1
|
Chee MYM, Wu AGR, Fong KY, Yew A, Koh YX, Goh BKP. Robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery for gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:4846-4857. [PMID: 39148006 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11162-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Minimally invasive oncological resections have become increasingly widespread in the surgical management of cancers. However, the role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains unclear. We aim to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis of existing literature to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic and robotic surgery in the management of GBC compared to open surgery (OS) by comparing outcomes. METHODS A literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE (2000 to December 2021) and EMBASE (2000 to December 2021) databases was conducted. The primary outcome studied was overall survival, and secondary outcomes studied were postoperative morbidity, severe complications, incidence of bile leak, length of hospital stay, operation time, R0 resection rate, local recurrence and lymph node yield. RESULTS Thirty-two full-text articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis with a total of 5883 patients undergoing either OS or MIS (laparoscopic or robotic) for GBC. 1- and 2-stage meta-analyses did not reveal any significant differences between OS, laparoscopic and robotic surgery in terms of overall survival, R0 resection, lymph node harvest, local recurrence and post-operative complications. Patients who underwent OS had significantly longer hospitalization stay and intra-operative blood loss compared to those who underwent laparoscopic or robotic surgery. Network meta-analysis did not reveal any significant differences between post-operative and survival outcomes of laparoscopic vs robotic surgery groups. CONCLUSION This network meta-analysis suggests that both laparoscopic and robotic surgery are safe and effective approaches in the surgical management of GBC, with post-operative and survival outcomes comparable to OS. An MIS approach may also lead to shorter hospitalization stay, less intraoperative blood loss and post-operative complications compared to OS. There was no obvious benefit of either MIS approach (laparoscopic versus robotic) over the other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeline Yen Min Chee
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Ministry of Health Holdings Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Khi-Yung Fong
- Ministry of Health Holdings Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ashley Yew
- Ministry of Health Holdings Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ye Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Surgery, Academic Clinical Program, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Surgery, Academic Clinical Program, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Academia Level 5, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sohn HJ, Lee M, Han Y, Kwon W, Yoon YS, Han HS, Lim CS, Jang JY. Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) versus open extended cholecystectomy: A multicenter propensity score matched study. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2024. [PMID: 38323670 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This multicenter study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive extended cholecystectomy (MI-EC) versus open EC (O-EC) for patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC). METHODS Patients who underwent EC (cholecystectomy, wedge resection of the liver bed, and regional lymphadenectomy) for GBC between 2010 and 2020 in three centers were included in the study. The clinicopathological data were compared after propensity score matching. Additional subgroup analysis on laparoscopic and robotic EC (L-EC and R-EC) was performed. RESULTS A total of 377 patients were included: 308 for O-EC and 69 for MI-EC, respectively. The MI-EC group had a longer operative time (188.9 vs. 238.1 min, p < .001) and shorter hospital stay (9.0 vs. 7.2 days, p = .007), although no differences were found in operative blood loss, complication rate and survival outcome. In subgroup analysis, L-EC patients had a longer operative time (264.4 vs. 202.0 min, p = .001), compared to R-EC patients with comparable perioperative and survival outcomes. CONCLUSION Although patients with MI-EC had a longer operation time and higher medical costs, the advantages were enhanced recovery with comparable short- and long-term outcomes. The operation time was less for R-EC patients than for L-EC patients, though the high cost still remains. The surgery type for EC can be selected according to the patient's condition, social status and surgeon's preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hee Ju Sohn
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mirang Lee
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Youngmin Han
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chang Sup Lim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
He S, Yu TN, Cao JS, Zhou XY, Chen ZH, Jiang WB, Cai LX, Liang X. Laparoscopic vs open radical resection in management of gallbladder carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:6455-6475. [PMID: 37900219 PMCID: PMC10601008 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i27.6455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical resection offers the only hope for the long-term survival of patients with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) above the T1b stage. However, whether it should be performed under laparoscopy for GBC is still controversial. AIM To compare laparoscopic radical resection (LRR) with traditional open radical resection (ORR) in managing GBC. METHODS A comprehensive search of online databases, including Medline (PubMed), Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, was conducted to identify comparative studies involving LRR and ORR in GBCs till March 2023. A meta-analysis was subsequently performed. RESULTS A total of 18 retrospective studies were identified. In the long-term prognosis, the LRR group was comparable with the ORR group in terms of overall survival and tumor-free survival (TFS). LRR showed superiority in terms of TFS in the T2/tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) Ⅱ stage subgroup vs the ORR group (P = 0.04). In the short-term prognosis, the LRR group had superiority over the ORR group in the postoperative length of stay (POLS) (P < 0.001). The sensitivity analysis showed that all pooled results were robust. CONCLUSION The meta-analysis results show that LRR is not inferior to ORR in all measured outcomes and is even superior in the TFS of patients with stage T2/TNM Ⅱ disease and POLS. Surgeons with sufficient laparoscopic experience can perform LRR as an alternative surgical strategy to ORR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilin He
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Tu-Nan Yu
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jia-Sheng Cao
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xue-Yin Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
- School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Zhe-Han Chen
