1
|
Kapoor ND, Groot OQ, Buckless CG, Twining PK, Bongers MER, Janssen SJ, Schwab JH, Torriani M, Bredella MA. Opportunistic CT for Prediction of Adverse Postoperative Events in Patients with Spinal Metastases. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:844. [PMID: 38667489 PMCID: PMC11049489 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14080844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the value of body composition measures obtained from opportunistic abdominal computed tomography (CT) in order to predict hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day postoperative complications, and reoperations in patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastases. 196 patients underwent CT of the abdomen within three months of surgery for spinal metastases. Automated body composition segmentation and quantifications of the cross-sectional areas (CSA) of abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue and abdominal skeletal muscle was performed. From this, 31% (61) of patients had postoperative complications within 30 days, and 16% (31) of patients underwent reoperation. Lower muscle CSA was associated with increased postoperative complications within 30 days (OR [95% CI] = 0.99 [0.98-0.99], p = 0.03). Through multivariate analysis, it was found that lower muscle CSA was also associated with an increased postoperative complication rate after controlling for the albumin, ASIA score, previous systemic therapy, and thoracic metastases (OR [95% CI] = 0.99 [0.98-0.99], p = 0.047). LOS and reoperations were not associated with any body composition measures. Low muscle mass may serve as a biomarker for the prediction of complications in patients with spinal metastases. The routine assessment of muscle mass on opportunistic CTs may help to predict outcomes in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal D. Kapoor
- Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, OH 44307, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery—Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital—Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Olivier Q. Groot
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery—Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital—Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Colleen G. Buckless
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital—Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA (M.A.B.)
| | - Peter K. Twining
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery—Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital—Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Michiel E. R. Bongers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery—Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital—Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Stein J. Janssen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph H. Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery—Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital—Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Martin Torriani
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital—Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA (M.A.B.)
| | - Miriam A. Bredella
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital—Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA (M.A.B.)
- Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee C, Tseng T, Chang R, Yen H, Chen Y, Chen Y, Wu C, Hu M, Yen M, Bongers M, Groot OQ, Lai C, Lin W. Psoas muscle area is an independent survival prognosticator in patients undergoing surgery for long-bone metastases. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7072. [PMID: 38457220 PMCID: PMC10922028 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predictive analytics is gaining popularity as an aid to treatment planning for patients with bone metastases, whose expected survival should be considered. Decreased psoas muscle area (PMA), a morphometric indicator of suboptimal nutritional status, has been associated with mortality in various cancers, but never been integrated into current survival prediction algorithms (SPA) for patients with skeletal metastases. This study investigates whether decreased PMA predicts worse survival in patients with extremity metastases and whether incorporating PMA into three modern SPAs (PATHFx, SORG-NG, and SORG-MLA) improves their performance. METHODS One hundred eighty-five patients surgically treated for long-bone metastases between 2014 and 2019 were divided into three PMA tertiles (small, medium, and large) based on their psoas size on CT. Kaplan-Meier, multivariable regression, and Cox proportional hazards analyses were employed to compare survival between tertiles and examine factors associated with mortality. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess whether incorporating adjusted PMA values enhanced the three SPAs' discriminatory abilities. The clinical utility of incorporating PMA into these SPAs was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS Patients with small PMA had worse 90-day and 1-year survival after surgery (log-rank test p < 0.001). Patients in the large PMA group had a higher chance of surviving 90 days (odds ratio, OR, 3.72, p = 0.02) and 1 year than those in the small PMA group (OR 3.28, p = 0.004). All three SPAs had increased AUC after incorporation of adjusted PMA. DCA indicated increased net benefits at threshold probabilities >0.5 after the addition of adjusted PMA to these SPAs. CONCLUSIONS Decreased PMA on CT is associated with worse survival in surgically treated patients with extremity metastases, even after controlling for three contemporary SPAs. Physicians should consider the additional prognostic value of PMA on survival in patients undergoing consideration for operative management due to extremity metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia‐Che Lee
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and BioinformaticsNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Ting‐En Tseng
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Ruey‐Feng Chang
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and BioinformaticsNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Hung‐Kuan Yen
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNational Taiwan University HospitalHsinchuTaiwan
- Department of Medical EducationNational Taiwan University HospitalHsinchuTaiwan
| | - Yu‐An Chen
- Department of Medical EducationNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Yu‐Yung Chen
- Department of Medical EducationNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Chih‐Horng Wu
- Department of Medical ImagingNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Ming‐Hsiao Hu
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Mao‐Hsu Yen
- Department of Computer Science and EngineeringNational Taiwan Ocean UniversityKeelungTaiwan
| | - Michiel Bongers
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Olivier Q. Groot
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of OrthopaedicsUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Cheng‐Yo Lai
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNational Taiwan University HospitalHsinchuTaiwan
| | - Wei‐Hsin Lin
