1
|
Lu Y, Xiao Z, Zhao X, Ye Y, Li S, Guo F, Xue H, Zhu F. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of the transition of HIPEC-induced acute kidney injury to acute kidney disease: a retrospective study. Ren Fail 2024; 46:2338482. [PMID: 38604946 PMCID: PMC11011229 DOI: 10.1080/0886022x.2024.2338482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute kidney injury (AKI) is recognized as a common complication following cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Characterized by prolonged renal function impairment, acute kidney disease (AKD) is associated with a higher risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and mortality. METHODS From January 2018 to December 2021, 158 patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were separated into non-AKI, AKI, and AKD cohorts. Laboratory parameters and perioperative features were gathered to evaluate risk factors for both HIPEC-induced AKI and AKD, with the 90-day prognosis of AKD patients. RESULTS AKI developed in 21.5% of patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC, while 13.3% progressed to AKD. The multivariate analysis identified that ascites, GRAN%, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and intraoperative (IO) hypotension duration were associated with the development of HIPEC-induced AKI. Higher uric acid, lessened eGFR, and prolonged IO hypotension duration were more predominant in patients proceeding with AKD. The AKD cohort presented a higher risk of 30 days of in-hospital mortality (14.3%) and CKD progression (42.8%). CONCLUSIONS Our study reveals a high incidence of AKI and AKI-to-AKD transition. Early identification of risk factors for HIPEC-induced AKD would assist clinicians in taking measures to mitigate the incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunwei Lu
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Trauma Center, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ziyan Xiao
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Trauma Center, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiujuan Zhao
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Trauma Center, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yingjiang Ye
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shu Li
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Trauma Center, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Fuzheng Guo
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Trauma Center, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Haiyan Xue
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Trauma Center, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Fengxue Zhu
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Trauma Center, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Djadou TM, Poh KS, Yellinek S, Fayazzadeh H, El-Hayek K, Simpfendorfer CH, DaSilva G, Wexner SD. Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Peritoneal Chemotherapy in Appendiceal and Colorectal Cancer: Outcomes and Survival. Am Surg 2023; 89:5757-5767. [PMID: 37155318 DOI: 10.1177/00031348231175452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We reviewed outcomes following cytoreductive surgery/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with appendiceal or colorectal neoplasms and evaluated key prognostic indicators for treatment. METHODS All patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery/HIPEC for appendiceal and colorectal neoplasms were identified from an IRB-approved database. Patient demographics, operative reports, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS 110 patients [median age 54.5 (18-79) years, 55% male] were included. Primary tumor location was colorectal (58; 52.7%) and appendiceal (52; 47.3%). 28.2%, .9%, and 12.7% had right, left, and sigmoid tumors, respectively; 11.8% had rectal tumors. 12/13 rectal cancer patients underwent preoperative radiotherapy. Mean Peritoneal Cancer Index was 9.6 ± 7.7; complete cytoreduction was achieved in 90.9%. 53.6% developed postoperative complications. Reoperation, perioperative mortality, and 30-day readmission rates were 1.8%, .09%, and 13.6%, respectively. Recurrence at a median of 11.1 months was 48.2%; overall survival at 1 and 2 years was 84% and 56.8%, respectively; disease-free survival was 60.8% and 33.7%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 16.8 (0-86.8) months. Univariate analysis of preoperative chemotherapy, primary malignancy location, primary tumor perforated or obstructive, postoperative bleeding complication, and pathology of adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma and negative lymph nodes were identified as possible predictive factors of survival. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative chemotherapy (P < .001), perforated tumor (P = .003), and postoperative intra-abdominal bleeding (P < .001) were independent prognostic indicators for survival. CONCLUSIONS Cytoreductive surgery/HIPEC for colorectal and appendiceal neoplasms has low mortality and high completeness of cytoreduction score. Preoperative chemotherapy, primary tumor perforation, and postoperative bleeding are adverse risk factors for survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Moreno Djadou
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Keat Seong Poh
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - Shlomo Yellinek
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| | | | - Kevin El-Hayek
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Division of General Surgery, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH and Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH
| | | | - Giovanna DaSilva
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - Steven D Wexner
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nogueiro J, Fathi NQ, Guaglio M, Baratti D, Kusamura S, Deraco M. Risk factors for gastrointestinal perforation and anastomotic leak in patients submitted to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:107020. [PMID: 37597284 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Revised: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal leak is one of the most feared complications after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) and harbors significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. We aim to identify risk-factors for anastomotic leak (AL) and gastrointestinal perforation (GP) to optimize postoperative outcomes of this population. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 1043 consecutive patients submitted to CRS in a single institution. Potential risk factors for AL and GP, both related to patient overall condition, disease status and surgical technique were reviewed. RESULTS Anastomotic leaks were identified in 5.2% of patients, and GPs in 7.0%. The independent risk-factors for AL were age at surgery (OR1.40; CI95% 1.10-1.79); peritoneal cancer index (PCI) (OR1.04, CI95% 1.01-1.07); Cisplatin dose >240 mg during HIPEC (OR3.53; CI95% 1.47-8.56) and the presence of colorectal (CR) or colo-colic (CC) anastomosis (OR5.09; CI95% 2.71-9.53, and 4.58; CI95% 1.22-17.24 respectively). Male gender and intraoperative red blood cell transfusions were the only independent risk factors for GP identified (OR1.70; CI95% 1.04-2.78 and 1.06; CI95% 1.01-1.12, respectively). Regarding 30-day and 90-day postoperative mortality, independent risk-factors were mainly related to patient's overall condition. CONCLUSION Gastrointestinal leaks are a frequent source of postoperative morbidity, mainly at the expense of GP. A careful and systematic intraoperative revision of all potential gastrointestinal injuries is equally critical to perfecting anastomotic fashioning techniques to decrease gastrointestinal complication rates. We identified multiple risk-factors for AL and GP related to disease status and patient condition. Our study suggests that patient-related conditions are of paramount relevance, highlighting the importance of patient selection and preoperative patient optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Nogueiro
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Fellow from Department of General Surgery, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal; Medical Faculty, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Nik Qisti Fathi
