Are Pathologic Fractures in Patients With Osteosarcoma Associated With Worse Survival Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pathologic fractures occur in 5% to 10% of patients with osteosarcoma, and prior studies have suggested they are prognostically important. However, because they represent an uncommon event in the setting of an already rare disease, most studies fail to reach conclusive findings, and there is no agreement about how best to treat pathologic fractures.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is the occurrence of a pathologic fracture in patients with osteosarcoma associated with poorer overall survivorship? (2) Is the occurrence of a pathologic fracture in patients with osteosarcoma associated with poorer local recurrence-free survival or metastasis-free survival? (3) Is the surgical approach (amputation or limb salvage) associated with differences in local recurrence rates in patients with osteosarcoma with pathologic fractures?

METHODS

This systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Our study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: 380459). A search of the PubMed and Embase databases resulted in 625 and 747 titles, respectively. After application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 21 articles were finally included. Quality assessment of all studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The Risk of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool was used in the 11 articles that evaluated the effect of an intervention (amputation or limb salvage) on local recurrence rates. The relative risk (RR) was calculated to compare outcomes in patients with osteosarcoma with pathologic fractures and those without. Heterogeneity among studies was calculated using the I 2 statistic. The pooled RR was calculated using the fixed-effects or random-effects model depending on study heterogeneity. The fragility index and the ratio between the fragility index and the total number of participants for each outcome was additionally calculated to assess the robustness of our results. A total of 7604 patients with osteosarcoma, 12% of whom (885) had pathologic fractures, were included in our analysis.

RESULTS

Pathologic fractures in patients with osteosarcoma were associated with lower 3-year (RR 1.53 [95% CI 1.29 to 1.82]; p < 0.001) and 5-year overall survival (RR 1.27 [95% CI 1.16 to 1.40]; p < 0.001). No difference in recurrence rates was found between patients with osteosarcoma with pathologic fractures and those without (RR 1.22 [95% CI 0.91 to 1.64]; p = 0.18). However, having a pathologic fracture was associated with an increased risk of developing metastasis (RR 1.33 [95% CI 1.08 to 1.63]; p = 0.01). Treatment with limb salvage surgery was not associated with a higher rate of local recurrence (RR 1.58 [95% CI 0.88 to 2.85]; p = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

In light of these findings, surgeons should be aware that after appropriate case selection, patients with osteosarcoma and pathologic fractures undergoing limb salvage surgery may have similar rates of local recurrence to those undergoing amputation. Therefore, a pathologic fracture may no longer be an absolute contraindication for limb salvage surgery. Future studies adjusting for potential confounders such as tumor size, tumor location, and response to neoadjuvant therapy would provide further insight into the effect of pathologic fractures on our assessed outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Prognosis of limb‑salvage treatment of osteosarcoma in adolescent patients: a meta‑analysis

To evaluate the effectiveness of limb-salvage treatment for osteosarcoma in adolescent patients, a comprehensive search on PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library was conducted. Studies with a clear diagnosis of osteosarcoma were included and duplicate publications, studies without full text or incomplete information, those with an inability to extract data, divergent definitions of exposure, animal experiments, reviews, and systematic reviews were excluded. The data were analyzed using STATA 15.1. The findings of the present study revealed that overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with osteosarcoma in the limb-salvage treatment group were significantly longer than those in the amputation treatment group [hazard ratio (HR)=0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63-0.80; P=0.000 vs. HR=0.60; 95% CI: 0.48-0.76; P=0.000]. Additionally, the five-year OS rate for patients in the limb-salvage treatment group was higher than that in the amputation group [odds ratio (OR)=4.48; 95% CI: 2.74-7.31; P=0.000]. However, the local recurrence rate was notably higher in the limb-salvage treatment group compared with the amputation treatment group (OR=2.68; 95% CI: 1.50-4.77; P=0.001). Furthermore, the results indicated no significant difference in distant metastasis rates between the limb-salvage treatment group and the amputation treatment group (OR=0.32; 95% CI: 0.10-1.06; P=0.062). In conclusion, the present meta-analysis underscores the potential of limb-salvage therapy for adolescent patients with osteosarcoma. The OS and PFS of patients undergoing limb-salvage surgery are longer than those of amputation, with a higher five-year OS rate and a similar rate of distant metastasis. However, the local recurrence rate of limb-salvage surgery is significantly higher than that of amputation.

