Yttrium-90 radiation segmentectomy for hepatic metastases: A multi-institutional study of safety and efficacy

Voxel-Based Dosimetry Predicts Local Tumor Progression Post 90 Y Radiation Segmentectomy of Colorectal Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

Radiation segmentectomy (RS) is an alternative potential local curative treatment for selected colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) not amenable to ablation or limited resection.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric response of low volume CLMs to RS in heavily pretreated patients who are not candidates for resection or percutaneous ablation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study evaluated CLMs patients treated with RS (prescribed tumor dose >190 Gy) from 2015 to 2023. RS doses to tumor(s) and margins were calculated from SPECT/CT and PET/CT images. Response and local tumor progression (LTP) were assessed using anatomic (RECIST 1.1) and metabolic (PERCIST) criteria. LTP-free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival were estimated with Kaplan-Meier methodology. Variables were assessed as predictors of LTPFS using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients underwent 38 RS procedures to treat 57 tumors. Median time from initial diagnosis to detection of liver metastases and RS were 16.4 (interquartile range: 6.5-32.2) and 26.8 (interquartile range: 12.5-40.0) months, respectively. Median overall survival after RS was 14.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.8-30.7) months. Predictors of LTPFS included tumor number(s), mean tumor dose (MTD), and margin mean absorbed dose (MMAD). Complete radiographic (hazards ratio [HR]: 1.29e-16, 95% CI: 4.06e-17-4.07e-16, P < 0.001) and metabolic response (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15-0.95, P = 0.038) correlated with prolonged LTPFS. One-year LTPFS rate was 83.3% for tumors receiving MTD ≥400 Gy and a 5-mm surrounding MMAD ≥350 Gy ( P = 0.006). No instances of LTP were observed when tumors received stereotactic irradiation over 300 Gy (at least 95% of the tumor volume received ≥300 Gy). One-year LTPFS rate for tumors receiving MTD ≥400 Gy was 68.6% versus 14.3% for those that did not reach this threshold ( P = 0.013). In multivariate analysis, MTD ≥400 Gy and 5-mm MMAD ≥350 Gy were independent predictors of LTPFS (HR: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.01-0.81; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

MTD ≥400 Gy, MMAD ≥350 Gy, and stereotactic tumor irradiation ≥300 Gy are associated with prolonged LTPFS after RS for CLMs.

Yttrium-90 Radiation Segmentectomy for Treatment of Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and effectiveness of yttrium-90 (90Y) radiation segmentectomy (RS) for neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NELMs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-institution retrospective study included 18 patients with 23 liver tumors not amenable to resection or ablation, who underwent RS between 2009 and 2021. Tumor grades by Ki-67/mitotic indices were Grade I (n = 9/23, 39%), Grade II (n = 10/23, 45%), and Grade III (n = 4/23, 17%). Eleven patients (61%) were previously treated with somatostatin analogs, 5 (28%) with chemotherapy, and 2 (11%) with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Safety was assessed with preprocedural/postprocedural liver chemistries, blood counts, and clinical adverse events (AEs) using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Tumor response was assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to progression (TTP) from the date of 90Y.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 31.9 months. Grade 1 fatigue was observed in 13 of 18 patients (72%), with 1 of 18 patients (6%) experiencing Grade 3 fatigue. Three patients (17%) exhibited Grade 3 lymphopenia. No other Grade 3 or any Grade 4 AE was observed. Tumor objective response was achieved in 83% of patients by RECIST size criteria and 100% by mRECIST enhancement criteria. Median OS was 69.4 months (95% CI, 23.1-99.4), and median PFS was 12.2 months (95% CI, 4.6-28.8). Median overall TTP was 13.0 months (95% CI, 4.6-45.1), with median treated tumor TTP not reached.

CONCLUSIONS

90Y RS demonstrated high rates of antitumor response with a favorable toxicity profile and durable OS in the treatment of NELMs.

