1
|
Moreno-Ramírez D, Silva-Clavería F, Fernández-Orland A, Eiris N, Ruiz de Casas A, Férrandiz L. Surgery for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma and its Limits in Advanced Disease. Dermatol Pract Concept 2021; 11:e2021167S. [PMID: 34877075 DOI: 10.5826/dpc.11s2a167s] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgery remains the first-line therapeutic option for most patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). However, in the current therapeutic landscape, surgery must attempt to the complete tumor resection (R0 resection) with the lowest risk of surgical complications. This double aim is usually accomplished through standard excision with clinical margins in patients with low-risk tumors or by some of the micrographically controlled surgery procedures for patients with tumors at high-risk of local recurrence and metastasis. Surgery is also a first-line treatment for nodal metastases of cSCC as well as an option to consider in patients who develop recurrences while receiving immunotherapy, or as a palliation procedure in patients with advanced tumors. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy, that is the use of a medical treatment before surgery, is under investigation in patients with cSCC. The decision-making process and guidelines recommendations regarding cSCC surgery are reviewed in this manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Moreno-Ramírez
- Department of Medical-&-Surgical Dermatology. University Hospital Virgen Macarena. Medicine School, University of Sevilla. Seville, Spain
| | - Francisca Silva-Clavería
- Department of Medical-&-Surgical Dermatology. University Hospital Virgen Macarena. Medicine School, University of Sevilla. Seville, Spain
| | - Almudena Fernández-Orland
- Department of Medical-&-Surgical Dermatology. University Hospital Virgen Macarena. Medicine School, University of Sevilla. Seville, Spain
| | - Noemí Eiris
- Department of Medical-&-Surgical Dermatology. University Hospital Virgen Macarena. Medicine School, University of Sevilla. Seville, Spain
| | - Andrés Ruiz de Casas
- Department of Medical-&-Surgical Dermatology. University Hospital Virgen Macarena. Medicine School, University of Sevilla. Seville, Spain
| | - Lara Férrandiz
- Department of Medical-&-Surgical Dermatology. University Hospital Virgen Macarena. Medicine School, University of Sevilla. Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stratigos AJ, Garbe C, Dessinioti C, Lebbe C, Bataille V, Bastholt L, Dreno B, Concetta Fargnoli M, Forsea AM, Frenard C, Harwood CA, Hauschild A, Hoeller C, Kandolf-Sekulovic L, Kaufmann R, Kelleners-Smeets NWJ, Malvehy J, Del Marmol V, Middleton MR, Moreno-Ramirez D, Pellecani G, Peris K, Saiag P, van den Beuken-van Everdingen MHJ, Vieira R, Zalaudek I, Eggermont AMM, Grob JJ. European interdisciplinary guideline on invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: Part 2. Treatment. Eur J Cancer 2020; 128:83-102. [PMID: 32113942 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
In order to update recommendations on treatment, supportive care, education and follow-up of patients with invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), a multidisciplinary panel of experts from the European Dermatology Forum, the European Association of Dermato-Oncology and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer was formed. Recommendations were based on evidence-based literature review, guidelines and expert consensus. Treatment recommendations are presented for common primary cSCC (low risk, high risk), locally advanced cSCC, regional metastatic cSCC (operable or inoperable) and distant metastatic cSCC. For common primary cSCC (the most frequent cSCC type), first-line treatment is surgical excision with postoperative margin assessment or microscopically controlled sugery. Safety margins containing clinical normal-appearing tissue around the tumour during surgical excision and negative margins as reported in the pathology report are necessary to minimise the risk of local recurrence and metastasis. In case of positive margins, a re-excision shall be done, for operable cases. Lymph node dissection is recommended for cSCC with cytologically or histologically confirmed regional nodal involvement. Radiotherapy should be considered as curative treatment for inoperable cSCC, or for non-surgical candidates. Anti-PD-1 antibodies are the first-line systemic treatment for patients with metastatic or locally advanced cSCC who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiation, with cemiplimab being the first approved systemic agent for advanced cSCC by the Food and Drug Administration/European Medicines Agency. Second-line systemic treatments for advanced cSCC include epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (cetuximab) combined with chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Multidisciplinary board decisions are mandatory for all patients with advanced disease who require more than surgery. Patients should be engaged with informed decisions on management and be provided with best supportive care to optimise symptom management and improve quality of life. Frequency of follow-up visits and investigations for subsequent new cSCC depend on underlying risk characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Stratigos
- 1st Department of Dermatology-Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | - Claus Garbe
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Clio Dessinioti
- 1st Department of Dermatology-Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Celeste Lebbe
- Université de Paris, INSERM U976, AP-HP, Dermatology Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Lars Bastholt
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Brigitte Dreno
- Dermatology Department, CHU Nantes, Université Nantes, CIC 1413, CRCINA Inserm U1232, Nantes, France
| | - Maria Concetta Fargnoli
- Dermatology - Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Ana M Forsea
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Department of Oncologic Dermatology, Elias University Hospital Bucharest, Romania
| | - Cecille Frenard
- Dermatology Department, CHU Nantes, Université Nantes, CIC 1413, CRCINA Inserm U1232, Nantes, France
| | - Catherine A Harwood
- Centre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital (UKSH), Kiel, Germany
| | | | | | - Roland Kaufmann
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nicole W J Kelleners-Smeets
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Josep Malvehy
- Dermatology Department of Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBER de Enfermedades Raras, Instituto Carlos III, Spain
| | - Veronique Del Marmol
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Mark R Middleton
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David Moreno-Ramirez
- Department of Medical-&-Surgical Dermatology Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Ketty Peris
- Institute of Dermatology, Università Cattolica, Rome, Italy; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Philippe Saiag
- Department of General and Oncologic Dermatology, Ambroise-Paré Hospital, APHP, EA 4340 'Biomarkers in Cancerology and Hemato-oncology', UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Marieke H J van den Beuken-van Everdingen
- Centre of Expertise for Palliative Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ricardo Vieira
- Coimbra Hospital and Universitary Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Iris Zalaudek
