1
|
Mosaferi Z, Pirestani M, Arefian E, Gojani G, Kavousinasab N, Karimi P, Deilami A, Abrehdari-Tafreshi Z. Exploring the Relationship Between KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF Mutations and Clinical Characteristics in Iranian Colorectal Cancer Patients. J Gastrointest Cancer 2024; 55:1134-1143. [PMID: 38709419 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01064-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with colorectal cancer can benefit from anti-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) therapy. However, this therapy is not effective for treating colorectal cancers with constitutive activating mutations in the KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF genes. Molecular analysis of tumor tissue frequently informs treatment decisions for colorectal cancer. This study aims to identify KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in Iranian patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer and to assess the prevalence of these mutations relative to the tumor differentiation stage within these populations. METHODS From April 2018 to December 2022, 2000 specimens from patients with colorectal cancer were collected. Data on sex, age, and tumor differentiation stage were recorded for all samples. For mutation detection, the KRAS and NRAS exons (2, 3, and 4) were amplified using the Diatech kit, and a specific primer was used to amplify BRAF exon 15. Pyrosequencing was then performed. RESULTS Analysis of samples revealed that 1105 specimens (55.3%) contained mutations in at least one of the screened genes. Among the genes studied, the highest occurrence was the KRAS mutation at 47.4%, followed by NRAS at 5.3% and BRAF at 2.7%. Most KRAS mutations were found in exon 2 (89.7%), with the G12D mutation being the most prevalent at 32% of cases. There was a significant difference in the rate of KRAS mutations in women (52.5%) compared to men (43.5%) (P = 0.02). For NRAS, the majority mutations were observed in exon 3 (76.2%), with the Q61H mutation being the most prevalent at 28.5% of cases. There were no significant associations between the clinicopathological parameters and mutations. CONCLUSION The study's findings indicate a rising frequency of mutations in these genes in Iran, highlighting the need to screening mutations in the main exons of all three genes for effective colorectal cancer treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Mosaferi
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Tehran Medical Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Majid Pirestani
- Parasitology & Entomology Dept, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ehsan Arefian
- Department of Microbiology, School of Biology, College of Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
- Pediatric Cell and Gene Therapy Research Center, & Tissue Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, GeneTehran, Cell, Iran
| | - Goli Gojani
- National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (NIGEB), Tehran, Iran
| | - Nastaran Kavousinasab
- Department of Biology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Parto Karimi
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Azam Deilami
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Tehran Medical Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zahra Abrehdari-Tafreshi
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, School of Biology, College of Sciences, University of Tehran, P. O. Box, Tehran, 14155-6455, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koti S, Demyan L, Deutsch G, Weiss M. Surgery for Oligometastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Defining Biologic Resectability. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4031-4041. [PMID: 38502293 PMCID: PMC11076395 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15129-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is most often metastatic at diagnosis. As systemic therapy continues to improve alongside advanced surgical techniques, the focus has shifted toward defining biologic, rather than technical, resectability. Several centers have reported metastasectomy for oligometastatic PDAC, yet the indications and potential benefits remain unclear. In this review, we attempt to define oligometastatic disease in PDAC and to explore the rationale for metastasectomy. We evaluate the existing evidence for metastasectomy in liver, peritoneum, and lung individually, assessing the safety and oncologic outcomes for each. Furthermore, we explore contemporary biomarkers of biological resectability in oligometastatic PDAC, including radiographic findings, biochemical markers (such as CA 19-9 and CEA), inflammatory markers (including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, and scoring indices), and liquid biopsy techniques. With careful consideration of existing data, we explore the concept of biologic resectability in guiding patient selection for metastasectomy in PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shruti Koti
- Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Queens, NY, USA.
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
| | - Lyudmyla Demyan
- Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Queens, NY, USA
| | - Gary Deutsch
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - Matthew Weiss
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sasaki K, Margonis GA, Moro A, Wang J, Wagner D, Gagnière J, Shin JK, D'Silva M, Sahara K, Miyata T, Kusakabe J, Beyer K, Dupré A, Kamphues C, Imai K, Baba H, Endo I, Taura K, Cho JY, Aucejo F, Kornprat P, Kreis ME, Kim JM, Burkhart R, David Kwon CH, Pawlik TM. Nontumor related risk score: A new tool to improve prediction of prognosis after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Surgery 2022; 171:1580-1587. [PMID: 35221105 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.01.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prognostic stratification of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis based solely on tumor-related factors has only moderate discriminatory ability. We hypothesized that the inclusion of nontumor related factors can improve prediction of long-term prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis. METHODS Nontumor related laboratory markers were assessed utilizing a training cohort from 2 U.S. institutions (n = 1,205). Factors independently associated with prognosis were used to develop a nontumor related prognostic score. The discriminatory ability, assessed by Harrell's C-statistics (C-index) and net reclassification improvement, was validated and compared with 3 commonly used tumor-related clinical risk scores: Fong clinical risk scores, m-clinical risk scores, and Genetic and Morphological Evaluation (GAME) score in an external validation cohort from 5 Asian (n = 1,307) and 3 European (n = 1,058) institutions. The discriminatory ability of nontumor related prognostic score combined with each of these 3 tumor-related prognostic scores was also estimated. RESULTS Alkaline phosphatase (hazard ratio 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.84), albumin (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.89), and mean corpuscular volume (hazard ratio 19.0, per log unit; 95% confidence interval, 4.79-75.0) were each independently associated with increased risk of death after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (all P < .05). In turn, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, and mean corpuscular volume were combined to form a nontumor related prognostic score (2.942 × mean corpuscular volume + 0.399 × alkaline phosphatase-0.339 × albumin-12) × 10 (median, 16; range, 1-30). The nontumor related prognostic score had good-to-modest discriminatory ability in the external cohort (C-index = 0.58), which was comparable to the 3 established tumor-related prognostic scores (C-index: Fong clinical risk scores, 0.53, m-clinical risk scores, 0.55, GAME, 0.58). The addition of the nontumor related prognostic score to the tumor-related prognostic scores enhanced the discriminatory ability in the entire study cohort (C-index: nontumor related score+Fong, 0.60, nontumor related score+m-clinical risk scores, 0.61, nontumor related score+GAME, 0.64), as well reclassification improvement (42.5, 42.7%, and 21.2%, respectively). CONCLUSION Nontumor related prognostic information may help improve the prognostic stratification of patients after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis. The nontumor related prognostic score may be combined with tumor-related prognostic tools to enhance prognostic stratification of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazunari Sasaki
