1
|
Strickland BK, Dixon PG, Jones PD, Demarais S, Owen NO, Cox DA, Landry-Guyton K, Baldwin WM, McKinley WT. Cohort antler size signals environmental stress in a moderate climate. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY 2020; 64:611-621. [PMID: 31900588 DOI: 10.1007/s00484-019-01850-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Revised: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Research in northern latitudes confirms that climate teleconnections exert important influences on ungulate fitness, but studies from regions with milder climates are lacking. We explored the influence of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), Northern Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), and El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on male, 2.5-year-old white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) antler and body mass in Mississippi, USA, a region with mild winters and warm, humid summers. Explanatory variables were seasonal averages of each climate index extending back to 3 years prior to account for possible maternal and lag effects. Seasonal climate indices from the period of gestation and the first year of life were correlated with deer morphometrics. Reduced antler mass was largely correlated (R2 = 0.52) with PDO values indicating dry conditions during parturition and neonatal development and NAO values indicating warmer than normal winters during gestation and the first year of life. Body mass was less correlated (R2 = 0.16) to climate indices, responding negatively to warmer winter weather during the first winter of life. Climate may promote variable fitness among cohorts through long-term effects on male competition for dominance and breeding access. Because broad-scale climate indices simplify complex weather systems, they may benefit management at larger scales. Although this study compared climate with morphological variables, it is likely that demographic characteristics can likewise be modeled using climate indices. As climate change in this region is projected to include greater variability in summer precipitation, we may see concomitantly greater variability in fitness among cohorts of white-tailed deer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bronson K Strickland
- Department of Wildlife, Fisheries & Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Box 9690, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA.
| | - P Grady Dixon
- Department of Geosciences, Fort Hays State University, Hays, KS, USA
| | - Phillip D Jones
- Department of Wildlife, Fisheries & Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Box 9690, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA
| | - Stephen Demarais
- Department of Wildlife, Fisheries & Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Box 9690, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA
| | - Nathan O Owen
- Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, Box 5448, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA
| | - David A Cox
- Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, Box 5448, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA
| | - Katie Landry-Guyton
- Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, Box 5448, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA
| | - W Mark Baldwin
- Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, Box 5448, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA
| | - William T McKinley
- Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, & Parks, Jackson, MS, 39211, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jones PD, Strickland BK, Demarais S, McKinley WT, Ernst JR, Klassen JA. Seasonal flooding effects on deer in the Mississippi river batture. J Wildl Manage 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Phillip D. Jones
- Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and AquacultureMississippi State UniversityBox 9690 Mississippi State MS 39762 USA
| | - Bronson K. Strickland
- Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and AquacultureMississippi State UniversityBox 9690 Mississippi State MS 39762 USA
| | - Stephen Demarais
- Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and AquacultureMississippi State UniversityBox 9690 Mississippi State MS 39762 USA
| | - William T. McKinley
- Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks1505 Eastover Drive Jackson MS 39211 USA
| | - James R. Ernst
- Louisiana Department of Wildlife & FisheriesP.O. Box 98000 Baton Rouge LA 70898 USA
| | - Jessica. A. Klassen
- Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and AquacultureMississippi State UniversityBox 9690 Mississippi State MS 39762 USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peters SO, Sinecen M, Gallagher GR, Pebworth LA, Jacob S, Hatfield JS, Kizilkaya K. Comparison of linear model and artificial neural network using antler beam diameter and length of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) dataset. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0212545. [PMID: 30794631 PMCID: PMC6386314 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Evaluation of harvest data remains one of the most important sources of information in the development of strategies to manage regional populations of white-tailed deer. While descriptive statistics and simple linear models are utilized extensively, the use of artificial neural networks for this type of data analyses is unexplored. Linear model was compared to Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) models with Levenberg–Marquardt (L-M), Bayesian Regularization (BR) and Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG) learning algorithms, to evaluate the relative accuracy in predicting antler beam diameter and length using age and dressed body weight in white-tailed deer. Data utilized for this study were obtained from male animals harvested by hunters between 1977–2009 at the Berry College Wildlife Management Area. Metrics for evaluating model performance indicated that linear and ANN models resulted in close match and good agreement between predicted and observed values and thus good performance for all models. However, metrics values of Mean Absolute Error and Root Mean Squared Error for linear model and the ANN-BR model indicated smaller error and lower deviation relative to the mean values of antler beam diameter and length in comparison to other ANN models, demonstrating better agreement of the predicted and observed values of antler beam diameter and length. ANN-SCG model resulted in the highest error within the models. Overall, metrics for evaluating model performance from the ANN model with BR learning algorithm and linear model indicated better agreement of the predicted and observed values of antler beam diameter and length. Results of this study suggest the use of ANN generated results that are comparable to Linear Models of harvest data to aid in the development of strategies to manage white-tailed deer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunday O. Peters
- Department of Animal Science, School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Berry College, Mount Berry, Georgia, United States of America
- Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Mahmut Sinecen
- Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey
| | - George R. Gallagher
- Department of Animal Science, School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Berry College, Mount Berry, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Lauren A. Pebworth
- Department of Animal Science, School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Berry College, Mount Berry, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Suleima Jacob
- Department of Animal Science, School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Berry College, Mount Berry, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Jason S. Hatfield
- Department of Animal Science, School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Berry College, Mount Berry, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Kadir Kizilkaya
- Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bartareau TM. Estimating body mass of Florida white-tailed deer from standard age and morphometric measurements. WILDLIFE RESEARCH 2019. [DOI: 10.1071/wr18142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Context
Measuring a mammal’s body mass has importance in understanding nutritional condition, reproductive biology and ecology. It can be impractical for a researcher to measure the body mass when equipment needed to weigh individuals is inadequate or unavailable.
