The effect of prior adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in metastatic breast cancer

Amitriptyline inhibits bronchoconstriction and directly promotes dilatation of the airways

INTRODUCTION

The standard therapy for bronchial asthma consists of combinations of acute (short-acting ß2-sympathomimetics) and, depending on the severity of disease, additional long-term treatment (including inhaled glucocorticoids, long-acting ß2-sympathomimetics, anticholinergics, anti-IL-4R antibodies). The antidepressant amitriptyline has been identified as a relevant down-regulator of immunological TH2-phenotype in asthma, acting-at least partially-through inhibition of acid sphingomyelinase (ASM), an enzyme involved in sphingolipid metabolism. Here, we investigated the non-immunological role of amitriptyline on acute bronchoconstriction, a main feature of airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic disease.

METHODS

After stimulation of precision cut lung slices (PCLS) from mice (wildtype and ASM-knockout), rats, guinea pigs and human lungs with mediators of bronchoconstriction (endogenous and exogenous acetylcholine, methacholine, serotonin, endothelin, histamine, thromboxane-receptor agonist U46619 and leukotriene LTD4, airway area was monitored in the absence of or with rising concentrations of amitriptyline. Airway dilatation was also investigated in rat PCLS by prior contraction induced by methacholine. As bronchodilators for maximal relaxation, we used IBMX (PDE inhibitor) and salbutamol (ß2-adrenergic agonist) and compared these effects with the impact of amitriptyline treatment. Isolated perfused lungs (IPL) of wildtype mice were treated with amitriptyline, administered via the vascular system (perfusate) or intratracheally as an inhalation. To this end, amitriptyline was nebulized via pariboy in-vivo and mice were ventilated with the flexiVent setup immediately after inhalation of amitriptyline with monitoring of lung function.

RESULTS

Our results show amitriptyline to be a potential inhibitor of bronchoconstriction, induced by exogenous or endogenous (EFS) acetylcholine, serotonin and histamine, in PCLS from various species. The effects of endothelin, thromboxane and leukotrienes could not be blocked. In acute bronchoconstriction, amitriptyline seems to act ASM-independent, because ASM-deficiency (Smdp1-/-) did not change the effect of acetylcholine on airway contraction. Systemic as well as inhaled amitriptyline ameliorated the resistance of IPL after acetylcholine provocation. With the flexiVent setup, we demonstrated that the acetylcholine-induced rise in central and tissue resistance was much more marked in untreated animals than in amitriptyline-treated ones. Additionally, we provide clear evidence that amitriptyline dilatates pre-contracted airways as effectively as a combination of typical bronchodilators such as IBMX and salbutamol.

CONCLUSION

Amitriptyline is a drug of high potential, which inhibits acute bronchoconstriction and induces bronchodilatation in pre-contracted airways. It could be one of the first therapeutic agents in asthmatic disease to have powerful effects on the TH2-allergic phenotype and on acute airway hyperresponsiveness with bronchoconstriction, especially when inhaled.

Adjuvant therapy reduces the benefit of palliative treatment in disseminated breast cancer - own findings and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant treatment concepts have improved the 10-year cure rate of breast and colon cancer, but new treatments for metastatic disease have yielded only incremental benefit. If treatments for disseminated cancer were actually prolonging life rather than only increasing remission rates, this effect should have been documented over the last 30+ years. However, published data concerning advances in treatment for disseminated cancer have been contradictory.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To add data-based information, we analyzed 2 sources: a regional population-based cancer registry (Hamburgisches Krebsregister, HKR), and a research cancer registry (Projektgruppe Internistische Onkologie, PIO). We compared the survival of several thousand patients with metastatic disease who received treatment only after dissemination with that of patients who received initial adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

After adjuvant treatment, survival in patients with disseminated breast cancer is up to a third shorter than that of patients without adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In accordance with published evidence, we conclude that ineffective adjuvant treatment shortens survival after documentation of metastatic disease. This is probably due to the elimination of chemo-sensitive tumor cells or to the induction of resistance in remaining micrometatases. This negative effect on survival after dissemination has been shown clearly for breast cancer and is also probable for cancer of the colon and other sites.

