Clinical presentation and surgical outcomes in primary aldosteronism differ by race

Association of Medicaid expansion of the Affordable Care Act with operations for benign endocrine surgical disease

•Background: The Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion increased insurance coverage and access to care for endocrine cancers, though impact on benign endocrine disease is unknown. •Methods: Patients undergoing operations for benign thyroid, parathyroid, and adrenal disease were collected from the Vizient® Clinical Data Base from 2009 to 2016 and grouped by state Medicaid expansion status in January 2014. Insurance coverage was analyzed by difference-in-differences analysis, and logistic regression evaluated odds of operation by insurance status. •Results: 134,242 patients were included. Medicaid coverage in expansion states increased for all operations (Adj-DD 5.78%, p < 0.001) with decreases in uninsured and private insurance. Medicaid patients had increased odds of undergoing thyroid operations (OR 1.56, p < 0.001) and decreased odds of parathyroid (OR 0.68, p < 0.001) or adrenal operations (OR 0.70, p < 0.001) versus private insurance. •Conclusion: Medicaid expansion increased insurance coverage for benign endocrine disease, however, barriers remain for Medicaid patients with parathyroid and adrenal disease.

Predictive model of hypertension resolution after adrenalectomy in primary aldosteronism: the SPAIN-ALDO score

PURPOSE

To develop a predictive model of hypertension resolution after adrenalectomy in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA), based on their presurgical characteristics.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter study of PA patients in follow-up in 20 Spanish tertiary hospitals between 2018 and 2021 was performed (SPAIN-ALDO Register). Clinical response postadrenalectomy was classified according to the primary aldosteronism surgical outcome (PASO) consensus criteria. The predictive model was developed using a multivariate logistic regression model with the estimation of all possible equations.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients (54.8% females; mean age of 51.5 ± 10.9 years) with PA who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy were included. After a mean follow-up of 29.1 ± 30.43 months after surgery, hypertension cure was obtained in 37.7% ( n  = 55) of the patients. The predictive model with the highest diagnostic accuracy to predict hypertension cure combined the variables female sex, use of two or fewer antihypertensive medications, hypertension grade 1, without type 2 diabetes and nonobesity. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of this model was 0.841 [0.769-0.914]. Based on this model, the group of patients with a higher probability of cure (80.4%) were those without type 2 diabetes, BMI <30 kg/m 2 , female sex, hypertension grade 1 and who use two or fewer antihypertensives. Our predictive model offered a slightly higher diagnostic accuracy than Wachtel's (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.809), Utsumi's (AUC: 0.804) and Zarnegar's (AUC: 0.796) models and was similar than the Burello's (AUC: 0.833) model.

CONCLUSION

Female sex, use of two or fewer antihypertensive medications, hypertension grade 1, no type 2 diabetes and nonobesity may predict hypertension cure after adrenalectomy in patients with PA. Our score provides a potential tool to guide preoperative patient counseling.

Outcomes of Adrenalectomy and the Aldosteronoma Resolution Score in the Black and Hispanic Population

Background

Outcomes after adrenalectomy in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) are variable. The aldosteronoma resolution score (ARS) uses preoperative variables to calculate a score that identifies those patients that are more likely to have resolution of hypertension after adrenalectomy. We aim to determine the efficacy of adrenalectomy and whether the ARS accurately predicts clinical success in a Black and Hispanic population.

Methods

We reviewed patients who underwent adrenalectomy for PA from 2004 to 2018 at two academic centers treating primarily Hispanic and Black patients. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated based on the primary aldosteronism surgical outcome consensus criterion. Retrospectively, the accuracy of ARS was determined by a receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC).

Results

Forty-three Hispanic and 10 Black patients underwent adrenalectomy for PA. Twenty-two patients (41.5%) had complete clinical success. Variables associated with complete clinical success in the univariate analysis were female gender (p = 0.026), younger age (p = 0.001), lower preoperative aldosterone (p = 0.035), lower preoperative systolic blood pressure (p = 0.001), fewer number of preoperative antihypertensive medications (p = 0.007) and a higher ARS (p = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, only fewer number of preoperative antihypertensive medications was independently associated with complete clinical success (p = 0.026). The AUC of the ARS was 0.746.

Conclusion

The rate of clinical success from adrenalectomy is good for Hispanic and Black patients with PA. Our analysis shows that the ARS is an accurate test of clinical success in Hispanic and Black patients. The ARS may be utilized preoperatively to frame expectations after adrenalectomy in these populations.

Minimally Invasive Partial Versus Total Adrenalectomy for the Treatment of Primary Aldosteronism: Results of a Multicenter Series According to the PASO Criteria

BACKGROUND

Determination of success after adrenal-sparing surgery for primary aldosteronism (PA) is limited by the lack of standardized definitions of outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive partial adrenalectomy (MIPA) for PA by comparing perioperative and functional outcomes with minimally invasive total adrenalectomy (MITA) according to the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) criteria.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Between March 2011 and April 2020, a multicenter adrenalectomy dataset was queried for "unilateral adrenal mass, PA, MIPA (n = 29), or MITA (n = 61)"at four participating Institutions.

INTERVENTION

MITA and MIPA for PA.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Differences between continuous variables were assessed with the Wilcoxon rank sum test, while Pearson's χ² test was used for categorical data. Complete, partial, and absent clinical success rates were assessed for the overall cohort and compared between groups.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The median tumor size was significantly higher in the MITA group (4.2 vs 2.7 cm; p = 0.001), while preoperative hypertension rate was significantly higher in the MIPA series (82.8% vs 57.4%, p = 0.01). The median length of hospital stay was increased in the MITA cohort (4 vs 3 d; p = 0.038). Overall, at a median follow-up of 42 mo (interquartile range 27-54 mo), complete, partial, and absent clinical success was observed in 60%, 17.7%, and 22.3% of cases, respectively. The complete clinical success rate was higher in the MIPA group (72.4% vs 54.1%), while a partial clinical success was higher in the MITA series (23% vs 6.8%). The absence of clinical success was comparable between groups (MITA 23% vs MIPA 20.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

MIPA showed excellent perioperative results with a complete clinical success rate of 72.4%. Owing to the heterogeneity of the PASO criteria in the assessment of partial or absent success, the quest for a univocal definition of satisfactory clinical outcomes in the treatment of PA remains open.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We compared minimally invasive partial adrenalectomy (MIPA) and minimally invasive total adrenalectomy for the treatment of unilateral primary aldosteronism, assessing the outcomes with the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) criteria. MIPA seems to provide comparable perioperative outcomes and midterm clinical success rates.