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Fellow from University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
| | - Marcello Guaglio
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Baratti
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Shigeki Kusamura
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marcello Deraco
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adam MA, Zhou H, Byrd J, Greenberg AL, Kelly YM, Hall L, Jones HL, Pingpank JF, Lipton ZC, Bartlett DL, Choudry HM. Predicting Severe Complications from Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach to Augment Clinical Judgment. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5433-5442. [PMID: 37266808 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13657-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CRS-HIPEC provides oncologic benefit in well-selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis; however, it is a morbid procedure. Decision tools for preoperative patient selection are limited. We developed a risk score to predict severity of 90 day complications for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Adults who underwent CRS-HIPEC at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (March 2001-April 2020) were analyzed as part of this study. Primary endpoint was severe complications within 90 days following CRS-HIPEC, defined using Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) scores as a dichotomous (determined using restricted cubic splines) and continuous variable. Data were divided into training and test sets. Several machine learning and traditional algorithms were considered. RESULTS For the 1959 CRS-HIPEC procedures included, CCI ranged from 0 to 100 (median 32.0). Adjusted restricted cubic splines model defined severe complications as CCI > 61. A minimum of 20 variables achieved optimal performance of any of the models. Linear regression achieved the highest area under the receiving operator characteristic curve (AUC, 0.74) and outperformed the NSQIP Surgical Risk calculator (AUC 0.80 vs. 0.66). Factors most positively associated with severe complications included peritoneal carcinomatosis index score, symptomatic status, and undergoing pancreatectomy, while American Society of Anesthesiologists 2 class, appendiceal diagnosis, and preoperative albumin were most negatively associated with severe complications. CONCLUSIONS This study refines our ability to predict severe complications within 90 days of discharge from a hospitalization in which CRS-HIPEC was performed. This advancement is timely and relevant given the growing interest in this procedure and may have implications for patient selection, patient and referring provider comfort, and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helen Zhou
- Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Lauren Hall
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Heather L Jones
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gheybi K, Buckley E, Vitry A, Roder D. Associations of advanced age with comorbidity, stage and primary subsite as contributors to mortality from colorectal cancer. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1101771. [PMID: 37089488 PMCID: PMC10116414 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1101771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundAlthough survival from colorectal cancer (CRC) has improved substantially in recent decades, people with advanced age still have a high likelihood of mortality from this disease. Nonetheless, few studies have investigated how cancer stage, subsite and comorbidities contribute collectively to poor prognosis of older people with CRC. Here, we decided to explore the association of age with mortality measures and how other variables influenced this association.MethodsUsing linkage of several administrative datasets, we investigated the risk of death among CRC cases during 2003–2014. Different models were used to explore the association of age with mortality measures and how other variables influenced this association.ResultsOur results indicated that people diagnosed at a young age and with lower comorbidity had a lower likelihood of all-cause and CRC-specific mortality. Aging had a greater association with mortality in early-stage CRC, and in rectal cancer, compared that seen with advanced-stage CRC and right colon cancer, respectively. Meanwhile, people with different levels of comorbidity were not significantly different in terms of their increased likelihood of mortality with advanced age. We also found that while most comorbidities were associated with all-cause mortality, only dementia [SHR = 1.43 (1.24–1.64)], Peptic ulcer disease [SHR = 1.12 (1.02–1.24)], kidney disease [SHR = 1.11 (1.04–1.20)] and liver disease [SHR = 1.65 (1.38–1.98)] were risk factors for CRC-specific mortality.ConclusionThis study showed that the positive association of advanced age with mortality in CRC depended on stage and subsite of the disease. We also found only a limited number of comorbidities to be associated with CRC-specific mortality. These novel findings implicate the need for more attention on factors that cause poor prognosis in older people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazzem Gheybi
- University of South Australia Allied Health and Human Performance, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- University of South Australia, Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Buckley
- University of South Australia Allied Health and Human Performance, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- University of South Australia, Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Agnes Vitry
- University of South Australia Clinical and Health Sciences, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - David Roder
- University of South Australia Allied Health and Human Performance, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- University of South Australia, Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- *Correspondence: David Roder
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Predictors of Small Bowel Obstruction Post-Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:2176-2183. [PMID: 35852704 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05394-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancies carries considerable morbidity; however, the significance of postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO) is not well defined. We aim to identify predictors for post-CRS/HIPEC SBO and their oncologic associations. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of all CRS/HIPEC cases performed at a surgical oncology center (2013-2018). Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative factors, and province-wide hospital readmissions were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used for baseline characteristics, multivariate logistic regression for predictors of SBO at 1 year, and Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test for survival analysis. RESULTS A total of n = 97 CRS/HIPEC procedures were performed for diagnoses of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (44%), high-grade appendiceal adenocarcinoma (8%), colorectal adenocarcinoma (34%), and mesothelioma (9%). The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) score was 16. Cumulative incidence of post-CRS/HIPEC SBO readmission was 24% at 1 year and 38% at 2 and 3 years. Of 29 patients readmitted with SBO, 14 (48%) had more than one readmission for SBO, and nine surgeries were performed for obstruction. Multivariate regression identified significant independent predictors of SBO within 1-year post-CRS/HIPEC as high-grade appendiceal or colorectal primaries (odds ratio [OR] 4.58, p = 0.02) and PCI ≥ 20 (OR 3.27, p = 0.05). Overall survival (OS) was worse in patients readmitted with SBO within 1 year compared to those without (3-year OS 58% vs. 75%, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION SBO is the most common readmission diagnosis post-CRS/HIPEC and is associated with worse survival. High-grade appendiceal and colorectal primary tumors and PCI ≥ 20 are predictors for SBO.