Usefulness of chemotherapy beyond the second line for metastatic breast cancer: a therapeutic challenge

PURPOSE

Several lines of chemotherapy can be proposed for patients with metastatic breast cancer, but beyond the second line, agreement is lacking concerning the most appropriate therapeutic strategy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the files of 162 patients, who had received at least 3 lines of chemotherapy (CT3) for metastatic breast cancer during a 5-year period (2000-2004), in order to analyze management practices and search for factors affecting survival from CT3 and predictive factors of non-progressive disease (NPD) after CT3.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis identified seven factors which had a positive influence on survival from CT3 (SBR grade I, absence of adjuvant hormone therapy, free interval >or=2 years, absence of cerebromeningeal metastasis before CT, unique focus at initiation of CT3, use of polychemotherapy for CT2, and complete response to CT1 or CT2) and two predictive factors of NPD (histology and drug group used for CT3).

CONCLUSIONS

These factors should help determine the appropriate strategy for proposing a third line of chemotherapy.

Predominance of the basal type and HER-2/neu type in brain metastasis from breast cancer

Although breast cancer is the second most common cause of central nervous system (CNS) metastases with a notable increase of incidence, only few studies on brain-metastasizing breast cancer are available. In this immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study, metastases to the CNS (n=85) and primary breast cancers, with known involvement of the CNS (n=44) including paired primary and metastasized tumours (n=23), were investigated retrospectively for the expression of oestrogen- (ER) and progesterone- (PR) hormone receptors, Her-2/neu, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Ki-67, and cytokeratins (CKs) 5/14. The majority of brain metastases were steroid hormone receptor negative (ER 66%, PR 82%) corresponding to the findings in primary tumours with known involvement of the CNS (68% ER-negative, 75% PR-negative). The frequency of HER-2/neu-overexpressing or -amplified cancers was increased in both groups (34 and 32%, respectively). EGFR expression was more frequent in metastases (41%) than in primary tumours (16%). The proportions of cases with a basal phenotype were 26 and 30%, respectively. In paired primary tumours and metastases to the CNS, constancy of Her-2/neu status was observed in 87% of cases with only one sample turning Her-2/neu-negative and two samples acquiring overexpression/amplification in brain metastases. In contrast, steroid hormone receptors exhibited more frequently a loss of expression (17%) than a gain (9%) with 74% revealing a constant phenotype. We conclude that brain-metastasizing breast cancer belongs predominantly to the basal type or Her-2/neu type. Primary and metastatic tumours differ from each other only in a minority of cases, leading rather to a loss of steroid hormone receptors and to a gain of EGFR and Her-2/neu.

The significance of the site of recurrence to subsequent breast cancer survival

AIM

To investigate differences in the 3-year survival of patients with recurrent breast cancer dependent on recurrence site.

METHODS

The study was a review of 294 patients from a breast cancer database, who were treated for operable breast cancer and subsequently developed a recurrence between 1989 and 2003. Patients were divided into four groups according to the site of first recurrence (local, lymph node, bone or visceral). Breast Cancer Specific Survival (BCSS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier life table analysis and the log rank test.

RESULTS

Patient and tumour characteristics were comparable between the four groups. Survival rates between the recurrence site groups were significantly different. Patients in whom first recurrence was local had the best prognosis with a 3-year BCSS of 83% compared to 33% for patients with first node recurrence (p<0.001), 23% for patients with first bone recurrence (p=0.03) and 13% for patients with first visceral recurrence (p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Survival of patients with recurrent breast cancer is associated with the site of first recurrence. The prognosis from recurrence is progressively worse with local, regional, bone and visceral metastasis.

Central nervous system metastases in women after multimodality therapy for high risk breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Central nervous system (CNS) relapse is increasing in breast cancer. This increase may reflect altered failure patterns from adjuvant therapy, more effective systemic therapy with improved control in non-CNS sites, or a resistant breast cancer subtype.

METHODS

To determine the factors associated with clinical CNS relapse, we examined response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (chemosensitivity), time to relapse and sites of relapse in a cohort of 140 patients without evidence of metastasis at presentation.

RESULTS

At 5 years (interquartile range 3-6 years), 44 (31%) patients developed distant metastases, including 13 with CNS metastases. CNS relapse was early (median 24 months after diagnosis) and associated with relapse in bone and liver, suggesting hematogenous dissemination. Those with CNS relapse were younger at diagnosis (40 versus 49 years) and more likely to have lymphovascular invasion in the primary tumor compared with non-CNS metastases. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not different (69% versus 73% response rate) between the two groups. Extent of residual disease after chemotherapy was strongly associated with relapse outside the CNS but not CNS relapses. The CNS was an isolated or dominant site of metastasis in 8 of 13. Despite treatment, most patients with CNS involvement died of neurologic causes a median of 6 months later.

CONCLUSION

Breast cancers that develop CNS metastases differ from those that develop metastases elsewhere. Both tumor behavior and reduced chemotherapy accessibility to the CNS may contribute to increased CNS involvement in breast cancer patients treated with multimodality therapy.

