1
|
Kim HS, Kang MJ, Kang J, Kim K, Kim B, Kim SH, Kim SJ, Kim YI, Kim JY, Kim JS, Kim H, Kim HJ, Nahm JH, Park WS, Park E, Park JK, Park JM, Song BJ, Shin YC, Ahn KS, Woo SM, Yu JI, Yoo C, Lee K, Lee DH, Lee MA, Lee SE, Lee IJ, Lee H, Im JH, Jang KT, Jang HY, Jun SY, Chon HJ, Jung MK, Chung YE, Chong JU, Cho E, Chie EK, Choi SB, Choi SY, Choi SJ, Choi JY, Choi HJ, Hong SM, Hong JH, Hong TH, Hwang SH, Hwang IG, Park JS. Practice guidelines for managing extrahepatic biliary tract cancers. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2024; 28:161-202. [PMID: 38679456 PMCID: PMC11128785 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.23-170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021. Methods Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop. Results In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing. Conclusions The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Sun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Pancreatobiliary Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mee Joo Kang
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jingu Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital of Hallym University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Bohyun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong-Hun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Soo Jin Kim
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yong-Il Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo Young Kim
- Department of Pathology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Sil Kim
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Haeryoung Kim
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Jung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hae Nahm
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Suk Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Eunkyu Park
- Division of HBP Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Joo Kyung Park
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Myung Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Byeong Jun Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yong Chan Shin
- Department of Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Keun Soo Ahn
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Sang Myung Woo
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, Hospital, Immuno-Oncology Branch Division of Rare and Refractory Center, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Changhoon Yoo
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyoungbun Lee
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Ho Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myung Ah Lee
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Eun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ik Jae Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Huisong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Ho Im
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Kee-Taek Jang
- Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Young Jang
- Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun-Young Jun
- Department of Pathology, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong Jae Chon
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Min Kyu Jung
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Yong Eun Chung
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Uk Chong
- Department of Surgery, National Health Insurance Services Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Eunae Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Eui Kyu Chie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sae Byeol Choi
- Department of Surgery, Korea Universtiy Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seo-Yeon Choi
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Ji Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Young Choi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye-Jeong Choi
- Department of Pathology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Seung-Mo Hong
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hyung Hong
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Ho Hong
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Shin Hye Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - In Gyu Hwang
- Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Seong Park
- Department of Surgery, Pancreatobiliary Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brown KT, Chou JF, Suchy HB, Getrajdman GI, Gonen M, Covey AM, Brody LA, Schattner MA, D'Angelica MI, Kingham TP, Erinjeri JP, Jarnagin WR. Outcome of patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and previous biliary instrumentation: an observational study. BMC Gastroenterol 2024; 24:181. [PMID: 38783208 PMCID: PMC11118511 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03241-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the outcome of previously untreated patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who present to a cancer referral center with or without pre-existing trans-papillary biliary drainage. METHODS Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma presenting between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017, were identified from a prospective surgical database and by a query of the institutional database. Of 237 patients identified, 106 met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Clinical information was obtained from the Electronic Medical Record and imaging studies were reviewed in the Picture Archiving and Communication System. RESULTS 73 of 106 patients (69%) presenting with a new diagnosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma underwent trans-papillary biliary drainage (65 endoscopic and 8 percutaneous) prior to presentation at our institution. 8 of the 73 patients with trans-papillary biliary drainage (11%) presented with and 5 developed cholangitis; all 13 (18%) required subsequent intervention; none of the patients without trans-papillary biliary drainage presented with or required drainage for cholangitis (p = 0.008). Requiring drainage for cholangitis was more likely to delay treatment (p = 0.012) and portended a poorer median overall survival (13.6 months, 95%CI [4.08, not reached)] vs. 20.6 months, 95%CI [18.34, 37.51] p = 0.043). CONCLUSION Trans-papillary biliary drainage for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma carries a risk of cholangitis and should be avoided when possible. Clinical and imaging findings of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma should prompt evaluation at a cancer referral center before any intervention. This would mitigate development of cholangitis necessitating additional drainage procedures, delaying treatment and potentially compromising survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen T Brown
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Joanne F Chou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hannah B Suchy
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - George I Getrajdman
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mithat Gonen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anne M Covey
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lynn A Brody
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark A Schattner
- Division of Gastroenterology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael I D'Angelica
- Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery Division, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery Division, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph P Erinjeri
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery Division, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dar FS, Abbas Z, Ahmed I, Atique M, Aujla UI, Azeemuddin M, Aziz Z, Bhatti ABH, Bangash TA, Butt AS, Butt OT, Dogar AW, Farooqi JI, Hanif F, Haider J, Haider S, Hassan SM, Jabbar AA, Khan AN, Khan MS, Khan MY, Latif A, Luck NH, Malik AK, Rashid K, Rashid S, Salih M, Saeed A, Salamat A, Tayyab GUN, Yusuf A, Zia HH, Naveed A. National guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:1018-1042. [PMID: 38577184 PMCID: PMC10989497 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i9.1018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
