Reliability of Performing Multiparametric Ultrasound in Adult Livers

The Effect of Backscatter Anisotropy in Assessing Hepatic Steatosis Using Ultrasound Hepatorenal Index

OBJECTIVES

To discuss challenges in assessing hepatic steatosis using ultrasound hepatorenal index (HRI).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed HRI and liver magnetic resonance imaging-based proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) in 134 adult participants (53 men and 81 women, mean age 55 years). The diagnostic performance of HRI for determining hepatic steatosis was tested by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) using liver MRI-PDFF as the reference. Regression plots were employed to compare the sampling sites in liver and kidney that were used to calculate HRIs.

RESULTS

In 11 of 134 cases (8.2%), we failed to acquire HRI measurements. In the remaining 123 cases, AUROC for HRI (cutoff: 1.69 ± 0.13 [mean ± standard deviation]) for defining the HRI threshold for diagnosing hepatic steatosis was 0.83. In 60 of 123 cases (49%) with HRI measurement IQR/median >0.3, slopes of the regression lines in the liver showed backscatter intensity changes consistent with signal attenuation. However, in the kidney, the backscatter intensity was inverted yielding position-dependent HRI cutoff values, mid-pole = 2.24 ± 0.20 and upper pole = 1.08 ± 0.16.

CONCLUSIONS

HRI is used to estimate liver steatosis based on backscattered ultrasound. In order to compensate for effects such as body habitus and transducer frequency, the liver backscatter is divided by backscatter from a corresponding region at the same depth in the right renal cortex. Theoretically, this compensation should make HRI sampling position independent. Yet, due to renal cortical backscatter anisotropy, this compensation method does not work in general, potentially producing inaccurate liver fat estimates.

Shear Wave Dispersion Elastography in ALD and MASLD: Comparative Pathophysiology and Clinical Potential-A Narrative Review

Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is a major cause of global morbidity and mortality, progressing from steatosis to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. While liver biopsy remains the gold standard for identifying liver disease, non-invasive methods like shear wave dispersion (SWD) elastography offer promising alternatives. This scoping review evaluates SWD's potential in the study of ALD, comparing it to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). SWD measures changes in shear wave speed in relation to liver viscosity and necroinflammation. Studies in MASLD suggest that SWD effectively correlates with fibrosis and inflammation stages, but its application in ALD remains underexplored. Both ALD and MASLD show similar inflammatory and fibrotic pathways, despite having different etiologies and histological features. This review emphasizes the necessity to identify ALD-specific SWD reference values and verify SWD's ability to improve diagnosis and disease progression. Prospective studies comparing SWD findings with histological benchmarks in ALD are essential for establishing its clinical utility. Incorporating SWD into clinical practice could revolutionize the non-invasive evaluation of ALD, offering a safer, cost-effective, and repeatable diagnostic tool.

Ultrasound normalized local variance to assess metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

PURPOSE

Increased prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) highlights a desire for screening with liver ultrasound normalized local variance (NLV). We aimed to assess variations in NLV values measured at different sampling depths and discuss common technical considerations in measuring liver NLV.

METHODS

We retrospectively measured liver NLVs at variable depths on ultrasound images pre-recorded in 116 participants who underwent liver magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) and ultrasound to screen for MASLD. Liver NLVs were measured and differences at variable depths were tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple paired comparisons using post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD), Scheffé, Bonferroni, and Holm multiple comparisons. Diagnostic performance of NLV values were analyzed by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve.

RESULTS

The NLV measured at a depth of 10 cm significantly differed from those measured near the liver capsule and at depths of 6 cm and 8 cm (p < 0.001) from the skin. There was no significant difference in NLV value in other paired groups (p > 0.05). The difference in the area under AUROCs for NLVs measured at variable depths was not significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The best diagnostic performance of liver NLV was measured at depth of 8 cm from the skin, although NLV measured at variable depth showed similar diagnostic performance for assessing ≥ mild hepatic steatosis. The study results provide a reference that can be used in the development of standardized scanning protocols and technical considerations in measuring liver NLV.

An ultrasound multiparametric method to quantify liver fat using magnetic resonance as standard reference

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is an unmet need for a reliable and reproducible non-invasive measure of fatty liver content (FLC) for monitoring steatotic liver disease in clinical practice. Sonographic FLC assessment is qualitative and operator-dependent, and the dynamic quantification range of algorithms based on a single ultrasound (US) parameter is unsatisfactory. This study aims to develop and validate a new multiparametric algorithm based on B-mode images to quantify FLC using Magnetic Resonance (MR) values as standard reference.

