Early complications after intraoperative radiotherapy revisited

Gold-nanoparticle-enriched breast tissue in breast cancer treatment using the INTRABEAM® system: a Monte Carlo study

Using a 50-kV INTRABEAM^® system after breast-conserving surgery, breast skin injury and long treatment time remain the challenging problems when large-size spherical applicators are used. This study has aimed to address these problems using gold (Au) nanoparticles (NPs). For this, surface and isotropic doses were measured using a Gafchromic EBT3 film and a water phantom. The particle propagation code EGSnrc/Epp was used to score the corresponding doses using a geometry similar to that used in the measurements. The simulation was validated using a gamma index of 2%/2 mm acceptance criterion in the gamma analysis. After validation Au-NP-enriched breast tissue was simulated to quantify any breast skin dose reduction and shortening of treatment time. It turned out that the gamma value deduced for validation of the simulation was in an acceptable range (i.e., less than one). For 20 mg-Au/g-breast tissue, the calculated Dose Enhancement Ratio (DER) of the breast skin was 0.412 and 0.414 using applicators with diameters of 1.5 cm and 5 cm, respectively. The corresponding treatment times were shortened by 72.22% and 72.30% at 20 mg-Au/g-breast tissue concentration, respectively. It is concluded that Au-NP-enriched breast tissue shows significant advantages, such as reducing the radiation dose received by the breast skin as well as shortening the treatment time. Additionally, the DERs were not significantly dependent on the size of the applicators.

An investigation into the INTRABEAM miniature x-ray source dosimetry using ionization chamber and radiochromic film measurements

PURPOSE

Intraoperative radiotherapy using The INTRABEAM System (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany), a miniature low-energy x-ray source, has proven to be an effective modality in the treatment of breast cancer. However, some uncertainties remain in its dosimetry. In this work, we investigated the INTRABEAM system dosimetry by performing ionization chamber and radiochromic film measurements of absorbed dose in a water phantom.

METHODS

Ionization chamber measurements were performed with a PTW 34013 parallel-plate soft x-ray chamber at source to detector distances of 5 to 30 mm calculated using (a) the dose formula consistent with the TARGIT breast protocol (TARGIT), (b) the formula recommended by the manufacturer (Zeiss), and (c) the recently proposed CQ formalism of Watson et al. (Physics in Medicine & Biology, 2018;63:015016) EBT3 Gafchromic film measurements were made at the same depths in water. To account for the energy dependence of EBT3 film, multiple dose response calibration curves were employed across a range of photon beam qualities relevant to the INTRABEAM spectrum in water.

RESULTS

At all depths investigated, the TARGIT dose was significantly lower than that measured by the Zeiss and CQ methods, as well as film. These dose differences ranged from 14% to as large as 80%. In general, the doses measured by film, and the Zeiss and CQ methods were in good agreement to within measurement uncertainties (5-6%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the TARGIT dose underestimates the physical dose to water from the INTRABEAM source. Understanding the correlation between the TARGIT and physical dose is important for any studies wishing to make dosimetric comparisons between the INTRABEAM and other radiation emitting devices.