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Knoedler S, Schliermann R, Knoedler L, Wu M, Hansen FJ, Matar DY, Obed D, Vervoort D, Haug V, Hundeshagen G, Paik A, Kauke-Navarro M, Kneser U, Pomahac B, Orgill DP, Panayi AC. Impact of sarcopenia on outcomes in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2023; 109:4238-4262. [PMID: 37696253 PMCID: PMC10720826 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgeons have historically used age as a preoperative predictor of postoperative outcomes. Sarcopenia, the loss of skeletal muscle mass due to disease or biological age, has been proposed as a more accurate risk predictor. The prognostic value of sarcopenia assessment in surgical patients remains poorly understood. Therefore, the authors aimed to synthesize the available literature and investigate the impact of sarcopenia on perioperative and postoperative outcomes across all surgical specialties. METHODS The authors systematically assessed the prognostic value of sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, searching the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to 1st October 2022. Their primary outcomes were complication occurrence, mortality, length of operation and hospital stay, discharge to home, and postdischarge survival rate at 1, 3, and 5 years. Subgroup analysis was performed by stratifying complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Sensitivity analysis was performed by focusing on studies with an oncological, cardiovascular, emergency, or transplant surgery population and on those of higher quality or prospective study design. RESULTS A total of 294 studies comprising 97 643 patients, of which 33 070 had sarcopenia, were included in our analysis. Sarcopenia was associated with significantly poorer postoperative outcomes, including greater mortality, complication occurrence, length of hospital stay, and lower rates of discharge to home (all P <0.00001). A significantly lower survival rate in patients with sarcopenia was noted at 1, 3, and 5 years (all P <0.00001) after surgery. Subgroup analysis confirmed higher rates of complications and mortality in oncological (both P <0.00001), cardiovascular (both P <0.00001), and emergency ( P =0.03 and P =0.04, respectively) patients with sarcopenia. In the transplant surgery cohort, mortality was significantly higher in patients with sarcopenia ( P <0.00001). Among all patients undergoing surgery for inflammatory bowel disease, the frequency of complications was significantly increased among sarcopenic patients ( P =0.007). Sensitivity analysis based on higher quality studies and prospective studies showed that sarcopenia remained a significant predictor of mortality and complication occurrence (all P <0.00001). CONCLUSION Sarcopenia is a significant predictor of poorer outcomes in surgical patients. Preoperative assessment of sarcopenia can help surgeons identify patients at risk, critically balance eligibility, and refine perioperative management. Large-scale studies are required to further validate the importance of sarcopenia as a prognostic indicator of perioperative risk, especially in surgical subspecialties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Knoedler
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Rainer Schliermann
- Faculty of Social and Health Care Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Regensburg, Regensburg
| | - Leonard Knoedler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Mengfan Wu
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
| | - Frederik J. Hansen
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen, Erlangen
| | - Dany Y. Matar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Doha Obed
- Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Dominique Vervoort
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Valentin Haug
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Gabriel Hundeshagen
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Angie Paik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Martin Kauke-Navarro
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Ulrich Kneser
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Bohdan Pomahac
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Dennis P. Orgill
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Adriana C. Panayi
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lei M, Wu B, Zhang Z, Qin Y, Cao X, Cao Y, Liu B, Su X, Liu Y. A Web-Based Calculator to Predict Early Death Among Patients With Bone Metastasis Using Machine Learning Techniques: Development and Validation Study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e47590. [PMID: 37870889 PMCID: PMC10628690 DOI: 10.2196/47590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with bone metastasis often experience a significantly limited survival time, and a life expectancy of <3 months is generally regarded as a contraindication for extensive invasive surgeries. In this context, the accurate prediction of survival becomes very important since it serves as a crucial guide in making clinical decisions. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based web calculator that can provide an accurate assessment of the likelihood of early death among patients with bone metastasis. METHODS This study analyzed a large cohort of 118,227 patients diagnosed with bone metastasis between 2010 and 2019 using the data obtained from a national cancer database. The entire cohort of patients was randomly split 9:1 into a training group (n=106,492) and a validation group (n=11,735). Six approaches-logistic regression, extreme gradient boosting machine, decision tree, random forest, neural network, and gradient boosting machine-were implemented in this study. The performance of these approaches was evaluated using 11 measures, and each approach was ranked based on its performance in each measure. Patients (n=332) from a teaching hospital were used as the external validation group, and external validation was performed using the optimal model. RESULTS In the entire cohort, a substantial proportion of patients (43,305/118,227, 36.63%) experienced early death. Among the different approaches evaluated, the gradient boosting machine exhibited the highest score of prediction performance (54 points), followed by the neural network (52 points) and extreme gradient boosting machine (50 points). The gradient boosting machine demonstrated a favorable discrimination ability, with an area under the curve of 0.858 (95% CI 0.851-0.865). In addition, the calibration slope was 1.02, and the intercept-in-large value was -0.02, indicating good calibration of the model. Patients were divided into 2 risk groups using a threshold of 37% based on the gradient boosting machine. Patients in the high-risk group (3105/4315, 71.96%) were found to be 4.5 times more likely to experience early death compared with those in the low-risk group (1159/7420, 15.62%). External validation of the model demonstrated a high area under the curve of 0.847 (95% CI 0.798-0.895), indicating its robust performance. The model developed by the gradient boosting machine has been deployed on the internet as a calculator. CONCLUSIONS This study develops a machine learning-based calculator to assess the probability of early death among patients with bone metastasis. The calculator has the potential to guide clinical decision-making and improve the care of patients with bone metastasis by identifying those at a higher risk of early death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingxing Lei
- Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Hainan Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Hainan, China
- Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, China
| | - Bing Wu
- Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Department of Orthopedics, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhicheng Zhang
- Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yong Qin
- Department of Joint and Sports Medicine Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Xuyong Cao
- Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yuncen Cao
- Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Baoge Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiuyun Su
- Intelligent Medical Innovation institute, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yaosheng Liu
- Senior Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Department of Orthopedics, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gazendam A, Ghert M. What’s New in Musculoskeletal Tumor Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:2131-2144. [PMID: 37010478 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.00811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michelle Ghert
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|