1
|
Choueiki JM, Sales S, Callicott S, Ashman D, Worst K, Badillo A, Varda BK, Mayhew A, Xu TO, Levitt MA. Is Collaborative Care the Future of Medicine? Lessons Learned from the Care of Children with Colorectal Conditions. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 11:570. [PMID: 38790565 PMCID: PMC11119695 DOI: 10.3390/children11050570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
The treatment of patients with colorectal disorders requires care from a wide variety of medical and surgical specialties over the course of their lifetime. This is ideally handled by a collaborative center which facilitates the assessment and development of patient care among multiple specialties which can enhance the quality and implementation of treatment plans, improve communication among different specialties, decrease morbidity, and improve patient satisfaction and outcomes. This collaborative approach can serve as a model for other parts of medicine requiring a similar multi-disciplinary and integrated method of care delivery. We describe the process, as well as the lessons learned in developing such a program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marc A. Levitt
- Division of Colorectal and Pelvic Reconstruction, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC 20010, USA; (J.M.C.); (S.S.); (S.C.); (D.A.); (K.W.); (A.B.); (B.K.V.); (T.O.X.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Patient driven change: Is collaborative care the future of medicine? Lessons learned from the care of children with colorectal problems. J Pediatr Surg 2023; 58:189-197. [PMID: 36418202 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
A basic premise in the care of complex patients is that experience, increased volume of cases, and an integrated, multi-disciplinary approach yields improved outcomes. Is this true using the example of the care of children with colorectal and pelvic reconstructive needs? This review gives a brief historical context on how care for this patient group evolved, delineates the key elements to create a collaborative care model, and describes multiple advances that have been developed, based on the model, which have improved patient care and quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Review.
Collapse
|
3
|
Imaging of anorectal malformations: where are we now? Abdominal imaging task force of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology. Pediatr Radiol 2022; 52:1802-1809. [PMID: 35648164 PMCID: PMC9360087 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-022-05395-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
Anorectal and cloacal malformations are a broad mix of congenital abnormalities related to the distal rectum and anus. Confusion exists between all the forms in this large and heterogeneous group. The spectrum includes everything from anal stenosis, ventral anus, anal atresia (with and without fistula) and the full spectrum of cloacal malformations. Imaging in these conditions is done through the whole armamentarium of radiologic modalities, with very different imaging strategies seen across the centres where these conditions are managed. In 2017, the European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) abdominal imaging task force issued recommendations on the imaging algorithm and standards for imaging anorectal malformations. This was followed by further letters and clarifications together with an active multispecialty session on the different imaging modalities for anorectal malformations at the 2018 ESPR meeting in Berlin. Through this paper, the abdominal task force updates its guidelines and recommended imaging algorithm for anorectal malformations.
Collapse
|
4
|
Contrast-enhanced genitosonography and colosonography: emerging alternatives to fluoroscopy. Pediatr Radiol 2021; 51:2387-2395. [PMID: 33978789 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-020-04770-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Imaging plays a crucial role in evaluating newborns and infants with cloacal and urogenital malformations. Contrast-enhanced genitosonography (ceGS) and contrast-enhanced colosonography (ceCS) are sensitive and radiation-free alternatives to fluoroscopic genitography and colography for diagnosis and surgical planning. These imaging techniques are performed by instilling a US contrast agent into specific body cavities to define the genitourinary and colorectal anatomy. This review article presents the experience with ceGS and ceCS applications in children, focusing on the background, examination technique, and interpretation of imaging findings, as well as strengths and weaknesses compared to conventional techniques.
