Combination of solvent extraction with deep eutectic solvent based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for the analysis of aflatoxin M1 in cheese samples using response surface methodology optimization

Development of deep eutectic solvent-based microwave-assisted extraction combined with temperature controlled ionic liquid-based liquid phase microextraction for extraction of aflatoxins from cheese samples

In this study, for the first time, a deep eutectic solvent-based microwave-assisted extraction was combined with ionic liquid-based temperature controlled liquid phase microextraction for the extraction of several aflatoxins from cheese samples. Briefly, the analytes are extracted from cheese sample (3 g) into a mixture of 1.5 mL choline chloride:ethylene glycol deep eutectic solvent and 3.5 mL deionized water by exposing to microwave irradiations for 60 s at 180 W. The liquid phase was taken and mixed with 55 μL 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate. By cooling the solution in the refrigerator centrifuge, a turbid state was obtained and the analytes were extracted into the ionic liquid droplets. The analytes were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography equipped with fluorescence detector. Low limits of detection (9-23 ng kg-1 ) and quantification (30-77 ng kg-1 ), high extraction recovery (66%-83%), acceptable enrichment factor (40-50), and good precision (relative standard deviations ≤ 5.2%) were obtained using the offered approach. These results reveal the high extraction capability of the method for determination of aflatoxins in the cheese samples. In this method, there was no need for organic solvents and it can be considered as green extraction method.

Use of green alternative solvents in dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction: A review

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction is one of the most widely used microextraction techniques currently in the analytical chemistry field, mainly due to its simplicity and rapidity. The operational mode of this approach has been constantly changing since its introduction, adapting to new trends and applications. Most of these changes are related to the nature of the solvent employed for the microextraction. From the classical halogenated solvents (e.g., chloroform or dichloromethane), different alternatives have been proposed in order to obtain safer and non-pollutants microextraction applications. In this sense, low-density solvents, such as alkanols, switchable hydrophobicity solvents, and ionic liquids were the first and most popular replacements for halogenated solvents, which provided similar or better results than these classical dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction solvents. However, despite the good performances obtained with low-density solvents and ionic liquids, researchers have continued investigating in order to obtain even greener solvents for dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction. For that reason, in this review, the evolution over the last five years of the three types of solvents already mentioned and two of the most promising solvent alternatives (i.e., deep eutectic solvents and supramolecular solvents), have been studied in detail with the purpose of discussing which one provides the greenest alternative.

Use of 1-octyl-3-methylimidazole hexafluorophosphate modified magnetic hyperbranched polyamideamine as sorbent for the extraction of pyrethroid insecticides from tea infusion

Magnetic hyperbranched polyamideamine was carboxylated using succinic anhydride and modified further with 1-octyl-3-methylimidazole hexafluorophosphate successively. The morphology and chemical composition of the prepared material was characterized by transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller measurement, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, etc. 1-Octyl-3-methylimidazole hexafluorophosphate modified magnetic hyperbranched polyamideamine was used as sorbent in the magnetic solid-phase extraction for the separation and enrichment of five pyrethroid insecticides from tea infusion. The magnetic solid-phase extraction method proposed in this article has low method detection limits (0.53-0.71 ng/mL), acceptable coefficient of determination (0.9992-0.9998), wide linear ranges (2.5-500.0 ng/mL), and good repeatability (intraday: 1.2-6.3%; interday: 1.6-5.4%). In the detection of five pyrethroid insecticides in tea infusion, relative recoveries were in the range from 87.7 to 114.7% with satisfactory relative standard deviations (0.2-7.4%). With the aid of quantum chemistry calculations, the interaction energy between the sorbent and five pyrethroid insecticides was calculated, which proved the necessity of the modification of 1-octyl-3-methylimidazole hexafluorophosphate.