Sacral anatomical parameters varies in different Roussouly sagittal shapes as well as their relations to lumbopelvic parameters

The Significance of Odontoid Incidence in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

Observational study.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the cervical sagittal parameters for standing Digital radiography (DR) and supine Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to further clarify the relationship between odontoid incidence (OI) and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

METHODS

52 CSM patients aged 54.46 ± 2.89 years underwent both standing DR and supine MRI scans of cervical spine between November 2021 and November 2022. OI, odontoid tilt (OT), C2 slope (C2S), T1 slope (T1S), C0-2 angle, C2-7 angle (cervical lordosis [CL]), and T1S-CL were measured in both DR and MRI images using Surgimap (Version 2.3.2.1). Pearson correlation and linear regression were used to compare these parameters between the two modalities.

RESULTS

Cervical sagittal parameters, including OI, OT, C2S, C0-2 angle, T1S, C2-7 angle (CL) and T1S-CL, showed no significant differences in the measurements between the two modalities. Based on the DR images, OI was related to OT (r = .386, P < .01), C2S (r = .505, P < .01), CL (r = -.412, P < .01), and T1S-CL (r = .320, P < .05), and OI was matched with CL (r2 = .170) and T1S-CL (r2 = .102). Based on MRI images, OI was related to OT (r = .433, P < .01), C2S (r = .516, P < .01), CL (r = -.355, P < .01), and T1S-CL (r = .271, P < .05), and OI matched with C2-7 (r2 = .126) and T1S-CL (r2 = .073).

CONCLUSION

OI is an independent parameter related to cervical anatomy and its measurement is unaffected by external factors. In patients with CSM, odontoid parameters may effectively describe the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine on DR and MRI images.

Archetype analysis of the spine-hip relationship identifies distinct spinopelvic profiles

INTRODUCTION

The position of the pelvis in the sagittal plane can vary considerably between different functional positions. Adapting the position of the acetabular cup in relation to the alignment between the spine and the hip of each individual, prior to prosthesis placement, can prevent the risk of prosthetic impingement. Taken individually, risk factors for unfavorable spinopelvic kinematics can be difficult to interpret when trying to precisely predict which patients are at risk. Furthermore, the use of classifications or algorithms can be complex, most often associated with limited values and often difficult to apply in current practices of risk assessment.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that the deconstruction of the data matrix including age and spinopelvic parameters (SPT, LL, PI, LF and PI-LL) correlated with the analysis of spinopelvic kinematics could be used to define an individualized hip-spine relationship.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We applied archetypal analysis, which is a probabilistic, data-driven and unsupervised approach, to a complete phenotype cohort of 330 patients before total hip arthroplasty to define the spinopelvic profile of each individual using the spinopelvic parameters without threshold value. For each archetype, we analyzed the spinopelvic kinematics, not implemented in the creation of the archetypes.

RESULTS

An unsupervised learning method revealed seven archetypes with distinct spinopelvic kinematic profiles ranging from -8.9 ° to 13.15 ° (p = 0.0001) from standing to sitting and -5. 35 ° to -10.81 ° (p = 0.0001) from supine to standing. Archetype 1 represents the "ideal" patient (A1); young patients without spinopelvic anomaly and the least at risk of mobility anomaly. Followed by 3 archetypes without sagittal imbalance according to their lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence, from the highest to the lowest (archetypes 2-4), archetype 4 exposing a greater risk of spinopelvic kinematic anomaly compared to others. Then 2 archetypes with sagittal imbalance: archetype 5, with an immobile pelvis in the horizontal plane from standing to sitting position in anterior tilt and archetype A6, with significant posterior pelvic tilt standing, likely compensating for the imbalance and associated with the greatest anomaly of spinopelvic kinematics. Finally, archetype 7 with the stiffest lumbar spine without sagittal imbalance and significant unfavorable kinematics from standing to sitting.

CONCLUSION

An archetypal approach to patients before hip replacement can refine diagnostic and prognostic features associated with the hip-spine relationship and reduced heterogeneity, thereby improving spinopelvic characterization. This risk stratification of spinopelvic kinematic abnormalities could make it possible to target patients who require adapted positioning or types of implants before prosthetic surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV retrospective study.

A Novel Cervical Sagittal Classification for Asymptomatic Population Based on Cluster Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE

To propose a novel cervical sagittal classification for asymptomatic people so as to deepen the understanding of cervical sagittal alignment.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical spine sagittal morphology varies in people. There is a lack of widely-accepted cervical sagittal classification method.

METHODS

In all, 183 asymptomatic subjects were included. A series of global and segmental cervical sagittal parameters were measured. Subjects with cervical lordosis (CL)<0 degrees were incorporated directly into the kyphosis (K) group. For subjects with CL ≥0 degrees, a two-step cluster analysis was used to arrive at the optimal number of clusters. The results of the expressions for the subtypes were derived by graphing. The 60 randomly selected lateral cervical spine films were evaluated by 4 spine surgeons at 4-week intervals using our classification method, the Toyama classification method and the Donk classification method. The 3 classification methods' reliability was expressed by the intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC), and convenience was expressed by the measuring time. Finally, the distribution of 4 subtypes was depicted, and sagittal parameters were compared among subtypes.

RESULTS

Four subtypes of the cervical spine were suggested: Large lordosis (LL): CL≥-1.5×T1 slope (TS)+70°; Small lordosis (SL): -1.5×TS+50°≤CL<-1.5×TS+70°; Straight (S): 0°≤CL<-1.5×TS+50°; and K: CL<0°. The measuring time for our classification method was significantly less than the Toyama classification method (P<0.001). Our classification method showed high inter-observer reliability (ICC=0.856) and high to excellent intra-observer reliability (ICC between 0.851 and 0.913). SL was the most common type (37.7%). Men had more LL type and women had more S type and K type. The proportion of S and K increased with age. Cervical sagittal parameters were significantly different among the subtypes except for C4 vertebral body (VB) angle (P=0.546), C2-C7 SVA (P=0.628) and NT (P=0.816).