Systemic Immunological Changes After Yttrium-90 Radioembolization: A Pilot Prospective Observational Study-Clinical Insights

PURPOSE

To prospectively investigate levels of circulating cytokines, changes in frequencies of various immune cell subsets and expression of proliferation and checkpoint molecules on T cells in the peripheral blood after yttrium-90 radioembolization (TARE) of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively collected, isolated, and froze peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and plasma samples from 15 patients immediately before, immediately after, 3 and 6 weeks post-TARE of CLM. Plasma samples were assessed for various cytokines using a multiplex immunoassay platform. PBMC samples were analyzed in a monocyte/dendritic cell (DC)/B cell flow panel and a T cell activation/exhaustion flow phenotyping panel. We compared the levels at the respective time points using Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

IFN-g significantly decreased immediately after (mean 1.62 vs. 3.02 at baseline, p = 0.04) and increased at 6 weeks compared to the immediately post-TARE nadir (mean 9.42 vs. 1.62, p = 0.04). IL-10 decreased at 3 weeks (mean 0.36 vs. 1.75, p = 0.025) post-TARE compared to baseline. Increased CD3+T cells (mean 78.24 vs. 60.8, p = 0.002) and decreased CTLA-4+CD4+T cells (mean 2.58 vs. 4.41, p = 0.033) were observed at 3 weeks compared to baseline. Increased Ki-67+ proliferating CD8+T cells at 3 and 6 weeks (mean 7.28 and 9.06, respectively, vs. 3.93 at baseline, p = 0.02 and 0.03) were recorded.

CONCLUSION

A shift toward a favorable antitumoral cytokinic and immune cells response was observed after TARE. Significant changes were in specialized immune cells subsets playing important roles in the activation of the immune system. These results support trials combining TARE with immunotherapy for patients with CLM.

Histopathologic Changes after Yttrium-90 Radioembolization of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Pilot Feasibility Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the histopathologic changes and potential correlations of tumor absorbed dose (TAD) after yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective pilot study assessed 12 patients with 13 CLMs through positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsies before, immediately after TARE (T0), and 3 weeks after TARE (T3). Subsequent sampling from the same location was enabled by fiducial placement. Biopsy samples were evaluated with hematoxylin and eosin, TUNEL, Ki67, OxPhos, caspase-3 (CC3), and pH2AX antibodies. Proliferation changes (Ki67) and double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) were evaluated quantitatively. TAD was calculated on post-TARE PET/CT scan of the biopsy needle location at T0 and T3.

RESULTS

Median TAD at 3 weeks after TARE was 162 Gy (interquartile range (IQR), 92-211 Gy). DSBs decreased significantly from T0 (median, 77%; IQR, 75%-100%) to T3 (median, 14%; IQR, 0%-54%; P = .028). A decrease in Ki67 was also documented (median, 73%; IQR, 70%-80% at T0 vs median, 41%; IQR, 0%-66% at T3; P = .046). There was a strong positive correlation between TAD and DSBs at T0 (r[9] = 0.68) and a strong negative correlation at T3 (r[10] = -0.855; P = .042 and P = .002, respectively). There was a strong negative correlation between TAD and Ki67 at both T0 (r[9] = -0.733; P = .025) and T3 (r[10] = -0.681; P = .030). Tumors that exhibited caspase-3 activation (8/13, 62%) at either T0 or T3 time point were more likely to develop progression (7/8 [88%] vs 1/5 [20%]; P = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-TARE biopsy can be used to assess TAD and histopathologic changes. Significant decreases in DSBs and proliferation index were noted after TARE. Post-TARE CC3 activation deserves further exploration.

The Impact of Local Control on Overall Survival after Y-90 Selective Internal Radiotherapy of Liver Metastases in Oligometastatic Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

Y-90 Selective Internal Radiotherapy (SIRT) is an ablative therapy used for inoperable liver metastasis. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the impact of local control after SIRT on overall survival (OS) in oligometastatic patients. A retrospective, single-institution study identified oligometastatic patients with ≤5 non-intracranial metastases receiving unilateral or bilateral lobar Y-90 SIRT from 2009 to 2021. The primary endpoint was OS defined from Y-90 SIRT completion to the date of death or last follow-up. Local failure was classified as a progressive disease at the target lesion(s) by RECIST v1.1 criteria starting at 3 months after SIRT. With a median follow-up of 15.7 months, 33 patients were identified who had a total of 79 oligometastatic lesions treated with SIRT, with the majority histology of colorectal adenocarcinoma (n = 22). In total, 94% of patients completed the Y-90 lobectomy. Of the 79 individual lesions treated, 22 (27.8%) failed. Thirteen patients received salvage liver-directed therapy following intrahepatic failure; ten received repeat SIRT. Median OS (mOS) was 20.1 months, and 12-month OS was 68.2%. Intralesional failure was associated with worse 1 y OS (52.3% vs. 86.2%, p = 0.004). These results suggest that intralesional failure following Y-90 may be associated with inferior OS, emphasizing the importance of disease control in low-metastatic-burden patients.