A consensus meeting of national experts from all major national hepatobiliary centres in the country was held on May 26, 2023, at the Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre (PKLI & RC) after initial consultations with the experts. The Pakistan Society for the Study of Liver Diseases (PSSLD) and PKLI & RC jointly organised this meeting. This effort was based on a comprehensive literature review to establish national practice guidelines for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA). The consensus was that hCCA is a complex disease and requires a multidisciplinary team approach to best manage these patients. This coordinated effort can minimise delays and give patients a chance for curative treatment and effective palliation. The diagnostic and staging workup includes high-quality computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Brush cytology or biopsy utilizing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a mainstay for diagnosis. However, histopathologic confirmation is not always required before resection. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration of regional lymph nodes and positron emission tomography scan are valuable adjuncts for staging. The only curative treatment is the surgical resection of the biliary tree based on the Bismuth-Corlette classification. Selected patients with unresectable hCCA can be considered for liver transplantation. Adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered to patients with a high risk of recurrence. The use of preoperative biliary drainage and the need for portal vein embolisation should be based on local multidisciplinary discussions. Patients with acute cholangitis can be drained with endoscopic or percutaneous biliary drainage. Palliative chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine has shown improved survival in patients with irresectable and recurrent hCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal Saud Dar
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Zaigham Abbas
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Dr. Ziauddin University Hospital, Karachi 75600, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Irfan Ahmed
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
- University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen B24 3FX, United Kingdom
| | - Muhammad Atique
- Department of Pathology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Usman Iqbal Aujla
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | | | - Zeba Aziz
- Department of Oncology, Hameed Latif Hospital, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Abu Bakar Hafeez Bhatti
- Division of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
| | - Tariq Ali Bangash
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Shaikh Zayed Hospital and Post Graduate Medical Institute, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Amna Subhan Butt
- Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Osama Tariq Butt
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Wahab Dogar
- Department of Liver Transplant, Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences, Gambat 66020, Pakistan
| | - Javed Iqbal Farooqi
- Department of Medicine & Gastroenterology, Lifecare Hospital and Research Centre, Peshawar 25000, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
| | - Faisal Hanif
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary & Liver Transplant, Bahria International Hospital, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Jahanzaib Haider
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary & Liver Transplant, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Siraj Haider
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary & Liver Transplant, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Syed Mujahid Hassan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences, Gambat 66020, Pakistan
| | | | - Aman Nawaz Khan
- Department of Radiology, Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Shoaib Khan
- Army Liver Transplant Unit, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Yasir Khan
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Amer Latif
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Shaikh Zayed Hospital and Post Graduate Medical Institute, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Nasir Hassan Luck
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi 75500, Pakistan
| | - Ahmad Karim Malik
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Kamran Rashid
- Rashid Nursing Home and Cancer Clinic, Rashid Nursing Home and Cancer Clinic, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan
| | - Sohail Rashid
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Mohammad Salih
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
| | - Abdullah Saeed
- Department of Radiology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Amjad Salamat
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Quaid-e-Azam International Hospital, Rawalpindi 44000, Pakistan
| | - Ghias-un-Nabi Tayyab
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Post Graduate Medical Institute, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Aasim Yusuf
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Haseeb Haider Zia
- Division of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
| | - Ammara Naveed
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clocchiatti L, Marino R, Ratti F, Pedica F, Casadei Gardini A, Lorenzin D, Aldrighetti L. Defining and predicting textbook outcomes for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of factors improving achievement of desired postoperative outcomes. Int J Surg 2024; 110:209-218. [PMID: 37800550 PMCID: PMC10793762 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Definition of textbook outcome (TO), defined as a single indicator combining the most advantageous short-term outcomes, is still lacking for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). The primary endpoint of the present study is to analyze the rate of achievement of a disease-specific TO for PHC within a high volume tertiary referral centre. Secondary endpoints are to identify predictive factors of TO-achievement and to analyze the impact of achieving TO on long-term results. METHODS Between 2010 and 2022, a total of 237 patients undergoing combined liver and biliary resection for PHC at tertiary referral centre were included. Disease-specific TO were defined as: no 90-day mortality, no postoperative complications, no readmission, no intraoperative transfusions and resection margins. A logistic regression model was developed to identify predictors associated with TO-achievement. Kaplan-Meier curves were designed to determine TO's impact on survival. RESULTS TO was achieved in 60 (25.3%) patients. At multivariate logistic regression, preoperative biliary drainage [odds ratio (OR) 2.90 (1.13-3.40), P =0.026], high prognostic nutritional index [OR 7.11 (6.71-9.43), P =0.007[ and minimally invasive approach [OR 3.57 (2.31-3.62), P =0.013] were identified as independent predictors of TO. High ASA score [OR 0.38 (0.17-0.82), P =0.013] decreased the odds of TO. A significant improvement in both overall survival and disease-free survival was associated to TO fulfilment. CONCLUSION Since the achievement of TO correlates with better disease-free and overall survival, every effort should be made to ameliorate modifiable aspects prior to surery: management within referral centres with dedicated experience in biliary tract cancer and preoperative optimization protocol may positively contribute to improve postoperative outcomes, increasing the chance to obtain TO. Moreover, the implementation of advanced minimally invasive programs plays as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
| | | | - Andrea Casadei Gardini
- Department of Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Hospital, Milan
| | - Dario Lorenzin
- General Surgery Clinic and Liver Transplant Center, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Biliary Strictures. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:405-426. [PMID: 36863037 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
A biliary stricture is an abnormal narrowing in the ductal drainage system of the liver that can result in clinically and physiologically relevant obstruction to the flow of bile. The most common and ominous etiology is malignancy, underscoring the importance of a high index of suspicion in the evaluation of this condition. The goals of care in patients with a biliary stricture are confirming or excluding malignancy (diagnosis) and reestablishing flow of bile to the duodenum (drainage); the approach to diagnosis and drainage varies according to anatomic location (extrahepatic vs perihilar). For extrahepatic strictures, endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition is highly accurate and has become the diagnostic mainstay. In contrast, the diagnosis of perihilar strictures remains a challenge. Similarly, the drainage of extrahepatic strictures tends to be more straightforward and safer and less controversial than that of perihilar strictures. Recent evidence has provided some clarity in multiple important areas pertaining to biliary strictures, whereas several remaining controversies require additional research. The goal of this guideline is to provide practicing clinicians with the most evidence-based guidance on the approach to patients with extrahepatic and perihilar strictures, focusing on diagnosis and drainage.