Collapse
|
7
|
Rieser CJ, Alvikas J, Phelos H, Hall LB, Zureikat AH, Lee A, Ongchin M, Holtzman MP, Pingpank JF, Bartlett DL, Choudry MHA. Failure to Thrive Following Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Causes and Consequences. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:2630-2639. [PMID: 34988834 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11100-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Failure to thrive (FTT) is a complex syndrome of nutritional failure and functional decline. Readmission for FTT following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS HIPEC) is common but underexamined. This study aims to determine features, risk factors, and prognostic significance of FTT following CRS HIPEC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed patients who underwent CRS HIPEC from 2010 to 2018 at our institution. Patients were categorized into no readmission, FTT readmission, and other readmission. FTT was determined by coding and chart review. We compared baseline characteristics, oncologic data, perioperative outcomes, and survival among the three cohorts. RESULTS Of 1068 discharges examined, 379 patients (36%) were readmitted within 90 days, of which 134 (12.5%) were labeled as FTT. Patients with FTT readmission had worse preoperative functional status, higher rates of malnutrition, more complex resections, longer hospital stays, and more postoperative complications (all p < 0.001). Ostomy creation [relative risk ratio (RRR) 4.06], in-hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE), discharge to nursing home (RRR 2.48), pre-CRS HIPEC chemotherapy (RRR 1.98), older age (RRR 1.84), and female gender (RRR 1.69) were all independent predictors for FTT readmission on multinomial regression (all p < 0.01). FTT readmission was associated with worse median overall survival on multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.60, p < 0.001] after controlling for oncologic, perioperative, and baseline factors. CONCLUSIONS FTT is common following CRS HIPEC and appears to be associated with baseline patient characteristics, operative burden, and postoperative complications. Perioperative strategies for improving nutrition and activity, along with early recognition and intervention in FTT may improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline J Rieser
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Jurgis Alvikas
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Heather Phelos
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lauren B Hall
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melanie Ongchin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew P Holtzman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James F Pingpank
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M Haroon A Choudry
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mitani Y, Arai Y, Tomohiro Mitani, Gohda Y, Yano H, Kondo I, Sakamoto E, Katagiri D, Hinoshita F. Association of intraoperative gross hematuria with acute kidney injury after cytoreductive surgery. Pleura Peritoneum 2022; 7:19-26. [PMID: 35602922 PMCID: PMC9069499 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2021-0145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) has been established in the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Although it is still necessary to take adequate measures against major postoperative complications including acute kidney injury (AKI), consensus is lacking on how to assess and stratify risk for patients with postoperative AKI after CRS-HIPEC. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the association of intraoperative gross hematuria as a surrogate marker of ureter injury with postoperative AKI incidence. Methods This retrospective cohort study investigated patients without impaired preoperative kidney function who underwent CRS-HIPEC at a single referral center, and evaluated the relationship between intraoperative gross hematuria and incidence of postoperative AKI as defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes practice guidelines. Logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratio of intraoperative gross hematuria for AKI, adjusting for confounding factors and other risk factors for AKI. Results We enrolled 185 patients (males, 37%). Twenty-five patients developed intraoperative gross hematuria. Postoperative AKI occurred in 10 (40%) of 25 patients with hematuria and 28 (17.5%) of 160 patients without hematuria. The crude odds ratio for exposure to hematuria was 3.14 (95% confidence interval, 1.30–7.60; p=0.020) for postoperative AKI. Adjusted odds ratio as estimated by multivariate logistic regression was 4.57 (95% confidence interval, 1.55–13.45; p=0.006). Conclusions Intraoperative gross hematuria is significantly associated with postoperative AKI incidence after CRS-HIPEC. Early detection and treatment of postoperative acute kidney injury is essential. How to prevent acute kidney injury after cytoreductive surgery is unclear. Intraoperative hematuria is related to postoperative acute kidney injury. Hematuria is easily detectable and may reflect ureter injury. This may improve long-term outcomes for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yumi Mitani
- Department of Nephrology , National Center for Global Health and Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Yohei Arai
- Department of Nephrology , Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Tomohiro Mitani
- Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Yoshimasa Gohda
- Department of Surgery , National Center for Global Health and Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Hideaki Yano
- Department of Surgery , National Center for Global Health and Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Isao Kondo
- Department of Nephrology , National Center for Global Health and Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Emi Sakamoto
- Department of Nephrology , National Center for Global Health and Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Daisuke Katagiri
- Department of Nephrology , National Center for Global Health and Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Fumihiko Hinoshita
- Department of Nephrology , National Center for Global Health and Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Care and Medical Sports , Teikyo Heisei University , Tokyo , Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
García-Fadrique A, Estevan Estevan R, Sabater Ortí L. Quality Standards for Surgery of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:188-202. [PMID: 34435297 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10642-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standardization of surgical outcomes throughout surgical procedures is mandatory. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) should provide proficient oncological and surgical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN The aim of this study was to identify clinically relevant quality indicators and their quality standard, and to determine their acceptable quality limit. A systematic review on cytoreductive results from 2000 to 2018 was performed focusing on clinical guidelines, consensus conferences, and publications. After the selection of quality indicators, a systematic review of indexed references was performed in order to calculate the quality standard for each indicator. STUDY SELECTION Unicentric/multicentric series, comparative studies, and clinical trials. Studies were to include outcomes after cytoreduction of colorectal origin and series with more than 50 patients. Quality indicators with at least 10 series were mandatory and objective measurements were also mandatory for inclusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Quality indicators selected were 1- to 5-year survival, overall disease-free survival, 1- to 5-year disease-free survival, complete surgical resection, duration of surgery, length of stay, overall morbimortality, major morbidity, re-intervention, postoperative hemorrhage, intestinal fistula, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, postoperative medical complications, overall recurrence, and failure to rescue. RESULTS The most relevant quality indicators and critical quality limits were overall disease-free survival and 5-year overall disease-free survival (14 months and <10 months, and 14% and <4%, respectively), completeness of surgical resection (89% and <80%, respectively), overall mortality (3% and >8%, respectively), overall morbidity (47% and >63%, respectively), failure to rescue (12% and <30%, respectively), reintervention (13 and <22%, respectively), anastomotic leakage (6% and <13%, respectively), and overall recurrence (60% and <74%, respectively). CONCLUSION This is the first study to assess quality standards in CRS + HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases. The current data are of particular relevance for future studies to control the variability of this surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Luis Sabater Ortí
- Hospital Clínico Universitario, Department of Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Perianesthesia Care of the Oncologic Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study. J Perianesth Nurs 2021; 36:543-552. [PMID: 34303613 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2020.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study was to understand the perianesthesia care for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). METHOD This is a retrospective study. DESIGN The perioperative electronic medical records of 189 CRS + HIPEC surgical cases at a hospital of Western Pennsylvania from 2012 to 2018 were analyzed to study the characteristics of perianesthesia care for CRS + HIPEC surgery. FINDINGS The patients' median age was 57 (range 21-83) years, and 60% were men. The mean anesthesia time was 10.47 ± 2.54 hours. Most tumors were appendix or colorectal in origin, and the mean peritoneal cancer index score was 16.19 ± 8.76. The mean estimated blood loss was 623 ± 582 mL. The mean total intravenous crystalloid administered was 8,377 ± 4,100 mL. Fifty-two patients received packed red blood cells during surgery. Postoperatively, 100% of the patients were transferred to the intensive care unit. A majority (52%) of patients were extubated in the operating room. Median lengths of hospital and intensive care unit stays were 13 and 2 days, respectively. A majority (73%) of patients had 1 or more postoperative complications and 29% of patients experienced major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher) during the hospital stay. Prolonged hospitalization was owing to gastrointestinal dysfunctions and respiratory failure related to atelectasis and pleural effusion. CONCLUSIONS CRS + HIPEC is a major surgery with numerous challenges to the perianesthesia care team regarding hemodynamic adjustment, pain control, and postoperative complications, which demand training and future studies from the perianesthesia care team.
