Impact of ablation algorithm versus tumor-dependent parameters on local control after microwave ablation of malignant liver tumors

A comparison of three different microwave systems for laparoscopic liver tumor ablation

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to perform a comparison of three current microwave ablation (MWA) systems widely used for laparoscopic liver ablations in terms of ablation kinetics and geometry of ablation zones.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, institutional review board-approved study comparing Emprint, Emprint HP, and NeuWave systems for laparoscopic liver ablation. Analyses were performed via Mann-Whitney U and χ2 tests. Continuous data are presented as median (interquartile range).

RESULTS

For Emprint, Emprint HP, and NeuWave groups, tumor size was 1.16 (0.8), 1.21 (0.7), and 1.27 (0.9) cm (p = 0.54). Ablation time per lesion was 7 (6), 4 (2.8), and 4 (3.3) min (p < 0.0001), yielding similar ablation zone volumes and margins. The time to first ablation bubble was 1 (0.13), 1.5 (0.85), and 0.75 (0.5) min, and total ablation times were 7 (4.4), 4 (2), and 3.5 (2.8) min (p < 0.0001). The roundness index A, B, and transverse were 0.94, 0.98, and 0.79; 0.95, 0.95, and 0.78; and 1.02, 0.95, and 0.96.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a saline-cooling system with Emprint system allowed for larger diameter spherical ablation zones to be created, it led to decreased efficiency compared to the CO2-cooled NeuWave system, which exposes the active antenna directly to tissue. Increased power delivered by Emprint HP improved the efficiency of saline-cooled design, as demonstrated by faster ablation times.

Navigation Improves Tumor Ablation Performance: Results From a Novel Liver Tumor Simulator Study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of microwave ablation in treating hepatic tumors requires advanced ultrasound skills. Failure of proper technique has the potential for either under- or over-treatment and possible harm to the patient. Emprint SX™ navigation provides surgeons with intra-operative, real-time navigation through augmented reality localization of the ablation antenna and the expected ablation zone. We hypothesize that incorporating this technology leads to improved targeting and optimizes ablation coverage. This study utilizes a simulated model to evaluate ablation outcomes using Emprint SX™ navigation vs standard ultrasound.

METHODS

Surgical residents and faculty were recruited from a single institution. Using a novel tumor ablation simulator, participants performed ablations via 2 modes: standard ultrasound guidance (STD) and Emprint SX™ navigation (NAV). Primary outcome was the percentage of under-ablation. Secondary outcomes included percentage of over-ablation, time to complete trial, and number of attempts to position antenna.

RESULTS

281 trials were performed by fifteen participants, with 47% female and 60% novice ablationists. Under-ablation volume decreased by a mean of 16.3% (SEM ±12.9, P < .001) with NAV compared to STD. Over-ablation volume decreased by a mean of 14.0% (±8.2, P < .001). NAV time was faster by a mean of 32 seconds (±24.9, P < .001) and involved fewer antenna placement attempts by a mean of 1.3 (±1.0, P < .001). For novice ablationists, all outcomes were improved with NAV and novices saw larger improvements compared to experienced ablationists (P = .018).

DISCUSSION

In a simulated model, NAV improves ablation efficacy and efficiency, with novices gaining the greatest benefit over standard ultrasound.

Microwave Ablation, Radiofrequency Ablation, Irreversible Electroporation, and Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Intermediate Size (3-5 cm) Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Purpose of Review

Based on good local control rates and an excellent safety profile, guidelines consider thermal ablation the gold standard to eliminate small unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, efficacy decreases exponentially with increasing tumour size. The preferred treatment for intermediate-size unresectable CRLM remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare safety and efficacy of local ablative treatments for unresectable intermediate-size CRLM (3–5 cm).

Recent Findings

We systematically searched for publications reporting treatment outcomes of unresectable intermediate-size CRLM treated with thermal ablation, irreversible electroporation (IRE) or stereotactic ablative body-radiotherapy (SABR). No comparative studies or randomized trials were found. Literature to assess effectiveness was limited and there was substantial heterogeneity in outcomes and study populations. Per-patient local control ranged 22–90% for all techniques; 22–89% (8 series) for thermal ablation, 44% (1 series) for IRE, and 67–90% (1 series) for SABR depending on radiation dose.

