1
|
Basso O, Shapiro GD, Gagnon R, Tamblyn R, Platt RW. Type of infertility and prevalence of congenital malformations. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2024; 38:43-53. [PMID: 37859584 DOI: 10.1111/ppe.13012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children conceived with assisted reproductive technologies (ART) or after a long waiting time have a higher prevalence of congenital malformations, but few studies have examined the contribution of type of infertility. OBJECTIVES To quantify the association between causes of infertility and prevalence of malformations. METHODS We compared the prevalence at birth of all and severe malformations diagnosed up to age 2 between 6656 children born in 1996-2017 to parents who had previously been assessed for infertility a an academic fertility clinic ("exposed") and 10,382 children born in the same period to parents with no recent medical history of infertility ("reference"). We estimated prevalence ratios (PR) and prevalence differences (PD), by infertility status, type of treatment (non-ART, ART), and infertility diagnosis, in all children and among singletons. RESULTS Compared with children of parents with no infertility, children of parents with infertility had a higher prevalence of malformations (both definitions), particularly following ART conceptions. After accounting for treatment, ovulatory disorders were associated with a higher prevalence of both all (PR 1.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15, 1.93; PD 3.8, 95% CI 1.0, 6.6) and severe (PR 1.53, 95% CI 1.02, 2.29; PD 1.8, 95% CI -0.2, 3.7) malformations (the estimates refer to exposed children conceived without treatment). Unexplained and male factor infertility were associated with all and severe malformations, respectively. Estimates among singletons were similar. A diagnosis of ovulatory disorders was associated with all malformations also in analyses restricted to exposed children, regardless of treatment (we did not examine severe malformations, due to limited power). CONCLUSIONS In this study, ovulatory disorders were consistently associated with a higher prevalence of congenital malformations (including severe malformations) among live births, regardless of mode of conception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Basso
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gabriel D Shapiro
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Robert Gagnon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Robyn Tamblyn
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Robert W Platt
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wilson R, O'Connor D. Maternal folic acid and multivitamin supplementation: International clinical evidence with considerations for the prevention of folate-sensitive birth defects. Prev Med Rep 2021; 24:101617. [PMID: 34976673 PMCID: PMC8684027 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
More evidence is available for maternal intake, absorption, distribution, tissue specific concentrations, and pregnancy outcomes with folic acid (fortification/supplementation) during preconception - first trimester. This Quality Improvement prevention review used expert guidelines/opinions, systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational case control/case series studies, published in English, from 1990 to August 2021. Optimization for an oral maternal folic acid supplementation is difficult because it relies on folic acid dose, type of folate supplement, bio-availability of the folate from foods, timing of supplementation initiation, maternal metabolism/genetic factors, and many other factors. There is continued use of high dose pre-food fortification 'RCT evidenced-based' folic acid supplementation for NTD recurrence pregnancy prevention. Innovation requires preconception and pregnancy use of 'carbon one nutrient' supplements (folic acid, vitamin B12, B6, choline), using the appropriate evidence, need to be considered. The consideration and adoption of directed personalized approaches for maternal complex risk could use serum folate testing for supplementation dosing choice. Routine daily folic acid dosing for low-risk women should consider a multivitamin with 0.4 mg of folic acid starting 3 months prior to conception until completion of breastfeeding. Routine folic acid dosing or preconception measurement of maternal serum folate (after 4-6 weeks of folate supplementation) could be considered for maternal complex risk group with genetic/medical/surgical co-morbidities. These new approaches for folic acid oral supplementation are required to optimize benefit (decreasing folate sensitive congenital anomalies; childhood morbidity) and minimizing potential maternal and childhood risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R.D. Wilson
- Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, FMC NT 435, 1403 29 St NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - D.L. O'Connor
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aboughalia H, Noda S, Chapman T, Revzin MV, Deutsch GH, Browd SR, Katz DS, Moshiri M. Multimodality Imaging Evaluation of Fetal Spine Anomalies with Postnatal Correlation. Radiographics 2021; 41:2176-2192. [PMID: 34723699 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021210066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Congenital anomalies of the spine are associated with substantial morbidity in the perinatal period and may affect the rest of the patient's life. Accurate early diagnosis of spinal abnormalities during fetal imaging allows prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal treatment planning, which can substantially affect functional outcomes. The most common and clinically relevant congenital anomalies of the spine fall into three broad categories: spinal dysraphism, segmentation and fusion anomalies of the vertebral column, and sacrococcygeal teratomas. Spinal dysraphism is further categorized into one of two subtypes: open spinal dysraphism and closed spinal dysraphism. The latter category is further subdivided into those with and without subcutaneous masses. Open spinal dysraphism is an emergency and must be closed at birth because of the risk of infection. In utero closure is also offered at some fetal centers. Sacrococcygeal teratomas are the most common fetal pelvic masses and the prognosis is variable. Finally, vertebral body anomalies are categorized into formation (butterfly and hemivertebrae) and segmentation (block vertebrae) anomalies. Although appropriate evaluation of the fetal spine begins with US, which is the initial screening modality of choice, MRI is increasingly important as a problem-solving tool, especially given the recent advances in fetal MRI, its availability, and the complexity of fetal interventions. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Aboughalia
- From the Departments of Radiology (H.A., S.N., T.C., M.M.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (G.H.D.), and Neurological Surgery (S.R.B.), University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195; Departments of Radiology (S.N., T.C.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (G.H.D.), and Neurological Surgery (S.R.B.), Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Wash; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (M.V.R.); and Department of Radiology, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.)