METHODS

Patients with elevated liver enzymes and/or bright liver at US (N = 195) underwent FLC evaluation by MR and by US. Five US-derived quantitative features [attenuation rate(AR), hepatic renal-ratio(HR), diaphragm visualization(DV), hepatic-portal-vein-ratio(HPV), portal-vein-wall(PVW)] were combined by mixed linear/exponential regression in a multiparametric model (Steatoscore2.0). One hundred and thirty-four subjects were used for training and 61 for independent validations; score-computation underwent an inter-operator reproducibility analysis.

RESULTS

The model is based on a mixed linear/exponential combination of 3 US parameters (AR, HR, DV), modelled by 2 equations according to AR values. The computation of FLC by Steatoscore2.0 (mean ± std, 7.91% ± 8.69) and MR (mean ± std, 8.10% ± 10.31) is highly correlated with a low root mean square error in both training/validation cohorts, respectively (R = 0.92/0.86 and RMSE = 5.15/4.62, p < .001). Steatoscore2.0 identified patients with MR-FLC≥5%/≥10% with sensitivity = 93.2%/89.4%, specificity = 86.1%/95.8%, AUROC = 0.958/0.975, respectively and correlated with MR (R = 0.92) significantly (p < .001) better than CAP (R = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiparametric Steatoscore2.0 measures FLC providing values highly comparable with MR. It is reliable, inexpensive, easy to use with any US equipment and qualifies to be tested in larger, prospective studies as new tool for the non-invasive screening and monitoring of FLC.

Diagnostic Performance of Quantitative Ultrasound Parameters in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Marked liver steatosis, steatohepatitis, and significant fibrosis are risk factors for unfavorable outcomes in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In this study, the diagnostic performance of attenuation coefficient (AC), liver stiffness (LS), and dispersion slope (DS) was evaluated separately and combined in the diagnosis of liver steatosis and fibrosis in NAFLD suspects using biopsy or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-four NAFLD suspects were prospectively imaged with an Aplio i800 ultrasound scanner (Canon Medical Systems, Tustin, CA). AC, LS, and DS measurements were obtained from the right liver lobe.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients underwent liver biopsy, and 40 had MRI. There were 32 patients (43%) with liver steatosis and fibrosis (S + F), 22 (30%) with steatosis (S), 5 (7%) with fibrosis (F), and 15 (20%) with normal liver (N). Mean ACs were significantly higher in steatotic livers (n = 54) than in non-steatotic livers (n = 20) (P < 0.0001). LS and DS were significantly higher in patients with liver fibrosis (n = 37) compared to non-fibrotic livers (n = 37) (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.0002, respectively). In detecting (S + F), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC) was 0.87 for combined ultrasound parameters of LS and AC (negative predictive value [NPV]: 75%, positive predictive value [PPV]: 77%, P < 0.0001). In detecting patients with liver steatosis and fibrosis stage ≥2, LS had an AUROCC of 0.93 (NPV: 87%, PPV: 82%, P < 0.0001). In the biopsy group, 32% (11/34) were diagnosed with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). DS values showed a significant difference among patients with (n = 23) or without (n = 11) hepatocellular ballooning (P = 0.02). AUROCC was 0.87 for combined ultrasound parameters of AC, LS, and DS with body mass index (BMI) in detecting NASH (NPV: 80%, PPV: 87%, P = 0.0006).

CONCLUSION

AC and LS showed high diagnostic value in detecting liver steatosis and fibrosis, respectively. The combined AC and LS values further improved the diagnostic accuracy in detecting NAFLD and high-risk NAFLD patients.

