Efficacy of Behavioral Couples Therapy Versus Individual Recovery Counseling for Addressing Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Women With Drug Use Disorders

Histories of violence among clients seeking substance use disorder treatment: a systematic mapping review

Introduction

There is a limited literature base regarding the intersection of drug and alcohol treatment, violence, and trauma. While research substantiates that exposure to violence and trauma impacts the propensity to misuse substances, the conceptualization in clinical trials and practice has largely been narrow and gendered, referring only to intimate partner or domestic violence. Our systematic mapping review explored a more inclusive and expansive review of survivors of and perpetrators of violence and trauma (e.g., intimate partner violence, sexual assault, stalking, child abuse, political and community violence, criminal violence, micro violence, structural violence, and oppression) to establish: 1) the types of treatment settings included in intervention studies, 2) the common indicators of success or common outcomes recorded, and 3) understanding who is seeking treatment for drug and alcohol use with histories of violence.

Methods

A systematic mapping review was conducted to identify any peer-reviewed articles published from 2011 to 2022. The Web of Science database was searched using a broad set of Boolean search terms related to violence, substance use disorders, and treatment. Over 8,800 records were identified from the systematic review with a total of 48 articles meeting inclusion criteria.

Results

Most studies in this review included populations reporting perpetration of violence (n=23, 48%) versus participants reporting survival of trauma/violence (n=17, 35%). Results also indicated female identifying populations (n=19; 40%) were predominantly served, were treated in the US (n=33; 69%) and seen in an outpatient setting (n=24; 50%). Authors also were attentive to studies that included sexual and gender minorities and discovered only three studies (6%) explicitly acknowledging inclusion of transgender participants or participants in relationship with partners of the same sex; three more studies (6%) were focused on participants with histories of or engaging in sex work.

Discussion

This review outlines treatment and research implications directly situated in the gap of service delivery found in this review. Specifically, the results elucidate the impact on minoritized and excluded identities based on gender, sexual preference, criminal legal status and directions for research and treatment to increase inclusion, representation, and equity across research and treatment settings.

Mechanisms and moderators of behavioural couples therapy for alcohol and substance use disorders: an updated review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Behavioural couples therapy (BCT) and alcohol behavioural couples therapy (ABCT) are couples-based interventions for substance use disorders (SUDs) that have been deemed a 'gold standard' treatment. Despite the substantial amount of promising research, there is a lack of research on the active components of treatment and treatment mechanisms and moderators. Since the most recent meta-analysis, a number of studies have been conducted that advance our understanding of the efficacy of BCT and ABCT.

AIMS

The purpose of the present review was to provide an update on the current knowledge of these treatments and to investigate mediators and moderators of treatment.

METHOD

A systematic search strategy of relevant databases from 2008 to 2021 identified 20 relevant articles that were coded for relevant information including study design, treatment, outcomes, as well as mechanisms and moderators.

RESULTS

The results indicated that BCT and ABCT are successful in reducing alcohol and substance use for both male and female clients, dual problem couples, and for reducing post-traumatic stress symptoms and intimate partner violence. The reviewed studies discussed a number of treatment mechanisms, with the most studied mechanism being relationship functioning. Moderators included relationship functioning and patient gender.

CONCLUSIONS

The results point to the need for additional research on active treatment components, mechanisms and moderators, in order to provide a more efficient and cost-effective treatment.

Associations between relationship quality and treatment-related stress among couples receiving methadone for opioid use disorder

BACKGROUND

Social relationships may buffer or exacerbate stress among patients receiving methadone treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Little is known, however, about how relationship quality is linked to treatment-related stress among couples in which both partners receive methadone. We considered the links between relationship quality and treatment-related stress among couples in methadone treatment for OUD.

METHODS

Participants for this cross-sectional observational study included 60 heterosexual married or cohabiting couples aged 18 and older drawn from two opioid treatment programs in Rhode Island and Massachusetts. Both partners completed a self-administered survey which assessed their sociodemographic information, relationship and treatment characteristics, and perceived treatment-related stress. We estimated actor-partner interdependence models to evaluate the links between each partner's perceptions of relationship quality (with their partner and their closest family member or friend) and treatment-related stress.

RESULTS

When their partners reported a more positive partner relationship, women had lower treatment-related stress. When women reported a more positive relationship with their own closest family member or friend, both women and their partners had lower treatment-related stress. When men perceived a more positive relationship with their closest family member or friend, their partners reported greater treatment-related stress. Negative relationship quality was not significantly linked to treatment-related stress.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the importance of considering how social relationship quality might impact the experiences of couples receiving methadone for OUD. In particular, women's close relationships may help to mitigate treatment-related stress.

Dyadic associations between relationship quality and risk of opioid use among couples receiving methadone for opioid use disorder

BACKGROUND

Social relationships may serve as both protective factors and risk factors for opioid use (nonmedical prescription opioid or illicit opioid use) among patients receiving methadone for opioid use disorder (OUD). Yet little is known about how relationship quality is linked to outcomes among couples receiving methadone. We evaluated the links between relationship quality and risk of opioid use among couples in which both partners received methadone.

METHODS

Participants included 53 heterosexual married or cohabiting couples aged 18 and older who were drawn from two opioid treatment programs in Rhode Island and Massachusetts. Both members of the couple completed a self-administered survey assessing their sociodemographic information, relationship and treatment characteristics, and risk of opioid use.

RESULTS

Roughly half of women (47.2%) and men (52.8%) had a moderate to high risk of nonmedical prescription opioid use and almost two-thirds (64.2%) had a moderate to high risk of street opioid use. Risk of street opioid use was highly correlated within couples. Actor-partner interdependence models revealed that when women reported higher positive relationship quality, they had a lower risk of nonmedical prescription opioid use and their partners had a lower risk of street opioid use. Negative relationship quality was not significantly linked to risk of opioid use.

CONCLUSIONS

Couples in which both partners receive methadone for OUD may be at risk of return to use, and positive partner relationships may play a role in lowering this risk. Women's perceptions of relationship quality might be a particularly important target for clinical care and interventions.

Adverse childhood experiences are associated with at-risk drinking, cannabis and illicit drug use in females but not males: an Emergency Department study

BACKGROUND

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with adult substance use in the general population. Given pervasive health disparities among underserved populations, understanding how ACEs are associated with substance use among urban Emergency Department (ED) patients could help inform design of effective screening, brief interventions, and referral to treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate gender differences in prevalence of separate and cumulative ACEs among a sample of urban ED patients, and assess its association with at-risk drinking (4+/5+ drinks for females/males), cannabis, and illicit drug use. We hypothesized that the association between ACEs and each outcome would be stronger among females than males.

METHODS

Cross-sectional survey data were obtained from 1,037 married/partnered ED patients (53% female) at a public safety-net hospital. Gender-stratified logistic regression models were estimated for each substance use outcome.

RESULTS

One+ ACEs were reported by 53% of males and 60% of females. Females whose mother was a victim of domestic violence had greater odds of at-risk drinking compared to females who did not report this ACE (AOR = 1.72; 95% CI 1.03, 2.88). Females' cumulative ACEs were associated with cannabis use (OR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.06, 4.83) and illicit drug use (OR = 3.35; 95% CI 1.21, 9.30). Males' separate and cumulative ACEs were not associated with increased likelihood for any of the outcomes.

CONCLUSION

ACEs are associated with greater odds of substance use among female than male ED patients. The prevalence of ACE exposure in this urban ED sample underscores the importance of ED staff providing trauma-informed care.