Collapse
|
11
|
Rieser CJ, Jones H, Hall LB, Kang E, Altpeter S, Zureikat AH, Holtzman MP, Lee A, Ongchin M, Pingpank JF, Choudry MHA, Bartlett DL. Definition and Prediction of Early Recurrence and Mortality Following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: Towards Predicting Oncologic Futility Preoperatively. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:9116-9125. [PMID: 34224045 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10289-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Early recurrence (ER) is a significant challenge for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) following cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS HIPEC). Preoperative risk stratification for ER would improve preoperative decision making. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study examining patients who underwent CRS HIPEC for CRPM from 2000 to 2018. Optimal definition of ER was determined via minimum p-value approach based on differentiation of post-recurrence survival. Risk factors for ER were assessed in a derivation cohort by uni- and multivariate logistic regression. A predictive score for ER was generated using preoperative variables and validated in an independent cohort. RESULTS 384 patients were analyzed, 316 (82%) had documented recurrence. Optimal length of post-operative RFS to distinguish ER (n = 144, 46%) vs. late recurrence (LR) (n = 172, 63%) was 8 mos (p<0.01). ER patients had shorter median OS post-CRS-HIPEC (13.6 vs. 39.4 mos, p<0.01). Preoperative BMI (OR 1.88), liver lesions (OR 1.89), progression on chemotherapy (OR 2.14), positive lymph nodes (OR 2.47) and PCI score (16-20: OR 1.7; >20: OR 4.37) were significant predictors of ER (all p<0.05). Using this model, patients were assigned risk scores from 0 to 9. Intermediate (scores 4-6) and high-risk patients (score 7-9) had observed rates of ER of 56% and 79% and overall 2-year survival rates of 27% and 0% respectively. The model showed fair discrimination (AUC 0.72) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow GOF p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS ER predicts markedly worse OS following surgery. Preoperative factors can accurately stratify risk for ER and identify patients in whom CRS-HIPEC for CPRM is futile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline J Rieser
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Heather Jones
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lauren B Hall
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Eliza Kang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Shannon Altpeter
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew P Holtzman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melanie Ongchin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James F Pingpank
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M Haroon A Choudry
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rieser CJ, Hoehn RS, Zenati M, Hall LB, Kang E, Zureikat AH, Lee A, Ongchin M, Holtzman MP, Pingpank JF, Bartlett DL, Choudry MHA. Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Presentation and Outcomes in Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Following Cytoreduction and Chemoperfusion: Persistent Inequalities in Outcomes at a High-Volume Center. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:3522-3531. [PMID: 33687614 PMCID: PMC8184539 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09627-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (CRS HIPEC) can offer significant survival advantage for select patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM). Low socioeconomic status (SES) is implicated in disparities in access to care. We analyze the impact of SES on postoperative outcomes and survival at a high-volume tertiary CRS HIPEC center. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining patients who underwent CRS HIPEC for CRPM from 2000 to 2018. Patients were grouped according to SES. Baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and survival were examined between groups. RESULTS A total of 226 patients were analyzed, 107 (47%) low-SES and 119 (53%) high-SES patients. High-SES patients were younger (52 vs. 58 years, p = 0.01) and more likely to be White (95.0% vs. 91.6%, p = 0.06) and privately insured (83% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). They traveled significantly further for treatment and had lower burden of comorbidities and frailty (p = 0.01). Low-SES patients more often presented with synchronous peritoneal metastases (48% vs. 35%, p = 0.05). Following CRS HIPEC, low-SES patients had longer length of stay and higher burden of postoperative complications, 90-day readmission, and 30-day mortality. Median overall survival following CRS HIPEC was worse for low-SES patients (17.8 vs. 32.4 months, p = 0.02). This disparity persisted on multivariate survival analysis (low SES: HR = 1.46, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Despite improving therapies for CRPM, low-SES patients remain at a significant disadvantage. Even patients who overcome barriers to care experience worse short- and long-term outcomes. Improving access and addressing these disparities is crucial to ensure equitable outcomes and improve patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline J Rieser
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Richard S Hoehn
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mazen Zenati
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lauren B Hall
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Eliza Kang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melanie Ongchin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew P Holtzman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James F Pingpank
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M Haroon A Choudry
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rieser CJ, Hall LB, Kang E, Zureikat AH, Holtzman MP, Pingpank JF, Bartlett DL, Choudry MHA. Predischarge Prediction of Readmission After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Derivation and Validation of a Risk Prediction Score. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:5287-5296. [PMID: 33486643 PMCID: PMC8349345 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09547-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ninety-day hospital readmission rates following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) range from 20 to 40%. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to develop and validate a simple score to predict readmissions following CRS/HIPEC. STUDY DESIGN Using a prospectively maintained database, we retrospectively reviewed clinicopathologic, perioperative, and day-of-discharge data for patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal surface malignancies between 2010 and 2018. In-hospital mortalities and discharges to hospice were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to identify predictors of unplanned readmission, with three-quarters of the sample randomly selected as the derivation cohort and one-quarter as the validation cohort. Using regression coefficient-based scoring methods, we developed a weighted 7-factor, 10-point predictive score for risk of readmission. RESULTS Overall, 1068 eligible discharges were analyzed; 379 patients were readmitted within 90 days (35.5%). Seven factors were associated with readmission: stoma creation, Peritoneal Cancer Index score ≥ 15, hyponatremia, in-hospital major complication, preoperative chemotherapy, anemia, and discharge to nursing home. In the validation cohort, 25 patients (9.2%) were categorized as high risk for readmission, with a predicted rate of readmission of 69.3% and an observed rate of 76.0%. The score had fair discrimination (area under the curve 0.70) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit p-value of 0.77). CONCLUSION Our proposed risk score, easily obtainable on day of discharge, distinguishes patients at high risk for readmission over 90 days following CRS/HIPEC. This score has the potential to target high-risk individuals for intensive follow-up and other interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline J Rieser
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Lauren B Hall
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Eliza Kang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew P Holtzman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James F Pingpank