Controversies and Challenges in the Management of Osteosarcoma-an Indian Perspective

Osteosarcoma (OGS) is the most common primary bone tumor in children and adolescents which requires a multidisciplinary approach to management. Although chemotherapy and surgery can cure more than half of localized OGS cases, the unique challenges faced by resource-limited countries like India make this outcome difficult to achieve. Various questions in the management of OGS including role of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) in neoadjuvant setting, triplet vs doublet chemotherapy, intensification of chemotherapy based on response in setting of doublet, and indigenous prosthesis in setting of limb salvage need to be defined. Similarly, in the metastatic and recurrent setting, questions regarding intent of treatment, indications of chemotherapy, timing of surgery, and role of targeted therapies need clarification. Lack of randomized trials from India makes definite conclusions difficult, but an attempt can be made to define the best approach in the Indian scenario from available evidence. Hence, a critical review of literature from India and the West was done to define possible management approaches and highlight the lacuna for future research.

Impact of treatment refusal and abandonment on survival outcomes in pediatric osteosarcoma in Southeast Asia: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Treatment refusal and abandonment (TxRA) are major barriers to improving outcomes among children with sarcomas of the extremities as curative treatment options bearing on amputation or disfiguring surgery, particularly in countries with limited resources. A multi-institutional retrospective study was conducted to determine the predictive factors for TxRA among patients with osteosarcoma associated with survival outcomes across Southeast Asia (SEA).

METHODS

Pediatric patients with osteosarcoma treated between January 1998 and December 2017 in four SEA pediatric oncology centers from three countries were studied. Nelson-Aalen estimates, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox's proportion hazard model were applied to address the cumulative incidence, survival outcomes, and to identify prognostic factors associated with TxRA.

RESULTS

From a total of 208 patients with osteosarcoma enrolled; 18 (8.7%) patients refused and 41 (19.7%) patients abandoned treatment. Income classification of countries, age at diagnosis, tumor size, disease extent, chemotherapy protocols, and types of surgery were associated with TxRA. Tumor size more than 15 cm was an independent risk factor associated with TxRA. The 5-year overall and relapse-free survivals were 49.4% and 50.4%, respectively. However, these rates declined further to 37.9% and 35.8%, respectively, when TxRA were considered as events. Tumor size larger than 15 cm and metastatic disease were independent risk factors associated with TxRA-sensitive outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of TxRA was high in SEA, particularly in lower middle-income countries. Factors associated with TxRA related to tumor burden. Treatment outcomes could be substantially improved by lowering the refusal and abandonment rates.

Prognostic factors in High-Grade Localized Osteosarcoma of the Extremities: The Tunisian Experience

BACKGROUND

Osteosarcoma is the most frequent bone cancer occurring in children and adolescents aged 10-20 years. Several prognostic factors have been identified by studies done at western centers. The aim of our study was to identify the prognostic factors in Tunisian patients in order to improve their management.

METHODS

We reviewed the data of localized limb osteosarcoma patients treated in Salah Azaïz Institute from January 1980 to December 2018. Patient's treatment and survival variables were assessed. Patients received a neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent surgery in an expert center. They received afterward an adjuvant chemotherapy depending on the tumor necrosis assessed by Huvos.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were enrolled. Mean duration of follow-up was 30 months (range 1-297 months). Males were 1.6 times more frequent, median age was 17 (from 1 to 62 years). Conventional osteoblastic osteosarcoma was the most frequent histological subtype (77%). Median tumor size was 10 cm. Femoral location was the most frequent (60%). The overall average history of symptoms was 103 days (4 to 423 days). The 5-year overall-survival was 38% and the event free survival 32%. Tumor site, lactate dehydrogenase levels, high methotrexate levels at 24 h, clinical evaluation of the tumor perimeter, surgery type and delay of relapse were found to affect overall survival. Tumor site, Lactate dehydrogenase levels and clinical evaluation of the tumor perimeter affected the progression free survival.

CONCLUSION

Demographic characteristics of Tunisian patients are mainly the same than worldwide. Femoral site, normal level of lactate dehydrogenase, a clinical response during neoadjuvant treatment, an R0 surgery, a delay of relapse over 2 years and Median H24 Methotrexate level superior to 4.4 µmol/l were associated with a better prognosis in our study.

Factors Affecting Prognosis and Survival in Extremity Osteosarcoma

Background

Osteosarcoma is a malignant bone tumor affecting mainly children and young adults and commonly involves extremities. The aim of this study was to assess the patient-related, tumor-related, and treatment-related factors affecting the overall survival in patients with non-metastatic extremity osteosarcoma.