Collapse
|
6
|
Páez-Carpio A, Hessheimer A, Bermúdez P, Zarco FX, Serrano E, Moreno J, Molina V, Ausania F, Carrero E, Burrel M, Fondevila C, Gómez FM. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for biliary obstruction in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a 10-year analysis of safety and outcomes using the CCI index. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:109. [PMID: 36847837 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02852-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) safety and efficacy in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PCCA). METHODS This retrospective observational study included patients with PCCA and obstructive cholestasis referred for a PTBD in our institution between 2010 and 2020. Technical and clinical success rates and major complication and mortality rates one month after PTBD were used as main variables. Patients were divided and analyzed into two groups: > 30 and < 30 Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). We also evaluated post-surgical outcomes in patients undergoing surgery. RESULTS Out of 223 patients, 57 were included. Technical success rate was 87.7%. Clinical success at 1 week was 83.6%, before surgery 68.2%, 80.0% at 2 weeks and 86.7% at 4 weeks. Mean total bilirubin (TBIL) values were 15.1 mg/dL (baseline), 8.1 mg/dL one week after PTBD), 6.1 mg/dL (2 weeks) and 2.1 mg/dL (4 weeks). Major complication rate was 21.1%. Three patients died (5.3%). Risk factors for major complications after the statistical analysis were: Bismuth classification (p = 0.01), tumor resectability (p = 0.04), PTBD clinical success (p = 0.04), TBIL 2 weeks after PTBD (p = 0.04), a second PTBD (p = 0.01), total PTBDs (p = 0.01) and duration of drainage (p = 0.03). Major postoperative complication rate in patients who underwent surgery was 59.3%, with a median CCI of 26.2. CONCLUSION PTBD is safe and effective in the management of biliary obstruction caused by PCCA. Bismuth classification, locally advanced tumors, and failure to achieve clinical success in the first PTBD are factors related to major complications. Our sample reported a high major postoperative complication rate, although with an acceptable median CCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo Páez-Carpio
- Department of Radiology, CDI, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Amelia Hessheimer
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patricia Bermúdez
- Department of Radiology, CDI, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Federico X Zarco
- Department of Radiology, CDI, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elena Serrano
- Department of Radiology, CDI, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julián Moreno
- Department of Radiology, CDI, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Víctor Molina
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fabio Ausania
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, ICEDM, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Carrero
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Burrel
- Department of Radiology, CDI, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando M Gómez
- Department of Radiology, CDI, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nooijen LE, Franssen S, Buis CI, Dejong CHC, den Dulk M, van Delden OM, Ijzermans JN, Groot Koerkamp B, Kazemier G, van Lienden K, Klümpen HJ, Kuipers H, Olij B, Porte RJ, Rauws EA, Voermans RP, van Gulik TM, Erdmann JI, Roos E, Coelen RJ. Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial of biliary drainage in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:210-217. [PMID: 36376222 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The DRAINAGE trial was a randomized controlled trial comparing preoperative endoscopic (EBD) and percutaneous biliary drainage (PTBD) in patients with potentially resectable, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes. METHODS Patients were randomized in four tertiary referral centers. Follow-up data were available for all included patients. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were readmissions, and re-interventions not including in-trial interventions. RESULTS A total of 54 patients were randomized; 27 in both groups. Median follow-up for both groups was 62 months (95% CI 54-70). The median OS was 13 months (95% CI 7.9-18.1) in the EBD and 7 months (95% CI 0.0-17.2) in the PTBD group (P = 0.28). Twenty (37%, n = 8 EBD vs n = 12 PTBD, P = 0.43) of 54 patients were readmitted at least once, mostly due to drainage-related complications (n = 13, 24%). Of note, 14 out of the 54 patients died within the trial. A total of 76 drainage procedures (32 EBD and 44 PTBD) were performed in 28 patients. The median number of stent or drain placements was 2 (2-4) for the EBD group and 2 (1-3) for the PTBD group (P = 0.77). DISCUSSION Although this follow-up study represented a small cohort, no long-term differences in survival, readmissions, and drainage procedures for EBD and PTBD were found, even when comparing the resected and unresected group. However, this study demonstrates the complexity of biliary drainage for patients with potentially resectable pCCA, even in tertiary referral centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn E Nooijen
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stijn Franssen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carlijn I Buis
- University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Surgery, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis H C Dejong
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan N Ijzermans
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Krijn van Lienden
- RAKU, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Sciences, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hendrien Kuipers
- University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Surgery, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Bram Olij
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Robert J Porte
- University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Surgery, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Erik A Rauws
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rogier P Voermans
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E Roos
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R J Coelen
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moll CF, de Moura DTH, Ribeiro IB, Proença IM, do Monte Junior ES, Sánchez-Luna SA, Merchán MFS, Intriago JMV, Bernardo WM, de Moura EGH. Endoscopic Biliary Darinage (EBD) versus Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD) for biliary drainage in patients with Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma (PCCA): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2023; 78:100163. [PMID: 36681067 PMCID: PMC10757298 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 11/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Biliary drainage for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma (PCCA) can be performed either by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD). To date there is no consensus about which method is preferred. Taking that into account, the aim of this study is to compare Endoscopic Biliary Drainage (EBD) versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma through a systematic review and metanalysis. A comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases was performed. Evaluated outcomes included technical