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M Haroon A Choudry
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhou S, Feng Q, Zhang J, Zhou H, Jiang Z, Liu Z, Zheng Z, Chen H, Wang Z, Liang J, Pei W, Liu Q, Zhou Z, Wang X. High-grade postoperative complications affect survival outcomes of patients with colorectal Cancer peritoneal metastases treated with Cytoreductive surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal chemotherapy. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:41. [PMID: 33413223 PMCID: PMC7791857 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07756-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) arising from colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Methods Patients with PM arising from CRC treated with CRS and HIPEC were systematically reviewed at the China National Cancer Center and Huanxing Cancer Hospital from June 2017 to June 2019. High-grade complications that occurred within 30 days were defined as grade 3 to 4 events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) classification. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models for overall survival were created. Predictors of high-grade postoperative complications were evaluated with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results In all, 86 consecutive cases were included in this study. Forty-one patients (47.7%) developed postoperative complications, while 22 patients (25.6%) experienced high-grade complications. No mortality occurred during the postoperative period. The median survival of all patients was 25 months, and the estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 35.0%. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, a high peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) score (HR, 1.07, 95% CI, 1.01–1.14; P=0.015) and grade 3–4 postoperative complications (HR, 1.86, 95% CI, 1.22–3.51; P=0.044) correlated with worse overall survival. High estimated blood loss (OR, 1.01, 95% CI, 1.01–1.02; P< 0.001) was identified as an independent risk factor for developing high-grade complications. Conclusion Careful patient selection, high levels of technical skill and improved perioperative management are crucial to ensure patient survival benefits after CRS+HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sicheng Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Qiang Feng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Huanxing Cancer Hospital, Beijing, 100122, China
| | - Haitao Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zheng Jiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zhaoxu Zheng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Haipeng Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jianwei Liang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Wei Pei
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Qian Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zhixiang Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xishan Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Spiegelberg J, Neeff H, Holzner P, Runkel M, Fichtner-Feigl S, Glatz T. Comparison of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimens for treatment of peritoneal-metastasized colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12:903-917. [PMID: 32879667 PMCID: PMC7443840 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i8.903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in combination with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) improves patient survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Commonly used cytotoxic agents include mitomycin C (MMC) and oxaliplatin. Studies have reported varying results, and the evidence for the choice of the HIPEC agent and uniform procedure protocols is limited.
AIM To evaluate therapeutic benefits and complications of CRS + MMC vs oxaliplatin HIPEC in patients with peritoneal metastasized CRC as well as prognostic factors.
METHODS One hundred and two consecutive patients who had undergone CRS and HIPEC for CRC PC between 2007 and 2019 at the Medical Center of the University Freiburg regarding interdisciplinary cancer conference decision were retrospectively analysed. Oxaliplatin and MMC were used in 68 and 34 patients, respectively. Each patient’s demographics and tumour characteristics, operative details, postoperative complications and survival were noted. Complications were stratified and graded using Clavien/Dindo analysis. Prognostic outcome factors were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis of survival.
RESULTS The two groups did not differ significantly regarding baseline characteristics. We found no difference in median overall survival between MMC and oxaliplatin HIPEC. Regarding postoperative complications, patients treated with oxaliplatin HIPEC suffered increased complications (66.2% vs 35.3%; P = 0.003), particularly intestinal atony, intraabdominal infections and urinary tract infection, and had a prolonged intensive care unit stay compared to the MMC group (7.2 d vs 4.4 d; P = 0.035). Regarding univariate analysis of survival, we found primary tumour factors, nodal positivity and resection margins to be of prognostic value as well as peritoneal cancer index (PCI)-score and the completeness of cytoreduction regarding peritoneal carcinomatosis. Multivariate analysis of survival confirmed primary distant metastasis and primary tumour resection status to have a significant impact on survival and likewise peritoneal cancer index-scoring regarding peritoneal carcinomatosis.
CONCLUSION In this single-institution retrospective review of patients undergoing CRS with either oxaliplatin or MMC HIPEC, overall survival was not different, though oxaliplatin was associated with a higher postoperative complication rate, indicating treatment favourably with MMC. Further studies comparing HIPEC regimens would improve evidence-based decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Spiegelberg
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg 79106, Germany
| | - Hannes Neeff
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg 79106, Germany
| | - Philipp Holzner
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg 79106, Germany
| | - Mira Runkel
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg 79106, Germany
| | - Stefan Fichtner-Feigl
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg 79106, Germany
| | - Torben Glatz
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Freiburg 79106, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne 44625, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hepatic resection and blood transfusion increase morbidity after cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for colorectal carcinomatosis. Clin Transl Oncol 2020; 22:2032-2039. [PMID: 32277348 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02346-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is an effective but complex treatment for peritoneal metastasis (PM). Our objective was to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality following CRS-HIPEC. METHODS Retrospective study of prospectively collected data of patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for PM arises from colorectal cancer between January 2008 and December 2017. Perioperative variables were correlated with morbidity outcomes using a logistic regression model. RESULTS Sixty-seven patients underwent CRS-HIPEC, and overall morbidity and mortality were 31.3% and 4.5% respectively. Major morbidity rate was 19.4%; 7.5% of patients were re-operated. Intraoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.01), liver resection (p < 0.01), and intestinal anastomosis (p < 0.01) were associated with a higher morbidity in univariate analysis. A multivariate analysis identified blood transfusion and liver resection as independent risk factors (OR 3.66, IC 1.13-16.54; OR 4.33, IC 1.17-11.46, respectively). Extension of visceral resection did not correlate with morbidity. Patients with lymph-node infiltration had a higher major complication rate (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS CRS-HIPEC is a feasible treatment for colorectal PM with an acceptable morbi-mortality rate in experienced centers. In our study, digestive anastomosis, perioperative blood transfusion, hepatic resection, and lymph-node infiltration were associated with higher morbidity rates.
