Resection margin in patients with gastric cancer associated with esophageal invasion: clinicopathological study

The correlation between the margin of resection and prognosis in esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma

Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (AEG) has become increasingly common in Western and Asian populations. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for AEG; however, determining the distance from the upper edge of the tumor to the esophageal margin (PM) is essential for accurate prognosis. Despite the relevance of these studies, most have been retrospective and vary widely in their conclusions. The PM is now widely accepted to have an impact on patient outcomes but can be masked by TNM at later stages. Extended PM is associated with improved outcomes, but the optimal PM is uncertain. Academics continue to debate the surgical route, extent of lymphadenectomy, preoperative tumor size assessment, intraoperative cryosection, neoadjuvant therapy, and other aspects to further ensure a negative margin in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. This review summarizes and evaluates the findings from these studies and suggests that the choice of approach for patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction should take into account the extent of esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy. Although several guidelines and reviews recommend the routine use of intraoperative cryosections to evaluate surgical margins, its generalizability is limited. Furthermore, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy are more likely to increase the R0 resection rate. In particular, intraoperative cryosections and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were found to be more effective for achieving negative resection margins in signet ring cell carcinoma.

Stochastic differential equation modelling of cancer cell migration and tissue invasion

Invasion of the surrounding tissue is a key aspect of cancer growth and spread involving a coordinated effort between cell migration and matrix degradation, and has been the subject of mathematical modelling for almost 30 years. In this current paper we address a long-standing question in the field of cancer cell migration modelling. Namely, identify the migratory pattern and spread of individual cancer cells, or small clusters of cancer cells, when the macroscopic evolution of the cancer cell colony is dictated by a specific partial differential equation (PDE). We show that the usual heuristic understanding of the diffusion and advection terms of the PDE being one-to-one responsible for the random and biased motion of the solitary cancer cells, respectively, is not precise. On the contrary, we show that the drift term of the correct stochastic differential equation scheme that dictates the individual cancer cell migration, should account also for the divergence of the diffusion of the PDE. We support our claims with a number of numerical experiments and computational simulations.

Optimal Intraoperative Assessment of Gastric Margins

OBJECTIVES

Intraoperative pathology consultation (IOC) to assess margins is frequently requested during surgery of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction.

METHODS

We studied 110 consecutive patients undergoing gastrectomy with IOC margin assessment.

RESULTS

Gastric margins at IOC utilized the most blocks but were least often positive. In 64% of patients, the entire gastric margin was examined using average six blocks; representative sections were examined in 25% of patients using two blocks. There was no difference in patient outcome between those who had entire vs representative sections of margin examined. Gross variables showing strongest associations with positive margins were tumor size and tumor distance to margin. Tumors sized greater than 2.3 cm had significantly increased risk of positive margin, and tumor distance greater than 4.5 cm to margin was associated with negative margins.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude representative sections of the closest gastric margin are sufficient to ensure R0 resection in the majority of cases.

The distance of proximal resection margin dose not significantly influence on the prognosis of gastric cancer patients after curative resection

Purpose

It is well known that the curative resection with an adequate proximal margin length is the most effective treatment in gastric cancer. However, despite surgeon's effort to achieve a sufficient proximal margin length, it is often difficult to obtain a recommended proximal margin length in some cases. Therefore, this study was planned to investigate the impact of the length of proximal margin on prognosis of overall survival.

Methods

Between June 1992 and December 2010, 1,888 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent were reviewed. According to tumor's location (total vs. subtotal gastrectomy), pathologic T staging, and differentiation, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of the discrepancies of proximal margin length on overall survival. Also, the impact of the discrepancies of proximal margin length on local recurrence was assessed.

Results

The 5-year survival rate of positive proximal margin group was 5.9%. In negative proximal margin groups, multivariate analysis showed that the discrepancies of proximal margin length have no impact on overall survival. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that there is no association between discrepancy of proximal margin length and local recurrence.

Conclusion

It takes effort to secure a negative proximal margin in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer because of the poor prognosis of positive proximal margin. In negative proximal margin patients, there's no need to achieve an additional proximal margin length for long-term survival benefit because there was no impact of proximal margin length on overall survival and local recurrence.

Prognostic impact of microscopic tumor involved resection margin in advanced gastric cancer patients after gastric resection

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with positive surgical resection margins is dismal in gastric cancer. However, the influence of positive margin itself on prognosis is still uncertain, especially in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The aims of the present study were to evaluate the prognostic impact of microscopic tumor involved resection margins in stage III-IV AGC after gastric resection in comparison with other well-known factors.

