Caudal approach to the middle hepatic vein as a resection pathway in difficult major hepatectomies under laparoscopic approach

The dorsal approach to the middle hepatic vein from the hilar plate in laparoscopic hemihepatectomy (with video)

BACKGROUND

Although laparoscopic hemihepatectomy has gained prominence, one of the critical challenges in this procedure is the approach to the middle hepatic vein (MHV). The MHV, which runs in the midplane of the liver, is situated above the hilar plate and serves as an anatomical landmark in hemihepatectomy. We have introduced dorsal approach to the MHV from the hilar plate in laparoscopic hemihepatectomy under the laparoscopic caudo-dorsal view.

METHODS

The liver parenchyma was divided along the midplane, which was identified as a surface ischemic line caused by selective inflow control of the right or left hemiliver. The MHV is dissected from the main root from the hilar plate toward the peripheral branches. The liver parenchyma was divided from the dorsal toward the ventral side, and the transection plane was tailored according to the particular type of hemihepatectomy.

RESULTS

This approach was utilized in 28 patients with 9 undergoing right hepatectomy and 19 undergoing left hepatectomy. The median duration of the surgery was 260 min (range, 140-360 min), whereas median estimated blood loss was 80 mL (range, 40-400 mL). One patient (3.6%) has experienced postoperative major complications. The median length of postoperative hospitalization was 7 days (range, 5-20 days).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the dorsal approach to the MHV from the hilar plate in laparoscopic hemihepatectomy represents a significant advancement in the surgical technique. This approach offers enhanced visualization and precise dissection, which are critical for minimizing complications and improving surgical outcomes.

Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy Using the Hilar Plate-First Approach (with Video)

BACKGROUND

Effective inflow and outflow control of the liver is essential for a safe hepatectomy. Detachment of the hilar plate is a fundamental technique in the Glissonean approach. The hilar plate is situated near the middle hepatic vein, which runs in the midplane of the liver, and serves as a landmark during hemihepatectomy. In this study, we describe the technical details and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy using the hilar plate-first approach.

METHODS

The key procedures of the hilar plate-first approach included the following: (1) detachment of the hilar plate for the left Glissonean approach, (2) the middle hepatic vein approach from the hilar plate, (3) parenchymal transection along the ischemic line and middle hepatic vein, and (4) transection of the left Glissonean pedicle at the ventral aspect of the Arantius ligament.

RESULTS

Between September 2020 and September 2021, 12 patients underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy using the hilar plate-first approach. The median operation time was 227 min (range 140-350 min), and the median estimated blood loss was 82.5 ml (range 50-150 ml). The median length of postoperative hospital stay was 7 days (range 5-10 days). No major complications, including biliary complications, were observed.

CONCLUSION

The hilar plate-first approach contributes to the standardization of surgical techniques for laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy. This technique is a safe and effective approach for the inflow and outflow systems of the left hemiliver.

Pure laparoscopic major liver resection after yttrium90 radioembolization: a case-matched series analysis of feasibility and outcomes

Background

Liver surgery after radioembolization (RE) entails highly demanding and challenging procedures due to the frequent combination of large tumors, severe RE-related adhesions, and the necessity of conducting major hepatectomies. Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and its associated advantages could provide benefits, as yet unreported, to these patients. The current study evaluated feasibility, morbidity, mortality, and survival outcomes for major laparoscopic liver resection after radioembolization.

Material and methods

In this retrospective, single-center study patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or metastases from colorectal cancer undergoing major laparoscopic hepatectomy after RE were identified from institutional databases. They were matched (1:2) on several pre-operative characteristics to a group of patients that underwent major LLR for the same malignancies during the same period but without previous RE.

Results

From March 2011 to November 2020, 9 patients underwent a major LLR after RE. No differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss (50 vs. 150 ml; p = 0.621), operative time (478 vs. 407 min; p = 0.135) or pedicle clamping time (90.5 vs 74 min; p = 0.133) between the post-RE LLR and the matched group. Similarly, no differences were observed on hospital stay (median 3 vs. 4 days; p = 0.300), Clavien–Dindo ≥ III complications (2 vs. 1 cases; p = 0.250), specific liver morbidity (1 vs. 1 case p = 1.000), or 90 day mortality (0 vs. 0; p = 1.000).

Conclusion

The laparoscopic approach for post radioembolization patients may be a feasible and safe procedure with excellent surgical and oncological outcomes and meets the current standards for laparoscopic liver resections. Further studies with larger series are needed to confirm the results herein presented.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-022-02474-z.

Anatomy of the Middle Hepatic Vein Tributaries to Promote Safer Hepatic Vein-Guided Liver Resection

BACKGROUND

In laparoscopic anatomic liver resection, an increasingly common procedure, the hepatic vein-guided approach is widely used although the hepatic vein tributaries can be a major source of bleeding in the event of inadvertent injury. This report describes the anatomy of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) including its tributaries based on reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images and provides anatomic data to enable safe middle hepatic vein-guided liver resection.

METHODS

Following simulation modeling of the hepatic vasculatures, reconstructed MHV data was pooled from 35 healthy liver donors. Yields of the MHV tributaries were analyzed to enable MHV-guided liver resection.

RESULTS

A total of 252 tributaries were identified in the 35 donors. The MHV yielded fewer tributaries from its anterior and posterior aspects than from its right-side and left-side aspects (40 [15.9%], 13 [5.2%], 93 [36.9%], and 106 [42.1%], respectively). The MHV tributaries from the anterior and posterior aspects were smaller in diameter than those from the right-side and left-side aspects (median, 3.0, 2.0, 4.8, and 4.0 mm, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Our simulation revealed that MHV dissection from the anterior or posterior aspect poses a lower risk of injury to the MHV tributaries compared to dissection from either lateral aspect. In addition, MHV dissection from the anterior or posterior aspect allows for safer identification and isolation of the thick MHV tributaries originating from the lateral aspects. Ideally, the anterior or posterior aspect of the MHV should be accessed and exposed before the lateral aspects are dissected to minimize the risk of MHV tributary injury.

Pure Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Tumors Close to the Major Hepatic Veins: Intraparenchymal Identification of the Major Hepatic Veins using the Ventral Approach

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic hepatectomy for tumors close to the major hepatic veins (HVs) is a technically demanding procedure that is relatively contraindicated. We investigated this surgical technique and the outcomes of intraparenchymal identification of the major HVs using the ventral approach in pure laparoscopic hepatectomy for tumors close to the major HVs.

METHODS

In the present study, tumors < 10 mm from the major HVs were defined as lesions in proximity to the major HVs. The cranio-ventral part of the liver parenchyma along the targeted major hepatic veins was opened to facilitate an open cutting plane. After a wide exposure of the surgical plane, the targeted major HVs were identified.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients with tumors close to the major HVs underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy. The median operative time was 260 min (range, 160-410 min), while the intraoperative blood loss was 100 mL (range, 30-310 mL). The median Pringle maneuver time was 45 min (range, 40-75 min). The median tumor size was 50 mm (range, 17-140 mm), and the median tumor margin was 4 mm (range, 0-10 mm). Three patients (23.1%) experienced minor postoperative complications. The median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days (range, 4-25 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy for tumors close to the major HVs is technically feasible in selected patients. Intraparenchymal identification of the major HVs using the ventral approach achieves transection plane accuracy and avoids inadvertent injury to the major HVs.