
- Department of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Tom Terboven
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology, St. Josefskrankenhaus Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julia Mühlbauer
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Frederik Wessels
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Thomas Stefan Worst
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Intelligent Systems and Robotics in Urology (ISRU), Heidelberg, Germany
- DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maximilian Christian Kriegmair
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
- Urologische Klinik München Planegg, Planegg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Georgiadis G, Zisis IE, Docea AO, Tsarouhas K, Fragkiadoulaki I, Mavridis C, Karavitakis M, Stratakis S, Stylianou K, Tsitsimpikou C, Calina D, Sofikitis N, Tsatsakis A, Mamoulakis C. Current Concepts on the Reno-Protective Effects of Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors in Acute Kidney Injury: Systematic Search and Review. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9051284. [PMID: 32365529 PMCID: PMC7287956 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with increased morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and mortality, especially in high risk patients. Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is), currently available as first-line therapy of erectile dysfunction in humans, have shown a beneficial potential of reno-protection through various reno-protective mechanisms. The aim of this work is to provide a comprehensive overview of the available literature on the reno-protective properties of PDE5Is in the various forms of AKI. Medline was systematically searched from 1946 to November 2019 to detect all relevant animal and human studies in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. In total, 83 studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Sildenafil is the most widely investigated compound (42 studies), followed by tadalafil (20 studies), icariin (10 studies), vardenafil (7 studies), zaprinast (4 studies), and udenafil (2 studies). Even though data are limited, especially in humans with inconclusive or negative results of only two clinically relevant studies available at present, the results of animal studies are promising. The reno-protective action of PDE5Is was evident in the vast majority of studies, independently of the AKI type and the agent applied. PDE5Is appear to improve the renal functional/histopathological alternations of AKI through various mechanisms, mainly by affecting regional hemodynamics, cell expression, and mitochondrial response to oxidative stress and inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Georgiadis
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece; (G.G.); (I.-E.Z.); (I.F.); (C.M.); (M.K.)
| | - Ioannis-Erineos Zisis
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece; (G.G.); (I.-E.Z.); (I.F.); (C.M.); (M.K.)
- Department of Forensic Sciences and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete 71003, Greece;
| | - Anca Oana Docea
- Department of Toxicology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania;
| | | | - Irene Fragkiadoulaki
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece; (G.G.); (I.-E.Z.); (I.F.); (C.M.); (M.K.)
- Department of Forensic Sciences and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete 71003, Greece;
| | - Charalampos Mavridis
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece; (G.G.); (I.-E.Z.); (I.F.); (C.M.); (M.K.)
| | - Markos Karavitakis
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece; (G.G.); (I.-E.Z.); (I.F.); (C.M.); (M.K.)
| | - Stavros Stratakis
- Department of Nephrology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece; (S.S.); (K.S.)
| | - Kostas Stylianou
- Department of Nephrology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece; (S.S.); (K.S.)