Collapse
|
5
|
Hwang M, Back SJ, Didier RA, Lorenz N, Morgan TA, Poznick L, Steffgen L, Sridharan A. Pediatric contrast-enhanced ultrasound: optimization of techniques and dosing. Pediatr Radiol 2021; 51:2147-2160. [PMID: 32955599 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-020-04812-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
When performing contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), ultrasound (US) scanner settings, examination technique, and contrast agent dose and administration must be optimized to ensure that high-quality, diagnostic and reproducible images are acquired for qualitative and quantitative interpretations. When carrying out CEUS in children, examination settings should be tailored to their body size and specific indications, similar to B-mode US. This review article details the basic background knowledge that is needed to perform CEUS optimally in children, including considerations related to US scanner settings and US contrast agent dose selection and administration techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misun Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. .,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Susan J Back
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ryne A Didier
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Norbert Lorenz
- Children's Hospital, Dresden Municipal Hospital, Teaching-Hospital of Technical University, Dresden, Germany
| | - Trudy A Morgan
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Laura Poznick
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Ludwig Steffgen
- Trainings-Zentrum Ultraschall-Diagnostik LS GmbH, Mainleus, Germany
| | - Anush Sridharan
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ntoulia A, Anupindi SA, Back SJ, Didier RA, Hwang M, Johnson AM, McCarville MB, Papadopoulou F, Piskunowicz M, Sellars ME, Darge K. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a comprehensive review of safety in children. Pediatr Radiol 2021; 51:2161-2180. [PMID: 34716453 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-021-05223-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been increasingly used in pediatric radiology practice worldwide. For nearly two decades, CEUS applications have been performed with the off-label use of gas-containing second-generation ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs). Since 2016, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the UCA Lumason for three pediatric indications: the evaluation of focal liver lesions and echocardiography via intravenous administration and the assessment of vesicoureteral reflux via intravesical application (contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography, ceVUS). Prior to the FDA approval of Lumason, numerous studies with the use of second-generation UCAs had been conducted in adults and children. Comprehensive protocols for clinical safety evaluations have demonstrated the highly favorable safety profile of UCA for intravenous, intravesical and other intracavitary uses. The safety data on CEUS continue to accumulate as this imaging modality is increasingly utilized in clinical settings worldwide. As of August 2021, 57 pediatric-only original research studies encompassing a total of 4,518 children with 4,906 intravenous CEUS examinations had been published. As in adults, there were a few adverse events; the majority of these were non-serious, although very rarely serious anaphylactic reactions were reported. In the published pediatric-only intravenous CEUS studies included in our analysis, the overall incidence rate of serious adverse events was 0.22% (10/4,518) of children and 0.20% (10/4,906) of all CEUS examinations. Non-serious adverse events from the intravenous CEUS were observed in 1.20% (54/4,518) of children and 1.10% (54/4,906) of CEUS examinations. During the same time period, 31 studies with the intravesical use of UCA were conducted in 12,362 children. A few non-serious adverse events were encountered (0.31%; 38/12,362), but these were most likely attributable to the bladder catheterization rather than the UCA. Other developing clinical applications of UCA in children, including intracavitary and intralymphatic, are ongoing. To date, no serious adverse events have been reported with these applications. This article reviews the existing pediatric CEUS literature and provides an overview of safety-related information reported from UCA uses in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aikaterini Ntoulia
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Sudha A Anupindi
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Susan J Back
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ryne A Didier
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Misun Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ann M Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - M Beth McCarville
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | | | - Maria E Sellars
- Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Kassa Darge
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Barnewolt CE, Acharya PT, Aguirre Pascual E, Back SJ, Beltrán Salazar VP, Chan PKJ, Chow JS, Coca Robinot D, Darge K, Duran C, Ključevšek D, Kwon JK, Ntoulia A, Papadopoulou F, Woźniak MM, Piskunowicz M. Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography part 2: urethral imaging. Pediatr Radiol 2021; 51:2368-2386. [PMID: 34386854 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-021-05116-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Ultrasound (US) has been increasingly used as an important imaging tool to assess the urethra in children. The earliest reports of pediatric urethral sonography involved imaging the urethra in a non-voiding state, during physiological voiding of urine, and after instillation of saline. The introduction of US contrast agents has continued to improve visualization of urethral anatomy. Contrast-enhanced US of the urethra can be performed during the voiding phase of a standard contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) exam or with retrograde instillation of a contrast agent, depending on the exam indication. Both techniques are well tolerated by children and provide accurate information about urethral pathology and periurethral soft tissues. This article reviews the technical aspects and imaging findings of urethral pathologies in children using contrast-enhanced US, both by the voiding and retrograde instillation techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol E Barnewolt
- Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard University, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Patricia T Acharya
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Susan J Back
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Vivian P Beltrán Salazar
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pui Kwan Joyce Chan
- Department of Radiology, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Hong Kong (SAR), People's Republic of China
| | - Jeanne S Chow
- Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard University, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - David Coca Robinot
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Kassa Darge
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Carmina Duran
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Damjana Ključevšek
- Department of Radiology, University Children's Hospital Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Jeannie K Kwon
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Aikaterini Ntoulia
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Magdalena M Woźniak
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lacher M, Badillo A, Vilanova-Sánchez A, Rentea RM, Gosemann JH, Levitt MA. Laparoscopic Approach in Anorectal Malformations: How We Do It. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021; 31:1200-1208. [PMID: 34551270 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2021.0422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopy has a major role in the treatment of anorectal malformations (ARM) since Georgeson et al. introduced the laparoscopic assisted anorectoplasty in 2000. The majority of ARM can be repaired through a posterior sagittal incision without the need to enter the abdomen. Some ARM types require an abdominal approach to detach the rectum from the urinary tract in males or the vagina in females. Those malformations benefit from laparoscopy. In this article, we aimed to highlight the technical aspects relevant to the current laparoscopic repair of ARM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Lacher
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andrea Badillo
- Division of Colorectal and Pelvic Reconstruction, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Alejandra Vilanova-Sánchez
- Urogenital and Colorectal Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rebecca M Rentea
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Comprehensive Colorectal Center, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Marc A Levitt
- Division of Colorectal and Pelvic Reconstruction, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tirrell TF, McNamara ER, Dickie BH. Reoperative surgery in anorectal malformation patients. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6:43. [PMID: 34423164 PMCID: PMC8343547 DOI: 10.21037/tgh-20-214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently accepted primary repair of congenital anorectal malformations (ARMs) includes a posterior sagittal incision, which allows for optimal visualization and identification of important pelvic structures and anatomical features. Reconstructive surgery involves meticulous dissection and separation of pelvic structures, and careful reconstruction can result in good functional outcomes for many patients, who live without ongoing sequelae from their malformation. However, some patients may require reoperative procedures for anatomic or functional reasons. Males and females present with slightly different symptoms and should be approached differently. Males are most likely to require reoperations for anorectal or urethral pathologies, but the urinary system is often spared in females-they instead must contend with Mullerian duct anomalies, of which there are many varieties. Depending on the original malformation and severity of symptoms, redo surgery may be needed to optimize function and quality of life. Surgical management with reoperative surgery in ARMs ranges from straightforward to complex, depending on the issue. One must weigh the risks of reoperative surgery and potentially creating more scarring against the need for a better anatomical and functional outcome. Current management trends and practice patterns with regards to reoperative surgery in ARM patients are not widely studied or standardized but we provide an overview of the more common pathologies, preoperative evaluation and workup required to identify the issues, and options for reoperative repair in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Erin R McNamara
- Department of Urology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Belinda H Dickie
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rentea RM, Badillo AT, Hosie S, Sutcliffe JR, Dickie B. Lasting impact on children with an anorectal malformations with proper surgical preparation, respect for anatomic principles, and precise surgical management. Semin Pediatr Surg 2020; 29:150986. [PMID: 33288132 DOI: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2020.150986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Optimal outcomes in the management of children with Anorectal Malformation (ARM) require careful surgical preparation and detailed understanding of the anatomic principles and operative setup. A clear understanding of operative anatomy and surgical principals guides decision making. Adherence to the principles of ARM repair, as well as the application of operative and imaging adjuncts, will yield the safest and most successful approach to ARM. In this review, we detail the surgical preparation, anatomic principles, and surgical management issues unique to ARM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca M Rentea
- Comprehensive Colorectal Center, Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.