The Future Is Beyond Bright: The Evolving Role of Quantitative US for Fatty Liver Disease

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality. Nonfocal liver biopsy is the historical reference standard for evaluating NAFLD, but it is limited by invasiveness, high cost, and sampling error. Imaging methods are ideally situated to provide quantifiable results and rule out other anatomic diseases of the liver. MRI and US have shown great promise for the noninvasive evaluation of NAFLD. US is particularly well suited to address the population-level problem of NAFLD because it is lower-cost, more available, and more tolerable to a broader range of patients than MRI. Noninvasive US methods to evaluate liver fibrosis are widely available, and US-based tools to evaluate steatosis and inflammation are gaining traction. US techniques including shear-wave elastography, Doppler spectral imaging, attenuation coefficient, hepatorenal index, speed of sound, and backscatter-based estimation have regulatory clearance and are in clinical use. New methods based on channel and radiofrequency data analysis approaches have shown promise but are mostly experimental. This review discusses the advantages and limitations of clinically available and experimental approaches to sonographic liver tissue characterization for NAFLD diagnosis as well as future applications and strategies to overcome current limitations.

Influence of Measurement Depth and Acquisition Parameters on Shear Wave Speed and Shear Wave Dispersion in Certified Phantoms Using a Canon Aplio Clinical Ultrasound Scanner

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the work described here was to investigate the relative contribution of confounding factors on liver shear wave speed (SWS) and shear wave dispersion slope (SWDS) measurements in three certified phantoms using a Canon Aplio clinical ultrasound scanner.

METHODS

A Canon Aplio i800 i-series ultrasound system (Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Tochigi, Japan) with i8CX1 convex array (center frequency = 4 MHz) was used to examine dependencies caused by the depth, width and height of the acquisition box (AQB), the depth and size of the region of interest (ROI), the AQB angle and the pressure of the ultrasound probe on the surface of the phantom.

RESULTS

Results revealed that depth is the most significant confounder in both SWS and SWDS measurements. AQB angle, height and width and ROI size exhibited minimal confounding effects on measurements. For SWS, the most consistent measurement depth is when the top of the AQB is placed between 2 and 4 cm, and the ROI is located between 3 and 7 cm deep. For SWDS, results indicate that measurement values significantly decrease with depth from the surface of the phantom until approximately 7 cm deep, and consequently no stable area of AQB placement or ROI depth exists.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to SWS, the same ideal acquisition depth range cannot necessarily be applied to SWDS measurements because of a significant depth dependency.

Shear Wave Dispersion in Chronic Liver Disease: From Physical Principles to Clinical Usefulness

The development of new applications in ultrasound (US) imaging in recent years has strengthened the role of this imaging technique in the management of different pathologies, particularly in the setting of liver disease. Improved B-mode imaging (3D and 4D), contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) and especially US-based elastography techniques have created the concept of multiparametric ultrasound (MP-US), a term borrowed from radiological sectional imaging. Among the new elastography techniques, shear wave dispersion is a newly developed imaging technology which enables the assessment of the shear waves' dispersion slope. The analysis of the dispersion qualities of shear waves might be indirectly related to the tissue viscosity, thus providing biomechanical information concerning the pathologic state of the liver such as necroinflammation. Some of the most recent US devices have been embedded with software that evaluate the dispersion of shear waves/liver viscosity. In this review, the feasibility and the clinical applications of liver viscosity are reviewed based on the preliminary findings of both animal and human studies.

US Attenuation Imaging for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Fatty Liver Disease

Purpose

This study aimed to determine whether the attenuation coefficient (AC) from attenuation imaging (ATI) was correlated with visual US assessment in patients with hepatic steatosis. Moreover, it aimed to assess whether the patient's blood chemistry results and CT attenuation were correlated with AC.

Materials and Methods

Patients who underwent abdominal US with ATI between April 2018 and December 2018 were included in this study. Patients with chronic liver disease or cirrhosis were excluded. The correlation between AC and other parameters, such as visual US assessment, blood chemistry results, liver attenuation, and liver-to-spleen (L/S) ratio, were analyzed. AC values according to visual US assessment grades were compared using analysis of variance.

Results

A total of 161 patients were included in this study. The correlation coefficient between US assessment and AC was 0.814 (p < 0.001). The mean AC values for the normal, mild, moderate, and severe grades were 0.56, 0.66, 0.74, and 0.85, respectively (p < 0.001). Alanine aminotransferase levels were significantly correlated with AC (r = 0.317, p < 0.001). The correlation coefficients between liver attenuation and AC and between L/S ratio and AC were -0.702 and -0.626, respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Visual US assessment and AC showed a strong positive correlation with the discriminative value between the groups. Computed tomography attenuation and AC showed a strong negative correlation.

