Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography for the Diagnosis of Tubal Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

[Pregnancy after intrauterine insemination following hysterosalpingo-foam-sonography or hysterosalpingography]

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination performed after hysterosalpingography (HSG) or hysterosalpingo-foam-sonography (HyFoSy).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study including 242 intrauterine insemination (IUI) performed between 2015 and 2020 at the fertility center of the Reunion Island. Among these inseminations, 121 with previous HSG and 121 with previous HyFoSy were matched. The main outcome of interest was clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes were birth rate and time to pregnancy after tubal patency test.

RESULTS

The pregnancy rate after insemination was 9.9% for the HSG group and 11.6% for the HyFoSy group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (P=0.66). The live birth rate was similar in the two groups (7.4% for HSG and 10.7% for HyFoSy; P=0.37). Over half (57.1%) of the pregnancies occurred within 6 months after HyFoSy, whereas only 8.3% after HSG.

CONCLUSION

IUI results are not influenced by HyFoSy compared to HSG with regard to the pregnancy rates. Use of HyFoSy in infertility assessment allows global evaluation and more rapid adapted management. This approach could optimize management of patients undergoing IUI.

Diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography for assessment of fallopian tube patency in infertile women

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy), using two-dimensional ultrasound in tubal patency assessment in infertile women compared with laparoscopy with dye chromotubation?

DESIGN

This prospective study was conducted at My Duc Hospital, Vietnam. Infertile women aged 18 years or older, who were scheduled for laparoscopy, were included. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for perception of pain during HyFoSy was used. Laparoscopy was carried out on the same day. Clinicians undertaking laparoscopy were blinded to HyFoSy results. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A sample size of 455 women (n = 910 fallopian tubes) was needed to demonstrate a fluctuation hypothesis, not exceeding 6%, for sensitivity and specificity (power 0.80, two-sided alpha 5%, loss to follow-up 5%).

RESULTS

Between 2019 and 2022, 455 participants were recruited. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography was unsuccessfully carried out in six participants. Two withdrew their consent. Data analysis was conducted on the remaining 447 participants (n = 868 fallopian tubes). The sensitivity and specificity of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography compared with laparoscopy were 0.75 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.79) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.74), respectively. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography gave a positive predictive value of 0.76 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.80) and negative predictive value of 0.68 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.73). A total of 42.8% of women reported a VAS score of no pain. No adverse event was reported.

CONCLUSION

Compared with laparoscopy with dye chromotubation, two-dimensional HyFoSy is a well-tolerated, reliable technique for assessing tubal patency.

Diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingo-lidocaine-foam sonography combined with power Doppler (HyLiFoSy-PD) compared to laparoscopy and dye testing in tubal patency assessment in cases of infertility

Background

Tubal patency testing is an essential part of female subfertility evaluation. Hysterosalpingogram is less invasive and less expensive compared to laparoscopy and dye testing (LDT), i.e., laparoscopic chromopertubation. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) uses commercial echogenic gel foam that is easily visible on ultrasound to assess the tubes. It offers a safer and less painful alternative to HSG, with no radiation exposure. Hysterosalpingo-lidocaine-foam sonography with power Doppler (HyLiFoSy-PD) uses lidocaine-made gel foam as a contrast medium. It was postulated to as to be less painful and easier to detect on ultrasound, compared with hysterosalpingo-foam sonography using other contrast media and that it can also be used whenever the commercial gel used with HyFoSy is not available or is relatively expensive.

Methodology

This prospective diagnostic accuracy study was carried out between February 2018 and 2020 at the Cairo Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cairo University. One hundred twenty-two infertile patients, who were already scheduled for LDT as a part of their infertility work-up, were consecutively recruited for this study. The HyLiFoSy-PD (index test) was performed 1 week before the scheduled LDT for these patients. Using an intrauterine pediatric Folley’s balloon catheter, 20 ml of lidocaine-made gel foam was slowly infused intrauterine, while observing their flow in both fallopian tubes using a grayscale and power Doppler transvaginal two-dimensional ultrasound system. All patients then underwent LDT (reference test). The results of HyLiFoSy-PD were compared with those of LDT to determine the accuracy of HyLiFoSy-PD in tubal patency assessment. We also assessed the procedure duration, associated pain, and other complications.

Results

Comparing HyLiFoSy-PD with LDT in the 115 patients who completed the procedure, results showed 98.1% sensitivity, 90% specificity, 99% positive predictive value, 81.8% negative predictive value, 9.81 positive likelihood ratio, 0.02 negative likelihood ration, and 97.4% overall accuracy in the assessment of tubal patency (odds ratio = 463.5 with confidence interval = 79.39–2706; P-value: 0.687). The median procedure duration was 11 min. All patients experienced some degree of pain during the procedure with 91 patients (79%) reported mild pain and 24 patients (21%) reported moderate pain.

Conclusion

HyLiFoSy-PD was found to be an accurate tool in tubal patency assessment. It was also found to be safe and well-tolerated.