METHODS

Among 1,536 consecutive gastric cancer patients who received intentional curative resection for stage III-IV AGC between April 2001 and December 2011 at the National Cancer Center, 35 patients (2.28 %) had positive resection margins on their final histology. A comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics, recurrence pattern, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) was made between positive margin (PM) patients and negative margin (NM) patients.

RESULTS

Among the 35 PM patients, 15 (42.9 %) had proximal involved margins, 21 (60.0 %) had distal involved margins, and one (2.9 %) had both involved margins. Twenty-eight PM patients (80.0 %) were stage III, and 7 (20.0 %) were stage IV. Recurrence was significantly higher in PM than NM (63.6 % vs. 39.7 %, respectively; p = 0.005). The OS and DFS rates were significantly lower in the PM group than in the NM group (14.9 vs. 36.3 months, p < 0.001 and 11.6 vs. 27.1 months, p = 0.005, respectively). The presence of PM was an independent risk factor for both OS and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of PM is an independent risk factor for OS and DFS. Considering the prognostic impact of PM, a sufficient resection margin should be ensured when determining the resection line in gastrectomy with curative intent. The reoperation to secure clear resection margins should be considered as a treatment of choice in the case of PM.

Surgical treatment of adenocarcinomas of the gastro-esophageal junction

BACKGROUND

Patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) may undergo either esophagectomy or gastrectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of surgical therapy with regard to postoperative outcome and survival in patients with Siewert type II tumors.

METHODS

A prospective database of 266 consecutive patients with surgically resectable GEJ adenocarcinomas from 2003 to 2013 was analyzed. The surgical approach was based on preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings.

RESULTS

According to the histopathological analysis, 67 patients (25 %) had type I tumor, 176 patients (66 %) had type II tumor, and 16 patients (6 %) had type III tumor. In total, 86 % were treated with esophagectomy and 14 % with gastrectomy. Overall 5-year survival was 38 %. In type II patients, the type of operation did not significantly influence overall survival on multivariate analysis (p = 0.606). A positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) at the site of the esophagus was more common with gastrectomy (29 vs. 11 %; p = 0.025). No significant differences in mortality, morbidity, or disease recurrence were found. In patients with type II tumors, upper mediastinal nodal involvement (subcarinal, paratracheal, and aortapulmonary window) was found in 11 % of the patients. In 34 % of patients treated with esophagectomy, paraesophageal lymph nodes metastases were harvested compared with 5 % of patients treated with gastrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a type II GEJ adenocarcinoma, a positive CRM was more common with gastrectomy. Esophagectomy provides for a more complete para-esophageal lymphadenectomy. Furthermore, the high prevalence of mediastinal nodal involvement indicates that a full lymphadenectomy of these stations should be considered.

Relevant risk factors and prognostic impact of positive resection margins after endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the treatment of esophageal mucosal lesions has a risk of resection margin residues. The related risk factors and prognosis of post-ESD resection margin residues have not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to investigate the associated risk factors and the prognostic impact of resection margin residues after ESD of superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records at our hospital, including the clinical, endoscopic, and pathological data from patients who underwent ESD for the treatment of superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia from January 2008 to December 2012. In addition, we conducted a statistical analysis of the following factors: sex, age, location, the proportion of circumferential extension, the maximum diameter of the resected specimen, macroscopic type, the depth of invasion, and the endoscopists.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients were included in the study. Overall, 148 lesions were completely resected. There were 17 patients (17 lesions) presenting with positive resection margin after ESD and the positive rate was 11.5 %. A total of 16 patients were followed-up. Among the patients who had resection margin residues, three underwent surgical esophageal resection, one underwent radiotherapy, two received ESD, and one received endoscopic mucosal resection. The remaining nine patients were periodically followed-up, and no recurrences were found. The results of a one-dimensional analysis suggested that there were significant differences in the maximum diameters of the resected specimens, macroscopic type, and the depth of invasion between the positive resection margin group and the negative resection margin group. The results of a multivariate regression analysis suggested that the maximum diameter of the resected specimens and the depth of invasion were risk factors for resection margin residues.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum diameter of the resected specimens and the depth of tumor invasion are risk factors for post-ESD positive resection margins, which suggests that larger lesions and a greater depth of invasion increases the chance of residual tumor after ESD.