| | - Christina Tsitsimpikou
- Department of Hazardous Substances, Mixtures and Articles, General Chemical State Laboratory of Greece, Ampelokipi, Athens, Greece;
| | - Daniela Calina
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Nikolaos Sofikitis
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Ioannina University, Ioannina, Greece;
| | - Aristidis Tsatsakis
- Department of Forensic Sciences and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete 71003, Greece;
| | - Charalampos Mamoulakis
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece; (G.G.); (I.-E.Z.); (I.F.); (C.M.); (M.K.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Swavely NR, Anele UA, Porpiglia F, Mir MC, Hampton LJ, Autorino R. Optimization of renal function preservation during robotic partial nephrectomy. Ther Adv Urol 2019; 11:1756287218815819. [PMID: 30671138 PMCID: PMC6329014 DOI: 10.1177/1756287218815819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past few years, the role of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) has exponentially grown. Multiple recognized factors contribute to postoperative renal function in patients undergoing RPN. The aim of this review is to identify these potential factors, and to evaluate strategies that may help optimize the goal of renal function preservation. A nonsystematic literature review was performed to retrieve the most recent evidence on factors contributing to renal function post-RPN. Analyzed elements include baseline factors (tumor complexity and patient characteristics), intraoperative (surgical) factors (control of the renal hilum and type of ischemia, resection technique, renorrhaphy technique), and pharmacotherapeutics. In conclusion, the advantages of robotic surgery in the setting of partial nephrectomy (PN) are becoming well established. Maximal preservation of renal function remains a priority goal of the procedure, and it is influenced by a plethora of factors. Adequate patient selection using radiomics, control of comorbidities, utilization of evidence-based intraoperative techniques/strategies, and postoperative care are key components of postoperative preservation of renal function. Further investigations regarding these factors and their effects on long-term renal function are necessary and will continue to aid in guiding appropriate patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie R Swavely
- Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, USA Department of Surgery, McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Uzoma A Anele
- Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, USA Department of Surgery, McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | - Maria C Mir
- Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia Foundation, Valencia, Spain
| | - Lance J Hampton
- Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, USA Department of Surgery, McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- VCU Health and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGuire VA Medical Center, 1200 East Broad St, Richmond, VA 23249, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ischemia Techniques in Nephron-sparing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes. Eur Urol 2018; 75:477-491. [PMID: 30327272 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The optimal ischemia technique at partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal masses is yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE To summarize and analyze the current evidence about surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes after different ischemia techniques (cold, warm, and zero ischemia) at PN. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A computerized systematic literature search was performed by using PubMed (MEDLINE) and Science Direct. Identification and selection of the studies were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) criteria. Outcomes of interest were estimated blood loss (EBL), overall complications, positive surgical margins, local tumor recurrence, and renal function preservation. Meta-analysis and forest-plot diagrams were performed. Overall pooled estimates, together with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), of the incidence of all parameters were obtained using a random effect model (RE-Model) on the log transformed means (MLN), proportion, or standardized mean change, as deemed appropriate. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS One hundred and fifty-six studies were included. No clinically meaningful differences were found in terms of EBL after cold (mean: 215.5; 95% CI: 154.2-276.8m), warm (mean: 201.8; 95% CI: 175.0-228.7ml), or zero (mean: 261.2; 95% CI: 171.0-351.3ml) ischemia technique. Overall, postoperative complications were recorded in 14.1% (95% CI: 6.7-27.4), 11.1% (95% CI: 10.0-12.3), and 9.7% (95% CI: 7.7-12.2) of patients after cold, warm, and zero ischemia (p<0.01), respectively. Positive surgical margins were recorded in 4.8% (95% CI: 1.9-10.9), 4.0% (95% CI: 3.4-4.8), and 5.6% (95% CI: 3.1-9.8) of patients after cold, warm, and zero ischemia (p<0.01), respectively. Local recurrence was recorded in 3.2% (95% CI: 1.9-5.2) and 3.1% (95% CI: 0.7-11.5) of patients after warm and zero ischemia (p<0.01), respectively. The log2 of estimated glomerular filtration ratio mean changes were-1.37 (95% CI:-3.42 to 0.68),-1.00 (-2.04 to 0.03), and-0.71 (-1.15 to-0.27) ml/min after cold, warm, and zero ischemia, respectively. Low level of evidence, retrospective nature of most of included studies, a high risk of selection bias, and heterogeneity within included studies limited the overall quality of the analysis. CONCLUSIONS The effect of ischemia technique at PN is still debatable and subject to confounding by several factors, namely, patients' selection criteria, surgical technique used, and percentage of functional parenchyma spared during surgery. These confounders bias available evidence and were addressed by only a small part of available studies. Unfortunately, the overall quality of literature evidences and the high risk of selection bias limit the possibility of any causal interpretation about the relationship between the ischemia technique used and surgical, oncological, or functional outcomes. Thus, none of the available ischemia technique could be recommended over the other. PATIENT SUMMARY The present analysis shows that none of the available ischemia techniques, namely, cold, warm, or zero ischemia, is universally superior to the others, and other factors play a role in the surgical outcome.
Collapse
|