Value of Perfusion Parameters for Differentiating Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Metastasis With Hypervascularity and a Normal Hepatic Background on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging

Microbubble-Assisted Ultrasound for Imaging and Therapy of Melanoma Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review

Recent technological developments in ultrasound (US) imaging and ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) have improved diagnostic confidence in echography. In the clinical management of melanoma, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging complements conventional US imaging (i.e., high-resolution US and Doppler imaging) for clinical examination and therapeutic follow-up. These developments have set into motion the combined use of ultrasound and UCAs as a new modality for drug delivery. This modality, called sonoporation, has emerged as a non-invasive, targeted and safe method for the delivery of therapeutic drugs into melanoma. This review focuses on the results and prospects of using US and UCAs as dual modalities for CEUS imaging and melanoma treatment.

Imaging Diagnosis of HCC: Future directions with special emphasis on hepatobiliary MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a unique cancer entity that can be noninvasively diagnosed using imaging modalities without pathologic confirmation. In 2018, several major guidelines for HCC were updated to include hepatobiliary contrast agent magnetic resonance imaging (HBA-MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as major imaging modalities for HCC diagnosis. HBA-MRI enables the achievement of high sensitivity in HCC detection using the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). CEUS is another imaging modality with real-time imaging capability, and it is reported to be useful as a second-line modality to increase sensitivity without losing specificity for HCC diagnosis. However, until now, there is an unsolved discrepancy among guidelines on whether to accept “HBP hypointensity” as a definite diagnostic criterion for HCC or include CEUS in the diagnostic algorithm for HCC diagnosis. Furthermore, there is variability in terminology and inconsistencies in the definition of imaging findings among guidelines; therefore, there is an unmet need for the development of a standardized lexicon. In this article, we review the performance and limitations of HBA-MRI and CEUS after guideline updates in 2018 and briefly introduce some future aspects of imaging-based HCC diagnosis.

Diagnostic role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography versus conventional B-mode ultrasonography in cirrhotic patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study

Background

Early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is very important for the prognosis of patients. However, there are very few studies that compared the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and B-mode ultrasonography for early HCC in cirrhotic patients.

Methods

This retrospective study included cirrhotic patients, who were suspected of early HCC between January 2020 and June 2021. The diagnosis of patients was based on the pathology results of surgery or biopsy. Demographic and clinical characteristics of included patients were recorded. The diagnoses of suspected lesions using both types of ultrasonography were recorded, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of early HCC in cirrhotic patients were calculated.

Results

Eventually, 137 patients with solitary lesions in the liver were included in this study, including 89 patients diagnosed with HCC and 48 patients diagnosed with non-HCC. The median diameter of suspected lesions was 26 mm, and the median level of alpha fetoprotein (AFP) was 37.2 ng/mL. When comparing the demographic and clinical characteristics of cirrhotic patients with HCC and non-HCC, it was found that patients with HCC had significantly higher levels of AFP than those with non-HCC (P=0.03). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of CEUS in early HCC were 73%, 93.8%, 95.6%, 65.2% and 80.3%, respectively. In CEUS, all of these parameters were much higher than those in B-mode ultrasonography, i.e., 64%, 75%, 82.6%, 52.9%, and 67.9%. It was also found that the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS was much higher than that of B-mode ultrasonography especially regarding lesions <20 mm. To further improve the sensitivity of CEUS in early HCC, AFP was combined with CEUS for the diagnosis of early HCC. As a result, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of CEUS combined with AFP level were 83.1%, 87.5%, 92.5%, 73.7%, and 84.7%, respectively.

Conclusions

Our study confirmed that CEUS' diagnostic accuracy for early HCC in cirrhotic patients was significantly higher than that of B-mode ultrasonography. However, the sensitivity of CEUS needs to be improved further, and the combination of CEUS and AFP level may be a potential solution.

The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma compared to histopathology; a retrospective single-center analysis of 119 patients1

BACKGROUND

HCC as the 6th most common tumor entity with the fourth highest mortality and an increasing prevalence especially due to today's lifestyle acquires a high attention in the clinical setting. Beside CECT and CEMRI, CEUS depicts a dynamic, low-risk and radiation free imaging method that finds its use mainly in screening and active surveillance programs.

PURPOSE

The aim of the retrospective study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of CEUS in correlation to pathologic findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2004 and 2018 a total number of 119 patients were included in this retrospective single-center study. Every patient underwent CEUS in addition to a native B-mode and Color-Doppler scan. After given informed consent SonoVue® (Bracco, Milan, Italy), a second-generation blood-pool agent, was used as contrast medium. Every examination was performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist (EFSUMB level 3). A low mechanical index (MI) of <0,2 was chosen to obtain a good imaging quality.

RESULTS

All 119 included patients received CEUS followed by a liver biopsy for inter-modality comparison. In correlation to the pathology results, CEUS showed a diagnostic sensitivity of 96,6%, a specificity of 63,9%, a PPV of 86,7% and a NPV of 88,5% by detecting liver lesions suspicious for HCC. According to the Cohen's Kappa coefficient (k = 0,659) CEUS shows a strong inter-modality agreement in comparison to the histopathological finding.

