Comparison of the Ablation and Hyperechoic Zones in Different Tissues Using Microwave and Radio Frequency Ablation

Low temperature plasma ablation device for minimally invasive surgery

This study introduces the design principle of a high-frequency square wave power supply, as well as the simulation and design process of a minimally invasive electrosurgical scalpel, which formed the low temperature plasma in saline solution. In order to verify the performance of the device, saline discharge experiments and pork ablation experiments were performed. An alternating high-frequency square-wave voltage was applied between coaxial double-layer electrodes with a spacing of 400 µm. The waveforms and amplitude of output voltage and current, conductance between electrodes, and output power were measured in saline discharge experiments. The results of pork ablation experiments with different power sources demonstrate that the device can generate low-temperature plasma for ablation rather than relying on thermal effects. The device can ablate pork under the driving of a 10 V, 100 kHz square wave voltage. In addition, the ablation speed and area will be greater with an increase in voltage or frequency.

Can the Entire Ablative Hyperechoic Zone be Regarded as a Necrotic Lesion After Radiofrequency Ablation of the Liver?

Developments in image fusion technology made it possible to visualize the ablative margin on ultrasound (US). The purpose of the present study was to assess the ablative area of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma and compare it with the ablative hyperechoic zone with a non-enhanced area on contrast-enhanced US/contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CEUS/CECT) in the same cross-section. This retrospective study included 25 patients with 27 hepatocellular carcinomas. The long and short dimensions of the ablative hyperechoic zone were measured using B-mode US, and those of the non-enhanced area were assessed with CEUS/CECT on the same cross-section measured with B-mode US, using image fusion techniques. The technical effectiveness of ablation with an adequate ablative margin in a single session was determined in all patients. The long and short dimensions of the ablative hyperechoic zone ranged between 15.0 and 40.7 mm (mean: 27.3 ± 6.9 mm) and between 14.0 and 33.0 mm (mean: 23.3 ± 5.8 mm), respectively. R values for the long and short dimensions were 0.99 and 0.98, respectively, between B-mode US and CEUS, and 0.96 and 0.92, respectively, between B-mode US and CECT. The ablative hyperechoic zone may be regarded as a necrotic lesion after radiofrequency ablation.

How large is the periablational zone after radiofrequency and microwave ablation? Computer-based comparative study of two currently used clinical devices

Purpose:

To compare the size of the coagulation (CZ) and periablational (PZ) zones created with two commercially available devices in clinical use for radiofrequency (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), respectively.

Methods:

Computer models were used to simulate RFA with a 3-cm Cool-tip applicator and MWA with an Amica-Gen applicator. The Arrhenius model was used to compute the damage index (Ω). CZ was considered when Ω> 4.6 (>99% of damaged cells). Regions with 0.6<Ω< 2.1 were considered as the PZ (tissue that has undergone moderate sub-ablative hyperthermia). The ratio of PZ volume to CZ volume (PZ/CZ) was regarded as a measure of performance, since a low value implies achieving a large CZ while keeping the PZ small.

Results:

Ten-min RFA (51 W) created smaller periablational zones than 10-min MWA (11.3 cm³ vs. 17.2 22.9 cm³, for 60 100 W MWA, respectively). Prolonging duration from 5 to 10 min increased the PZ in MWA more than in RFA (2.7 cm³ for RFA vs. 8.3–11.9 cm³ for 60–100 W MWA, respectively). PZ/CZ for RFA were relatively high (65–69%), regardless of ablation time, while those for MWA were highly dependent on the duration (increase of up to 25% between 5 and 10 min) and on the applied power (smaller values as power was raised, 102% for 60 W vs. 81% for 100 W, both for 10 min). The lowest PZ/CZ across all settings was 56%, obtained with 100 W-5 min MWA.

Conclusions:

Although RFA creates smaller periablational zones than MWA, 100 W-5 min MWA provides the lowest PZ/CZ.