Aims
The purpose of this study was to develop a model to accurately estimate the body mass of hunter-harvested Florida white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus osceola, Odocoileus virginianus seminolus) based on the relationship between scale mass, sex and standard age and morphometric measurement predictor variables easily obtainable in the field.
Methods
An information-theoretic approach was used to evaluate simple and multiple linear regression models with 67% of the data, and the best model in the set was validated using the remaining 33%.
Key results
Chest girth was the best single predictor of body mass. A global model including sex, age, age2 and body length variables was better supported than chest girth alone, and subspecies information did not contribute significantly to the body-mass–predictor-variable relationship. The best model explained 98.5% of the variation in body mass as follows: body mass (kg) = –18.41 + 6.53 × sex (0 = female, 1 = male) + 5.04 × age (year) – 0.49 × age2 (year2) + 4.76 × 10−3 × chest girth2 (cm2) + 0.12 × body length (cm). The 95% confidence interval on the bias of the estimated body mass of the best model was –0.50 to 0.59 kg. The difference between estimated and scale body mass was –0.04 kg ± 0.28 (s.e.).
Conclusions
Individuals maintained a similar proportion of body mass to predictor variables, and differences between the observed and estimated body mass of model applied to the validation dataset were not significant.
Implications
The validated body-mass-estimation model presented will enable accurate estimates of the body mass of white-tailed deer in cases where standard age and morphometric measurements are available, but the individuals were not weighed. These results provide a basis to formulate and parameterise body-mass-estimation models for other white-tailed deer subspecies and populations. Without the need for specialised equipment, the body-mass-estimation model can be used by personnel involved in white-tailed deer research, management and sport hunting to assess trends in individual and population health in support of this species’ conservation. Photograph by Carlton Ward Jr.
Collapse
|
5
|
Campbell KL, Strickland BK, Demarais S, Wang G, Jones PD, Dacus CM. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates limits to utility of lactation index for white-tailed deer management. WILDLIFE SOC B 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/wsb.904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kamen L. Campbell
- Mail Stop 9690 Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture; Mississippi State University; MS 39762 USA
| | - Bronson K. Strickland
- Mail Stop 9690 Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture; Mississippi State University; MS 39762 USA
| | - Stephen Demarais
- Mail Stop 9690 Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture; Mississippi State University; MS 39762 USA
| | - Guiming Wang
- Mail Stop 9690 Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture; Mississippi State University; MS 39762 USA
| | - Phillip D. Jones
- Mail Stop 9690 Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture; Mississippi State University; MS 39762 USA
| | - Chad M. Dacus
- Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks; 1505 Eastover Drive, Jackson MS 39211 USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Strickland BK, Jones PD, Demarais S, Dacus CM. Adjusting for body mass change in white-tailed deer during hunting season. WILDLIFE SOC B 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/wsb.776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bronson K. Strickland
- Mail Stop 9690 Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture; Mississippi State University; MS 39762 USA
| | - Phillip D. Jones
- Mail Stop 9690 Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture; Mississippi State University; MS 39762 USA
| | - Stephen Demarais
- Mail Stop 9690 Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture; Mississippi State University; MS 39762 USA
| | - Chad M. Dacus
- Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks; 1505 Eastover Drive Jackson MS 39211 USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kekkonen J, Wikström M, Ala-Ajos I, Lappalainen V, Brommer JE. Growth and Age Structure in an Introduced and Hunted Cervid Population: White-Tailed Deer in Finland. ANN ZOOL FENN 2016. [DOI: 10.5735/086.053.0206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|