Effect of understaging on local recurrence of rectal cancer

Evolution of clinical nature, treatment and survival of locally recurrent rectal cancer: Comparative analysis of two national cross-sectional cohorts

BACKGROUND

In the Netherlands, use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer declined after guideline revision in 2014. This decline is thought to affect the clinical nature and treatability of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Therefore, this study compared two national cross-sectional cohorts before and after the guideline revision with the aim to determine the changes in treatment and survival of LRRC patients over time.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of primary rectal cancer in 2011 (n = 2094) and 2016 (n = 2855) from two nationwide cohorts with a 4-year follow up were included. Main outcomes included time to LRRC, synchronous metastases at time of LRRC diagnosis, intention of treatment and 2-year overall survival after LRRC.

RESULTS

Use of neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for the primary tumour decreased from 88.5% to 60.0% from 2011 to 2016. The 3-year LRRC rate was not significantly different with 5.1% in 2011 (n = 114, median time to LRRC 16 months) and 6.3% in 2016 (n = 202, median time to LRRC 16 months). Synchronous metastasis rate did not significantly differ (27.2% vs 33.7%, p = 0.257). Treatment intent of the LRRC shifted towards more curative treatment (30.4% vs. 47.0%, p = 0.009). In the curatively treated group, two-year overall survival after LRRC diagnoses increased from 47.5% to 78.7% (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Primary rectal cancer patients in 2016 were treated less often with neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy, while LRRC rates remained similar. Those who developed LRRC were more often candidate for curative intent treatment compared to the 2011 cohort, and survival after curative intent treatment also improved substantially.

Concordance of MRI With Pathology for Primary Staging of Rectal Cancer in Routine Clinical Practice: A Single Institution Experience

PURPOSE

MRI is the preferred imaging modality for primary staging of rectal cancer, used to guide treatment. Patients identified with clinical stage I disease receive upfront surgical resection; those with clinical stage II or greater undergo upfront neoadjuvant therapy. Although clinical under-/over-staging may have consequences for patients and presents opportunities for organ preservation, the correlation between clinical and pathologic staging in routine clinical practice within a single institute has not been fully established.

METHODS

This retrospective, Institutional Review Board-approved study, conducted at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center with a multi-disciplinary rectal cancer disease center, included patients undergoing rectal MRI for primary staging January 1, 2018-August 30, 2020. Data collection included patient demographics, initial clinical stage via MRI report, pathologic diagnosis, pathologic stage, and treatment. The primary outcome was concordance of overall clinical and pathologic staging. Secondary outcomes included reasons for mismatched staging.

RESULTS

A total 105 rectal adenocarcinoma patients (64 males, mean age 57 ± 12.7 years) had staging MRI followed by surgical resection. A total of 28 patients (27%) had mismatched under-/over- staging. Ten patients (10%) were understaged with mismatched T stage group (clinical stage I, pathologic stage II), five (5%) were understaged with mismatched N stage group (clinical stage I, pathologic stage III), and 13 (12%) were overstaged (clinical stage II-III, pathologic stage 0-I). Treatment matched concordance between clinical and pathologic stages was 86%.

CONCLUSION

MRI for primary rectal cancer staging has high concordance with pathology. Future studies to assess strategies for reducing clinically relevant understaging would be beneficial.

The prognostic value of extramural venous invasion in preoperative MRI of rectal cancer patients

AIM

This study aimed to examine the prognostic value of extramural venous invasion observed in preoperative MRI on survival and recurrences.

METHOD

In total, 778 rectal cancer patients were evaluated in multidisciplinary meetings in Helsinki University Hospital during the years 2016-2018. 635 patients met the inclusion criteria of stage I-III disease and were intended for curative treatment at the time of diagnosis. 128 had extramural venous invasion in preoperative MRI.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 2.5 years. In a univariate analysis extramural venous invasion was associated with poorer disease-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] 2.174, 95% CI 1.118-4.224, P = 0.022), whereas circumferential margin ≤1 mm, tumour stage ≥T3c or nodal positivity were not. Disease recurrence occurred in 17.3% of the patients: 13.4% had metastatic recurrence only, 1.7% mere local recurrence and 2.2% both metastatic and local recurrence. In multivariate analysis, extramural venous invasion (HR 1.734, 95% CI 1.127-2.667, P = 0.012) and nodal positivity (HR 1.627, 95% CI 1.071-2.472, P = 0.023) were risk factors for poorer disease-free survival (DFS). Circumferential margin ≤1 mm was a risk factor for local recurrence in multivariate analysis (HR 5.675, 95% CI 1.274-25.286, P = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

In MRI, circumferential margin ≤1 mm is a risk factor for local recurrence, but the risk is quite well controlled with chemoradiotherapy and extended surgery. Extramural venous invasion instead is a significant risk factor for poorer DFS and new tools to reduce the systemic recurrence risk are needed.

No benefit after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in stage IV rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis on a real-world population

BACKGROUND

Stage IV rectal cancer occurs in 25% of patients and locoregional control of primary tumor is usually poorly considered, since priority is the treatment of metastatic disease.

AIMS

This study evaluates impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (nCHRTS) vs. upfront surgery on locoregional control and overall survival in stage IV rectal cancer.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with stage IV rectal carcinoma between 2009 and 2019, undergone elective surgery at the National Cancer Institute of Milan (Italy), were included. Propensity score-based matching was performed between the two study groups. Loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed using Kaplan-Meyer method.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients were analyzed. After propensity score matching, 88 patients were included in the final analysis. The 3-yr LRRFS rates were 80.3% for nCHRTS vs. 90.4% for upfront surgery patients (p = 0.35). The 3-yr OS rates were respectively 81.8% vs. 58% (p = 0.36). KRAS mutation (HR 2.506, p = 0.038) and extra-liver metastases (HR 4.308, p = 0.003) were both predictive of worse OS in univariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

The present study failed to demonstrate a significant impact of nCHRTS on LRRFS or OS in stage IV rectal cancer.

The assessment of risk factors for long-term survival outcome in ypN0 patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and radical anterior resection

BACKGROUND

The main negative prognostic factors in patients with rectal cancer after radical treatment include regional lymph node involvement, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion. However, some patients still develop cancer recurrence despite the absence of the above risk factors. The aim of the study was to assess clinicopathological factors influencing long-term oncologic outcomes in ypN0M0 rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy and radical anterior resection.

METHODS

A retrospective survival analysis was performed on a group of 195 patients. We assessed clinicopathological factors which included tumor regression grade, number of lymph nodes in the specimen, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL).

RESULTS

In the univariate analysis, AL and CCI > 3 had a significant negative impact on disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). After the division of ALs into early and late ALs, it was found that only patients with late ALs had a significantly worse survival. The multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that CCI > 3 was a significant adverse risk factor for DFS (HR 5.78, 95% CI 2.15-15.51, p < 0.001), DSS (HR 7.25, 95% CI 2.25-23.39, p < 0.001), and OS (HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.72-8.85, p = 0.001). Similarly, late ALs had a significant negative impact on the risk of DFS (HR 5.05, 95% CI 1.97-12.93, p < 0.001), DSS (HR 10.84, 95% CI 3.44-34.18, p < 0.001), and OS (HR 4.3, 95% CI 1.94-9.53, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Late AL and CCI > 3 are the factors that may have an impact on long-term oncologic outcomes. The impact of lymph node yield on understaging was not demonstrated.