Efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in breast cancer surgery-A systematic review and meta-analysis

Differential nerve blockade to explain anterior thoracic analgesia without sensory blockade after an erector spinae plane block may be wishful thinking

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is currently used as a component of multimodal analgesic regimen in a multitude of indications but the mechanism by which it produces anterior thoracic analgesia remains a subject of controversy. This is primarily the result of ESPB's failure to consistently produce cutaneous sensory blockade (to pinprick and cold sensation) over the anterior hemithorax. Nevertheless, ESPB appears to provide 'clinically meaningful analgesia' in various clinical settings. Lately, it has been proposed that the discrepancy between clinical analgesia and cutaneous sensory blockade could be the result of differential nerve blockade at the level of the dorsal root ganglion. In particular, it is claimed that at a low concentration of local anesthetic, the C nerve fibers would be preferentially blocked than the Aδ nerve fibers. However, the proposal that isolated C fiber mediated analgesia with preserved Aδ fiber mediated cold and pinprick sensation after an ESPB is unlikely, has never been demonstrated and, thus, without sufficient evidence, cannot be attributed to the presumed analgesic effects of an ESPB.

Evaluation of the Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized placebo controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) reduces postoperative pain after several types of abdominal laparoscopic surgeries. There is sparse data on the effect of ESPB in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. The purpose of this study was to test the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ESPB for this procedure.

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study, adult patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair were randomly assigned to either bilateral preoperative ESPB with catheters at the level of Th7 (2 × 30 ml of either 2.5 mg/ml ropivacaine or saline), with postoperative catheter top ups every 6 h for 24 h. The primary outcome was rescue opioid consumption during the first hour postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were total opioid consumption at 4 h and 24 h, pain scores, nausea, sedation, as well as Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR-15) and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) during the first week.

RESULTS

In total, 64 patients were included in the primary outcome measure. There was no significant difference in rescue opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents (OME)) at one hour postoperatively, with the ESPB group 26.9 ± 17.1 mg versus 32.4 ± 24.3 mg (mean ± SD) in the placebo group (p= 0.27). There were no significant differences concerning the secondary outcomes during the seven-day observation period. Seven patients received a rescue block postoperatively, providing analgesia in five patients.

CONCLUSION

We found no difference in measured outcomes between ESPB and placebo in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Future studies may evaluate whether a block performed using higher concentration and/or at a different thoracic level provides more analgesic efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04438369 ; 18/06/2020. .

The effects of combined acupuncture anesthesia and serratus anterior plane block with ropivacaine on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing chest surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of combined acupuncture anesthesia and ropivacaine on postoperative analgesia and neuro-related factors in patients undergoing chest surgery.

METHODS

The analgesic drug dosage, postoperative PCIA pressing times, VAS scores at rest and during activity at 6 h (T1), 12 h (T2), 18 h (T3), and 24 h (T4) postoperatively.

RESULTS

The analgesic drug dosage and postoperative PCIA pressing times were lower in the observation group than in the control group (p < 0.05). The VAS scores at T1-T4 postoperatively were lower in the observation group than in the control group (p < 0.05). The SAS scores at T1-T4 postoperatively were lower in the observation group than in the control group (p < 0.05). The levels of IL-6 and IL-10 on postoperative day 1 were higher than those on preoperative day 1 in both groups, with a smaller change in the observation group (p < 0.05). The levels of S100β protein on postoperative day 1 were higher than those on preoperative day 1 in both groups, while the BDNF levels were lower, with a smaller change in the observation group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the control group (11.36%) and the observation group (15.56%) (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Combined acupuncture anesthesia and ropivacaine can effectively improve postoperative analgesia and agitation in patients undergoing chest surgery, reduce the dosage of analgesic drugs, regulate the levels of inflammatory factors and neurotrophic factors in patients, and do not increase the risk of adverse reactions related to patients.

A Randomized Clinical Study to Compare the Perioperative Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Over Thoracic Epidural in Modified Radical Mastectomy

Aim This study aims to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided erector spinae block (ESB) with thoracic epidural (TE) in managing postoperative pain among breast cancer (BC) surgery patients. Methods A total of 42 patients were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups, each comprising 21 participants. Primary endpoints assessed included intraoperative fentanyl consumption, postoperative pain scores, and the need for rescue analgesia. Secondary endpoints encompassed intraoperative hemodynamic changes and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Results The study found no significant difference in intraoperative fentanyl requirement (p=0.62) or postoperative pain scores measured using numerical rating scores (NRS) throughout the 48-hour postoperative period. None of the patients in either group required rescue analgesia. Notably, there was a statistically significant difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting at the two-hour mark, favoring the erector spinae block. Both groups exhibited comparable hemodynamic changes during intraoperative monitoring. Conclusions Our investigation concludes that the ESF offers equivalent analgesic efficacy to the thoracic epidural during both surgery and the postoperative period without inducing any significant hemodynamic instability. Considering the lower complication rate associated with paraspinal blocks compared to neuraxial blocks, the ESB presents itself as a promising alternative method for effective pain relief in mastectomy procedures.