success, clinical success, post drainage complications (cholangitis, pancreatitis, bleeding, and major complications), crossover, hospital length stay, and seeding metastases. Data extracted from the studies were used to calculate Mean Differences (MD). Seventeen studies were included, with a total of 2284 patients (EBD = 1239, PTBD = 1045). Considering resectable PCCA, the PTBD group demonstrated lower rates of crossover (RD = 0.29; 95% CI 0.07‒0.51; p = 0.009 I² = 90%), post-drainage complications (RD = 0.20; 95% CI 0.06‒0.33; p < 0.0001; I² = 78%), and post-drainage pancreatitis (RD = 0.10; 95% CI 0.05‒0.16; p < 0.0001; I² = 64%). The EBD group presented reduced length of hospital stay (RD = -2.89; 95% CI -3.35 ‒ -2,43; p < 0.00001; I² = 42%). Considering palliative PCCA, the PTBD group demonstrated a higher clinical success (RD = -0.19; 95% CI -0.27 ‒ -0.11; p < 0.00001; I² = 0%) and less post-drainage cholangitis (RD = 0.08; 95% CI 0.01‒0.15; p = 0.02; I² = 48%) when compared to the EBD group. There was no statistical difference between the groups regarding: technical success, post-drainage bleeding, major post-drainage complications, and seeding metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Flaksbaum Moll
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Igor Braga Ribeiro
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| | - Igor Mendoça Proença
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Epifanio Silvino do Monte Junior
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Sergio A Sánchez-Luna
- Basil I. Hirschowitz Endoscopic Center of Excellence, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
| | - Maria Fernanda Shinin Merchán
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Josselyn Mariana Vera Intriago
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Wanderley Marques Bernardo
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
- Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hamad A, Pawlik TM. Are the Current Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Liver Surgery Enough? World J Surg 2023; 47:35-36. [PMID: 36422658 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06841-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Hamad
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Van Eecke E, Degroote H, Vanlander A, Hindryckx P. Outcome of primary ERCP versus primary PTC for biliary drainage in malignant hilar biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7160-7170. [PMID: 35941311 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09413-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with malignant hilar biliary strictures can suffer from obstructive jaundice. Controversy remains on the optimal approach to obtain preoperative or palliative biliary drainage in these patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare the two modalities most commonly used in this scenario: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC). METHODS MEDLINE via PubMed was searched for relevant articles published from 2005 to April 2019. Following outcome measures were used to compare ERCP and PTC: therapeutic success rate, cholangitis, pancreatitis, bleeding, tube dislocation, reintervention rate, mortality such as 30d mortality and in-hospital death, median survival time, drainage patency, duration until decompression and hospital stay. Risk of bias assessment for the retrospective studies was conducted by NOS. RoB 2 was used for RCT. A meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.3. The certainty of evidence was appraised using GRADE. RESULTS Eleven articles of which one RCT and ten retrospective cohort studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for data-analysis (1417 patients; 784 ERCP, 633 PTC). The combined odds ratio (OR) for therapeutic succes was 3.5 times higher in the PTC group (95% CI 2.05-5.97; high certainty). In terms of cholangitis, ERCP carried a 1.7-fold risk as compared to PTC (95% CI 0.92-3.08; moderate certainty). Patients who underwent ERCP were 11.50 times more likely to undergo a reintervention (95% CI 3.51-37.70; moderate certainty). ERCP was comparable to PTC in terms of pancreatitis (low certainty), bleeding (high certainty) and tube dislocation rate (moderate certainty). Mortality tended to be numerically higher in the PTC group but low patient numbers, selection bias and study heterogeneity did not allow uniform comparative analysis. CONCLUSIONS In patients with malignant hilar biliary strictures, PTC is associated with a better therapeutic success rate, less cholangitis and lower reintervention rate as compared to ERCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evy Van Eecke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan, 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Helena Degroote
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan, 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Aude Vanlander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan, 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pieter Hindryckx
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan, 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. .,Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ellis RJ, Soares KC, Jarnagin WR. Preoperative Management of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092119. [PMID: 35565250 PMCID: PMC9104035 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is a rare hepatobiliary malignancy that requires thoughtful, multidisciplinary evaluation in the preoperative setting to ensure optimal patient outcomes. Comprehensive preoperative imaging, including multiphase CT angiography and some form of cholangiographic assessment, is key to assessing resectability. While many staging systems exist, the Blumgart staging system provides the most useful combination of resectability assessment and prognostic information for use in the preoperative setting. Once resectability is confirmed, volumetric analysis should be performed. Upfront resection without biliary drainage or portal venous embolization may be considered in patients without cholangitis and an estimated functional liver remnant (FLR) > 40%. In patients with FLR < 40%, judicious use of biliary drainage is advised, with the goal of selective biliary drainage of the functional liver remnant. Percutaneous biliary drainage may avoid inadvertent contamination of the contralateral biliary tree and associated infectious complications, though the relative effectiveness of percutaneous and endoscopic techniques is an ongoing area of study and debate. Patients with low FLR also require intervention to induce hypertrophy, most commonly portal venous embolization, in an effort to reduce the rate of postoperative liver failure. Even with extensive preoperative workup, many patients will be found to have metastatic disease at exploration and diagnostic laparoscopy may reduce the rate of non-therapeutic laparotomy. Management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma continues to evolve, with ongoing efforts to improve preoperative liver hypertrophy and to further define the role of transplantation in disease management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J. Ellis
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (R.J.E.); (K.C.S.)
| | - Kevin C. Soares
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (R.J.E.); (K.C.S.)
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - William R. Jarnagin
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (R.J.E.); (K.C.S.)