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
| | - Georgios Antonios Margonis
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Amika Moro
- Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jane Wang
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Doris Wagner
- Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Johan Gagnière
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Inserm, Université Clermont, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Jung Kyong Shin
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mizelle D'Silva
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Kota Sahara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Tatsunori Miyata
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Jiro Kusakabe
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Katharina Beyer
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Aurélien Dupré
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Inserm, Université Clermont, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Carsten Kamphues
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katsunori Imai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Kojiro Taura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Jai Young Cho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Federico Aucejo
- Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Peter Kornprat
- Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Martin E Kreis
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Richard Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH. https://twitter.com/timpawlik
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pikouli A, Papaconstantinou D, Wang J, Kavezou F, Pararas N, Nastos C, Pikoulis E, Margonis GA. Reevaluating the prognostic role of BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer liver metastases. Am J Surg 2021; 223:879-883. [PMID: 34544580 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mutations in the BRAF proto-oncogene have been shown to predict poor patient survival following curative-intent liver surgery for metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effect of mutated BRAF status (mutBRAF) on the overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in these patients. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed for studies reporting outcomes of patients undergoing curative-intent surgery stratified by BRAF mutation status. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate whether inclusion of KRAS mutation status significantly influenced the results. RESULTS Six studies incorporating 1857 patients with known BRAF status were identified. Pooled results revealed significantly worse OS (Hazard Ratio 2.8, 95% C.I. 2.09 to 3.77) and DFS (Hazard Ratio 2.29, 95% C.I. 2.09 to 3.77) in mutBRAF patients. Subgroup analysis revealed no statistically significant impact of including KRAS status testing on the obtained results. CONCLUSIONS Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer carrying BRAF mutations have significantly worse oncologic outcomes following surgery and more aggressive disease phenotype overall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Pikouli
- Third Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Papaconstantinou
- Third Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Greece.
| | - Jane Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Foteini Kavezou
- Second Department of Anesthesiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Pararas
- Third Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Greece
| | - Constantinos Nastos
- Third Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Greece
| | - Emmanouil Pikoulis
- Third Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Eurboonyanun K, Lahoud RM, Kordbacheh H, Pourvaziri A, Promsorn J, Chadbunchachai P, O'Shea A, Atre ID, Harisinghani M. Imaging predictors of BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:2336-2344. [PMID: 32193591 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02484-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths and is associated with various genetic mutations. BRAF mutations, found in approximately 10% of all CRCs, are associated with negative predictive outcomes. The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between the imaging findings and BRAF statuses of CRC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study population was colorectal cancer patients who underwent biopsy or surgery in a single institution from September 2004 to October 2018, and in whom the pathologic specimens were tested for BRAF mutation. The exclusion criteria were (1) patients without pre-operative cross-sectional imaging, and (2) patients whose tumors were invisible on imaging. Two hundred and eighty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 128 were excluded, and a total of 155 patients were enrolled in the study. RESULTS BRAF mutations were significantly more common in female patients (p = 0.007). Patients with mutated BRAF were significantly older than those with wild-type BRAF (p = 0.001). BRAF-mutant tumors were predominant in right-sided colon (p = 0.001) with higher numbers of polypoid- or mass-like morphology (p = 0.019) and heterogeneous enhancement (p = 0.009). Compared to their wild-type counterparts, BRAF-mutated CRCs have a lower occurrence of non-peritoneal, and overall metastases (p = 0.013 and p = 0.004, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed three significant factors for the prediction of BRAF mutations in CRC patients: right-sided location (p = 0.002), heterogeneous tumor enhancement (p = 0.039), and lack of non-peritoneal metastasis (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION By recognizing the specific imaging features of BRAF-mutant CRCs, it would be possible to identify a patient who has a higher risk of carrying BRAF mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kulyada Eurboonyanun
- Abdominal Imaging Division, Radiology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
| | - Rita Maria Lahoud
- Abdominal Imaging Division, Radiology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Hamed Kordbacheh
- Abdominal Imaging Division, Radiology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Ali Pourvaziri
- Abdominal Imaging Division, Radiology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Julaluck Promsorn
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Payia Chadbunchachai
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Aileen O'Shea
- Abdominal Imaging Division, Radiology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Isha D Atre
- Abdominal Imaging Division, Radiology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Mukesh Harisinghani
- Abdominal Imaging Division, Radiology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Melstrom LG, Tzeng CWD. Metastatic colorectal cancer: The reality of the present and the optimism of the future. J Surg Oncol 2019; 119:547-548. [PMID: 30806484 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|