Methodology

A retrospective, single institutional study of 100 patients with non-metastatic extremity osteosarcoma was done between 2014 and 2019. Age, sex, histologic type, tumor site, use of preoperative chemotherapy and its duration, response to chemotherapy, type of surgery, presence of local recurrence, occurrence of lung metastasis, and survival data were recorded. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier method. p < 0.05 by log-rank test was considered statistically significant. Statistical data were analyzed using SPSS v.25(IBM).

Results

The median age of presentation was 18 years with male sex preponderance. The most common site of presentation was distal femur, and commonest histological variant was osteoblastic osteosarcoma. Incidence of local recurrence was 9%, and lung metastasis was identified in 12% on follow-up. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 65.5%, and 5-year local recurrence-free survival was 57.6%. The 5-year OS in neoadjuvant chemotherapy group was 80% compared to 39.5% in upfront surgery group (p = 0.015). The 5-year OS in patients with tumor necrosis > 90% and < 90% was 93.2% and 71.2%, respectively (p = 0.038). The 5-year OS in patients without lung metastasis was 76%, whereas none who developed lung metastasis has survived 5 years (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, good response to chemotherapy, and the absence of lung metastasis on follow-up can independently predict better overall survival.

Survival analysis of osteosarcoma patients: A 15-year experience

INTRODUCTION

Management of osteosarcoma has evolved considerably for the past two decades and there have been changes of practices especially pertaining to chemotherapy regime. This is a review of our cases in the past 15 years.

METHOD

This is a retrospective survival analysis study of 128 patients treated at University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) from 1997 to 2011.

RESULTS

There were 80 (62.5%) male and 48 (37.5%) female patients with the median age being 15 (5-59). Majority had osteosarcoma of extremities (94.5%). More than 60% patients developed metastasis throughout the course of treatment with 39% presenting with lung metastasis. Osteoblastic osteosarcoma was the commonest subtype (65.6%). Of the 109 patients treated surgically, 84 patients (65.6%) underwent limb salvage surgery while the rest underwent amputation. Seventy-one per cent of patients completed treatment with local recurrence rate of 22.7%. The 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 56.31% (95% CI: 46.20, 65.24) and 22.33% (95% CI: 14.86, 30.76), respectively. The 5-year event-free survival was 52.94% (95% CI: 41.83, 62.87). In multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors were presence of metastasis and completion of treatment for both 5-year and 10-year overall survival. Good histological response was only significant for multivariate analysis at 5 years. Patients with metastasis had a hazard ratio of 20.4 at 5 years and 3.26 at 10 years.

CONCLUSION

Overall survival rate for osteosarcoma patients at our centre was comparably higher than other centres in the region. Two independent risk factors for survival are metastatic status and completion of treatment. A standardized chemotherapy regime is essential for long-term survival.

Outcomes of Elective Major Cancer Surgery During COVID 19 at Tata Memorial Centre: Implications for Cancer Care Policy

BACKGROUND

Overburdened systems and concerns of adverse outcomes have resulted in deferred cancer surgeries with devastating consequences. In this COVID pandemic, the decision to continue elective cancer surgeries, and their subsequent outcomes, are sparsely reported from hotspots.

METHODS

A prospective database of the Department of Surgical Oncology was analysed from March 23rd to April 30th, 2020.

FINDINGS

Four hundred ninety-four elective surgeries were performed (377 untested and 117 tested for Covid 19 before surgery). Median age was 48 years with 13% (n = 64) above the age of 60 years. Sixty-eight percent patients were American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) grade I. As per surgical complexity grading, 71 (14·4%) cases were lower grade (I-III) and 423 (85.6%) were higher grade complex surgeries (IV - VI).Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade III complications were 5.6% (n = 28) and there were no postoperative deaths. Patients >60 years documented 9.3% major complications compared to 5.2% in <60 years (P = 0.169). The median hospital stay was 1 to 9 days across specialties.Postoperatively, 26 patients were tested for COVID 19 and 6 tested positive. They all had higher grade surgeries but none required escalated or intensive care treatment related to COVID infection.

INTERPRETATION

A combination of scientific and administrative rationale contributed to favorable outcomes after major elective cancer surgeries. These results support the continuation of elective major cancer surgery in regions with Covid 19 trends similar to India.