CONCLUSION

With a high sensitivity and a strong cross-modality comparability to histopathology, the CEUS is highly effective in the detection of suspicious HCC lesions.

Characteristics of hepatic solitary necrotic nodules on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

Background

To summarize the characteristics of solitary necrotic nodules (SNN) in the liver observed under contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS).

Methods

Conventional ultrasonography (US) and CEUS were performed in 24 patients who were confirmed to have SNN by pathological assessment. The US data and dynamic enhancement patterns of CEUS were recorded and retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Ten of 24 patients underwent surgical resection, while the other 14 patients underwent a puncture biopsy to be confirmed as SNN. Among the 24 patients, 13 patients had a single lesion and 11 patients had multiple lesions. The largest lesion was selected for CEUS examination for patients with multiple lesions. Eleven patients presented no enhancement in all three phases, while the other 13 patients presented with a peripheral thin rim-like enhancement in the arterial phase, an iso-enhancement in the portal phase and delayed phase. However, no enhancement in the interior of the lesions was detected during three phases of CEUS.

Conclusions

SNN has characteristic findings on the CEUS, which play an important role in the differential diagnoses of liver focal lesions.

Hepatic Angiomyolipoma: Clinical Features and Imaging Findings of Quantitative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Perfusion Analysis and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) analysis and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can differentiate hepatic angiomyolipoma (AML) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and hepatic epithelial angiomyolipoma (EAML) from nonepithelial AML.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 26 CEUS lesions pathologically confirmed as AML and 60 patients with confirmed HCC. Clinical and ultrasound (US) features of AML versus HCC and EAML versus nonepithelial AML were analyzed. Quantitative parameters, including arrival time, ascending slope, time to peak, peak intensity (PI), fall time (FT), and mean transit time (MTT), were analyzed. Diagnostic performance of MRI and CEUS was compared.

RESULTS

Angiomyolipoma was significantly different from HCC in US findings of solitary tumor (P < .001), well-defined border (P = .025), and hyperechogenicity (P < .001). Tumor types were significantly different in US findings of centripetal filling pattern (P < .001), less hypoenhancement in the CEUS delayed phase (P = .04), high PI (P = .007) and ascending slope (P = .006), and short FT (P = .001) and MTT (P < .05). The sensitivity and specificity of quantitative parameters were 61.5% to 96.2% and 55.0% to 71.7% (area under the curve, 0.642-0.773). An early draining vein and tumor vessels, intratumor fat, absence of pseudocapsules, mild signal intensity on diffusion-weighted imaging, and hypointensity in the MRI delayed phase were helpful for differentiation of AML from HCC (P < .05). The positive predictive values of CEUS and MRI were 46.3% to 100% and 42.9% to 75%, with no significant difference (P > .05). Epithelial AML was more likely to be hypoechoic with a centripetal filling pattern than nonepithelial AML (P < .05). The MTT and FT of EAML were shorter than those of nonepithelial AML (P < .05). The PI of EAML was significantly stronger than that of nonepithelial AML (P < .01). The sensitivity and specificity of quantitative parameters were 68.7% to 100.0% and 60.0% to 100.0% (area under the curve, 0.825-0.941). Less intratumor fat was helpful for differentiation of EAML from nonepithelial AML (P < .05). The positive predictive values of CEUS and MRI were 77.8% to 100% and 85.7%, with a significant difference (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative CEUS findings could be valuable in differentiating EAML from HCC.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Findings and Differential Diagnosis of Hepatic Epithelioid Angiomyolipoma Compared with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma (EAML) has malignant potential that can easily be misdiagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the treatment options of these conditions are different. This retrospective study investigated whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can differentiate EAML from HCC. We included 24 patients with pathologically confirmed EAML and 36 patients with HCC who underwent pre-operative conventional ultrasound and CEUS. The conventional ultrasound and CEUS features of the two groups were analyzed. Time intensity curves (TICs) were analyzed for all lesions using quantitative perfusion analysis software. This study found that significant differences existed between the EAML and HCC groups in terms of clinical features such as sex, age, symptoms, alpha-fetoprotein and history of hepatitis B virus infection (p < 0.05). Tumor size, number, border and echogenicity on conventional ultrasound were significantly different between EAML and HCC (p < 0.05). Regarding CEUS, EAML was more likely to have a centripetal enhancement pattern than HCC (p < 0.05). The tumor enhancement degree in the delayed phase in CEUS was significantly different between EAML and HCC (p < 0.05). Quantitative analysis of CEUS parameters revealed that the wash-in area under the curve (AUC) was larger in EAML than in HCC (p < 0.05). Time to peak was significantly shorter in EAML than in HCC (p < 0.05). The peak intensity was significantly stronger in EAML than in HCC (p < 0.05). Regarding the diagnostic performance of CEUS parameters that showed statistical significance on univariate analysis, the sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing EAML from HCC was 66.7%-100.0% and 55.6%-91.7%, respectively. Overall, CEUS could be valuable in differentiating EAML from HCC. Specific features such as the centripetal filling and prolonged enhancement patterns on CEUS, higher peak intensity, bigger wash-in AUC and shorter time to peak on TICs may contribute to a more confirmative differential diagnosis of EAML.