Occult central nervous system involvement in patients with metastatic breast cancer: prevalence, predictive factors and impact on overall survival

BACKGROUND

As screening central nervous system (CNS) imaging is not routinely performed, the incidence and clinical relevance of occult CNS metastases in advanced breast cancer is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients screened for participation in one of four clinical trials were included; each of the trials excluded patients with known CNS involvement and required screening CNS imaging. A cohort of breast cancer patients with symptomatic CNS metastases was identified from the IU Cancer Center Tumor Registry for comparison.

RESULTS

From November 1998 to August 2001, 155 screening imaging studies were performed. Twenty-three patients (14.8%) had occult CNS metastases. HER-2 overexpression (P = 0.02) and number of metastatic sites (P = 0.03) were predictive of CNS involvement by multivariate analysis. Median survival from time of metastasis (1.78 versus 2.76 years; P <0.0001) and from screening (4.67 versus 10.4 months; P = 0.0013) was shorter in patients with than without occult CNS metastasis. Survival among patients with occult CNS metastasis was similar to patients with symptomatic CNS disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CNS involvement, whether occult or symptomatic, have an impaired survival. Occult CNS metastasis is relatively common, but impact on survival of treating occult CNS disease in patients with progressive systemic metastases is questionable.

Adjuvant anthracycline therapy as a prognostic factor in metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Prognostic factors in metastatic breast cancer continue to be identified. Previous adjuvant chemotherapy appeared to have poor prognosis in some studies but, despite this, the prior use of anthracyclines in the adjuvant setting has not been clearly established as an adverse prognostic factor once metastatic disease develops.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients (n = 1,436) with stages I-IIIa breast cancer were surgically treated with/without radiotherapy and/or systemic adjuvant treatment. Of these, 297 patients who relapsed with metastatic disease constitute the sample population of this retrospective study. Survival, as a function of time since diagnosis of metastatic disease, was assessed in relation to the following factors: age, size of the primary tumor, grade, number of positive axillary nodes, type of surgery, type of adjuvant treatment administered, time to relapse, number of metastatic sites, presence of visceral metastases and type of treatment employed at the time of relapse.

RESULTS

In multivariable analysis three factors remained significant predictors of short survival time: more than 1 site of metastases (p = 0.00003), shorter time to relapse (p = 0.003) and the previous administration of anthracyclines as adjuvant therapy (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The prior use of adjuvant anthracyclines, with other known clinical prognostic factors, confers a poorer outcome in metastatic disease, perhaps as a result of resistant clones selection or by induction of de novo resistance.

High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for breast cancer: current status, future trends

High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HDC/HSCT) has been extensively studied as a potential treatment for breast cancer. A literature search of MEDLINE from January 1990 through December 1999 identified 497 published full papers. Of these articles, 120 reported the results of clinical trials, 78 were reviews, and 299 reported on issues related to the technology of peripheral stem cells, supportive care, and toxicity. The phase II data must be interpreted with caution, as it is subject to selection bias; transplant recipients tended to be younger, rigorously staged, and selected to be chemotherapy responsive. There continues to be controversy regarding the role of high-dose therapy in this disease. Only a few fully published randomized trials are available; these studies were powered only to detect large differences in survival and no benefit was shown. Several large controlled trials are either in progress or are too early for definitive analysis. This review analyzes the current literature on HDC/HSCT for breast cancer, identifying prognostic factors and discussing ongoing research designed to improve antitumor effects.

Outcome of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma treated at a private medical oncology clinic

BACKGROUND

Metastatic breast carcinoma usually is fatal. The median survival after recurrence is 2 years. Five-year survival after recurrence is approximately 10-20%. Although encouraging data have been reported from clinical trials, two issues confound the translation of clinical research to the general medical community: patient selection bias and the absence of untreated controls. Therefore, the authors examined their community-based metastatic breast carcinoma patients, comparing their results with reports from clinical trials and with untreated historic controls.

METHODS

This was a nonconcurrent cohort study of 407 community-based metastatic breast carcinoma patients treated at the authors' private medical oncology clinic in northeast Louisiana. Prognostic variables were correlated with survival time.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients at the time of diagnosis of breast carcinoma was 61 years. The median age at the time of first recurrence was 65 years. The median overall survival and median survival after recurrence were 4. 5 years and 20.1 months, respectively. The 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 17% and 2.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinical trial participants and the authors' private practice cohort are incommensurable, outcomes in these disparate groups were similar but, unfortunately, not much different from those of untreated historic controls.

