Adequacy of lymph node harvest following colectomy for obstructed and nonobstructed colon cancer

Advanced Preoperative Clinical Stage Is Associated With More Lymph Node Harvest in Patients With Right Colon Cancer

PURPOSE

The adequacy of lymph node (LN) harvest is important in oncological colon cancer resections. While several studies have suggested factors influencing LN yield in colon cancer, limited data are available only regarding right hemicolectomies with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and central vessel ligation (CVL).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 169 patients who underwent right hemicolectomies with CME and CVL for right-sided colon cancer between February 2019 and March 2023. The patients were divided into 2 groups: groups with ≤24 LN yield and >24 LN yield, and the patient, surgical, and pathologic factors, which could potentially influence the LN yield, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Younger age, lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and advanced clinical TNM (cTNM) stage among patient factors, the presence of obstructions regarding the surgical factors, and the presence of desmoplastic tumor reaction in the pathologic factors were more likely to harvest >24 LNs. In a multivariate analysis, younger age, lower ASA classification, advanced cTNM stage, and an ileocolic artery (ICA) crossing pattern posterior to the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) were independently associated with a >24 LN harvest. Patients with cTNM 3,4 showed the tendency of > 24 LN yield consistently within each subgroup, irrespective of the age, ASA classification, and ileocolic artery crossing pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

Our investigation revealed a significant correlation between the advanced preoperative clinical stage and an increased number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs) in patients undergoing right hemicolectomies with CME a CVL. The observed association is potentially influenced by tumor aggressiveness and the extent of surgical resection performed by the surgeon. To elucidate the intricate relationship between surgical outcomes and the quantity of LN harvest in patients subjected to standardized CME and CVL for right-sided colon cancer, further dedicated research is warranted.

Outcome of Obstructing vs Nonobstructing Colorectal Carcinomas: Comparative Study at Tertiary Care Hospital in Kashmir

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the commonly diagnosed malignancy presenting either in obstruction or without obstruction. Bowel obstruction (BO) is usually a complication of advanced cancer, significantly reducing the quality of life. We aimed to study the outcomes of these obstructed colorectal cancers requiring emergency intervention and compare it with nonobstructed cancers.

Materials and methods

In our observational comparative study, patients were divided into groups on basis of their presentation and site of lesion: nonobstructing colon group/obstructing colon group nonobstructing rectum group/obstructing rectum group.

Results

A total of 232 patients with known modes of presentation between 2015 and 2018 were included; 144 colonic, 88 rectal carcinomas with 71 being completely obstructive ones. Our study showed higher recurrence in obstructive groups with local recurrence being more common. The median interval for recurrence was early in obstructive group (p < 0.001*). The overall 5-year survival rates were better in Nonobstructing colon group, (p = -0.046* in OR vs NOR) (p = -0.031* in OC vs NOC). 5-year disease-free survival rates statistically insignificant (p = 0.203 in NOC and OC groups), (p = 0.307 in NOR and OR groups). Immediate post-op, complications except for SSI, there was no significant difference between the two groups. Our study showed higher proportion of R0 resection in NOC groups as compared with obstructive groups (p = 0.021* in in OC vs NOC and p = 0.037* in OR vs NOR) with better lymph node retrieval in NOC groups.

Conclusion

On comparing outcome of patients who had completed multi-modal therapy in both groups, there was significantly better outcome for patients who have presented without obstruction.

How to cite this article

Ul Haq MF, Bhat GA, Wani MA, et al. Outcome of Obstructing vs Nonobstructing Colorectal Carcinomas: Comparative Study at Tertiary Care Hospital in Kashmir. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2024;14(1):75-80.

Minimally invasive colectomies can be performed with similar outcomes to open counterparts for colorectal cancer emergencies: a propensity score matching analysis utilizing ACS-NSQIP

PURPOSE

The safety and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the setting of colorectal cancer emergencies have been debated. We sought to compare postoperative outcomes of MIS with open techniques in the setting of colorectal cancer emergencies from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database.

METHODS

We included patients undergoing colectomy for colorectal cancer emergency between 2012 and 2019 "2012-2019" from the ACS-NSQIP dataset. We compared short-term morbidity, mortality, short-term oncological outcomes, and secondary outcomes for MIS vs open colectomies using propensity score matching. We then evaluated the trends of MIS versus open colectomies using linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

