Simultaneous enantioselective determination of omeprazole, rabeprazole, lansoprazole, and pantoprazole enantiomers in human plasma by chiral liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Improved quantitative determination of (R)- and (S)-rabeprazole sodium and its metabolites in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS and its application to a toxicokinetic study

There exist two enantiomers: (R)- and (S)-rabeprazole. (R)-rabeprazole offers specific pharmacokinetic advantages and enhanced therapeutic efficacy, warranting further investigation and development. Here, we developed a simple and rapid chiral liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to simultaneously quantify rabeprazole enantiomers and their metabolites (rabeprazole sulfoxide and desmethyl rabeprazole enantiomers) and a LC-MS to quantify rabeprazole thioether. As for the chiral LC-MS/MS method, Chiral-AGP column (150 × 4 mm, 5 μm) was used and its mobile phase was acetonitrile (mobile phase A) and 10 mmol/L ammonium acetate (mobile phase B) (linear gradient profile: 0 min, 10 % B; 5 min, 15 % B; 9 min, 15 % B; 9.01 min, 10 % B; 13 min, 10 % B). The multiple reactions monitoring transitions of m/z 360.3 → 242.1, 376.2 → 240.1, 346.2 → 228.2 and 368.2 → 190.2 were opted for quantifying rabeprazole enantiomers, rabeprazole sulfoxide, desmethyl rabeprazole enantiomers and internal standard omeprazole. The analyte samples were prepared by a simple liquid-liquid extraction method. As for the LC-MS method, analytes were separated on a Inertsil® ODS-3 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm). The mobile phase was acetonitrile-5 mmol/L ammonium acetate water solution (65:35, v/v). ESI+ was used and ion peaks with m/z 344.2 (rabeprazole thioether) and 285.1 (internal standard diazepam) were monitored. Both these 2 methods were validated for specificity, linearity, precision, accuracy, matrix effect and extraction recovery, and, particularly, the stability of analytes under various conditions. We successfully applied these methods to a 13-week toxicokinetic study of rabeprazole in rats after intravenous administration of (R)- (80, 20, 5 mg/kg/d) and racemic (80 mg/kg/d) rabeprazole sodium. The results showed that rabeprazole and its metabolites did not accumulate in rats. However, desmethyl rabeprazole and rabeprazole thioether showed higher exposure and lower clearance rate in the last administration than in the first one. (R)-rabeprazole showed a higher exposure and a slower elimination rate than (S)-rabeprazole in rats. These findings offer experimental evidence and a theoretical foundation for further preclinical investigations and clinical applications of (R)-rabeprazole.

Development of Levo-Lansoprazole Chiral Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Sensor Based on the Polylysine-Phenylalanine Complex Framework Conformational Separation

The efficacies and toxicities of chiral drug enantiomers are often dissimilar, necessitating chiral recognition methods. Herein, a polylysine-phenylalanine complex framework was used to prepare molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) as sensors with enhanced specific recognition capabilities for levo-lansoprazole. The properties of the MIP sensor were investigated using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and electrochemical methods. The optimal sensor performance was achieved by applying self-assembly times of 30.0 and 25.0 min for the complex framework and levo-lansoprazole, respectively, eight electropolymerization cycles with o-phenylenediamine as the functional monomer, an elution time of 5.0 min using an ethanol/acetic acid/H₂O mixture (2/3/8, V/V/V) as the eluent, and a rebound time of 10.0 min. A linear relationship was observed between the sensor response intensity (ΔI) and logarithm of the levo-lansoprazole concentration (l-g C) in the range of 1.0 × 10^-13-3.0 × 10^-11 mol/L. Compared with a conventional MIP sensor, the proposed sensor showed more efficient enantiomeric recognition, with high selectivity and specificity for levo-lansoprazole. The sensor was successfully applied to levo-lansoprazole detection in enteric-coated lansoprazole tablets, thus demonstrating its suitability for practical applications.

