The prognostic significance of adrenocortical carcinomas identified incidentally

Histological scores and tumor size on stage II in adrenocortical carcinomas

Adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC) are aggressive tumors with a poor prognosis. Histological scores are advised for the diagnosis, however, there are borderline cases that may be misjudged as adrenocortical adenomas (ACA). The three main scores used are: Weiss Modified System (WMS), Reticulin Algorithm (RA), and Helsinki Score (HS). We intend to compare the accuracy of the three scores in ACC diagnosis and to identify predictive factors of overall survival (OS). Retrospective study (2004–2016) at Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra of the adrenal tumors, classified as ACC or ACA, with a history of posterior tumor relapse/metastases, without lesions in the contralateral adrenal gland: 13F and 6M, with a median age of 51 ± 12.41 years. Nodules’ median size was 9.20 ± 6.2 cm. Patients had a median OS of 52 ± 18.6 months, with 57.9% and 46.3%, at 3 and 5 years. Seven patients had local recurrence and nine had metastases. Thirteen cases were in stage II. The WMS and the HS allowed a diagnosis of ACC in 15 cases and the RA defined ACC in 17 cases. All cases had, at least, focal disruption of the reticulin framework. More than 5 mitosis/50 HPF was associated with worse OS: 49.67 ± 21.43 versus 108.86 ± 14.02 months (p = 0.026). In patients with stage II, tumor size ⩾10 cm was associated with worse OS: 19.25 ± 7.15 versus 96.11 ± 16.7 months (p = 0.007), confirmed by multivariate analysis (p = 0.031). The correct diagnosis of ACC is a pathologist responsibility. The RA seems the most accurate. Any loss of the reticulin framework should raise awareness for malignancy. In patients on stage II, a size ⩾10 cm is a predictor of worse prognosis.

Open versus minimally invasive surgery for suspected adrenocortical carcinoma

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. Although laparoscopy has been widely adopted for management of benign adrenal tumors, minimally invasive surgery for ACC remains controversial. Retrospective analyses, frequently with fewer than one hundred participants, comprise the majority of the literature. High-quality data regarding the optimal surgical approach for ACC are lacking due to the rarity of the disease and the fact that determination of tumor type (e.g., adenoma or carcinoma) is determined after adrenalectomy, since adrenal tumors are generally not biopsied. While the benefits of minimally invasive surgery including lower intra-operative blood loss and decreased hospital length-of-stay have been consistently demonstrated, clinical equipoise for long-term survival and recurrence outcomes between open and minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA) remains. This review examines retrospective studies that directly compare patients with ACC who underwent either open or laparoscopic adrenalectomy, and considers these findings in the context of current guideline recommendations for surgical management of ACC.

The clinical utility of 'GRAS' parameters in stage I-III adrenocortical carcinomas: long-term data from a high-volume institution

BACKGROUND

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare cancer with poor survival. We sought to identify prognostic factors and assess its clinical utility in postoperative management of nonmetastatic ACC.

METHODS

We included 65 patients who underwent adrenalectomy and clinicopathological diagnosed as European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors (ENSAT) stage I-III ACC in our center from 2009 to 2017. Potential clinicopathological parameters were selected. The prognostic correlation, including overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and univariate and multivariate Cox model.

RESULTS

The 2-year and 5-year post-surgery survival rate were 54.6% (95%CI: 42.5-70.1%) and 33.5% (95%CI: 22.3-50.6%), respectively. 46 (70.8%) cases were symptomatic ACC. Tumor-related or hormone-related symptom was identified as independent prognostic factor in OS (HR = 5.5, 95%CI: 1.87-16.16) and RFS (HR = 3.62, 95%CI: 1.28-10.24). Higher tumor grade (Weiss score > 6 or Ki67 index ≥ 20%) was independently associated with poor OS (HR = 4.73, 95%CI: 2.15-10.43). R status (R1/R2/Rx) was independently correlated with worse RFS (HR = 2.56, 95%CI:1.21-5.43). Accordingly, patients with higher GRAS (Grade, R status, age, and symptoms) score were more likely to have poor prognosis (OS: HR = 2.7, 95%CI: 1.43-5.11 and RFS: HR = 3.31, 95%CI: 1.68-6.52, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Symptoms, higher tumor grade and positive/unknown R status were independent risk factors in stage I-III ACC. Comprehensive consideration of GRAS parameters may optimize the prognostic assessment for postoperative patients.

A nomogram for individualized estimation of survival among adult patients with adrenocortical carcinoma after surgery: a retrospective analysis and multicenter validation study

Background

Clinical outcome of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) varies because of its heterogeneous nature and reliable prognostic prediction model for adult ACC patients is limited. The objective of this study was to develop and externally validate a nomogram for overall survival (OS) prediction in adult patients with ACC after surgery.

Methods

Based on the data from the Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, adults patients diagnosed with ACC between January 1988 and December 2015 were identified and classified into a training set, comprised of 404 patients diagnosed between January 2007 and December 2015, and an internal validation set, comprised of 318 patients diagnosed between January 1988 and December 2006. The endpoint of this study was OS. The nomogram was developed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression algorithm in the training set and its performance was evaluated in terms of its discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical usefulness. The nomogram was then validated using the internal SEER validation, also externally validated using the Cancer Genome Atlas set (TCGA, 82 patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2012) and a Chinese multicenter cohort dataset (82 patients diagnosed between December 2002 and May 2018), respectively.

Results

Age at diagnosis, T stage, N stage, and M stage were identified as independent predictors for OS. A nomogram incorporating these four predictors was constructed using the training set and demonstrated good calibration and discrimination (C-index 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.715 [0.679–0.751]), which was validated in the internal validation set (C-index [95% CI], 0.672 [0.637–0.707]), the TCGA set (C-index [95% CI], 0.810 [0.732–0.888]) and the Chinese multicenter set (C-index [95% CI], 0.726 [0.633–0.819]), respectively. Encouragingly, the nomogram was able to successfully distinguished patients with a high-risk of mortality in all enrolled patients and in the subgroup analyses. Decision curve analysis indicated that the nomogram was clinically useful and applicable.

Conclusions

The study presents a nomogram that incorporates clinicopathological predictors, which can accurately predict the OS of adult ACC patients after surgery. This model and the corresponding risk classification system have the potential to guide therapy decisions after surgery.

Clinicopathological features and outcomes of adrenocortical carcinoma: A single institution experience

Introduction:

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare endocrine malignancy with aggressive behavior. Most of our knowledge about this rare tumor is based on retrospective case series. This study aimed at analyzing the clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients treated at a tertiary cancer center in India.

Patients and Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with ACC registered from January 2006 to December 2015.

Results:

Thirty-seven patients were included in the study, 20 males and 17 females. Median age was 49 (18–78) years. Hormonal overproduction was noticed in 27% of patients. Median tumor size was 10 cm (2–22). Seventeen patients had metastatic disease and 20 patients were localised at diagnosis. Median follow-up was 22 months and median overall survival (OS) was 23.46 months. OS at 2 years and 5 years was 46.1% and 21%, respectively. The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 20 months. DFS at 2 years and 5 years was 45% and 24%, respectively. Age, sex, tumor size, hormonal overproduction, tumor laterality, and stage of the disease did not influence survival. However, advanced stage was associated with higher risk for recurrence. (P = 0.03).

Conclusion:

ACC is a rare endocrine malignancy with very poor survival rates. Rate of recurrence is high even after complete surgery. Systemic treatment options are limited. Newer agents are needed to improve outcome.