Collapse
|
17
|
Leimkühler M, de Haas RJ, Pol VEH, Hemmer PHJ, Been LB, van Ginkel RJ, Kruijff S, de Bock GH, van Leeuwen BL. Adding diagnostic laparoscopy to computed tomography for the evaluation of peritoneal metastases in patients with colorectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study. Surg Oncol 2020; 33:135-140. [PMID: 32561078 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite its widespread use, computed tomography (CT) is not perfect for evaluating peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin before cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). We therefore evaluated the value of adding diagnostic laparoscopy to CT when assessing patient eligibility for CRS + HIPEC. METHODS This was a retrospective study of a consecutive series of 112 patients evaluated systematically by diagnostic laparoscopy and CT between January 2012 and January 2018. Patient eligibility for CRS + HIPEC was assessed by the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) both at the time of initial diagnostic laparoscopy and during the retrospective review of CT images. Two experienced radiologists who were blinded to the PCI result at laparoscopy then independently estimated the PCI based on CT imaging. The primary outcome was the number of patients eligible for CRS + HIPEC by each method. RESULTS We identified 112 patients, of whom 95 (85%) were eligible for CRS + HIPEC based on diagnostic laparoscopy and 84 underwent CRS + HIPEC. Overall, 14 patients (17%) experienced an "open-and-close" procedure. In contrast to diagnostic laparoscopy, 100 patients (89%) were identified as being eligible for CRS + HIPEC by CT (p = 0.13), which would have resulted in an additional five open-and-close procedures. CONCLUSIONS Adding diagnostic laparoscopy to CT produced a clinically relevant, but statistically non-significant, reduction in the number of patients eligible for CRS + HIPEC. We conclude that diagnostic laparoscopy may be of use in preoperative assessments when systematic analysis by CT scores the PCI as greater than ten. Future research should focus on the cost-effectiveness of this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maleen Leimkühler
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Robbert J de Haas
- Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent E H Pol
- Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Patrick H J Hemmer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Lukas B Been
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Robert J van Ginkel
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Schelto Kruijff
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Geertruida H de Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara L van Leeuwen
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lee TC, Wima K, Sussman JJ, Ahmad SA, Cloyd JM, Ahmed A, Fournier K, Lee AJ, Dineen S, Powers B, Veerapong J, Baumgartner JM, Clarke C, Mogal H, Zaidi MY, Maithel SK, Leiting J, Grotz T, Lambert L, Hendrix RJ, Abbott DE, Pokrzywa C, Blakely AM, Lee B, Johnston FM, Greer J, Patel SH. Readmissions After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: a US HIPEC Collaborative Study. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:165-176. [PMID: 31745888 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04463-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) results in significant morbidity and readmissions. Previous studies have been limited by single-institution design or lack of tumor details in the database used. METHODS The 12-institution US HIPEC Collaborative Database was queried between 1999 and 2017. Preoperative and intraoperative patient and tumor details were analyzed for associations with readmissions. RESULTS A total of 2017 of 2372 cases were included in the analysis. The 30-day readmission rate was 15.9% (n = 321). Common indications for readmission included failure to thrive (29.9%), infection (23.6%), and ileus/bowel obstruction (15.1%). The readmitted cohort had more complications, including intra-abdominal abscess (21.2% vs 6.2%), ileus (28.0% vs 17.2%), anastomotic leak (11.2% vs 2.2%), enteric fistula (5.6% vs 1.5%), deep venous thrombosis (6.2% vs 2.5%), and pulmonary embolism (6.9% vs 2.5%). Factors independently associated with readmission (p < 0.05) included ECOG score ≥ 3 (OR 3.4), depression (OR 2.4), total parenteral nutrition (OR 3.6), low anterior resection or partial colectomy (OR 2.0), and stoma creation (OR 2.2). Factors not associated included neoadjuvant chemotherapy, peritoneal cancer index, and completeness of cytoreduction. Readmission rate between 31 and 90 days was 3.9% (n = 78). Independent predictors (p < 0.05) included operative time (OR 1.1), low anterior resection or partial colectomy (OR 1.7), and stoma creation (OR 2.2). CONCLUSIONS In the largest study to date examining readmissions after CRS-HIPEC, 30-day readmission rate was 15.9%. Tumor factors failed to predict readmission, whereas preoperative functional status and depression along with individual cytoreductive procedures predicted readmission. Patients with these risk factors or postoperative complications may benefit from closer post-discharge monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany C Lee
- Cincinnati Research on Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Koffi Wima
- Cincinnati Research on Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Sussman
- Cincinnati Research on Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Syed A Ahmad
- Cincinnati Research on Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ahmed Ahmed
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sean Dineen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Benjamin Powers
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jula Veerapong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Joel M Baumgartner
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Callisia Clarke
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Harveshp Mogal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Mohammad Y Zaidi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jennifer Leiting
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Travis Grotz
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Laura Lambert
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Ryan J Hendrix
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Courtney Pokrzywa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Andrew M Blakely
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Byrne Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | - Jonathan Greer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sameer H Patel
- Cincinnati Research on Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA. .,Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way (ML 0558), Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Epidemiology and risks for infection following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:2745-2752. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05093-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
20
|
Soucisse ML, Liauw W, Hicks G, Morris DL. Early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for lower gastrointestinal neoplasms with peritoneal metastasis: a systematic review and critical analysis. Pleura Peritoneum 2019; 4:20190007. [PMID: 31667329 PMCID: PMC6812220 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2019-0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) can be used in combination with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to treat patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of multiple origins. The present study is a systematic review to evaluate the role of EPIC after CRS + HIPEC for appendiceal and colorectal cancers with PC. Content We conducted a systematic search in PubMed according to the PRISMA guidelines and included all studies published before June 27 of 2019 comparing EPIC to HIPEC or the combination of both. Our search found 79 articles. After excluding non-relevant articles, a total of 13 retrospective clinical studies reporting on the efficacy and safety of EPIC compared to HIPEC or as a combination therapy for lower gastrointestinal neoplasms were analyzed. Initial EPIC reports led to its declined usage because of concerns with increased postoperative morbidity and uncertain added benefit on survival. Recent retrospective studies have been promising, showing significant improvements in OS and fewer issues with complications when adding EPIC to CRS + HIPEC. Conclusions Current evidence is entirely retrospective and is conflicting. It is hoped that ongoing clinical trials and additional studies will clarify EPIC’s role in the treatment of patients with PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikael L Soucisse