| | - Andrea T Badillo
- Divisions of Pediatric Surgery and Colorectal and Pelvic Reconstruction, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Stuart Hosie
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Stadtisches Kinikum Munchen GmBH, Munich, Germany
| | - Jonathan R Sutcliffe
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, United Kingdom
| | - Belinda Dickie
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ključevšek D, Riccabona M, Ording Müller LS, Woźniak MM, Franchi-Abella S, Darge K, Mentzel HJ, Ntoulia A, Avni FE, Napolitano M, Lobo L, Littooij AS, Augdal TA, Bruno C, Damasio BM, Ibe D, Stafrace S, Petit P. Intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in children: review with procedural recommendations and clinical applications from the European Society of Paediatric Radiology abdominal imaging task force. Pediatr Radiol 2020; 50:596-606. [PMID: 32055916 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-019-04611-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2019] [Revised: 11/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (US) has become an important supplementary tool in many clinical applications in children. Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography and intravenous US contrast agents have proved useful in routine clinical practice. Other applications of intracavitary contrast-enhanced US, particularly in children, have not been widely investigated but could serve as a practical and radiation-free problem-solver in several clinical settings. Intracavitary contrast-enhanced US is a real-time imaging modality similar to fluoroscopy with iodinated contrast agent. The US contrast agent solution is administered into physiological or non-physiological body cavities. There is no definitive list of established indications for intracavitary US contrast agent application. However, intracavitary contrast-enhanced US can be used for many clinical applications. It offers excellent real-time spatial resolution and allows for a more accurate delineation of the cavity anatomy, including the internal architecture of complex collections and possible communications within the cavity or with the surrounding structures through fistulous tracts. It can provide valuable information related to the insertion of catheters and tubes, and identify related complications such as confirming the position and patency of a catheter and identifying causes for drainage dysfunction or leakage. Patency of the ureter and biliary ducts can be evaluated, too. US contrast agent solution can be administered orally or a via nasogastric tube, or as an enema to evaluate the gastrointestinal tract. In this review we present potential clinical applications and procedural and dose recommendations regarding intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damjana Ključevšek
- Department of Radiology, University Children's Hospital,, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Bohoričeva 20, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| | - Michael Riccabona
- Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital LKH Graz and Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Lil-Sofie Ording Müller
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Paediatric Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Stéphanie Franchi-Abella
- Service de Radiopédiatrie, Hôpital Bicêtre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Kassa Darge
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hans-Joachim Mentzel
- Section of Pediatric Radiology, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology,, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | | | - Fred Efraim Avni
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Jeanne de Flandre Hospital,, Lille University Hospitals, Lille, France
| | - Marcello Napolitano
- Department of Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology,, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luisa Lobo
- Department of Radiology, Hospital de Santa Maria-CHLN, University Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Annemieke Simone Littooij
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology,, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital Utrecht/UMCU, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Costanza Bruno
- Radiology Institute, Department of Radiology, AOUI, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Donald Ibe
- Radiology Department, Silhouette Diagnostic Consultants,, Wuse 2, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Samuel Stafrace
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
| | - Philippe Petit
- Service d'Imagerie Pédiatrique et Prénatale, Hôpital Timone Enfants, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chow JS, Paltiel HJ, Padua HM, McNamara E, Dickie BH. Case series: Comparison of contrast-enhanced genitosonography (ceGS) to fluoroscopy and cone-beam computed tomography in patients with urogenital sinus and the cloacal malformation. Clin Imaging 2019; 60:204-208. [PMID: 31927495 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Revised: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In this case series, contrast enhanced genitosonography is compared to genitography performed using fluoroscopy and cone-beam computed tomography in patients with urogenital sinus and the cloacal malformation. The method of contrast enhanced genitosonography is described, including contrast preparation, contrast administration, ultrasound imaging approaches, as well as the benefits and potential pitfalls of this technique compared to fluoroscopy and computed tomography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne S Chow
- Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|