Dawood HM, Shawky E, Hammoda HM, Metwally AM, Ibrahim RS. Development of a validated HPTLC-bioautographic method for evaluation of aromatase inhibitory activity of plant extracts and their constituents.
PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS : PCA 2022;
33:115-126. [PMID:
34171936 DOI:
10.1002/pca.3074]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Aromatase is a CYP450 enzyme that catalyses the conversion of androgens into oestrogens, where the decrease in the production of oestrogens aided by aromatase inhibitors is considered a target in post-menopausal breast cancer therapy. TLC-bioautography is a technique employed for combining chromatographic separations on TLC plates with bioassays. This is the first report to evaluate aromatase inhibitory activity using this technique.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study is to develop and validate a new TLC-bioautographic method for determination of aromatase inhibitory activity in 14 plant extracts. Two quantitation methods, the peak area method and reciprocal iso-inhibition volume (RIV) method, were compared and investigated to attain reliable results. Factors affecting the enzymatic reaction (temperature, pH, enzyme and substrate concentrations … etc.) were also investigated to attain the optimum parameters.
METHODOLOGY
TLC assisted by digital image processing was implemented for quantitative estimation of the aromatase inhibition of 14 plant extracts using chrysin as positive control. The fluorometric substrate dibenzyl fluorescein (DBF) was utilised for the assay, where inhibitory compounds were visualised as dark spots against a blue fluorescent background. Two software programs, Sorbfil® videodensitometer (in the peak area method) and ImageJ® (in the RIV method), were thoroughly validated using the International Council on Harmonisation (ICH) guideline and used for quantitation.
RESULTS
The RIV method showed superiority over the peak area method in the quantitation results of the tracks with non-homogenous background with %RSD values of 0.98 and 1.49 compared with 2.86 and 3.58, respectively. Further, the methods allow the comparison of the activity of different unknown inhibitory compounds without the need for a reference or a positive control.
CONCLUSION
Using the TLC-bioautographic method by image processing combined with the RIV quantitation method, simultaneous separation and quantitation of aromatase inhibitory components could be applied to estimate the relative activity of various plant extracts.
Collapse