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Benzing C, Haiden LM, Krenzien F, Mieg A, Wolfsberger A, Atik CF, Nevermann N, Fehrenbach U, Schöning W, Schmelzle M, Pratschke J. Textbook outcome after major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma - definitions and influencing factors. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1561-1573. [PMID: 35246771 PMCID: PMC9283152 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02467-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The concept of “textbook outcome” (TO) as composite quality measure depicting the ideal surgical has not yet been defined for patients undergoing major hepatectomy (MH) for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). This study sought to propose a uniform definition through a systematic literature review as well as to identify patient- or procedure-related factors influencing TO. Methods In this retrospective study, we analyzed all patients undergoing MH for PHC at our department between January 2005 and August 2019. After conducting a systematic literature search, we defined TO as the absence of 90-day mortality and major complications, no hospital readmission within 90 days after discharge, and no prolonged hospital stay (<75. percentile). A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors influencing TO. Results Of 283 patients, TO was achieved in 67 (24%) patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative biliary drainage was associated with a decreased (OR= 0.405, 95% CI: 0.194–0.845, p=0.016) and left-sided-resection (OR= 1.899, 95% CI: 1.048–3.440, p=0.035) with increased odds for TO. Overall survival (OS) and DFS (disease-free survival) did not differ significantly between the outcome groups (OS: p=0.280, DFS: p=0.735). However, there was a trend towards better overall survival, especially in the late course with TO. Conclusion Our analysis proposed a uniform definition of TO after MH for PHC. We identified left hepatectomy as an independent factor positively influencing TO. In patients where both right- and left-sided resections are feasible, this underlines the importance of a careful selection of patients who are scheduled for right hepatectomy. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-022-02467-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Benzing
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lena Marie Haiden
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexa Mieg
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annika Wolfsberger
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cecilia Filiz Atik
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nora Nevermann
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Uli Fehrenbach
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Impact of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative outcomes in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Asian J Surg 2021; 45:993-1000. [PMID: 34588138 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.07.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE Complete resection is the most effective treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) but may result in high morbidity and mortality. Most HC patients have jaundice, and preoperative biliary drainage may reduce their risk of obstructive jaundice. ERCP and PTBD have been advocated for this purpose. This retrospective study investigated the influence of ERCP versus PTBD versus their combination on the short-term outcomes of curative HC resection. METHODS Patients having curative HC resection with preoperative biliary drainage in a span of 26 years were reviewed and divided into groups according to drainage modality. Drainage-related and surgical complications and hospital mortality were compared between groups. Intention-to-treat analysis using a separate set of initial drainage data was performed. RESULTS Eighty-six patients were divided into: Group A, ERCP only, n = 32 (32/86 = 37.2%); Group B, PTBD only, n = 10 (10/86 = 11.6%); Group C, ERCP + PTBD, n = 44 (44/86 = 51.2%). International normalized ratio was significantly higher in Group B (p = 0.008). The three groups were comparable in operative details, hospital stay, and mortality. Fifty-two patients had postoperative complications. Significantly more patients in Groups A and C had subphrenic abscess (A: 25%, B: 0%, C: 9.1%; p = 0.035) and subsequent radiological drainage. Group A had insignificantly more patients with wound infection (31.3% vs 10% vs 22.7%, p = 0.334), chest infection (28.1% vs 20% vs 11.4%, p = 0.178), and urinary tract infection (6.3% vs 0% vs 0%, p = 0.133). The three groups had similar rates of major complications (p = 0.501). They also had comparable survival outcomes (overall, p = 0.370; disease-free, p = 0.569). Fifteen and 71 patients received PTBD and ERCP respectively as first drainage mode. These two groups were comparable in liver function, preoperative comorbidity, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSION In the preoperative management of HC, the use of ERCP, PTBD or their combination is acceptable and can optimize patients' condition for curative HC resection.
Collapse
|
14
|
Qin H, Hu X, Zhang J, Dai H, He Y, Zhao Z, Yang J, Xu Z, Hu X, Chen Z. Machine-learning radiomics to predict early recurrence in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection. Liver Int 2021; 41:837-850. [PMID: 33306240 DOI: 10.1111/liv.14763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Up to 40%-65% of patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) rapidly progress to early recurrence (ER) even after curative resection. Quantification of ER risk is difficult and a reliable prognostic prediction tool is absent. We developed and validated a multilevel model, integrating clinicopathology, molecular pathology and radiology, especially radiomics coupled with machine-learning algorithms, to predict the ER of patients after curative resection in PHC. METHODS In total, 274 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and curative resection at 2 institutions were retrospectively identified and randomly divided into training (n = 167), internal validation (n = 70) and external validation (n = 37) sets. A machine-learning analysis of 18,120 radiomic features based on multiphase CECT and 48 clinico-radiologic characteristics was performed for the multilevel model. RESULTS Comprehensively, 7 independent factors (tumour differentiation, lymph node metastasis, pre-operative CA19-9 level, enhancement pattern, A-Shrink score, V-Shrink score and P-Shrink score) were built to the multilevel model and quantified the risk of ER. We benchmarked the gain in discrimination with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.883, superior to the rival clinical and radiomic models (AUCs 0.792-0.805). The accuracy (ACC) of the multilevel model was 0.826, which was significantly higher than those of the conventional staging systems (AJCC 8th (0.641), MSKCC (0.617) and Gazzaniga (0.581)). CONCLUSION The radiomics-based multilevel model demonstrated superior performance to rival models and conventional staging systems, and could serve as a visual prognostic tool to plan surveillance of ER and guide post-operative individualized management in PHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Qin
- Institute of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Xianling Hu
- Communication NCO Academy, Army Engineering University of PLA, Chongqing, China
| | - Junfeng Zhang
- Institute of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Chongqing General Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing, China
| | - Haisu Dai
- Institute of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Yonggang He
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Zhiping Zhao
- Institute of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Jiali Yang
- Institute of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Zhengrong Xu
- Institute of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Xiaofei Hu
- Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Zhiyu Chen