- Department of Surgery, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Winston Liauw
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gabrielle Hicks
- Department of Surgery, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David L Morris
- Department of Surgery, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Incidence and Long-term Outcomes of Patients Requiring Early Reoperation After HIPEC. J Surg Res 2019; 244:395-401. [PMID: 31325661 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.05.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Revised: 04/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains a formidable operation associated with considerable morbidity. It is unclear how often these patients require reoperation for postoperative complications and if the need for reoperations leads to worse long-term outcomes. METHODS The Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Database at a single center was retrospectively queried. Out of 149 entries, 141 HIPECs performed between 2012 and 2018 met inclusion criteria. Patients were categorized based on early reoperation (<60 d after HIPEC), and demographic and tumor factors were compared using univariate analyses. Recurrence was calculated for patients with complete cytoreduction and overall survival analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS There were 15 reoperations after 141 HIPECs (10.6%). Median duration between HIPEC and reoperation was 18 d. Indications for reoperation included intra-abdominal infection (n = 5), bowel obstruction (n = 4), wound infection (n = 3), bleeding (n = 2), and evisceration (n = 1). There were no identified patient- or tumor-related risk factors for reoperation. Reoperations were associated with longer hospital length of stay (19 versus 9 d, P = 0.005) and 30-d readmissions (46.7% versus 12.8%, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in 3-year recurrence-free survival, but there was a significant association between reoperation and 3-year overall survival (38.0% versus 71.9%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Complications requiring reoperation after HIPEC lead to increased short-term morbidity, longer hospital length of stay, and most importantly, reduced overall survival. Further studies investigating interventions to decrease complications and reduce reoperation rates are needed to improve outcomes after HIPEC.
Collapse
|
22
|
Shannon NB, Tan JWS, Tan HL, Wang W, Chen Y, Lim HJ, Tan QX, Hendrikson J, Ng WH, Loo LY, Skanthakumar T, Wasudevan SD, Kon OL, Lim TKH, Tan GHC, Chia CS, Soo KC, Ong CAJ, Teo MCC. A set of molecular markers predicts chemosensitivity to Mitomycin-C following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastasis. Sci Rep 2019; 9:10572. [PMID: 31332257 PMCID: PMC6646658 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46819-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality. We aim to generate and validate a biomarker set predicting sensitivity to Mitomycin-C to refine selection of patients with colorectal peritoneal metastasis (CPM) for this treatment. A signature predicting Mitomycin-C sensitivity was generated using data from Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer and The Cancer Genome Atlas. Validation was performed on CPM patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC (n = 62) using immunohistochemistry (IHC). We determined predictive significance of our set using overall survival as a surrogate endpoint via a logistic regression model. Three potential biomarkers were identified and optimized for IHC. Patients exhibiting lower expression of PAXIP1 and SSBP2 had poorer survival than those with higher expression (p = 0.045 and 0.140, respectively). No difference was observed in patients with differing DTYMK expression (p = 0.715). Combining PAXIP1 and SSBP2 in a set, patients with two dysregulated protein markers had significantly poorer survival than one or no dysregulated marker (p = 0.016). This set independently predicted survival in a Cox regression model (HR 5.097; 95% CI 1.731–15.007; p = 0.003). We generated and validated an IHC prognostic set which could potentially identify patients who are likely to benefit from HIPEC using Mitomycin-C.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joey Wee-Shan Tan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hwee Leong Tan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Weining Wang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yudong Chen
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hui Jun Lim
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Qiu Xuan Tan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Josephine Hendrikson
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wai Har Ng
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Li Yang Loo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Seettha D Wasudevan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Oi Lian Kon
- Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tony Kiat Hon Lim
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Grace Hwei Ching Tan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Claramae Shulyn Chia
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Khee Chee Soo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chin-Ann Johnny Ong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Waters PS, Smith AW, Fitzgerald E, Khan F, Moran BJ, Shields CJ, Lynch BL, O'Loughlin C, Lynch M, Mulsow J. Increased Incidence of Central Venous Catheter-Related Infection in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intra-Peritoneal Chemotherapy. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2019; 20:465-471. [PMID: 31013189 DOI: 10.1089/sur.2018.250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a complex surgical intervention with associated risks. Central venous catheter (CVC) line sepsis is one of a number of potential morbidities. The aim of this study was to calculate the incidence of catheter-related infection (CRI) in a CRS and HIPEC patient population and to assess its influence on length of hospital stay. Methods: Data were collected on consecutive patients who underwent CRS HIPEC between August 2013 and October 2017. Data included patient demographics, timing of CVC insertion/removal, time spent in critical care, and CVC tip/blood culture results. Charts were reviewed for patients with both positive CVC culture and positive blood cultures to assess for evidence of catheter related infection and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Results: Data on 100 consecutive CRS HIPEC operations performed between August 2013 and October 2017 was analyzed. There were 11 CRIs in 100 CVCs, resulting in a CRI rate of 16.2 per 1,000 CVC days. Patients within the CRI group had a longer high-dependency unit (HDU) stay compared with the non-septic group (6 days vs. 4.07 days, p < 0.05). The CVC duration for the CRI and non-CRI group was 8.4 and 7.6 days, respectively (p = 0.12). The CRI group also had an increased total hospital length of stay (LOS; 20.8 days vs. 15.4 days, p < 0.05). On average, CRIs occurred eight days post-operative and four days post-HDU discharge. There was no association identified with longer CVC duration (p = 0.34). There has been an annual decline in CRI rates in CRS and HIPEC patients over the duration of the study period from 19.1 per 1,000 CVC days in 2016 to 8.2 per 1,000 CVC days in 2017. Conclusion: This is the first study to report on CRI rates in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC. The CRI rate of 16.2 per 1,000 CVC days is higher than the overall national figure of 5.2 per 1,000 for CVC lines inserted in the operating room. Patients who developed line sepsis had longer HDU and longer overall hospital stay. Catheter-related infection was noted post-HDU discharge in all cases. Implementation of a CVC care bundle in the later years of the study period coincided with a reduction in CRI rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peadar S Waters
- 1National Centre for Peritoneal Malignancy, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Andrew W Smith
- 1National Centre for Peritoneal Malignancy, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emer Fitzgerald
- 3Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Faraz Khan
- 1National Centre for Peritoneal Malignancy, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Brendan J Moran