Progress of Pretreatment and Analytical Methods of Proton Pump Inhibitors: An Update since 2010

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most commonly used medication for stomach secretion disorders. However, when it comes to safe, discreet pharmaceutical practice, widely recognized preparational and analytical method(s) for PPIs with sensitivity, selectivity, speed and high accuracy still remains underdeveloped. For this reason, this paper sets out to make a comprehensive review of the preparation and determination methods for PPIs based on multiple matrices since 2010. We have integrated newly-developed techniques (such as solid phase extraction, liquid phase micro-extraction, and solid phase micro-extraction) into conventional sample preparational methods. On the other hand, our analytical techniques include liquid chromatography, supercritical fluid chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, and employment of sensors. In addition, we have identified the pros and cons of each technique and have forecast their future developmental trends.

A comparative study of chiral separation of proton pump inhibitors by supercritical fluid chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography

A comparative study of chiral separation of pantoprazole and rabeprazole is carried out using supercritical fluid chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography. The columns used were Chiralpak IA and Chiralpak IE. The best mobile phase in supercritical fluid chromatography was carbon dioxide-0.2% triethylamine in methanol (60:40) and 0.1% triethylamine in n-hexane-ethanol (50:50) in high-performance liquid chromatography. For supercritical fluid chromatography, values of the retention factor of pantoprazole enantiomers were 3.97 and 4.88. These values for rabeprazole enantiomers were 6.10 and 7.52. The values of separation and resolution factor for pantoprazole and rabeprazole were 1.23 and 1.23 and 2.20 and 3.36, respectively. Similarly, for high-performance liquid chromatography, the values of retention factor for enantiomers of pantoprazole were 4.02 and 7.32. These values for rabeprazole enantiomers were 5.32 and 7.88, respectively. The values of separation and resolution factor for pantoprazole and rabeprazole were 1.82 and 1.48 and 9.22 and 6.58, respectively. A comparison was carried out, which confirmed supercritical fluid chromatography as the best method due to its fastness, eco-friendly, and inexpensiveness. The reported methods are effective, efficient, and reproducible and may be used to separate and identify pantoprazole and rabeprazole in any unknown samples.

Chiral separation in the class of proton pump inhibitors by chromatographic and electromigration techniques: An overview

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are benzimidazole-derivative chiral sulfoxides, frequently used in the treatment of gastric hyperacidity-related disorders. Due to their stereoselective metabolism, the eutomeric forms of PPIs can present a more advantageous pharmacokinetic profile by comparison with the distomers or racemates. Moreover, two representatives of the class are used in therapy both as racemates and as pure enantiomers (esomeprazole, dexlansoprazole). A relatively large number of enantioseparation methods employed for the stereoselective determination of PPIs from pharmaceutical, biological, and environmental matrices were published in the past three decades. The purpose of the current overview is to provide a systematic survey of the available chiral separation methods published since the introduction of PPIs in the therapy up to the present. Analytical and bioanalytical methods using different chromatographic and electromigration techniques reported for the enantioseparation of omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, ilaprazole, and tenatoprazole are included. The analytical conditions of the presented methods are summarized in three comprehensive tables, while a critical discussion of the applied techniques, possible mechanism of enantiorecognition, and future perspectives on the topic are also presented.

Determination and Pharmacokinetics of Omeprazole Enantiomers in Human Plasma and Oral Fluid Utilizing Microextraction by Packed Sorbent and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

In the present work, the determination of omeprazole (OME) enantiomers in oral fluid and plasma samples was carried out utilizing microextraction by packed sorbent (MEPS) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. A chiral column with cellulose-SB phase was used for the first time for enantiomeric separation of OME with an isocratic elution system using 0.2% ammonium hydroxide in hexane-ethanol mixture (70 : 30, v/v) as the mobile phase. OME enantiomers were determined utilizing a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer in positive ion mode (ESI+) monitoring mass transitions: m/z 346.3 ⟶ 198.0 for OME and m/z 369.98 ⟶ 252.0 for internal standard. The limits of detection and quantification of the present method for both enantiomers were 0.1 and 0.4 ng/mL, respectively. The method validation provided good accuracy and precision. The matrix effect factor was less than 5%, and no interfering peaks were observed. The interday precision values ranged from 2.2 to 7.5 (%RSD), and the accuracy of determinations varied from −9.9% to 8.3%. In addition, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of omeprazole enantiomers in healthy subjects after a single oral dose was investigated. (S)-Enantiomers showed higher levels than (R)-enantiomers throughout 24 h. It was found that the mean maximum concentrations of (R)- and (S)-omeprazole in plasma samples were about two times higher than in oral fluid.