Influence of a positive proximal margin on oral intake in patients with palliative gastrectomy for far advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Resection margin involvement is one of the most significant risk factors for local recurrence in curative gastrectomy, and local recurrence results in anastomotic stenosis. In the present study, the effects of a positive resection margin in palliative gastrectomy on the symptoms of anastomotic stenosis and the amount of oral intake were analyzed.

METHODS

Between September 2002 and December 2009, 2,228 patients underwent resection for gastric cancer at Shizuoka Cancer Center, Japan, of whom 18 underwent palliative gastrectomy with a positive proximal margin because of urgent symptoms such as tumor bleeding, stenosis, or perforation. These 18 patients were analyzed retrospectively in this study.

RESULTS

Twelve patients had a positive proximal margin, and six patients had both proximal and distal margin involvement. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 2 patients. The median overall survival was 7.5 months, and the median time from operation to a decrease in oral intake was 5.5 months. Anastomotic recurrence developed in 3 patients, and in all of them, anastomotic stricture was found 2-3 months after gastrectomy. One of these patients, who was in good general condition, was treated by endoscopic balloon dilatation. The other 2 patients did not undergo balloon dilatation because their general condition was poor, with peritonitis carcinomatosa.

CONCLUSIONS

It does not appear necessary for palliative gastrectomy to achieve a negative proximal margin, because salvage therapies resulted in maintaining a tolerable oral intake in patients who were in good general condition.

Prognostic impact of microscopic positive margin in gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Complete resection with negative surgical margins has been a long-held surgical philosophy based on the concept that even minimal remaining cancer cells will develop recurrences.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the clinical significance of microscopic positive margin on the outcome of patients with gastric cancers.

METHODS

The relationships between the margin status and other clinicopathologic factors were examined in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy, and then the prognostic impact of the margin status was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The microscopic positive margin was identified in 23 patients (2.8%) by standard H&E staining. The positive margin showed a strong correlation significantly with tumor size (P < 0.05). Microscopic positive margin was found to be a significant prognostic factor on univariate analysis (5-year survival rate 51.9% vs. 82.2%, P < 0.0001), as well as multivariate analysis (risk ratio 3.24, 95% CI: 1.24-6.50, P < 0.01). Detailed analysis of margin status demonstrated that patients with positive margin in a deep site and/or in multiple layers showed poor survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Microscopic positive margin was found to be an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer patients. The status of the surgical margin might provide useful information for selecting additional treatments and performing intensive follow-up.

Prognostic significance of microscopic positive margins for gastric cancer patients with potentially curative resection

BACKGROUND

Most previous studies concerning the impact of positive margins on patient outcomes were based on patients with D1 lymphadenectomy. The prognostic significance of positive margins for patients with D2/D3 lymphadenectomy has not been investigated.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic and prognostic data were compared between 110 patients with positive margins and 2,159 patients with negative margins who underwent R0 surgery (D2/D3 lymphadenectomy). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent factors correlated with positive margins. Cox's proportional hazard model was applied to investigate whether a positive margin was an independent factor predicting poor outcome. Overall survival rates and the incidence of recurrence were compared between patients with positive and negative margins, stratifying by pT, pN, and TNM stage.

RESULTS

Tumor size, pT stage, and pN stage were independent factors associated with positive margins. Although the overall survival rate of patients with positive margins was significantly poorer than that of patients with negative margins, margin status was not an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis. Significant differences in survival between patients with negative and positive margins could be observed for those in pT1-2, pN0-1, and I-II stage, but not for those in pT3-4, pN2-3, and III-VI stage. Although locoregional recurrence was more frequently observed for patients with positive margins, the incidence of any recurrence was significantly higher only for patients in pT1-2, pN0-1, and I-II stage, but not for those in pT3-4, pN2-3, and III-VI stage.

CONCLUSION

A positive margin results in a significantly worse outcome for pT1-2, pN0-1, and I-II stage gastric cancer patients who undergo D2/D3 lymphadenectomy, but not for those in pT3-4, pN2-3, and III-IV stage.

Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: influence of esophageal resection margin and operative approach on outcome

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the length of esophageal resection or the operative approach influences outcome for patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

While R0 resection remains the mainstay of curative treatment of patients with GEJ cancer, the optimal length of esophageal resection remains controversial.

METHODS

Patients with Siewert I, II, or III adenocarcinoma who underwent complete gross resection without neoadjuvant therapy were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Proximal margin lengths were recorded ex vivo as the distance from the gross tumor edge to the esophageal transection line. Operative approaches were grouped into gastrectomy (limited esophagectomy) or esophagectomy (extended esophagectomy).