- 4Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, North Hampshire Hospital Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| | - Conor J Shields
- 1National Centre for Peritoneal Malignancy, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Breda L Lynch
- 2Department of Clinical Microbiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Colman O'Loughlin
- 3Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Maureen Lynch
- 2Department of Clinical Microbiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jurgen Mulsow
- 1National Centre for Peritoneal Malignancy, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Choudry HA, Bednar F, Shuai Y, Jones HL, Pai RK, Pingpank JF, Ahrendt SS, Holtzman MP, Zeh HJ, Bartlett DL. Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery-Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemoperfusion is Feasible and Offers Survival Benefit in Select Patients with Peritoneal Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:1445-1453. [PMID: 30825033 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07218-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We hypothesized that repeat cytoreductive surgery-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (CRS-HIPEC) for peritoneal metastases (PM) may be associated with suboptimal resection, more frequent postoperative complications, and worse oncologic outcomes. METHODS Using a prospectively maintained database, we compared clinicopathologic, perioperative, and oncologic outcome data in patients undergoing single or repeat CRS-HIPEC procedures. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. Multivariate analyses identified associations with perioperative and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS Of the 1294 patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC procedures at our institution, only one CRS-HIPEC procedure (single HIPEC cohort) was performed in 1169 patients (90.3%), whereas 125 patients (9.7%) underwent repeat CRS-HIPEC procedures (repeat HIPEC cohort). Of the 1440 CRS-HIPEC procedures at our institution, a first CRS-HIPEC procedure was performed in 1294 patients (89.9%), whereas subsequent second, third, and fourth CRS-HIPEC procedures were performed in 125 patients (8.7%), 18 patients (1.3%), and 3 patients (0.2%), respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) following the second CRS-HIPEC procedure was negatively impacted by shorter PFS following the first CRS-HIPEC procedure, independent of other significant variables related to the second procedure, including completeness of cytoreduction and postoperative complications. Patients undergoing multiple CRS-HIPEC procedures were not at higher risk for suboptimal resection or postoperative complications and demonstrated equivalent PFS following each successive procedure compared to the first procedure. CONCLUSIONS Repeat CRS-HIPEC procedures for PM were not associated with suboptimal perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Our data confirmed our ability to select patients appropriately for repeat CRS-HIPEC procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haroon A Choudry
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Filip Bednar
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Yongli Shuai
- The University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute Biostatistics Facility, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Heather L Jones
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Reetesh K Pai
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James F Pingpank
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Steven S Ahrendt
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew P Holtzman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Choudry MHA, Shuai Y, Jones HL, Pai RK, Pingpank JF, Ahrendt SS, Holtzman MP, Zeh HJ, Bartlett DL. Postoperative Complications Independently Predict Cancer-Related Survival in Peritoneal Malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:3950-3959. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6823-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
26
|
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may significantly improve overall survival in selected patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer. For good oncological results complete macroscopic cytoreduction is crucial; furthermore, a linear correlation between peritoneal tumor load, as determined by the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) and overall survival has been demonstrated; therefore, surgical treatment should be initiated as early as possible. Synchronous resection of up to three liver metastases may be performed safely and with good results and no influence on the morbidity. With respect to intraperitoneal chemotherapy, mitomycin C and oxaliplatin are most commonly used and may be regarded as equal; however, for perioperative chemotherapy study results are so far inconclusive with some trials hinting at decreased overall survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant therapy is likely to improve overall survival if at least 6 cycles are applied. Early detection of peritoneal metastases is difficult at present but might be facilitated in the future by the use of liquid biopsies, which may detect circulating free tumor-specific DNA or RNA. In the meantime, planned second-look laparotomy should be considered for patients at high risk of peritoneal recurrence. In addition, several international studies are currently evaluating the concept of adjuvant or prophylactic HIPEC. The CRS and HIPEC may be repeated in cases of recurrence and should be considered in suitable patients, applying the same criteria as for primary CRS and HIPEC. A recurrence-free interval of >2 years is associated with a significantly better prognosis.
Collapse
|
27
|
Cata JP, Zavala AM, Van Meter A, Williams UU, Soliz J, Hernandez M, Owusu-Agyemang P. Identification of risk factors associated with postoperative acute kidney injury after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a retrospective study. Int J Hyperthermia 2017; 34:538-544. [PMID: 28812384 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1368096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a postoperative complication associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence and risks factors for AKI after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) have not been fully studied. The purpose of this study was to identify perioperative risk factors predictive of AKI after CRS-HIPEC. METHODS This retrospective study collected demographic, tumour-related, intraoperative and postoperative data from 475 patients who underwent CRS-HIPECs. AKI was defined using the acute kidney injury network criteria and calculated on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 7 and day of hospital discharge. We conducted univariate and multivariate analyses to assess the association between variables of interest and AKI. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS The incidence of AKI was 21.3%. The multivariate analysis identified six predictor factors independently associated with the development of AKI (OR: [95%CI]); age: 1.16 (1.05-1.29, p < 0.005), BMI (overweight: 1.97 [1.00-3.88], p = 0.05) and obesity: 2.88 (1.47-5.63), p < 0.002)), preoperative pregabalin: 3.04 (1.71-5.39, p < 0.037), platinum-based infusion: 3.04 (1.71-5.39, p < 0.001) and EBL: 1.77 (1.27-2.47, p < 0.001). Splenectomy had a protective effect (OR: 0.44 (0.25-0.76, p < 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that the incidence of AKI is high. While other studies have reported that AKI is associated with platinum-based infusion, age and obesity, we report for the first time a negative association between pregabalin use and AKI. More studies are needed to confirm our results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan P Cata
- a Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA.,b Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Acsa M Zavala
- a Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Antoinette Van Meter
- a Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Uduak U Williams
- a Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Jose Soliz
- a Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Mike Hernandez
- c Department of Biostatistics , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Pascal Owusu-Agyemang
- a Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA.,b Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group , Houston , TX , USA
| |
Collapse
|