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fuyang First People’s Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 311400, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Wen-Bin Jiang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Liu-Xin Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fontana AP, Russolillo N, Di Menno Stavron J, Langella S, Tesoriere RL, Ricotti A, Ferrero A. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis of laparoscopic versus open Sg4b-5 bi-segmentectomy in patients with gallbladder cancer. Updates Surg 2023; 75:1471-1480. [PMID: 37495871 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01599-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Sg4b-5 anatomical bi-segmentectomy with regional lymphadenectomy (Sg4b5) is a surgical option for gallbladder cancer (GBC) treatment. The laparoscopic approach to this challenging operation is still controversial. Aim of this study was to compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open Sg4b5 in a single institution series of patients. All consecutive patients who underwent Sg4b5 for GBC from January 2000 to September 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed. 75 patients were analyzed, 18 in the laparoscopic and 57 in the open group. After IPTW, laparoscopic approach was associated with a significantly decreased median intraoperative blood loss (100 vs 237.09 ml, p = 0.001), shorter median length of hospital stay (4 vs 8 days, p = < 0.001) and a higher median number of harvested nodes (9 vs 7, p = 0.026). Operation time was shorter in the open group (355 vs 259 min, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found regarding clear resection margins, overall and major (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) morbidity, bile leakage rate, 90 days post-operative mortality, overall and disease-free survival. Laparoscopic Sg4b-5 anatomical bi-segmentectomy and regional lymphadenectomy is feasible and safe with long term outcome comparable to open approach at least in early stages. Laparoscopic approach confirms its well-known short-term benefits with less intraoperative bleeding and shorter length of stay. Moreover, it might allow a better lymphadenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea P Fontana
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy.
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Juliana Di Menno Stavron
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Serena Langella
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberto Lo Tesoriere
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Ricotti
- Clinical Trial Unit, Medical Direction of Hospital, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ahmed SH, Usmani SUR, Mushtaq R, Samad S, Abid M, Moeed A, Atif AR, Farhan SA, Saif A. Role of laparoscopic surgery in the management of gallbladder cancer: Systematic review & meta-analysis. Am J Surg 2023; 225:975-987. [PMID: 36693774 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This meta-analysis evaluates the safety and short-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gallbladder carcinoma(GBC). METHODS Meta-analysis was performed on laparoscopic(LG) and open group(OG) studies. Data for survival outcomes were extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves and combined with Tierney's method to estimate hazard ratios(HRs) and 95% CIs. RESULTS There was no significant difference in overall survival(HR: 1.01), disease-free survival(HR: 0.84), 30-day mortality(RR:1.10), overall recurrence(RR:0.93), intraoperative gallbladder violation(RR:1.17), operative time(WMD:8.32), number of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy(RR:1.06) and blood transfusion(RR: 0.81). A significant difference was seen in survival of T3 subgroup(HR:0.77) and number of lymph node dissections (LND)(WMD: 0.63) favoring OG, along with a decrease in postoperative complications(RR:0.65), greater incidence of R0 resections(RR:1.04), lower volume of intraoperative blood loss(WMD: 128.62), lower time in removing drainage tube(WMD: 1.35), shorter diet recovery time(WMD: 1.88), shorter hospital stay(WMD: 3.51), lower incidence of 90-day mortality(RR:0.49) favoring LG. A higher incidence of port-site recurrence(RR:1.99) was reported in LG. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic surgery is non-inferior to the open approach in terms of oncological outcomes and has an improved rate of postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syeda Hoorulain Ahmed
- Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Baba-e-Urdu Rd, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan.
| | - Shajie Ur Rehman Usmani
- Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Baba-e-Urdu Rd, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan
| | - Rabeea Mushtaq
- Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Baba-e-Urdu Rd, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan
| | - Saba Samad
- Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Baba-e-Urdu Rd, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan
| | - Minaam Abid
- Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Baba-e-Urdu Rd, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Moeed
- Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Baba-e-Urdu Rd, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Raafe Atif
- Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Baba-e-Urdu Rd, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan
| | - Syed Ali Farhan
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health, 1200 E Marshall St, Richmond, VA, 23219, United States
| | - Areeba Saif
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 7000 Fannin St, Houston, TX, 77030, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Biliary malignancies, although rare, can be some of the most challenging to manage surgically. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas are resectable if there is no evidence of metastatic disease. These tumors are managed with anatomic resection and portal lymphadenectomy when centrally located or multiple in a single lobe. Non-anatomic resection can be performed for solitary peripheral tumors with minimally invasive techniques. It is not our practice to routinely employ neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to resection of these tumors. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy is utilized at our institution in highly selected patients in the context of an ongoing clinical trial for unresectable tumors. Hilar cholangiocarcinomas, when resectable (i.e., ipsilateral arterial involvement or lack of vascular involvement), are managed with right or left (extended) hepatectomy, caudate resection, and portal lymphadenectomy. Distal cholangiocarcinomas are managed with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not routinely used in our treatment algorithm of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Nodal involvement and positive margin (R1) resection necessitates adjuvant chemotherapy. Finally, gallbladder carcinoma is managed with radical cholecystectomy, anatomic segment IVb/V resection, and portal lymphadenectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy is employed routinely amongst patients with T2 or higher tumors and those with positive lymph nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Washington
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Flavio Rocha
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| |
Collapse
|