RESULTS

From 1985 through 2003, 505 patients underwent R0/R1 gastrectomy (n = 153) or esophagectomy (n = 352) without neoadjuvant treatment. There were no differences in R1 resection rate, number of nodes examined or operative mortality between gastrectomy and esophagectomy. Univariate analysis found >3.8 cm to be the ex vivo proximal margin length (approximately 5 cm in situ) most predictive of improved survival. Multivariable analysis in patients who underwent R0 resection with >or=15 lymph nodes examined (n = 275) found the number of positive lymph nodes, T stage, tumor grade, and ex vivo proximal margin length >3.8 cm to be independent prognostic factors. Subset analysis found that the benefit associated with >3.8 cm margin was limited to patients with T2 or greater tumors and <or=6 positive lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients not receiving neoadjuvant therapy, the goal for patients with adenocarcinoma of the GEJ should be R0 resection including at least 15 lymph nodes, preferably with 5 cm of grossly normal in situ proximal esophagus for those with <or=6 positive lymph nodes. The operative approach may be individualized to achieve these goals.

Prognostic impact of resection margin involvement after extended (D2/D3) gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a 15-year experience at a single institute

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate whether microscopic positive margins are detrimental to the outcome of gastric cancer patients treated with extended (D2/3) gastrectomy.

METHODS

Among 2,740 consecutive patients who had undergone extended gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer between January 1987 and December 2002, 49 patients (1.8%) had positive resection margins on final histology.

RESULTS

Among 49 patients, 29 (59.2%) had proximal involved margins and 20 (40.8%) had distal involved margins. The median survival time of the positive margin group was 34 months. The negative margin group had a significantly longer median survival time of 69 months (P = 0.025). When both groups of patients were stratified according to nodal stage, a positive resection margin determined a worse prognosis only in patients with node-negative disease (174 months vs. 37 months, P = 0.0001). In patients with nodal metastasis, the median survival time was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that a positive microscopic margin is associated with a worse outcome in patients with node-negative disease. Therefore, a more aggressive treatment, such as re-operation, is needed in node-negative patients with a positive microscopic disease.

Influence of a microscopic positive proximal margin in the treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma of the cardia

AIM: To investigate the influence of a positive proximal margin in total gastrectomy patients with gastric adenocarcinoma of the cardia.

METHODS: Medical records of 191 patients with total gastrectomies for adenocarcinoma of the cardia between 1995 and 2000 were reviewed. The clinicopathologic features associated with a positive margin were determined, and the predictors for survival were analyzed.

RESULTS: The incidence of positive proximal margin was 8.4% (16/191). The positive margins were associated with advanced diseases. The tumor size and the depth of tumor invasion were independent risk factors for a positive margin. The mean survival in the positive margin group was 33.9 mo as compared with 62.4 mo in the negative group (P < 0.001). However, the difference in survival lost significance in subgroup analysis according to stage. Multivariate analysis identified that a positive margin was not an independent prognostic factor for survival.

CONCLUSION: A positive margin is more of an indication of advanced disease in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma of the cardia rather than an independent prognostic factor for survival.

Clinicopathological features of patients with Borrmann type IV gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To determine whether there is a specific pattern of clinicopathological features that could be used to distinguish -Borrmann type IV gastric carcinoma from other types of gastric carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the clinicopathological features of patients with Borrmann type IV carcinoma of the stomach. The results were compared with the features of patients who had other types of gastric carcinoma.

RESULTS

The incidence of Borrmann type IV gastric carcinoma was 11.0% (199 patients). A poorly differentiated tumour was found in 120 out of 199 patients (60.3%) with Borrmann type IV gastric carcinoma. The positive lymph node metastasis was found in 150 out of 199 patients (75.4%) with Borrmann type IV gastric carcinoma (P < 0.0001). The incidence of serosal invasion (91.5%) and peritoneal dissemination (37.7%) was significantly higher in these patients. Of the patients with Borrmann type IV gastric carcinoma,161 patients (80.9%) were classified as either stage III or IV at initial diagnosis. The curative resection rate of patients with Borrmann type IV gastric carcinoma was lower than that of patients with other types of gastric carcinoma (P < 0.001). The survival rate was higher in patients with a curative resection(P < 0.001). The 5-year survival rate of patients with Borrmann type IV tumour was lower than that of patients with other types of gastric carcinoma (P < 0.001). The 5-year survival rates were 90.9% for stage I patients with Borrmann type IV gastric carcinoma and 39.5%, 18.6% and 8.7% for stages II, III and IV, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Improving the prognosis for patients with Borrmann type IV gastric carcinoma requires early detection and a curative resection.

