1
|
Jain AJ, Maxwell JE, Katz MHG, Snyder RA. Surgical Considerations for Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4174. [PMID: 37627202 PMCID: PMC10453019 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a challenging disease process with a 5-year survival rate of only 11%. Neoadjuvant therapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer has multiple theoretical benefits, including improved patient selection for surgery, early delivery of systemic therapy, and assessment of response to therapy. Herein, we review key surgical considerations when selecting patients for neoadjuvant therapy and curative-intent resection. Accurate determination of resectability at diagnosis is critical and should be based on not only anatomic criteria but also biologic and clinical criteria to determine optimal treatment sequencing. Borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer is best treated with neoadjuvant therapy and resection, including vascular resection and reconstruction when appropriate. Lastly, providing nutritional, prehabilitation, and supportive care interventions to improve patient fitness prior to surgical intervention and adequately address the adverse effects of therapy is critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rebecca A. Snyder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (A.J.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Healy GM, Salinas-Miranda E, Jain R, Dong X, Deniffel D, Borgida A, Hosni A, Ryan DT, Njeze N, McGuire A, Conlon KC, Dodd JD, Ryan ER, Grant RC, Gallinger S, Haider MA. Pre-operative radiomics model for prognostication in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma with external validation. Eur Radiol 2021; 32:2492-2505. [PMID: 34757450 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08314-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), few pre-operative prognostic biomarkers are available. Radiomics has demonstrated potential but lacks external validation. We aimed to develop and externally validate a pre-operative clinical-radiomic prognostic model. METHODS Retrospective international, multi-center study in resectable PDAC. The training cohort included 352 patients (pre-operative CTs from five Canadian hospitals). Cox models incorporated (a) pre-operative clinical variables (clinical), (b) clinical plus CT-radiomics, and (c) post-operative TNM model, which served as the reference. Outcomes were overall (OS)/disease-free survival (DFS). Models were assessed in the validation cohort from Ireland (n = 215, CTs from 34 hospitals), using C-statistic, calibration, and decision curve analyses. RESULTS The radiomic signature was predictive of OS/DFS in the validation cohort, with adjusted hazard ratios (HR) 2.87 (95% CI: 1.40-5.87, p < 0.001)/5.28 (95% CI 2.35-11.86, p < 0.001), respectively, along with age 1.02 (1.01-1.04, p = 0.01)/1.02 (1.00-1.04, p = 0.03). In the validation cohort, median OS was 22.9/37 months (p = 0.0092) and DFS 14.2/29.8 (p = 0.0023) for high-/low-risk groups and calibration was moderate (mean absolute errors 7%/13% for OS at 3/5 years). The clinical-radiomic model discrimination (C = 0.545, 95%: 0.543-0.546) was higher than the clinical model alone (C = 0.497, 95% CI 0.496-0.499, p < 0.001) or TNM (C = 0.525, 95% CI: 0.524-0.526, p < 0.001). Despite superior net benefit compared to the clinical model, the clinical-radiomic model was not clinically useful for most threshold probabilities. CONCLUSION A multi-institutional pre-operative clinical-radiomic model for resectable PDAC prognostication demonstrated superior net benefit compared to a clinical model but limited clinical utility at external validation. This reflects inherent limitations of radiomics for PDAC prognostication, when deployed in real-world settings. KEY POINTS • At external validation, a pre-operative clinical-radiomics prognostic model for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) outperformed pre-operative clinical variables alone or pathological TNM staging. • Discrimination and clinical utility of the clinical-radiomic model for treatment decisions remained low, likely due to heterogeneity of CT acquisition parameters. • Despite small improvements, prognosis in PDAC using state-of-the-art radiomics methodology remains challenging, mostly owing to its low discriminative ability. Future research should focus on standardization of CT protocols and acquisition parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerard M Healy
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Sinai Health System and Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Rahi Jain
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Xin Dong
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dominik Deniffel
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ayelet Borgida
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ali Hosni
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David T Ryan
- Department of Radiology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nwabundo Njeze
- National Surgical Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Anne McGuire
- National Surgical Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kevin C Conlon
- National Surgical Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jonathan D Dodd
- Department of Radiology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Edmund Ronan Ryan
- Department of Radiology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- National Surgical Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Robert C Grant
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- PanCuRx Translational Research Initiative, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Steven Gallinger
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
- PanCuRx Translational Research Initiative, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Surgical Oncology Program, Hepatobiliary Pancreatic, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Masoom A Haider
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Sinai Health System and Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- PanCuRx Translational Research Initiative, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Coppola A, La Vaccara V, Fiore M, Farolfi T, Ramella S, Angeletti S, Coppola R, Caputo D. CA19.9 Serum Level Predicts Lymph-Nodes Status in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:690580. [PMID: 34123859 PMCID: PMC8190389 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.690580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The choice between upfront surgery or neoadjuvant treatments (NAT) for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDAC) is controversial. R-PDAC with potential nodal involvement could benefit from NT. Ca (Carbohydrate antigen) 19.9 and serum albumin levels, alone or in combination, have proven their efficacy in assessing PDAC prognosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of Ca 19.9 serum levels in predicting nodal status in R-PDAC. Methods Preoperative Ca 19.9, as well as serum albumin levels, of 165 patients selected for upfront surgery have been retrospectively collected and correlated to pathological nodal status (N), resection margins status (R) and vascular resections (VR). We further performed ROC curve analysis to identify optimal Ca 19.9 cut-off for pN+, R+ and vascular resection prediction. Results Increased Ca 19.9 levels in 114 PDAC patients were significantly associated with pN+ (p <0.001). This ability, confirmed in all the series by ROC curve analysis (Ca 19.9 ≥32 U/ml), was lost in the presence of hypoalbuminemia. Furthermore, Ca 19.9 at the cut off >418 U/ml was significantly associated with R+ (87% specificity, 36% sensitivity, p 0.014). Ca 19.9, at the cut-off >78 U/ml, indicated a significant trend to predict the need for VR (sensitivity 67%, specificity 53%; p = 0.059). Conclusions In R-PDAC with normal serum albumin levels, Ca 19.9 predicts pN+ and R+, thus suggesting a crucial role in deciding on NAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michele Fiore
- Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Tommaso Farolfi
- Department of Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Ramella
- Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Angeletti
- Unit of Clinical Laboratory Science, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Coppola
- Department of Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Damiano Caputo
- Department of Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|