Proximal femur sarcomas with intra-articular disease-Do intra-articular resections provide adequate local control?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hip preserving (intra-articular) resections for proximal femur sarcoma have better function compared to peri-acetabular (extra-articular) resections, which are more complex and morbid. But, do intra-articular resections in selected cases with intra-articular disease provide adequate local control?

METHOD

Extra-articular resection or intra-articular resection in cases without pathologic fracture or away from joint/capsule was classified as a planned safe margin (SM). Circumferential removal of labrum without acetabular resection in cases without gross joint contamination was classified as planned close margins (CM). We analyzed local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (death as a competing event) for 86 proximal femur resections (SM = 55, CM = 31).

RESULTS

The 5 years LRFS was 84% (n = 6/55, 10%) in the SM group and 67% (n = 4/31, 12%) in the CM group. There was no worsening of local recurrence (LR) in the CM group (subdistribution hazard [sH] = 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-2.29; P = .56). Poor chemotherapy-induced necrosis predicted worse LR (sH = 0.1; 95% CI, 0.01-0.8; P = .03). Overall survival was 16% (SE 8%) at 5 years with LR vs 64% (SE 7%) without LR (P = .0076).

CONCLUSION

In proximal femur sarcomas with potential for involvement of the hip joint, a CM in selected cases did not worsen LR; providing an option for avoiding additional morbidity with extra-articular resections.

A population-based propensity-matched study of regional dissections in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma

Background

The survival rates of patients with metastatic osteosarcoma are poor, and the prognosis is closely related to the choice of treatment, especially surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of patients with metastatic osteosarcoma undergoing regional dissections.

Methods

We collected data on patients with metastatic osteosarcoma between 2004 and 2014 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), while univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate outcomes. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize the effects of confounding factors.

Results

The SEER database had records of 2768 patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma, of whom 398 were included in our study. Of the included patients, 116 (29.15%) underwent regional dissections, while 282 (70.85%) underwent non-regional dissections. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, prior to PSM, showed that OS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26–0.44, P<0.001 and HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.35–0.64, P<0.001, respectively) and CSS (HR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.25–0.43, P<0.001 and HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.34–0.63, P<0.001, respectively) were better in patients who underwent regional dissections than those who underwent non-regional dissections. Compared with non-regional dissections, regional dissections, which included both primary tumour resection (PTR) and primary tumour and metastatic site resection (PTMR), were associated with better OS (P<0.001) and CSS (P<0.001) . However, the survival outcomes following PTR and PTMR showed no significant difference. After PSM, patients in the regional dissection group still had a higher OS (P<0.001) and CSS (P<0.001) than those in the non-regional dissection group.

Conclusions

Compared with non-regional dissection, regional dissection resulted in better survival in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma.

Prognostic factors in osteosarcoma: A study level meta-analysis and systematic review of current practice

Background

A consensus has not yet been reached regarding the abilities of gender, age, tumor size, tumor location, histologic subtypes, and surgery in the prediction of survival in osteosarcoma. We aimed to disclose their prognostic significance by conducting a meta-analysis of all the published data from the last decade.

Materials and Methods

Electronic database searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for relevant articles published within the last ten years. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were obtained to evaluate the prognostic values of the target factors.

Results

A total of 18,126 patients from 40 studies were eventually included. Results indicated that gender (male vs. female: 1.21, 95% CI, 1.11–1.32; female vs. male: 0.85, 95% CI, 0.75–0.98), age (12–20 vs. ≤12: 1.37, 95% CI, 1.13–1.65; ≥20 vs. <20: 1.29, 95% CI, 1.08–1.55; ≥40 vs. <40: 1.63, 95% CI, 1.21–2.20; ≥50 vs. <25: 2.60, 95% CI, 1.92–3.53; ≥60 vs. <60: 1.11, 95% CI, 1.06–1.18), tumor location (non-extremities vs. extremities: 2.10, 95% CI, 1.76–2.51; proximal vs. distal femur: 3.68, 95% CI: 1.51–8.96; proximal vs. distal humerus: 3.15, 95% CI: 1.53–6.49), tumor size (≥5 vs. <5: 1.42, 95% CI, 1.09–1.86; >8 vs. ≤8: 1.55, 95% CI, 1.07–2.24; >9 vs. ≤9: 1.44, 95% CI, 1.05–1.96), chemotherapy response (poor vs. good: 2.45, 95% CI, 2.02–2.97; good vs. poor: 0.41, 95% CI, 0.34–0.48), and surgery (yes vs. no: 0.45, 95% CI, 0.36–0.57; amputation vs. salvage: 2.34, 95% CI, 1.47–3.74) were significantly associated with overall survival in osteosarcoma patients.