Summary

Focal ablative therapy is safe and can induce long-term disease control, even for intermediate-size CRLM. Although SABR and tumuor-bracketing techniques such as IRE are suggested to be less susceptible to size, evidence to support any claims of superiority of one technique over the other is unsubstantiated by the available evidence. Future prospective comparative studies should address local-tumour-progression-free-survival, local control rate, overall survival, adverse events, and quality-of-life.

CT-monitored minimal ablative margin control in single-session microwave ablation of liver tumors: an effective strategy for local tumor control

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the usefulness of minimal ablative margin (MAM) control by intra-procedural contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in microwave ablation (MWA) of liver tumors.

METHODS

A total of 334 consecutive liver tumors (240 hepatocellular carcinomas [HCCs] and 94 colorectal liver metastases [CRLMs]) in 172 patients treated with percutaneous MWA were retrospectively included. MAM of each tumor was assessed after expected ablation completion using intra-procedural CECT, allowing within-session additional ablation to any potentially insufficient margin. On immediate post-MWA MRI, complete ablation coverage of tumor and final MAM status were determined. The cumulative local tumor progression (LTP) rate was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. To identify predictors of LTP, Cox regression analysis with a shared frailty model was performed.

RESULTS

Intra-procedural CECT findings prompted additional ablation in 18.9% (63/334) of tumors. Final complete ablation coverage of tumor and sufficient MAM were determined by MRI to be achieved in 99.4% (332/334) and 77.5% (259/334), and their estimated 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year LTP rates were 3.2%, 7.5%, and 12.9%; and 1.0%, 2.1%, and 6.9%, respectively. Insufficient MAM on post-MWA MRI, perivascular tumor location, and tumor size (cm) were independent risk factors for LTP (hazard ratio = 14.4, 6.0, and 1.1, p < 0.001, p = 0.003, and p = 0.011, respectively), while subcapsular location and histology (HCC vs CRLM) were not.

CONCLUSIONS

In MWA of liver tumors, intra-procedural CECT monitoring of minimal ablative margin facilitates identification of potentially suboptimal margins and guides immediate additional intra-session ablation to maximize rates of margin-sufficient ablations, the latter being a highly predictive marker for excellent long-term local tumor control.

KEY POINTS

• In MWA of liver tumors, intra-procedural CECT can identify potentially suboptimal minimal ablative margin, leading to immediate additional ablation in a single treatment session. • Achieving a finally sufficient ablative margin through the MWA with intra-procedural CECT monitoring of minimal ablative margin results in excellent local tumor control.

Assessment of a new 150 W single-antenna microwave ablation system in the treatment of malignant liver tumors: The first worldwide experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Data in literature regarding liver microwave ablation pertain to systems delivering 100 W of maximum power. Our aim is to assess a new 150 W microwave system for liver tumor ablation.

METHODS

This was an institutional review board-approved study of patients undergoing ablation of malignant liver tumors using a 150 W microwave system. Feasibility, safety, ablation algorithm, perioperative outcomes, and efficacy were analyzed. Comparison was made to historical patients undergoing ablation using a 100 W microwave system.

RESULTS

There were 33 patients with 76 malignant liver lesions who underwent ablation with the 150 W system. Using a step-wise algorithm, ablations without intraoperative complications were performed for tumors ranging in size from 0.3 to 6.7 cm. Ninety-day morbidity was 5%, with no mortality. Compared to the 100 W system, the 150 W system shortened ablation time and created larger ablation zones with a single stick.

CONCLUSION

This first worldwide experience showed that surgical ablations could be safely created at 150 W using a step-wise algorithm with complete tumor destruction achieved at short-term follow-up. Advantages versus 100 W systems include reduction in ablation time and creation of larger ablation zones with a single stick.