Enantiomeric separation of citalopram base by supercritical fluid chromatography

Density dependence of retention factors of trans-stilbene oxide for chiral separation by supercritical fluid chromatography

Retention factors for two enantiomers of trans-stilbene oxide, k₁ and k₂, were measured with a chiral AD-H column using two syringe pumps to feed CO₂ and methanol as a co-solvent at various temperatures, pressures and co-solvent mole fractions to determine the effects of these operating conditions on the retention factors. The retention factors k₁ and k₂ are for the (R,R)- and (S,S)-forms, respectively. When the isothermal compressibilities of a mixture of CO₂ and MeOH were lower than 0.01, far from the critical locus of the CO₂ and methanol mixture, both retention factors were well expressed with the solvent density and temperature with an average absolute relative deviation of 1-2%. In the vicinity of the critical locus, however, where the isothermal compressibilities were much larger than 0.01, the relationship between retention factor and density was complicated. Both retention factors were proportional to the isothermal compressibility, irrespective of methanol mole fraction at each temperature.

Enantioseparation of Citalopram by RP-HPLC, Using Sulfobutyl Ether-β-Cyclodextrin as a Chiral Mobile Phase Additive

Enantiomeric separation of citalopram (CIT) was developed using a reversed phase HPLC (RP-HPLC) with sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin (SBE-β-CD) as a chiral mobile phase additive. The effects of the pH value of aqueous buffer, concentration of chiral additive, composition of mobile phase, and column temperature on the enantioseparation of CIT were investigated on the Hedera ODS-2 C₁₈ column (250 mm × 4.6 mm × 5.0 um). A satisfactory resolution was achieved at 25°C using a mobile phase consisting of a mixture of aqueous buffer (pH of 2.5, 5 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate, and 12 mM SBE-β-CD), methanol, and acetonitrile with a volumetric ratio of 21 : 3 : 1 and flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. This analytical method was evaluated by examining the precision (lower than 3.0%), linearity (regression coefficients close to 1), limit of detection (0.070 µg/mL for (R)-CIT and 0.076 µg/mL for (S)-CIT), and limit of quantitation (0.235 µg/mL for (R)-CIT and 0.254 µg/mL for (S)-CIT).