CONCLUSIONS

We proposed a novel cervical sagittal classification for an asymptomatic population, which proved to be simple to implement with satisfactory reliability.

Effect of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae on sagittal balance of lumbo-pelvic complexity assessed by quantitative whole-body CT imaging

Background

The variation at the lumbosacral junction certainly results in occult alignment changes in the lumbo-pelvic complexity (LPC). This retrospective case-control study aims to investigate the influences of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) on sagittal lumbo-pelvic balance assessment and provide some recommendations for preoperative imaging evaluation.

Methods

Based on whole-body computed tomography (CT) images, a total of 210 individuals with complete segmentation anomalies of LSTV were included and divided into 23 presacral vertebrae (PSV) (sacralization, n=102), 25 PSV (lumbarization, n=108). The control group with 24 PSV (normal, n=100) was matched by age and gender. Sagittal lumbo-pelvic parameters including pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral table angle (STA), sacral kyphosis (SK), and pelvic radius (PR) were measured at the ontogenetical S1 (Ontog S1) level and the morphological S1 (Morph S1), respectively. These parameters were compared using t-test, Kruskal-Wallis H test and post hoc test. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and linear regression were used to investigate the association of lumbo-pelvic parameters with LSTV types and measurement levels.

Results

All the parameters at the Ontog S1 differed significantly from those at the Morph S1 (all P<0.001). At the Ontog S1 level, PI, PT, SS, and LL were negatively correlated with vertebrae counts; SK and PR were positively correlated with vertebrae counts (all P<0.001). Instead, reverse results were obtained at the Morph S1 level. The measurement level and vertebrae counts were independent influence factors for the measurement of PI, PT, SS, SK, and PR (all P<0.05). Compared with the measured values of the matched controls, the variability of most lumbo-pelvic parameters (PI, SS, LL, STA, SK, PR values of 25 PSV subgroup, and PI, PT, SS, LL, STA values of 23 PSV subgroup) at the Morph S1 level were significantly smaller than that at the Ontog S1. The measurements of PT, SS, LL, and PR were less influenced by the measurement level and vertebrae counts than those of PI and SK.

Conclusions

Morph S1 is more recommended for the measurements of most lumbo-pelvic parameters in patients with LSTV. The parameters (PT, SS, LL, STA, PR) are shown more stable and recommended to help reduce the effects caused by LSTV.

Revealing the Effect of Spinopelvic Alignment on Hip Disorders

Background

Hip osteoarthritis (HOA) is a growing burden and one of the leading causes of hip pain. The relationship between the HOA and the alignment of the spinopelvic region has been intensively studied, however the issue remains controversial. Spinopelvic imbalance, HOA, and dysplasia were investigated in relation to sagittal spinopelvic parameters in this study.

Methods

We collected computerized tomography (CT) topograms of the pelvis or abdomen from 380 patients. In antero-posterior (AP) topograms, Tonnis grading, center-edge angle (CEA) and Sharp's acetabular angle (AA) measurements were performed on each patient. Lateral topograms were used to evaluate the following spinopelvic parameters for each patient: pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), sacral table angle (STA), lumbar lordosis (LL), proximal lumbar lordosis (PLL), distal lumbar lordosis (DLL), and PI-LL difference. Initially, the cohort was divided into two subgroups based on whether or not they had HOA. Then, they were divided into two subgroups based on whether or not they had dysplasia. Ultimately, it was divided in half based on the PI-LL imbalance. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine the likely correlations between the spinopelvic parameters of these subgroups. In addition, the correlations between spinopelvic parameters were investigated.

Results

There were 380 patients evaluated. We found no association between HOA or dysplasia and spinopelvic parameters. In addition, there was no association between PI-LL imbalance and HOA or dysplasia.

Conclusion

There was no difference in constant PI and STA angle, besides other variable parameters, between groups having HOA and dysplasia or not. PI-LL imbalance has no effect on HOA and dysplasia.

The change of Roussouly classification after posterior lumbar fusion surgery

Background

Roussouly classification is an important morphologic classification which can help to determine high local stress zones of the spine. Different lumbar morphologies of Roussouly type suggest different biomechanics leading to degenerative evolution. This study aimed both to describe the change of the Roussouly classification of the human spine after posterior lumbar fusion surgery and to explore the influencing factors of postoperative Roussouly type.

Methods

The study is a retrospective case-control study on preoperative and postoperative Roussouly types. A total of 167 patients with lumbar degenerative disease who had undergone short-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery between January 2014 and December 2017 in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Air Force Medical University, were recruited. Preoperative and postoperative general data including gender, age, follow-up time, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, diagnosis, and surgical segment were recorded. Clinical parameters including pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured using Surgimap software, and the Roussouly classification was assessed.

Results

This study included 86 male patients and 81 female patients with a mean age of 52.0±12.4 [14-88] years. The mean follow-up time for these patients was 11.5±6.9 months. The value of sagittal alignment parameters changed after the posterior lumbar fusion surgery, except for the PI value (P=0.591). Roussouly classification changed after surgery. The preoperative Roussouly values of preoperative PI, SS, and LL were significantly different in patients of 4 postoperative Roussouly types.

Conclusions

The Roussouly classification changes after posterior lumbar fusion surgery. This change is independent of gender, age, follow-up time, and the number of surgical segments. The preoperative Roussouly type and PI value are essential in predicting one's postoperative Roussouly type.