Response to chemotherapy after relapse in patients with or without previous adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. The French Epirubicin Study Group

The French Epirubicin Study Group undertook a retrospective study to evaluate the response rate at relapse, time to treatment failure, and overall survival according to previous CMF-type adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who had taken part in two successive clinical trials. The statistical significance of the comparisons was tested after adjustment for the factors that differed most between the two groups. Patients who had received previous adjuvant chemotherapy had a lower response rate (p = 0.03), a shorter time to treatment failure (p = 0.007), and shorter overall survival after relapse (p = 0.008); overall survival after initial diagnosis was not significantly different. With respect to patients with axillary node metastases at the time of diagnosis (N+ patients), those with previous adjuvant chemotherapy had a lower response rate (p = 0.01) and shorter time to treatment failure (p = 0.02), but overall survival after relapse and after initial diagnosis were not significantly different. This retrospective and descriptive study suggests that chemotherapy is less effective after relapse, as measured by response rate and time to treatment failure, in patients with previous adjuvant chemotherapy.

The influence of adjuvant chemotherapy on outcome after relapse for patients with breast cancer

This study examines the outcome following relapse for 176 patients who had been entered into a randomised trial comparing adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) with no adjuvant therapy (controls). Relapse has occurred in 65/144 (45%) of the CMF group and 111/158 (70%) of controls (P < 0.0001). 123/176 patients received endocrine treatment after relapse with higher response rates (38 vs. 18%, P < 0.05) and longer time to progression (23 vs. 19 weeks, P = 0.03) for controls. 94/176 received chemotherapy after relapse again with higher response rates (47 vs. 23%, P = 0.05) and longer time to progression (17 vs. 9 weeks, P = 0.03) for controls. Despite this, survival after relapse was the same for the two groups (median 16 months). However, on subgroup analysis, postmenopausal patients who had received adjuvant CMF had shorter survival (P = 0.03). These results suggest that prior adjuvant therapy should be a stratification factor in clinical trials in advanced disease.

Systemic adjuvant therapy in women with resected node-negative breast cancer

Currently, the role of adjuvant systemic therapy in women with node-negative breast cancer is being determined. Several studies of adjuvant hormonal therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy have demonstrated a moderate reduction in the risk of recurrence in the treated patients. With relatively limited follow-up, however, overall survival has not improved with use of adjuvant therapy. The use of prognostic factors to select those patients at highest risk for relapse is an active area of oncologic research. The decision to recommend adjuvant therapy necessitates assessment of the probability of recurrence, the expected reduction of risk with adjuvant therapy, the toxic effects of therapy, and the influence of treatment on the patient's overall quality of life.

Recent advances in the treatment of breast cancer

Multidisciplinary efforts have defined a number of prognostic factors and newer strategies to improve the outcome of patients with breast cancer. Conservative surgery has led to improved functional and cosmetic results. The development of a number of effective adjuvant regimens has led to improved survival. In patients with stage I disease, several biological characteristics of tumor have been identified that are associated with increased risk of relapse. A multimodality approach to patients with locally advanced disease and inflammatory cancer has resulted in improved survival. A number of hormonal and cytotoxic drug contaminations can palliate metastatic disease, with a small fraction of patients remaining in extended remission. Dose-intensive programs may lead to further improvements in survival of selected patients with this disease.

Early breast cancer. A review

The therapy of early breast cancer has been changing during the last decennium. It requires a multi-disciplinary approach and in each of these disciplines improvements have been implemented. The result is that treatment schedules can now be adapted to specific subgroups. In this review early breast cancer is defined as operable disease, using the critera set out by Haagensen. Emphasis is given to describing the new developments in prognostic criteria, since these form the basis for creating subgroups for specific treatment schedules. Distinction is made between the factors relating to growth rate and those relating to metastatic potential. Data on screening promises a beneficial effect of the implementation of screening in national health care programs. Important shifts are seen in treatment schedules; the place of postoperative radiotherapy after classic ablative treatment is being challenged, whereas it plays a major role in the new breast conserving therapy schedules. The data mentioned in the review suggest that a large proportion of 'operable' cases can be treated with breast conservation but details in the technique of breast conserving therapy are still under investigation. They form a major part of the coming prospective studies in breast cancer. Improvements in reconstruction techniques, creating better cosmetic results, make reconstruction more competitive with breast conserving therapy. The use of chemotherapy and endocrine manipulation in early breast cancer has now been clearly confirmed by the overview technique by the Peto-group, thanks to all efforts of individual trialists together.