Different Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography Techniques as Novel Imaging-Based Approaches for Quantitative Evaluation of Hepatic Steatosis-Preliminary Findings

BACKGROUND

Modern ultrasound (US) shear-wave dispersion (SWD) and attenuation imaging (ATI) can be used to quantify changes in the viscosity and signal attenuation of the liver parenchyma, which are altered in hepatic steatosis. We aimed to evaluate modern shear-wave elastography (SWE), SWD and ATI for the assessment of hepatic steatosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the US data of 15 patients who underwent liver USs and MRIs for the evaluation of parenchymal disease/liver lesions. The USs were performed using a multifrequency convex probe (1-8 MHz). The quantitative US measurements for the SWE (m/s/kPa), the SWD (kPa-m/s/kHz) and the ATI (dB/cm/MHz) were acquired after the mean value of five regions of interest (ROIs) was calculated. The liver MRI (3T) quantification of hepatic steatosis was performed by acquiring proton density fat fraction (PDFF) mapping sequences and placing five ROIs in artifact-free areas of the PDFF scan, measuring the fat-signal fraction. We correlated the SWE, SWD and ATI measurements to the PDFF results.

RESULTS

Three patients showed mild steatosis, one showed moderate steatosis and eleven showed no steatosis in the PDFF sequences. The calculated SWE cut-off (2.5 m/s, 20.4 kPa) value identified 3/4 of patients correctly (AUC = 0.73, p > 0.05). The SWD cut-off of 18.5 m/s/kHz, which had a significant correlation (r = 0.55, p = 0.034) with the PDFF results (AUC = 0.73), identified four patients correctly (p < 0.001). The ideal ATI (AUC = 0.53 (p < 0.05)) cut-off was 0.59 dB/cm/MHz, which showed a significantly good correlation with the PDFF results (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

Hepatic steatosis can be accurately detected using all the US-elastography techniques applied in this study, although the SWD and the SWE showed to be more sensitive than the PDFF.

Quantitative Ultrasound Biomarkers to Assess Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

PURPOSE

To assess diagnostic performance of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) biomarkers in assessing hepatic steatosis.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 125 participants (mean age 54 years) who underwent liver QUS, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and laboratory tests within 30 days in this IRB approved study. Based on MRI-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) and MRE, we divided 125 participants into normal liver, nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and liver fibrosis (≥F1) groups. We examined diagnostic performance of ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC), normalized local variance (NLV), superb microvascular imaging-based vascularity index (SMI-VI), and shear wave velocity (SWV) for determining hepatic steatosis and fibrosis using area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). We also analyzed correlations of QUS biomarkers to MRI using Spearman correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

We observed significant differences in AC, NLV, and SMI-VI among the three groups (22 participants with normal liver, 78 with NAFL, and 25 with liver fibrosis). AUC of AC, NLV, and SMI-VI for determining ≥ mild steatotic livers (MRI-PDFF ≥5%) was 0.95, 0.90, and 0.92, respectively. AUC of SWV for determining ≥ F1 liver fibrosis was 0.93. The correlation of MRI-PDFF was positive to AC (r = 0.91) and negative to NLV (r = -0.74), SMI-VI (r = -0.8) in NAFL group. There was a significant difference in regression slope of AC to MRI-PDFF in livers with and without ≥F1 (0.84 vs 0.91, P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

QUS biomarkers have high sensitivity and specificity to determine and grade hepatic steatosis and detect liver fibrosis. The effect of liver fibrosis on the performance of QUS biomarkers in quantifying liver fat content warrants further investigation.

Ultrasound Methods for the Assessment of Liver Steatosis: A Critical Appraisal

The prevalence of the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease has reached major proportions, being estimated to affect one-quarter of the global population. The reference techniques, which include liver biopsy and the magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction, have objective practical and financial limitations to their routine use in the detection and quantification of liver steatosis. Therefore, there has been a rising necessity for the development of new inexpensive, widely applicable and reliable non-invasive diagnostic tools. The controlled attenuation parameter has been considered the point-of-care technique for the assessment of liver steatosis for a long period of time. Recently, many ultrasound (US) system manufacturers have developed proprietary software solutions for the quantification of liver steatosis. Some of these methods have already been extensively tested with very good performance results reported, while others are still under evaluation. This manuscript reviews the currently available US-based methods for diagnosing and grading liver steatosis, including their classification and performance results, with an appraisal of the importance of this armamentarium in daily clinical practice.