Recommendations for the management of yttrium-90 radioembolization in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases: a multidisciplinary review

PURPOSE

Strategies for the treatment of liver metastases from colon cancer (lmCRC) are constantly evolving. Radioembolization with yttrium 90 (Y-90 TARE) has made significant advancements in treating liver tumors and is now considered a potential option allowing for future resection. This study reviewed the scientific evidence and developed recommendations for using Y-90 TARE as a treatment strategy for patients with unresectable lmCRC.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary scientific committee, consisting of experts in medical oncology, hepatobiliary surgery, radiology, and nuclear medicine, all with extensive experience in treating patients with ImCRC with Y-90 TARE, led this project. The committee established the criteria for conducting a comprehensive literature review on Y-90 TARE in the treatment of lmCRC. The data extraction process involved addressing initial preliminary inquiries, which were consolidated into a final set of questions.

RESULTS

This review offers recommendations for treating patients with lmCRC using Y-90 TARE, addressing four areas covering ten common questions: 1) General issues (multidisciplinary tumor committee, indications for treatment, contraindications); 2) Previous process (predictive biomarkers for patient selection, preintervention tests, published evidence); 3) Procedure (standard procedure); and 4) Post-intervention follow-up (potential toxicity and its management, parameters for evaluation, quality of life).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the insights of the multidisciplinary committee, this document offers a comprehensive overview of the technical aspects involved in the management of Y-90 TARE. It synthesizes recommendations for applying Y-90 TARE across various phases of the treatment process.

Yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolization of Primary Lung Cancer Metastases to the Liver

PURPOSE

To assess whether yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is safe and effective in the treatment of primary lung cancer metastases to the liver (LCML).

METHODS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 57 patients with LCML who were treated with 79 TARE treatments. Histology included non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n = 27), small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (n = 17), and lung carcinoid (LC) (n = 13). Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method; differences between groups were estimated using log rank test. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine factors influencing survival. Adverse events were graded using the Society of Interventional Radiology Adverse Events Classification.

RESULTS

Median overall survival (OS) was as follows: NSCLC, 8.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3-16.4 months); SCLC, 4.1 months (95% CI, 1.9-6.6 months); and LC, 43.5 months (95% CI, 7.8-61.4 months). For NSCLC, presence of bilobar vs unilobar disease (hazard ratio [HR], 5.24; 95% CI, 1.64-16.79; P = .002); more tumors, 2-5 vs 1 (HR, 4.88; 95% CI, 1.17-20.37; P = .003) and >5 vs 1 (HR, 3.75; 95% CI, 0.95-6.92; P = .05); and lobar vs segmental treatment (HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 0-NA; P = .002) were negative predictors of OS. For SCLC, receipt of >2 lines of chemotherapy vs ≤2 lines (HR, 3.16; 95% CI, 0.95-10.47; P = .05) was a negative predictor of OS. For LC, tumor involvement of >50% was a negative predictor of OS (HR, 3.77 × 1015; 95% CI, 0-NA; P = .002). There were 11 of 79 severe or life-threatening adverse events within 30 days (abdominal pain, altered mental status, nausea/vomiting, acalculous/aseptic cholecystitis, hyponatremia, pancreatitis, renal failure, and death from pneumonia).

CONCLUSIONS

TARE has an acceptable safety profile for the treatment of LCML, with survival benefits best seen in LC tumors.

Liver-Directed Therapy for Neuroendocrine Tumor Metastases in the Era of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

OPINION STATEMENT

The treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) liver metastases involves a multidisciplinary approach that includes liver-directed therapies (LDT) and systemic treatments, such as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). LDT has demonstrated efficacy in rapidly reducing tumor bulk, improving symptoms, and delaying disease progression. Interventional radiologists should be consulted prior to switching therapy for patients with progressive or symptomatic neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases. Long-term follow-up data on the safety of Yttrium-90 radioembolization before and after PRRT remain limited. Therefore, a more conservative approach may be to preferentially employ transarterial embolization (TAE) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients' somatostatin receptor-avid disease who may be future candidates for PRRT. Notable exceptions where radioembolization may be a preferred treatment strategy may be patients with history of biliary tract instrumentation, asymmetric unilobar disease distribution, and rapidly progressive diffuse liver involvement. Selection of local treatment modality, sequencing, and combination of LDT with systemic therapy require further investigation.