- Department of Dermatology, University of Trieste, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thiem DGE, Scharr K, Pabst AM, Saka B, Kämmerer PW. Facial cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma - microscopic safety margins and their impact on developing local recurrences. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019; 48:49-55. [PMID: 31810842 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Surgical excision remains the treatment of choice for facial cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) despite there being no generally accepted diameter of clear margins. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of microscopic clear margins diameter (mCMD) with respect to the development of local recurrences (LR). MATERIALS AND METHODS The medical records of 99 patients with a total of 142 cases of facial cSCC, who underwent surgical treatment between January 2010 and December 2015, were reviewed for demographic data and clinicopathological features. RESULTS 100 cases were diagnosed as primary cSCC and 42 cases as secondary cSCC. Of these, nine (6.3%) developed LR. Mean time to LR was 20 months, with the cheek as the predominant site 55.5% (n = 5). Wound closure was either primary (56%) or secondary (44%), depending on the site. Although no significant correlation between mCMD and LR was found (rPearson = 0.029; rPearson = 0.015), >4.1 mm was shown to be a negative cut-off-value (horizontally and vertically) without LR (100% vs 0%). CONCLUSIONS Based on these results, however descriptive they are, the authors consider histological confirmation of clear margins to be necessary for reducing the formation of LR. Thus, consistent testing and histopathological reporting, in a multicentered effort, are needed to further clarify the role of mCMD in the development of cSCC-LR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D G E Thiem
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre Mainz, Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
| | - K Scharr
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre Rostock, Schillingallee 35, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - A M Pabst
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Federal Armed Forces Hospital, Rübenacherstr. 170, 56072 Koblenz, Germany
| | - B Saka
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre Rostock, Schillingallee 35, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - P W Kämmerer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre Mainz, Augustusplatz 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Breuninger H, Eigentler T, Häfner HM, Leiter U. Local surgical treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: deficits and controversies in the literature. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2019; 17:999-1004. [PMID: 31545559 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The prognostic impact of primary excision in the treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma depends on certain tumor characteristics (risk factors), the surgical approach chosen and the subsequent histological examination. For the development of the AWMF (Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany) guidelines for squamous cell carcinoma, the most conclusive guidelines available were evaluated using the DELBI tool (German Instrument for the Methodological Appraisal of Guidelines). These were the Scottish and Canadian guidelines as well as the joint guidelines published by EDF, EADO and EORTC. The primary literature on the aforementioned topics that was used for these guidelines included 49 studies and 9 reviews. None of the studies had a prospective, randomized design; 19 studies contained prospective data; 30 studies provided retrospective data. Overall, the results were heterogeneous. Not only were there discrepancies in terms of the validity of the various risk factors for locoregional disease progression - such as dedifferentiation, desmoplasia and perineural invasion - but also with respect to tumor thickness and surgical consequences. Differences were also found regarding the histological processing method used. In general, there are two such methods: conventional histology (bread loaf technique) and complete histological assessment of excision margins. The latter was found to be associated both with low recurrence rates and low metastatic rates, possibly due to the fact that patients treated with the latter method had lower-risk tumors. Publications on bread loaf histology lacked precise information as to how the tissue was actually processed. Likewise, there was a lack of usable data in terms of the surgical margins used in the primary excision. Conclusion: The current literature is inconsistent and insufficient with regard to the various prognostic factors and the surgical approach to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helmut Breuninger
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karl University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Eigentler
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karl University, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Ulrike Leiter
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karl University, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Scholten LA, Kedilioglu MA, Huizinga PM, Kibbelaar RE, de Jong K, Mouës CM. Long-term recurrence rates of whole specimen intraoperative frozen section analysis in basal cell carcinomas of the face with WIFSA. J Surg Oncol 2019; 119:903-908. [PMID: 30737791 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Recent studies show that whole specimen intraoperative frozen section analysis (WIFSA) is a reliable method for margin analysis in basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and has low recurrence rates after five-years follow-up. There are no studies with longer follow-up. Our aim is to present long-term recurrence rates after WIFSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients with a facial BCC receiving excision with WIFSA between 1992 and 2007 were evaluated. Recurrence rates were examined for primary BCC (pBCC), recurrent BCCs (rBCC), and the different histological subtypes. The accuracy of WIFSA was assessed by comparing with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded section analysis. RESULTS A total of 1140 patients with 1265 BCCs underwent excision with WIFSA, with a median and maximum follow-up of 10 and 25.3 years, respectively. Of all tumors, 90.0% were primary. Excisions were radical after an average of 1.4 excision rounds;5, 10, and 15-year recurrence rates for pBCCs are 3.3%, 5.1%, and 7.3%, respectively. An aggressive growth pattern and rBCCs are associated with more recurrences. The accuracy of WIFSA is 98.4%. CONCLUSIONS WIFSA provides a highly accurate analysis and has a low recurrence rate for primary BCCs. The increasing recurrence rates over time imply 5 years of follow-up may be insufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Scholten
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Muhammed A Kedilioglu
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline M Huizinga
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Robby E Kibbelaar
- Department of Pathology, Pathologie Friesland, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Kim de Jong
- Department of Epidemiology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Chantal M Mouës
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|