Conclusion

The meta-analysis demonstrated that male patients, older age, large tumor size, non-extremity osteosarcoma, proximal osteosarcoma, poor chemotherapy response, no surgical treatment, and amputation surgery were correlated with a poor prognosis in osteosarcoma patients.

Does Reconstruction with Reimplantation of Sterilized Tumor Bone Provide Survival Benefit in Diaphyseal Osteosarcoma?

Does reimplantation of sterilized tumor bone for reconstruction provide outcome benefits in intercalary osteosarcoma based on the potential immunogenic effect of reimplanted sterilized tumor tissue? Of 720 cases of surgically treated high-grade osteosarcoma patients treated at our institute from 2006 to 2013, 61 had predominantly diaphyseal disease. All patients were nonmetastatic at presentation. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment details, and local recurrence-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival were compared for 24 patients who had reconstruction with sterilized tumor bone reimplantation vs 37 who did not. Both the groups were well matched in terms of baseline characteristics. Means were compared with the t-test, proportions with the chi-square test, and survival with the log-rank test. The Kaplan‐Meier method was used to construct time to event curves. Cox proportional hazard regression modeling was employed for multivariate time to event analysis. Twenty-two had extracorporeal radiation and reimplantation (ECRT) with or without the vascularised fibula. Fifty-gray single dose was used in all cases. Two had pasteurization and reimplantation. Thirty seven had non-reimplantation reconstructions (including intercalary or osteoarticular endoprosthesis, pedicled bone grafts, rotation-plasty, and amputations). Five-year local recurrence-free survival was 85% for reimplantation and 97% for non-reimplantation groups (p=0.17). Five-year metastasis-free survival was 63% and 54%, respectively (p=0.44). Five-year overall survival was 70% and 58%, respectively (p=0.39). The data from this study did not demonstrate significantly better local recurrence-free, distant relapse-free, or overall survival benefit in the tumor bone reimplantation group.

Association of high PDPN expression with pulmonary metastasis of osteosarcoma and patient prognosis

Podoplanin (PDPN) is an important positive regulator of platelet aggregation and functions as a lymphatic endothelial marker. PDPN has been observed to be expressed in human tumor tissues and various cancer cell lines. In the present study, PDPN expression in patients with primary osteosarcoma was assessed at the mRNA and protein levels, and the associations between PDPN expression and pulmonary metastasis (PM) and prognosis were examined. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis was used to detect the expression levels of PDPN in primary osteosarcoma tissues and paired normal bone tissues (n=20 pairs). In addition, immunohistochemical analysis of PDPN expression was performed in 168 paraffin-embedded osteosarcoma tissue specimens and 23 matched normal tissues. The RT-qPCR results revealed higher mRNA expression levels of PDPN in patients with PM compared with patients without PM. Further survival analyses identified Enneking stage and PM as two independent prognostic indicators. Finally, univariate analysis revealed that high PDPN protein expression was significantly associated with Enneking stage and PM in patients with osteosarcoma.

Treatment-Related Prognostic Factors in Managing Osteosarcoma around the Knee with Limb Salvage Surgery: A Lesson from a Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the treatment-related factors associated with local recurrence and overall survival of patients with osteosarcoma treated with limb-salvage surgery.

Patients and Methods

Treatment-related factors were analyzed to evaluate their effects on local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) in 182 patients from 2004 to 2013.

Results

The mean length of follow-up was 73.4 ± 34.7 months (median, 68 months; range, 12-173 months), and 63 patients died by the end of the follow-up. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 68.6 ± 6.6% and 59.4 ± 10.6%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that treatment-related prognostic factors for overall survival were prolonged symptom intervals >=60 days, biopsy/tumor resection performed by different centers, previous medical history, incomplete preoperative chemotherapy (<8 weeks), and prolonged postoperative interval >21 days. In the multivariate analysis, biopsy/tumor resection performed by different centers, incomplete implementation of planned new adjuvant chemotherapy, and delayed resumption of postoperative chemotherapy (>21 days) were risk factors for poor prognosis; biopsy/tumor resection performed by different centers and tumor necrosis <90% were independent predictors of local recurrence.