Update on Locoregional Therapies for Liver Cancer: Radiation Segmentectomy

Over 900,000 people worldwide were diagnosed with liver cancer in 2022 alone, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for 75-85% of cases. Treatment for HCC includes some combination of systemic therapies, surgery, liver transplantation, ablation, and intra-arterial therapies with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Currently, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) guidelines have acknowledged liver transplantation, surgical resection, and thermal ablation as curative therapies in very early to early stage HCC (BCLC-0 and BCLC-A). While these modalities are the preferred curative treatments for a very early to early stage disease, there are challenges associated with these options, such as organ availability and patient eligibility. Current data shows the role of radiation segmentectomy as a curative therapeutic option for very early to early stage HCC that is unresectable and not amenable to ablation. As future data continues to elucidate the ability for radiation segmentectomy to achieve complete pathologic necrosis, the goal is for the BCLC staging model to acknowledge its role as a curative treatment in this patient population and incorporate it into the ever-evolving guidelines.

Interventional radiological therapies in colorectal hepatic metastases

Colorectal malignancy is the third most common cancer and one of the prevalent causes of death globally. Around 20-25% of patients present with metastases at the time of diagnosis, and 50-60% of patients develop metastases in due course of the disease. Liver, followed by lung and lymph nodes, are the most common sites of colorectal cancer metastases. In such patients, the 5-year survival rate is approximately 19.2%. Although surgical resection is the primary mode of managing colorectal cancer metastases, only 10-25% of patients are competent for curative therapy. Hepatic insufficiency may be the aftermath of extensive surgical hepatectomy. Hence formal assessment of future liver remnant volume (FLR) is imperative prior to surgery to prevent hepatic failure. The evolution of minimally invasive interventional radiological techniques has enhanced the treatment algorithm of patients with colorectal cancer metastases. Studies have demonstrated that these techniques may address the limitations of curative resection, such as insufficient FLR, bi-lobar disease, and patients at higher risk for surgery. This review focuses on curative and palliative role through procedures including portal vein embolization, radioembolization, and ablation. Alongside, we deliberate various studies on conventional chemoembolization and chemoembolization with irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads. The radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres has evolved as salvage therapy in surgically unresectable and chemo-resistant metastases.

Yttrium-90 Radiation Segmentectomy in Oligometastatic Secondary Hepatic Malignancies

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) radiation segmentectomy (RS) in the treatment of oligometastatic secondary hepatic malignancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This institutional review board-approved retrospective study evaluated 16 patients with oligometastatic secondary hepatic malignancies who were treated with RS. The median patient age was 61.9 years (range, 38.6-85.7 years). Of the 16 patients, 11 (68.8%) presented with solitary lesions. The median index tumor size was 3.1 cm (95% CI, 2.3-3.9). Primary outcomes were evaluation of clinical and biochemical toxicities using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, and imaging response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary outcomes were time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Clinical Grade 3 toxicities were limited to 1 (6.7%) patient who experienced fatigue, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Biochemical Grade 3 toxicities occurred in 1 (6.7%) patient who experienced lymphopenia. No Grade 4 clinical or biochemical toxicities were identified. Disease control was achieved in 14 (93.3%) of 15 patients. The median TTP of the treated tumor was 72.9 months (95% CI, 11.2 to no estimate). The median OS was 60.9 months (95% CI, 24.7 to no estimate).

CONCLUSIONS

⁹⁰Y RS displayed an excellent safety profile and was effective in achieving a high disease control rate in the treatment of oligometastatic secondary hepatic malignancies.

Maximum tumor-absorbed dose measured by voxel-based multicompartmental dosimetry as a response predictor in yttrium-90 radiation segmentectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Advances in hepatic radioembolization are based on a selective approach with radical intent and the use of multicompartment dosimetric analysis. The objective of this study is to assess the utility of voxel-based dosimetry in the quantification of actual absorbed doses in radiation segmentectomy procedures and to establish cutoff values predictive of response.

