Negative Predictive Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differentiating Avascular Solid-Appearing From Vascularized Masses: A Retrospective Consecutive Study

Contrast-enhanced US of the Liver and Kidney: A Problem-solving Modality

Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) has an important role as a supplement to CT or MRI in clinical practice. The main established utilizations are in the liver and the kidney. The primary advantages of CEUS compared with contrast-enhanced CT or MRI relate to its superior contrast resolution, real-time continuous scanning, pure intravascular nature, portability, and safety-especially in patients with renal impairment or CT or MRI contrast agent allergy. This article focuses on the use of CEUS in the liver and kidney.

Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in MR-guided focused ultrasound ablation on uterus fibroids: lesion selection and assessment of ablative effects

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) can be used for selecting lesions and assessing the ablative effects of MRgFUS ablation on uterus fibroids, compared with MR imaging.

METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of our hospital. From April 2018 to November 2019, a total of 44 symptomatic fibroids in 38 patients who underwent MRgFUS ablation were included. The association between pre-ablation characteristics on CEUS/MR imaging and the non-perfusion volume (NPV) after ablation was analyzed using multivariable linear regression analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve values was compared between the CEUS and MR imaging regression models. NPV after ablation was compared between CEUS and enhanced MR imaging.

RESULTS

On CEUS, entangled branch vessels, fast-in, and fast-out patterns were significantly associated with NPV, with an AUC of 0.95 (95% CI; 0.88, 1.00). On MR imaging, hyper-intensity on T2-weighted images (T2WI), hyper-intense ring-like signal on T2WI images, and hyper-enhancement on contrast-enhanced T1WI images were correlated with NPV, with an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI; 0.70, 1.00). After ablation, no differences in NPV were noted between contrast-enhanced T1WI (84.13 ± 75.42 cm³) and CEUS (80.22 ± 76.49 cm³).

CONCLUSIONS

Some pre-ablation characteristics of uterine fibroids on CEUS were associated with NPV after MRgFUS. CEUS may contribute to the evaluation of ablative outcomes and patient selection, similar to MR imaging.

KEY POINTS

• Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is effective for selecting the appropriate uterine fibroids before MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) ablation and evaluating non-perfusion volumes (NPV) after ablation, as a potential alternative to MR imaging. • Before ablation, entangled branch vessels, fast-in, and fast-out patterns on CEUS were significantly associated with NPV after MRgFUS. • No significant differences in NPV were detected between contrast-enhanced T1WI and CEUS after ablation.

The added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluation of indeterminate small solid renal masses and risk stratification of cystic renal lesions

OBJECTIVES

To investigate accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to characterize indeterminate small solid renal masses (sSRMs), excluding lipid-rich AMLs, and cystic renal masses (CRMs) according to the proposed Bosniak Classification 2019 MATERIALS AND METHODS: CEUS of pathology-proven CRMs and sSRMs (without definite enhancement or macroscopic fat on CT/MRI), and CRMs with ≥18 months follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Two radiologists blindly categorized CRMs according to new Bosniak Classification on CT/MRI. On CEUS, two other radiologists evaluated arterial-phase enhancement of sSRMs relative to renal cortex and categorized CRMs following new Bosniak Classification. Fisher's exact/chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables, and Cohen κ statistics for inter-observer agreement RESULTS: A total of 237 patients had 241 lesions: 161 pathology-proven sSRMs (122 malignant and 39 benign), 29 pathology-proven CRMs, 51 CRMs with adequate follow-up. Arterial-phase enhancement < renal cortex predicted malignancy with specificity of 97.4% (38/39) (CI 85.6-99.9%), and positive predictive value (PPV) of 98.2% (54/55) (CI 90.4-99.9%). Inter-observer kappa was 0.95. In pathology-proven CRMS, sensitivity of CEUS vs CT/MRI was 100% (15/15) (CI 79.6-100%) vs 60% (9/15) (CI 35.8-80.1%) (p value = .002) and negative predictive value (NPV) 100% (2/2) (CI 17.8-100%) vs 25% (2/8 ) (CI 4.4-59.1%) (p value < 0.0001), with similar specificity (50%) and PPV- 88.2% (15/17) (CI 65.7-97.9%) vs 81.8% (9/11) (CI 52.3-96.8%) ( p value = 0.586). Bosniak Classification inter-observer kappa was 0.92 for CEUS vs 0.68 for CT/MRI (p value = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, CEUS had high specificity and PPV to diagnose RCC in sSRMs excluding lipid-rich AML. CEUS had significantly higher sensitivity/NPV to diagnose malignancy in CRMs as compared to CT/MRI.

KEY POINTS

• Once lipid-rich AML is excluded by the other modalities, sSRM arterial phase hypo-enhancement relative to renal cortex on CEUS yielded high specificity (97.4%) and PPV (98.2%) to diagnose RCC. • When applying the proposed Bosniak Classification 2019, CEUS showed higher sensitivity compared to CT/MRI (100% vs 60%), p value=.0024, in the stratification of cystic renal masses to diagnose malignancy. • CEUS may reduce the number of CT/MRI Bosniak IIF lesions by assigning them to either II or III/IV categories.

Use of contrast ultrasound in differentiating thrombosed pseudoaneurysm from sarcoma, prior to surgery

We describe a case of a 69-year-old male with a right-sided popliteal mass following a motor vehicle accident 15 years ago. The mass was indeterminate via multiple modalities (magnetic resonance imaging, digital subtraction angiography, and vascular ultrasound) with biopsy requested prior to surgical removal to determine the appropriate surgical team – vascular versus sarcoma oncologic surgery. Contrast ultrasound was utilized to determine if biopsy was indicated and if so, to determine the most appropriate target. Contrast ultrasound showed no areas of enhancement, therefore biopsy was not performed and the patient safely proceeded to vascular surgery. Pathology confirmed the mass to be a thrombosed pseudoaneurysm of the popliteal artery. We present the benefits of using contrast ultrasound in the work up and diagnosis of a popliteal neoplasm versus suspected vascular complication.

Combination of CEUS and MRI for the diagnosis of periampullary space-occupying lesions: a retrospective analysis

Background

The value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and the combination of CEUS and MRI (CCWM) for the diagnosis of periampullary space-occupying lesions (PSOL) was investigated.

Methods

A total of 102 patients diagnosed with PSOLs by surgery or biopsy were recruited retrospectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of MRI, CEUS, and CCWM were analyzed.

Results

MRI, CEUS, and CCWM allowed for the accurate detection of 91.17, 92.15, and 99.01% of PSOLs, respectively. The specificity, PPV, and accuracy of CCWM were significantly different from MRI and CEUS (p < 0.05). However, there the sensitivity and NPV were not significantly different among the three diagnostic technologies. In addition, the specificity, PPV, and accuracy were not significantly different between MRI and CEUS (all p > 0.05).

Conclusions

CCWM is valuable for differentiating benign and malignant PSOL, which provides important guiding significances for the clinic.