Surgical treatment of gastric cancer invading the oesophagus

INTRODUCTION

There is controversy regarding which type of surgical treatment is most appropriate for upper gastric cancer invading the oesophagus.

METHODS

A review of the pertinent literature was carried out regarding oesophageal involvement in gastric cancer.

RESULTS

Invasion of the oesophagus occurred in 26-63% of Western surgical series. It was more frequent in Borrmann IV type, linitis plastica, pT3-pT4, diffuse type by Lauren, N+ or tumours exceeding 5 cm in diameter. Lymphatic tumour spread was caudad (coeliac nodes, hepatoduodenal nodes, paraortic nodes) but mediastinal nodes were also involved if tumour growth in the oesophagus exceeded 3 cm or if there was transmural oesophageal infiltration. In Western countries there was less than 30% 5-year survival and no long-term survivors when hepatoduodenal or mediastinal nodes were metastatic. Mediastinal dissection through thoracotomy did not provide any benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

A rational approach involves total gastrectomy plus partial oesophagectomy. Abdominal transhiatal resection may be performed in the case of a localized, non-infiltrating tumour and oesophageal involvement <2 cm. However, infiltrating, poorly differentiated or Borrmann III-IV tumours require a right thoracotomy to achieve a longer margin of clearance. When oesophageal involvement is >3 cm, or hepatoduodenal or mediastinal nodes are positive, no surgical procedure is curative and the literature demonstrates that extended aggressive surgery has no benefits.

What is the optimal distal resection margin for esophageal carcinoma?

BACKGROUND

Whereas a proximal resection margin of 12 cm is recommended for complete resection of esophageal cancer, the extent of distal resection is unclear.

METHODS

We examined distal resection margins in a consecutive series of patients who underwent esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinomas (n = 50), primary esophageal adenocarcinomas (n = 100), and adenocarcinomas of the cardia (n = 39), in whom all macroscopic tumor was judged to be completely resected.

RESULTS

Microscopic tumor was found at a 3-cm distal resection margin for one multifocal squamous cell carcinoma. Positive distal resection margins were seen in 12% (12 of 100 patients) of primary esophageal adenocarcinomas (median, 2 cm versus 4 cm if negative; p = 0.002, Wilcoxon) and 28% (11 of 39 patients) of cardia adenocarcinomas (median, 1 cm versus 3 cm if negative; p = 0.02, Wilcoxon). Although pathologic stage was shown to be the only significant predictor of overall survival (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.8; 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 2.6; p = 0.007), there was a trend toward reduced postoperative survival for patients with histologically positive distal resection margins, in particular for patients with cardia adenocarcinomas (median, 15.4 months versus 5.7 months if negative; p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

To achieve consistently negative distal resection margins, we recommend resection of at least 5 cm of macroscopically normal foregut below the distal margin of the primary tumor.

Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative resections: implications for clinical management

BACKGROUND

Resection-line involvement has been suggested as an important prognostic factor for gastric cancer.

METHODS

The relationship between resection-line involvement and outcome was examined in patients undergoing potentially curative resection for gastric cancer.

RESULTS

Tumor positive resection-lines were seen in 22 of the 259 evaluable patients (8.4%). Resection-line involvement was associated with tumor location (P = 0.01) and tumor differentiation (P = 0.02). Positive margins were associated with worse survival. However, if both groups of patients are stratified according to lymph node metastases, resection-line involvement determined a shorter survival only in patients with N0 stage disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest, in the case of positive margins, that re-laparatomy should be considered only for patients with N0 stage disease, while patients with metastatic lymph nodes should be watched closely without the need for a more aggressive surgical approach.

Early gastric cancer in the young: clinicopathological study

BACKGROUND

Thirty-four cases of early gastric carcinoma in patients under 50 years of age treated in the period from 1985 to 1995 were reviewed.

METHODS

These constituted 3.7% of 923 cases of gastric cancer in patients of all ages that were treated at Sendai National Hospital during the same 10-year period. Data were compared with those of 194 patients 50 years of age or older.

RESULTS

The incidence of gastric cancer in men and women was almost the same in both groups. Tumours tended to be located distally in the stomach. Macroscopically, depressed lesions were more common in younger patients. Significant differences were observed in depth of invasion, histological type and histological growth patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

The distinctive histological features of early gastric cancer in younger patients were a diffuse type of cancer with infiltrative tumours in the mucosal layer. The prognosis of younger patients was similar to that of older patients.