METHODS

Ambispective study in hepatocarcinoma patients treated with radiation segmentectomy. Calculated dosimetric parameters were mean tumor-absorbed dose, maximum tumor AD, minimal tumor AD in 30, 50, and 70% of tumor volume and mean AD in non-tumor liver. The actual absorbed dose (aAD) was calculated on the Y-90-PET/CT image using 3D voxel-based dosimetry software. To assess radiological response, localized mRECIST criteria were used. The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as CR or PR.

RESULTS

Twenty-four HCC patients, BCLC 0 (5), A (17) and B (2) were included. The mean yttrium-90 administered activity was 1.38 GBq in a mean angiosome volume of 206.9 cc and tumor volume 56.01 cc. The mean theoretical AD was 306.3 Gy and aAD 352 Gy. A very low concordance was observed between both parameters (rho_c 0.027). ORR at 3 and 6 m was 84.21% and 92.31%, respectively. Statistically significant relationship was observed between the maximum tumor-absorbed dose and complete radiological response at 3 m (p 0.022).

CONCLUSION

A segmental approach with radical intention leads to response rates greater than 90%, being the tumor maximum absorbed dose the dosimetric parameter that best predicts radiological response in voxel-based dosimetry.

Role of Radioembolization in Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

The liver is the most common site of metastasis for neuroendocrine tumors originating from the gastrointestinal tract. Neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELMs) portend a worsening clinical course, making local management important. Local treatment options include surgery, thermal ablation, and trans-catheter intra-arterial therapies, such as radioembolization. Radioembolization is generally preferred over other embolotherapies in patients with colonized biliary systems. Current best practice involves personalized treatment planning, optimizing tumor radiation absorbed dose and minimizing radiation to the normal hepatic parenchyma. As part of a multidisciplinary approach, radioembolization is a versatile embolotherapy offering neoadjuvant, palliative, and ablative treatment options for patients with NELMs.

EANM procedure guideline for the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases with intra-arterial radioactive compounds

Primary liver tumours (i.e. hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC)) are among the most frequent cancers worldwide. However, only 10-20% of patients are amenable to curative treatment, such as resection or transplant. Liver metastases are most frequently caused by colorectal cancer, which accounts for the second most cancer-related deaths in Europe. In both primary and secondary tumours, radioembolization has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment option. The vast potential of personalized dosimetry has also been shown, resulting in markedly increased response rates and overall survival. In a rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape, the role of radioembolization will be subject to changes. Therefore, the decision for radioembolization should be taken by a multidisciplinary tumour board in accordance with the current clinical guidelines. The purpose of this procedure guideline is to assist the nuclear medicine physician in treating and managing patients undergoing radioembolization treatment. PREAMBLE: The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional non-profit medical association that facilitates communication worldwide among individuals pursuing clinical and research excellence in nuclear medicine. The EANM was founded in 1985. These guidelines are intended to assist practitioners in providing appropriate nuclear medicine care for patients. They are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by medical professionals taking into account the unique circumstances of each case. Thus, there is no implication that an approach differing from the guidelines, standing alone, is below the standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set out in the guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines. The practice of medicine involves not only the science but also the art of dealing with the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible to always reach the most appropriate diagnosis or to predict with certainty a particular response to treatment. Therefore, it should be recognised that adherence to these guidelines will not ensure an accurate diagnosis or a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that the practitioner will follow a reasonable course of action based on current knowledge, available resources and the needs of the patient to deliver effective and safe medical care. The sole purpose of these guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving this objective.

Radiation Segmentectomy for the Treatment of Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Can Outcomes Be Compared to Surgical Resection?

PURPOSE

To investigate outcomes of radiation segmentectomy (RS) versus standard-of-care surgical resection (SR) as a quality endeavor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multisite, retrospective, analysis of treatment-naïve patients who received either RS or SR was performed. Inclusion criteria were solitary HCC ≤8 cm, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Cohort performance status 0-1, and absence of macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic disease. Target tumor and overall progression, time-to-progression (TTP), and overall survival were assessed. Outcomes were censored for liver transplantation.