| | - Sakura Noda
- From the Departments of Radiology (H.A., S.N., T.C., M.M.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (G.H.D.), and Neurological Surgery (S.R.B.), University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195; Departments of Radiology (S.N., T.C.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (G.H.D.), and Neurological Surgery (S.R.B.), Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Wash; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (M.V.R.); and Department of Radiology, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.)
| | - Teresa Chapman
- From the Departments of Radiology (H.A., S.N., T.C., M.M.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (G.H.D.), and Neurological Surgery (S.R.B.), University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195; Departments of Radiology (S.N., T.C.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (G.H.D.), and Neurological Surgery (S.R.B.), Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Wash; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (M.V.R.); and Department of Radiology, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.)
| | - Margarita V Revzin
- From the Departments of Radiology (H.A., S.N., T.C., M.M.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (G.H.D.), and Neurological Surgery (S.R.B.), University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195; Departments of Radiology (S.N., T.C.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (G.H.D.), and Neurological Surgery (S.R.B.), Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Wash; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (M.V.R.); and Department of Radiology, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.)
| | - Gail H Deutsch
- From the Departments of Radiology (H.A., S.N., T.C., M.M.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (G.H.D.), and Neurological Surgery (S.R.B.), University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195; Departments of Radiology (S.N., T.C.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (G.H.D.), and Neurological Surgery (S.R.B.), Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Wash; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (M.V.R.); and Department of Radiology, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.)
| | - Samuel R Browd
- From the Departments of Radiology (H.A., S.N., T.C., M.M.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (G.H.D.), and Neurological Surgery (S.R.B.), University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195; Departments of Radiology (S.N., T.C.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (G.H.D.), and Neurological Surgery (S.R.B.), Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Wash; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (M.V.R.); and Department of Radiology, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.)
| | - Douglas S Katz
- From the Departments of Radiology (H.A., S.N., T.C., M.M.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (G.H.D.), and Neurological Surgery (S.R.B.), University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195; Departments of Radiology (S.N., T.C.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (G.H.D.), and Neurological Surgery (S.R.B.), Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Wash; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (M.V.R.); and Department of Radiology, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.)
| | - Mariam Moshiri
- From the Departments of Radiology (H.A., S.N., T.C., M.M.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (G.H.D.), and Neurological Surgery (S.R.B.), University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195; Departments of Radiology (S.N., T.C.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (G.H.D.), and Neurological Surgery (S.R.B.), Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Wash; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (M.V.R.); and Department of Radiology, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brown I, Rolnik DL, Fernando S, Menezes M, Ramkrishna J, da Silva Costa F, Meagher S. Ultrasound findings and detection of fetal abnormalities before 11 weeks of gestation. Prenat Diagn 2021; 41:1675-1684. [PMID: 34643279 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Revised: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the proportion of major fetal structural abnormalities that can be detected before 11 gestational weeks. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of individual patient files at a tertiary provider of obstetric and gynecological ultrasound in Melbourne, Australia. All women who had a pre-cell-free DNA ultrasound with a crown-rump length of less than 45 mm and had one or more ultrasounds at a later gestation were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was the incidence of a fetal structural abnormality. RESULTS A total of 3333 cases were included in the final analysis. Overall, 316 fetuses (9.5%) had a structural abnormality detected at any point throughout gestation, of which 86 were major structural abnormalities (2.6%). Sixteen fetal abnormalities were detected before 11 weeks of gestation, including 15 major abnormalities (17.4% of the major anomalies). All major fetal abnormalities detected before 11 gestational weeks were confirmed at later ultrasound examinations or the pregnancy did not continue (in four cases due to termination of pregnancy and in one case spontaneous miscarriage before first trimester morphology ultrasound). CONCLUSION Detection of fetal abnormalities is possible before 11 weeks of gestation. Early suspicion is more likely in cases of major structural abnormalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imogen Brown
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Women's and Newborn, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel Lorber Rolnik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Women's and Newborn, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Monash Ultrasound for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shavi Fernando
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Women's and Newborn, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melody Menezes
- Monash Ultrasound for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Fabricio da Silva Costa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital and School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Simon Meagher
- Monash Ultrasound for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aboughalia H, Bastawrous S, Revzin MV, Delaney SS, Katz DS, Moshiri M. Imaging findings in association with altered maternal alpha-fetoprotein levels during pregnancy. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:3239-3257. [PMID: 32221672 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02499-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein is a valuable laboratory test used in pregnant women as an indicator to detect certain clinical abnormalities. These can be grouped into four main categories: fetal factors, pregnancy complications, placental abnormalities, and maternal factors. Imaging is an invaluable tool to investigate the various etiologies leading to altered maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein. By reading this article, the radiologist, sonologist, or other health care practitioner should be able to define the probable pathology leading to the laboratory detected abnormal maternal serum levels, thus helping the clinician to appropriately manage the pregnancy and counsel the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Aboughalia
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sarah Bastawrous
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Radiology, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Margarita V Revzin
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Shani S Delaney
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Douglas S Katz
- Department of Radiology, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY, USA
| | - Mariam Moshiri
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|