We examined a total of 5544 patients (open n = 4070; MIS n = 1474) and included 1352 patients for our postoperative outcome analyses after propensity score matching 1:1 (open n = 676; MIS n = 676). Within the matched cohort, mortality was significantly higher in the open group (open 6.95% vs MIS 3.99%, OR 1.8, p = 0.023). Anastomotic leak rates were comparable between the  two groups (open 4.46% vs MIS 4.02%, OR 1.12, p = 0.787). Pulmonary complications were significantly higher after open surgery (open 10.06% vs MIS 4.73%, OR 2.25, p < 0.001). Rates of ileus were significantly higher amongst open patients (open 29.08% vs MIS 19.94%, p < 0.001). Patients stayed on average 1 day longer in the hospital after open surgery (p < 0.001). Rates of MIS for early tumors (N0 and T1/T2, n = 289) did not significantly change over 7 years (p = 0.597, rate = - 0.065%/year); however, utilization of MIS for late tumors (N1 or T3/T4, n = 4359) increased by 2.06% per year (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that MIS was associated with superior postoperative outcomes compared to open surgery without compromising oncological outcomes in patients undergoing emergency colectomy for colon cancer. Within the matched cohort, MIS was associated with lower rates of mortality, pulmonary complications, ileus, and shorter postoperative length of stay.

Lymph node retrieval colon cancer: Are we making the grade?

BACKGROUND

Adequate lymph node (LN) excision is imperative for pathologic staging and determination of adjuvant treatment.

METHODS

he 2004-2017 National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for curative colon cancer resections. Tumors were categorized by location: left, right, and transverse colon cancers. Adequate (12-20 LNs) vs. inadequate (<12 LNs) lymphadenectomy was examined and sub-analysis of <12 LNs, 12-20 LNs or >20 LNs. Primary outcome was predictors of inadequate lymph node retrieval.

RESULTS

Of 101,551 patients, 11.2% (11,439) had inadequate lymphadenectomy. The inadequate lymphadenectomy rate steadily decreased. On multivariable analysis, inadequate LN retrieval was associated with transverse (OR 1.49, CI [1.30-1.71]) and left colon cancers (OR 2.66, CI [2.42-2.93], whereas income >$63,333 had decreased likelihood of inadequate LN retrieval (OR 0.68, CI[0.56-0.82].

CONCLUSION

We are making the grade as NCDB data demonstrates a steady decrease in inadequate lymphadenectomy (2004-2017). There remain socioeconomic risk factors for inadequate lymphadenectomy that need to be addressed.

Efficacy and Feasibility of Complete Mesocolic Excision with Central Vascular Ligation in Complicated Colorectal Cancer

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) involves sharp dissection through the embryological planes. However, it may be associated with high mortalities and morbidities especially in colorectal emergencies. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of CME with CVL in complicated colorectal cancers (CRCs). This was a retrospective study of emergency CRC resection in a tertiary center between March 2016 and November 2018. A total of 46 patients, with a mean age of 51 years, underwent an emergency colectomy for cancer (males, 26 [56.5%]; females, 20 [43.5%]). CME with CVL was performed for all patients. The mean operative time and blood loss were 188 min and 397 mL, respectively. Only five (10.8%) patients presented with burst abdomen, whereas only three (6.5%) presented with anastomotic leakage. The mean length of vascular tie was 8.7 cm, and the mean number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs) was 21.2. Emergency CME with CVL is a safe and feasible technique when performed by a colorectal surgeon and will result in obtaining a superior specimen with a large number of LNs.

Who should operate patients presenting with emergent colon cancer? A comparison of short- and long-term outcome depending on surgical sub-specialization

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer presents as emergencies in 20% of the cases. Emergency resection is associated with high postoperative morbidity and mortality. The specialization of the operating team in the emergency settings differs from the elective setting, which may have an impact on outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes following emergent colon cancer surgery depending on sub-specialization of the operating team.

METHODS

This is a retrospective population study based on data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR). In total, 656 patients undergoing emergent surgery for colon cancer between 2011 and 2016 were included. The cohort was divided in groups according to specialization of the operating team: (1) colorectal team (CRT); (2) emergency surgical team (EST); (3) general surgical team (GST). The impact of specialization on short- and long-term outcomes was analyzed.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference in 5-year overall survival (CRT 48.3%; EST 45.7%; GST 42.5%; p = 0.60) or 3-year recurrence-free survival (CRT 80.7%; EST 84.1%; GST 77.7%21.1%; p = 0.44) was noted between the groups. Neither was any significant difference in 30-day mortality (4.4%; 8.1%; 5.5%, p = 0.20), 90-day mortality (8.8; 11.9; 7.9%, p = 0.37) or postoperative complication rate (35.5%, 35.9 30.7, p = 0.52) noted between the groups. Multivariate analysis adjusted for case-mix showed no difference in hazard ratios for long-term survival or postoperative complications. The rate of permanent stoma after 3 years was higher in the EST group compared to the CRT and GST groups (34.5% vs. 24.3% and 23.9%, respectively; p < 0.0.5).

CONCLUSION

Surgical sub-specialization did not significantly affect postoperative complication rate, nor short- or long-term survival after emergent operation for colon cancer. Patients operated by emergency surgical teams were more likely to have a permanent stoma after 3 years.