RESULTS

123 patients were included (RS:57, SR:66). Tumor size, Child-Pugh class, ALBI score, platelet count, and fibrosis stage were significantly different between cohorts (p≤0.01). Grade ≥3 adverse events per Clavien-Dindo classification occurred in 0 RS vs 13(20%) SR patients. Target tumor progression occurred in 3(5%) RS and 5(8%) SR patients, and overall progression in 19(33%) RS and 21(32%) SR patients. Median overall TTP was 21.9 and 29.4 months after RS and SR, respectively (95%CI:15.5-28.2 and 95%CI:18.5-40.3, p=0.03). Overall TTP subgroup analyses showed no difference between cohorts with fibrosis stage 3-4 (p=0.26) and platelets <150x10⁹/L (p=0.29). The overall progression hazard ratio for RS vs SR was not significant per multivariate cox regression analysis (1.16, 95%CI:0.51-2.63, p=0.71). Median overall survival was not reached for either cohort. Propensity scores were calculated but were too dissimilar for matching.

CONCLUSION

Radiation segmentectomy and surgical resection are performed in different patient populations, which limits comparison. Radiation segmentectomy approaches surgical resection outcomes, with a lower incidence of major adverse events, in patients who are not eligible for hepatectomy.

Radioembolization With Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Randomized, Open-Label, International, Multicenter, Phase III Trial

PURPOSE

To study the impact of transarterial Yttrium-90 radioembolization (TARE) in combination with second-line systemic chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM).

METHODS

In this international, multicenter, open-label phase III trial, patients with CLM who progressed on oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based first-line therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive second-line chemotherapy with or without TARE. The two primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and hepatic PFS (hPFS), assessed by blinded independent central review. Random assignment was performed using a web- or voice-based system stratified by unilobar or bilobar disease, oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based first-line chemotherapy, and KRAS mutation status.

RESULTS

Four hundred twenty-eight patients from 95 centers in North America, Europe, and Asia were randomly assigned to chemotherapy with or without TARE; this represents the intention-to-treat population and included 215 patients in the TARE plus chemotherapy group and 213 patients in the chemotherapy alone group. The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.88; 1-sided P = .0013), with a median PFS of 8.0 (95% CI, 7.2 to 9.2) and 7.2 (95% CI, 5.7 to 7.6) months, respectively. The HR for hPFS was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.46 to 0.77; 1-sided P < .0001), with a median hPFS of 9.1 (95% CI, 7.8 to 9.7) and 7.2 (95% CI, 5.7 to 7.6) months, respectively. Objective response rates were 34.0% (95% CI, 28.0 to 40.5) and 21.1% (95% CI, 16.2 to 27.1; 1-sided P = .0019) for the TARE and chemotherapy groups, respectively. Median overall survival was 14.0 (95% CI, 11.8 to 15.5) and 14.4 months (95% CI, 12.8 to 16.4; 1-sided P = .7229) with a HR of 1.07 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.32) for TARE and chemotherapy groups, respectively. Grade 3 adverse events were reported more frequently with TARE (68.4% v 49.3%). Both groups received full chemotherapy dose intensity.

CONCLUSION

The addition of TARE to systemic therapy for second-line CLM led to longer PFS and hPFS. Further subset analyses are needed to better define the ideal patient population that would benefit from TARE.

Local Treatments in the Unresectable Patient with Colorectal Cancer Metastasis: A Review from the Point of View of the Medical Oncologist

For patients with isolated liver metastases from colorectal cancer who are not candidates for potentially curative resections, non-surgical local treatments may be useful. Non-surgical local treatments are classified according to how the treatment is administered. Local treatments are applied directly on hepatic parenchyma, such as radiofrequency, microwave hyperthermia and cryotherapy. Locoregional therapies are delivered through the hepatic artery, such as chemoinfusion, chemoembolization or selective internal radiation with Yttrium 90 radioembolization. The purpose of this review is to describe the different interventional therapies that are available for these patients in routine clinical practice, the most important clinical trials that have tried to demonstrate the effectiveness of each therapy and recommendations from principal medical oncologic societies.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Yttrium-90 Glass Microspheres in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, and Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Practice: Protocol for the Prospective PROACTIF Phase IV Registry Study in France

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

Recently, selective internal radiation therapy using yttrium-90 (Y90) glass microspheres (TheraSphere™) was approved for reimbursement by health authorities in France. The PROACTIF study aims to gather data on effectiveness, patient quality of life, and safety with use of Y90 glass microspheres in real-world clinical settings in France.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Patient with a diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC), and/or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who was treated with a dose of Y90 glass microspheres that has been reimbursed in France and who do not oppose use of their personal medical data.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

If data collection is opposed, treatment is reimbursed but not administered, or treatment is administered but not reimbursed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome measures include overall survival from time of Y90 glass microsphere treatment and quality of life, as assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Hepatobiliary questionnaire.