- Institute of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Giuliante F, Ardito F, Aldrighetti L, Ferrero A, Pinna AD, De Carlis L, Cillo U, Jovine E, Portolani N, Gruttadauria S, Mazzaferro V, Massani M, Rosso E, Ettorre GM, Ratti F, Guglielmi A, Cescon M, Colasanti M, Di Sandro S, Gringeri E, Russolillo N, Ruzzenente A, Sposito C, Zanello M, Zimmitti G. Liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Impact of biliary drainage failure on postoperative outcome. Results of an Italian multicenter study. Surgery 2021; 170:383-389. [PMID: 33622570 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative biliary drainage may be essential to reduce the risk of postoperative liver failure after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. However, infectious complications related to preoperative biliary drainage may increase the risk of postoperative mortality. The strategy and optimal drainage method continues to be controversial. METHODS This is a retrospective multicenter study including patients who underwent hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2000 and 2016 at 14 Italian referral hepatobiliary centers. The primary end point was to evaluate independent predictors for postoperative outcome in patients undergoing liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma after preoperative biliary drainage. RESULTS Of the 639 enrolled patients, 441 (69.0%) underwent preoperative biliary drainage. Postoperative mortality was 8.9% (12.5% after right-side hepatectomy versus 5.7% after left-side hepatectomy; P = .003). Of the patients, 40.5% underwent preoperative biliary drainage at the first admitting hospital, before evaluation at referral centers. Use of percutaneous preoperative biliary drainage was significantly more frequent at referral centers than at community hospitals where endoscopic preoperative biliary drainage was the most frequent type. The overall failure rate after preoperative biliary drainage was 43.3%, significantly higher at community hospitals than that at referral centers (52.7% v 36.9%; P = .002). Failure of the first preoperative biliary drainage was one of the strongest predictors for postoperative complications after right-side and left-side hepatectomies and for mortality after right-side hepatectomy. Type of preoperative biliary drainage (percutaneous versus endoscopic) was not associated with significantly different risk of mortality. CONCLUSION Failure of preoperative biliary drainage was significantly more frequent at community hospitals and it was an independent predictor for postoperative outcome. Centers' experience in preoperative biliary drainage management is crucial to reduce the risk of failure that is closely associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Antonio D Pinna
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of General Surgery, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, IRCCS, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Nazario Portolani
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, IRCCS-ISMETT, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- General Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano (National Cancer Institute), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Massani
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital of Treviso, Italy
| | - Edoardo Rosso
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe M Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, S. Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | | | - Matteo Cescon
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Colasanti
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, S. Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Gringeri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Carlo Sposito
- General Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano (National Cancer Institute), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Zanello
- Department of General Surgery, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, IRCCS, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Adverse oncologic effects of preoperative biliary drainage on early stage ampulla of Vater cancer. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:253-261. [PMID: 32665175 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) in ampulla of Vater (AoV) cancer is indiscriminately performed without logical backgrounds. This study was performed to evaluate the effect of PBD on short and long-term outcomes in AoV cancer. METHODS 313 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and were pathologically diagnosed as AoV cancer between January 2000 and December 2014 were reviewed. RESULTS 167 patients (53.4%) underwent PBD: Endoscopic drainage was performed in 106 patients (33.9%) and percutaneous drainage in 61 (19.5%). The postoperative complication rate of PBD group was significantly higher than that of upfront surgery group (48.5% vs. 38.4%, p = 0.045). The 5-year disease-free survival rate (5Y-DFSR) was significantly lower in PBD group compared to upfront surgery group (53.8% vs. 74.3%, p < 0.001). Worse 5Y-DFSR of PBD group was more evident in T1/T2 stage (59.2% vs. 84.1%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis with T1/T2 staged patients, PBD was independently associated with worse outcome (hazard ratio 2.145 [95% confidence interval, 1.202-3.826], p = 0.010). CONCLUSION For T1/T2 AoV cancer, PBD adversely affected the short-term postoperative complication rate as well as the long-term oncologic outcomes. Therefore, especially in patients with T1/T2 AoV cancer, routine practice of PBD should be refrained and be reserved for selected cases such as cholangitis.
Collapse
|
17
|
Italian Clinical Practice Guidelines on Cholangiocarcinoma - Part II: Treatment. Dig Liver Dis 2020; 52:1430-1442. [PMID: 32952071 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Currently, the only curative treatment for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is surgical resection, though this treatment is possible in less than 40% of patients. However, recent improvements in preoperative management have led to a higher number of patients who are candidates for this procedure. For unresectable patients, progress is ongoing in terms of locoregional and chemoradiation treatments and target therapies, especially in the definition of patient selection criteria. This is the second part of the Italian CCA guidelines, dealing with CCA treatment, that have been formulated in accordance with Italian National Institute of Health indications and developed according to the GRADE method and related advancements.
Collapse
|
18
|
Le TB. Percutaneous Transhepatic Intervention for Malignant Biliary Obstruction. J Clin Med 2020. [DOI: 10.38103/jcmhch.2020.64.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Biliary obstruction is a serious clinical condition resulting from either benign or malignant etiologies. For malignant obstruction, curative resection is rarely performed due to disease progression, thus decompression drainage is the management of choice. Percutaneous transhepatic drainage and stenting are effective alternative treatments to surgical bypass and endoscopic biliary drainage when these two modalities are contraindicated. Percutaneous biliary intervention is safe and effective in both drainage and restoration of bile flow with high successful rate and acceptable risk of complication. Multidisciplinary approach, proper patient selection, careful image review and comprehensive knowledge of available techniques, success rates and complications are utmost importance for a successful procedure.
Collapse
|
19
|
The effect and safety of preoperative biliary drainage in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:174. [PMID: 32682432 PMCID: PMC7368977 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01904-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The effect and safety of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are still controversial; the aim of our study is to evaluate all aspects of PBD. Methods All included studies featured PBD versus non-PBD (NPBD) groups were from 1996 to 2019 and were extracted from Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Science Citation Index Expanded. Results Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. PBD may lead to a significantly higher incidence of overall morbidities (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53, 0.85; P = 0.0009) and intraoperative transfusions (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55, 0.94; P = 0.02); moreover, bile leakage (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.24, 1.41; P = 0.04), infection (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.20, 0.47; P < 0.00001), and cholangitis (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.007, 0.48; P = 0.0007) are also related to PBD. However, NPBD was associated with more frequent hepatic insufficiency (OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.15, 8.31; P = 0.03). In the subgroup meta-analysis, the differences in the outcomes of bile leakage and overall morbidity lost significance between the PBD and NPBD groups when the mean total serum bilirubin (TSB) concentration was above 15 mg/dl. Conclusion Meta-analysis demonstrated that compared to NPBD, PBD is associated with a greater risk of several kinds of infection and morbidities, but its ability to reduce postoperative hepatic insufficiency cannot be ignored. In patients with a high TSB concentration, PBD tends to be a better choice. However, these results need to be confirmed in a future prospective randomized trial with large samples to clarify the effects and find a specific TSB concentration for PBD.