Conclusion

For localized osteosarcoma treated with limb-salvage surgery, it is necessary to optimize timely standard chemotherapy and to resume postoperative chemotherapy to improve survival rates. Biopsies should be performed at experienced institutions in cases of developing local recurrence.

Clinical outcome of various limb salvage surgeries in osteosarcoma around knee: Megaprosthesis, extracorporeal irradiation and resection arthrodesis

Background

We evaluated the outcome and the survival rate of Limb salvage surgeries (LSSs) in osteosarcoma around knee by using megaprosthesis, ECI autograft, and modified arthrodesis of the knee with metallic plus bone cement (MAMC).

Methods

We reviewed 35 cases of osteosarcoma around the knee that was treated by megaprosthesis, ECI autograft and MAMC from 2012 to 2017. The survival, local recurrence, metastases, complications and functional MSTS score were evaluated for each operation technique. Kaplan-Meier was used to describe the survival rate for each technique.

Result

Megaprostheses group had an excellent MSTS score (78.7%), the ECI group (72.3%) and MAMC group (68.4%). Local recurrence occurred in the megaprothesis group (0%), the ECI group (9.1%) and MAMC group (20%). Infection occurred in 3 cases of ECI (13.6%) while only 2 (40%) cases in MAMC group and 1 case (12.5%) in the megaprostheses group. Aseptic loosening occurred in the megaprostheses group 1 case (12.5%) and MAMC 1 case (20%). Metastases occurred in 18.2% of the ECI group compared to 25% of the megaprostheses group and 40% of the MAMC group. The megaprosthesis group had an overall survival rate of 90.9 months, whilst the ECI group is on 94.6 months and the MAMC group was 47.2 months.

Conclusion

Megaprosthesis showed good-excellent functional outcome and survival rate. ECI that is an option in LSS has good functional outcome as well. Knee arthrodesis with MAMC it is still an option to perform LSS even in the advanced local stage of the disease.

•

Various reconstruction options are available for the reconstruction of the distal femur and proximal tibia osteosarcoma.

•

Megaprosthesis showed good-excellent functional outcome and survival rate.

•

ECI that is an option in LSS has good functional outcome as well.

•

Knee arthrodesis with MAMC it is still an option to perform LSS even in the advanced local stage of the disease.

Analysis of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas registered during the year 2012 at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, with clinical outcomes

Introduction

Primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas are rare, but diagnostically and therapeutically challenging group of tumors, requiring multidisciplinary management. There are limited documented studies from multidisciplinary teams , in the form of comprehensive analysis of these tumors, from our country. This study is an analysis of cases of osteosarcomas, Ewing sarcomas (ESs), chondrosarcomas (CSs), and soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs), registered at our institution during 2012.

Methods

Clinical details, including outcomes of cases of bone and STSs, during the year 2012, were retrieved from the medical records of our institution and were further analyzed.

Results

Ninety-five high-grade, extremity-based, treatment-naïve cases of osteosarcomas were treated with a novel, dose-dense, nonhigh-dose methotrexate-based OGS-12 protocol. Good histopathologic response (necrosis ≥90%) was achieved in 59% nonmetastatic and 56% metastatic patients. At a median follow-up of 48 months, the estimated 5-year event-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 67% and 78%, respectively. In the metastatic cohort at a median follow-up of 51 months, the 5-year estimated progression-free survival was 24% and OS was 26%. Among 87 (73.2%) nonmetastatic and 32 (26.8%) metastatic, analyzable cases of ES, at a median follow-up of 40 months, the disease-free survival (DFS) and OS in the nonmetastatic group were 62% and 83%; in the metastatic group, they were 37.5% and 65.6%, respectively. Among 40 cases of CSs (33 nonmetastatic and 7 metastatic), 21 had limb salvage surgery while 5 had amputation. Microscopically, 90.4% were Grade II CSs. Five-year OS and DFS were 84.6% and 71%, respectively. Among 189 high-grade, extremity-based STSs (89% nonmetastatic), synovial sarcoma was the most common subtype (31%). Eighty-five percent had limb preservation surgery; a majority were offered adjuvant radiation with or without chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 51 (1-63) months, 3-year local control, DFS, and OS were 81%, 48%, and 64%, respectively.

Conclusions

The novel OGS 12 and Ewing Family of Tumors 2001 protocols have shown comparable outcomes to international standards in cases of osteosarcoma and ES, respectively, and merit wider applications, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Outcomes in STS and CSs were also comparable and underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for the management of sarcomas in LMICS.