ESTIMATED NUMBER OF PATIENTS TO BE INCLUDED

This is an open study and there is no set number of patients; 115 have already been enrolled.

PLANNED SUBGROUP ANALYSES

Analyses will be stratified by disease state (HCC, iCC, or mCRC). Subgroups to be analyzed include age group, unilobar/bilobar disease at baseline, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status at baseline, liver tumor burden at baseline, target lesion size, and standard versus multi-compartment personalized dosimetry treatment.

PLANNED RECRUITMENT AND OBSERVATION PERIOD

Recruitment includes patients who are prescribed and treated with a commercial vial of Y90 glass microspheres between 01 January 2019 and 31 December 2024.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04069468.

Radiation segmentectomy of hepatic metastases with Y-90 glass microspheres

PURPOSE

To evaluate safety and efficacy of radiation segmentectomy (RS) with ⁹⁰Y glass microspheres in patients with limited metastatic liver disease not amenable to resection or percutaneous ablation.

METHODS

Patients with ≤ 3 tumors treated with RS from 6/2015 to 12/2017 were included. Target tumor radiation dose was > 190 Gy based on medical internal radiation dose (MIRD) dosimetry. Tumor response, local tumor progression (LTP), LTP-free survival (LTPFS) and disease progression rate in the treated segment were defined using Choi and RECIST 1.1 criteria. Toxicities were evaluated using modified SIR criteria.

RESULTS

Ten patients with 14 tumors underwent 12 RS. Median tumor size was 3 cm (range 1.4-5.6). Median follow-up was 17.8 months (range 1.6-37.3). Response rates per Choi and RECIST 1.1 criteria were 8/8 (100%) and 4/9 (44%), respectively. Overall LTP rate was 3/14 (21%) during the study period. One-, two- and three-year LTPFS was 83%, 83% and 69%, respectively. Median LTPFS was not reached. Disease progression rate in the treated segment was 6/18 (33%). Median overall survival was 41.5 months (IQR 16.7-41.5). Median delivered tumor radiation dose was 293 Gy (range 163-1303). One major complication was recorded in a patient post-Whipple procedure who suffered anaphylactic reaction to prophylactic cefotetan and liver abscess in RS region 6.5 months post-RS. All patients were alive on last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

RS of ≤ 3 hepatic segments can safely provide a 2-year local tumor control rate of 83% in selected patients with limited metastatic liver disease and limited treatment options. Optimal dosimetry methodology requires further investigation.

Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications of Tumor Biology, Including Gene Alterations, in Colorectal Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

For patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM), the combination of surgical resection with other therapeutic options is essential. This article shows how recent advances in knowledge of tumor biology, including genetic alterations, affect the choice of therapeutic approach for patients with CLM.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature on recent advances in knowledge about CLM tumor biology including genetic profiles, clinical risk score models for CLM, preoperative therapy for CLM, and liver-directed therapy for CLM.

RESULTS

Studies showed that RAS alteration is a negative prognostic factor in addition to traditional clinical risk factors (e.g., larger diameter and higher number of CLM, spread of the primary tumor to regional lymph nodes). Although the response to preoperative chemotherapy is an important predictor of survival, poor response is not a contraindication to surgical resection. The combination of surgical therapy and percutaneous ablation can be considered in marginally resectable cases; however, a wider ablation margin is required for RAS-mutant CLM. More recently, genetic analysis using next-generation sequencing showed the negative prognostic impact of alterations in TP53, SMAD4, FBXW7, and RAS/BRAF in patients with CLM. In RAS-mutant CLM, intensive follow-up is required in patients who remain recurrence free 2 years after surgery.

DISCUSSION

In patients with CLM, RAS mutation status is important in predicting postoperative survival, selecting the treatment approach, and tailoring postoperative follow-up. In addition, more recent genetic analyses of CLM have identified additional predictors of survival.