Collapse
|
20
|
Chen GF, Yu WD, Wang JR, Qi FZ, Qiu YD. The methods of preoperative biliary drainage for resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e20237. [PMID: 32481299 PMCID: PMC7249990 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000020237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2019] [Revised: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) with those of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in patients with resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) and evaluate the effect of EBD and PTBD on tumor prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles about the comparison between PTBD and EBD. Data were analyzed by Revman 5.3. RESULTS PTBD showed a lower risk of drainage-related complications than EBD (OR, 2.73; 95%CI, 1.52-4.91; P < .05). PTBD was also associated with lower risk of pancreatitis (OR, 8.47; 95%CI, 2.28-31.45; P < .05). The differences in preoperative cholangitis, R0 resection, blood loss and recurrence showed no statistically significance between EBD and PTBD (all P > .05). Several literatures have reported the tumor implantation metastasis after PTBD. Since no well-designed prospective randomized controlled studies have explored in this depth, this article is unable to draw conclusions on this aspect. CONCLUSION PTBD is a reasonable choice for PBD, and EBD should only be used as preoperative drainage for HCCA by more experienced physicians. There is a greater need to design prospective randomized controlled studies to obtain high-level evidence-based medicinal proof. It is worth noting that, whether EBD or PTBD, accurate selective biliary drainage should be the trend.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guo-Feng Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Huai’an NO.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huai’an, Jiangsu Province
| | - Wei-Di Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Shanghai No. 10 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Shanghai, Shanghai Province
| | - Ji-Ru Wang
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Jiangsu College of Nursing, Huai’an, Jiangsu Province, P.R. China
| | - Fu-Zhen Qi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Huai’an NO.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huai’an, Jiangsu Province
| | - Yu-Dong Qiu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mehrabi A, Khajeh E, Ghamarnejad O, Nikdad M, Chang DH, Büchler MW, Hoffmann K. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of preoperative biliary drainage in patients undergoing liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Eur J Radiol 2020; 125:108897. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
22
|
Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Satyadas T. Endoscopic Versus Percutaneous Preoperative Biliary Drainage in Patients With Klatskin Tumor Undergoing Curative Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes. Surg Innov 2020; 27:279-290. [PMID: 32172684 DOI: 10.1177/1553350620911291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Aims. To compare short-term and long-term outcomes of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) and percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD) in patients with Klatskin tumor undergoing curative surgery. Methods. We conducted a search of electronic information sources to identify all studies comparing EBD and PBD in patients with Klatskin tumor undergoing curative surgery. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess the risk of bias observational studies. Random-effects or fixed-effects modeling was applied as appropriate to calculate pooled outcome data. Results. We identified 9 observational studies, enrolling a total of 1436 patients. The patients in the PBD group had more advanced disease than those in EBD group in terms of Bismuth-Corlette classification and tumor classification. EBD was associated with higher risks of postprocedural complications (odds ratio [OR] =2.24, P = .001), conversion to another drainage method (OR =11.16, P < .00001), cholangitis (OR = 4.58, P < .0001), and pancreatitis (OR = 8.90, P = .009) than PBD; there was no difference between the 2 methods in terms of technical success (OR = 0.79, P = .50) and tube dislocation (OR = 0.81, P = .54). Regarding the postoperative outcomes, there was no difference in terms of 30-day mortality (OR = 0.61, P = .16) and major postoperative complications (OR = 0.60, P = .06). Regarding the long-term outcomes, EBD was associated with lower risks of seeding metastasis (OR = 0.46, P = .0004) and 5-year recurrence (OR = 0.72, P = .010), and better 5-year survival (OR = 1.62, P = .001). Conclusions. EBD may be associated with higher procedure-related complications compared with PBD as a preoperative biliary drainage method in patients with Klatskin tumor undergoing curative surgery. The available evidence on long-term oncological and survival outcomes are subject to confounding by indication, and high-quality randomized controlled trials are required for definite conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shahin Hajibandeh
- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, Birmingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Li CX, Zhang H, Wang K, Wang X, Li XC. Preoperative Bilirubin Level Predicts Overall Survival and Tumor Recurrence After Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Patients. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11:10157-10165. [PMID: 31819648 PMCID: PMC6897510 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s230620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Currently, the correlation between preoperative bilirubin level and overall survival (OS) remains poorly defined in respectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (CC). The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the outcomes of perihilar CC after resection and then to analyze factors influencing curative resection, tumor recurrence and OS. Methods 115 patients with perihilar CC underwent surgical resection were retrospectively analyzed based on clinic characteristics, operative details, tumor recurrence and long-term survival data. Results The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates after resection were 75.9%, 36.5%, 21.7%, whereas the corresponding tumor recurrence rates were 29.6%, 70.8%, 85.3%, respectively. Preoperative bilirubin level combined with liver resection, resection margin, vascular invasion and perineural invasion, lymph node metastasis and TNM stage were found to be correlated with OS and tumor recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative bilirubin level together with resection margin, perineural invasion, and TNM stage were independent predictors of OS and tumor recurrence. Furthermore, preoperative bilirubin level was related with R0 resection, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage and postoperative liver function recovery. Conclusion Preoperative bilirubin level may effectively reflect the severity of perihilar CC and predict the OS and tumor recurrence after resection for perihilar CC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Xian Li
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Hui Zhang
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Ke Wang
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuehao Wang
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiang Cheng Li
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Matsukuma S, Tokumitsu Y, Shindo Y, Matsui H, Nagano H. Essential updates to the surgical treatment of biliary tract cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2019; 3:378-389. [PMID: 31346577 PMCID: PMC6635684 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Biliary tract cancer, which includes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic bile duct cancer, gallbladder cancer, and ampullary cancer, is an intractable disease with a dismal prognosis. Prognosis is particularly poor in cases involving vessels or lymph nodes. Hepatobiliary pancreatic surgeons worldwide have consistently focused on improving surgical treatment, perioperative management, and chemotherapy to improve the outcomes of these diseases. There has been significant progress even in the last 2 years (2017 and 2018), such as promising findings reported by studies on the optimal extent of surgical treatment and multi-institutional randomized controlled trials on adjuvant chemotherapy. We overview the current trends and advancements made in surgical treatment in 2017 and 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Matsukuma
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| | - Yukio Tokumitsu
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| | - Yoshitaro Shindo
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| | - Hiroto Matsui
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Comparing the efficacy of initial percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with stenting for relief of biliary obstruction in unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:1186-1190. [PMID: 31139984 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06871-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CC), management of biliary obstruction commonly involves either up-front percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) or initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with stent placement. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and of initial ERCP with stent placement with efficacy of initial PTBD in management of biliary obstruction in CC. METHODS A single-center database of patients with unresectable CC treated between 2006 and 2017 was queried for patients with biliary obstruction who underwent either PTBD or ERCP. Groups were compared with respect to patient, tumor, procedure, and outcome variables. RESULTS Of 87 patients with unresectable CC and biliary obstruction, 69 (79%) underwent initial ERCP while 18 (21%) underwent initial PTBD. Groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, gender, or tumor location. Initial procedure success did not differ between the groups (94% ERCP vs 89% PTBD, p = 0.339). Total number of procedures did not differ significantly between the two groups (ERCP median = 2 vs. PTC median = 2.5, p = 0.83). 21% of patients required ERCP after PTBD compared to 25% of patients requiring PTBD after ERCP (p = 1.00). Procedure success rate (97% ERCP vs. 93% PTBD, p = 0.27) and rates of cholangitis (22% ERCP vs. 17% PTBD, p = 0.58) were similar between the groups. Number of hospitalizations since initial intervention did not differ significantly between the two groups (ERCP median = 1 vs. PTC median = 3.5, p = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS In patients with CC and biliary obstruction, initial ERCP with stent placement and initial PTBD both represent safe and effective methods of biliary decompression. Initial ERCP and stenting should be considered for relief of biliary obstruction in such patients in centers with advanced endoscopic capabilities.
