Distal Forearm Fracture Open Reduction-Internal Fixation: Sonographic Detection of Hardware Malalignment and Associated Tendon Injuries Missed by Radiography

[Treatment of the fifth metacarpal neck fracture with elastic intramedullary nail under the guidance of high frequency ultrasound]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the feasibility and effectiveness of elastic intramedullary nail fixation for the fifth metacarpal neck fracture under the guidance of high frequency ultrasound.

METHODS

The clinical data of 30 patients with the fifth metacarpal neck fractures who were treated with elastic intramedullary nails fixation under the guidance of high frequency ultrasound and met the selection criteria between May 2013 and September 2017 were retrospectively analysed. There were 24 males and 6 females, the age ranged from 18 to 58 years, with an average of 31.4 years. The head-shaft angle of the fifth metacarpal was (55.6±11.3)°. The time from injury to operation was 12 hours to 8 days, with an average of 2.4 days. The operation time, number of intraoperative fluoroscopy, fracture reduction, complications, and fracture healing time were recorded. The head-shaft angle of the fifth metacarpal on the affected side after fracture healing were measured and compared with the healthy side. At last follow-up, the active range of motion of the fifth metacarpophalangeal joint of both sides were measured, and the function was evaluated by using the total active movement (TAM) evaluation standard of the Hand Surgery Association of Chinese Medical Association.

RESULTS

The operation time was 22-40 minutes, with an average of 32.4 minutes; the intraoperative fluoroscopy was performed once; ultrasound images and X-ray fluoroscopy showed that the fracture was well reduced and no adjustment was required. The incisions healed well after operation, without tendon adhesion or local numbness. All 30 patients were followed up 8-16 months, with an average of 11.7 months. The fracture healing time was 4-8 weeks, with an average of 5.6 weeks. The head-shaft angle of the fifth metacarpal was (13.2±1.4)°, which was significantly improved when compared with preoperative value ( t=-20.02, P=0.00); and there was no significant difference ( t=1.94, P=0.06) when compared with the healthy side [(12.6±1.0)°]. At last follow-up, the active range of motion of the fifth metacarpophalangeal joint on the affected side was (89.4±2.4)°, showing no significant difference ( t=-1.58, P=0.13) when compared with the healthy side [(90.3±2.0)°]. According to the TAM evaluation standard of the Hand Surgery Association of Chinese Medical Association, all patients were considered to be excellent.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of elastic intramedullary nail fixation for the fifth metacarpal neck fracture under the guidance of high frequency ultrasound is definite. It can dynamically observe the fracture reduction from different angles, reduce ionizing radiation and postoperative complications.

A Dual-Motor Drill Reduces Plunge, Simultaneously Gauges Depth, and Saves Time When Placing Orthopedic Screws

The technique for placement of orthopedic hardware remains unchanged despite technological advances. The surgeon controls drill bit speed and advancement, which risks drill bit overpenetration, or plunge. Measurement is performed as an additional step, introducing measurement error and increasing operative time. A dual-motor drill was created to control drill variables and combine drilling and measurement into a single step. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a dual-motor drill could reduce drilling and measurement errors while increasing the speed of placement of orthopedic hardware. Five orthopedic surgeons drilled and measured 10 holes with a standard drill and a dual-motor drill in randomized bicortical bone blocks. The bone blocks were placed on standard ballistic gels, which left a defect from drill bit overpenetration that could be measured with a calibrated gauge. The accuracy of drilling was determined by the depth of the defect in the ballistic gel and was compared between groups. Finally, time for drilling and measurement was collected and compared between groups. Overpenetration for the dual-motor drill (0.5±0.3 mm) was significantly less than for the standard drill (8.4±1.9 mm) (P<.0001). Depth measurement error for the dual-motor drill (0.6±0.3 mm) was significantly less than for the standard drill (2.6±0.5 mm) (P<.0001). Drilling and measurement time for the dual-motor drill (6.0±2.2 seconds) was significantly less than for the standard drill (13.4±3.9 seconds) (P<.0001). Use of a dual-motor drill reduced overpenetration, improved measurement accuracy, and reduced time spent during placement of orthopedic hardware. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(5):e465-e470.].