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang L, Lin N, Xin F, Zeng Y, Liu J. Comparison of long-term efficacy between endoscopic and percutaneous biliary drainage for resectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with biliary obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:81-88. [PMID: 30720001 PMCID: PMC6457183 DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_429_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM For resectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with biliary obstruction, it remains a controversy whether to choose percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) or endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD). A systematic review was conducted to compare the long-term efficacy between the two techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible studies were searched from January 1990 to May 2018, comparing the long-term efficacy between EBD and PTBD for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Primary end point was overall survival (OS) rate, and secondary end points included postoperative severe complications and seeding metastasis. Effect size on outcomes was calculated using a fixed- or random-effect model, accompanied with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULT Six studies were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that EBD was superior to PTBD in OS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.59-0.84,P= 0.0002). But subgroup results showed that the superiority disappeared in distal cholangiocarcinoma (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.56-1.01,P= 0.06). Other prognostic factors such as intraoperative blood transfusion, lymphatic metastasis and seeding metastasis, were inconsistent between groups. In addition, regional disparity was obviously apparent between Japanese and non-Japanese studies. CONCLUSION The conclusion that EBD was superior to PTBD in OS for resectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with biliary obstruction is less convincing, and more trials need to be conducted in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China,The United Innovation of Mengchao Hepatobiliary Technology Key Laboratory of Fujian Province, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Nanping Lin
- The United Innovation of Mengchao Hepatobiliary Technology Key Laboratory of Fujian Province, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China,Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China,Liver Diseases Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Fuli Xin
- The United Innovation of Mengchao Hepatobiliary Technology Key Laboratory of Fujian Province, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China,Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China,Liver Diseases Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yongyi Zeng
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China,Liver Diseases Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China,Address for correspondence: Dr. Jingfeng Liu, The United Innovation of Mengchao Hepatobiliary Technology Key Laboratory of Fujian Province, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350025, Fujian, PR, China. Liver Diseases Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350007, Fujian, PR, China Xihong Road 312, Fuzhou 350 005, Fujian, PR, China. E-mail: Dr. Yongyi Zeng, Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Liver Diseases Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350007, Fujian, PR, China Xihong Road 312, Fuzhou 350 005, Fujian, PR, China
| | - Jingfeng Liu
- The United Innovation of Mengchao Hepatobiliary Technology Key Laboratory of Fujian Province, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China,Liver Diseases Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China,Address for correspondence: Dr. Jingfeng Liu, The United Innovation of Mengchao Hepatobiliary Technology Key Laboratory of Fujian Province, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350025, Fujian, PR, China. Liver Diseases Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350007, Fujian, PR, China Xihong Road 312, Fuzhou 350 005, Fujian, PR, China. E-mail: Dr. Yongyi Zeng, Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Liver Diseases Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350007, Fujian, PR, China Xihong Road 312, Fuzhou 350 005, Fujian, PR, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pattern of the First Recurrence Has No Impact on Long-Term Survival after Curative Intent Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinomas. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2018; 2018:2546257. [PMID: 30158963 PMCID: PMC6109483 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2546257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Revised: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim To explore the pattern of the first recurrence and impact on long-term survival after curative intent surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinomas (PHC). Materials and Methods Patients with curative intent surgery for PHC between 1996 and 2017 were analyzed. Survival times were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons were made with the log-rank test. Results A number of 139 patients were included. The median overall survival was 26 months. A recurrence was observed in 86 patients (61.9%), during a median follow-up time of 89 months. The median disease-free survival was 21 months with 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year estimated recurrence rates of 38%, 60%, 69%, and 77%, respectively. A number of 57 patients (41%) developed distant only recurrence, while 26 patients (18.7%) presented local and distant recurrences. An isolated local recurrence was observed in 3 patients (2.2%). The median overall survival was 15 months for patients with local recurrence, 15 months for patients with liver metastases, and 17 months for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (p = 0.903) as the first recurrence. Conclusion Curative intent surgery for PHC is associated with high recurrence rates. Most patients will develop distant metastases, while an isolated local recurrence is uncommon. The pattern of recurrence does not appear to have a significant impact on survivals.
Collapse
|
28
|
|
29
|
Kimbrough CW, Cloyd JM, Pawlik TM. Surgical approaches for the treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018; 18:673-683. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1473039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Charles W. Kimbrough
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jordan M. Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|